TSTP Solution File: GRP124-1.004 by CARINE---0.734

View Problem - Process Solution 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CARINE---0.734
% Problem  : GRP124-1.004 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v1.2.0.
% Transfm  : add_equality
% Format   : carine
% Command  : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000

% Computer : art07.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory   : 2018MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat Nov 27 20:56:02 EST 2010

% Result   : Timeout 300.05s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP4309/GRP/GRP124-1.004+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ....................... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 42] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 17]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 282] [nf = 6] [nu = 156] [ut = 54]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 522] [nf = 12] [nu = 312] [ut = 54]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 1730] [nf = 42] [nu = 612] [ut = 54]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 2938] [nf = 72] [nu = 912] [ut = 54]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 4146] [nf = 102] [nu = 1212] [ut = 54]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 5354] [nf = 132] [nu = 1512] [ut = 54]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 6562] [nf = 162] [nu = 1812] [ut = 54]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 7770] [nf = 192] [nu = 2112] [ut = 54]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 8978] [nf = 222] [nu = 2412] [ut = 54]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 10186] [nf = 252] [nu = 2712] [ut = 54]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 11394] [nf = 282] [nu = 3012] [ut = 54]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 12602] [nf = 312] [nu = 3312] [ut = 54]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 13810] [nf = 342] [nu = 3612] [ut = 54]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 15018] [nf = 372] [nu = 3912] [ut = 54]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 16226] [nf = 402] [nu = 4212] [ut = 54]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 17434] [nf = 432] [nu = 4512] [ut = 54]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 18642] [nf = 462] [nu = 4812] [ut = 54]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 19850] [nf = 492] [nu = 5112] [ut = 54]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 21058] [nf = 522] [nu = 5412] [ut = 54]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 21 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 22266] [nf = 552] [nu = 5712] [ut = 54]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 22 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 23474] [nf = 582] [nu = 6012] [ut = 54]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 23 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 24682] [nf = 612] [nu = 6312] [ut = 54]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 24 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 25890] [nf = 642] [nu = 6612] [ut = 54]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 25 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 27098] [nf = 672] [nu = 6912] [ut = 54]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 26 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 28306] [nf = 702] [nu = 7212] [ut = 54]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 27 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 29514] [nf = 732] [nu = 7512] [ut = 54]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 28 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 30722] [nf = 762] [nu = 7812] [ut = 54]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 29 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 31930] [nf = 792] [nu = 8112] [ut = 54]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 30 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 33138] [nf = 822] [nu = 8412] [ut = 54]
% Restarting search with different parameters.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 33180] [nf = 822] [nu = 8412] [ut = 54]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 33420] [nf = 828] [nu = 8568] [ut = 54]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 33660] [nf = 834] [nu = 8724] [ut = 54]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 34876] [nf = 864] [nu = 9024] [ut = 54]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 37638] [nf = 896] [nu = 9804] [ut = 58]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 60140] [nf = 976] [nu = 14640] [ut = 58]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% 	t = 11 secs [nr = 1283718] [nf = 1056] [nu = 367380] [ut = 62]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% 	t = 31 secs [nr = 8010576] [nf = 1404888] [nu = 740856] [ut = 62]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% |                Statistics                 |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 50852645
% 	resolvents: 49234955	factors: 1617690
% Number of unit clauses generated: 8588276
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 16.89
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 17	[2] = 37	[5] = 4		[7] = 4		
% Total = 62
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 8588276	[2] = 18634358	[3] = 15688115	[4] = 6948759	[5] = 851353	[6] = 114480	
% [7] = 27304	
% Average size of a generated clause: 3.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] group_element_1	(+)4	(-)0
% [1] equalish_2		(+)5	(-)12
% [2] product_3		(+)5	(-)36
% 			------------------
% 		Total:	(+)14	(-)48
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 62
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 117820971
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% 	because of the shortest resolvents table: 483906
% Number of successful unifications: 50852645
% Number of unification failures: 1233392698
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 240
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 5071033
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 2361120
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 54292660
% Max entries in substitution set: 12
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 8147275
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 3
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 1
% Number of states in UCFA table: 47
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 161
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.29
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 41
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 1284245343
% ConstructUnitClause() = 8147320
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 8.31 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% |                                                      |
%   Inferences per sec: 169509
% |                                                      |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 303 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------