TSTP Solution File: GRP123-9.004 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : GRP123-9.004 : TPTP v5.0.0. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art04.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat Nov 27 20:55:54 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.05s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP2262/GRP/GRP123-9.004+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ............................. done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 84] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 18]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 568] [nf = 14] [nu = 314] [ut = 91]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1208] [nf = 196] [nu = 652] [ut = 91]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 3360] [nf = 378] [nu = 2022] [ut = 91]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 5956] [nf = 1352] [nu = 3392] [ut = 91]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 11984] [nf = 2326] [nu = 6826] [ut = 91]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 18012] [nf = 3300] [nu = 10260] [ut = 91]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 24040] [nf = 4274] [nu = 13694] [ut = 91]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 30068] [nf = 5248] [nu = 17128] [ut = 91]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 36096] [nf = 6222] [nu = 20562] [ut = 91]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 42124] [nf = 7196] [nu = 23996] [ut = 91]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 48152] [nf = 8170] [nu = 27430] [ut = 91]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 54180] [nf = 9144] [nu = 30864] [ut = 91]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 60208] [nf = 10118] [nu = 34298] [ut = 91]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 66236] [nf = 11092] [nu = 37732] [ut = 91]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 72264] [nf = 12066] [nu = 41166] [ut = 91]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 78292] [nf = 13040] [nu = 44600] [ut = 91]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 84320] [nf = 14014] [nu = 48034] [ut = 91]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 90348] [nf = 14988] [nu = 51468] [ut = 91]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 96376] [nf = 15962] [nu = 54902] [ut = 91]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 21 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 102404] [nf = 16936] [nu = 58336] [ut = 91]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 22 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 108432] [nf = 17910] [nu = 61770] [ut = 91]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 23 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 114460] [nf = 18884] [nu = 65204] [ut = 91]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 24 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 120488] [nf = 19858] [nu = 68638] [ut = 91]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 25 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 126516] [nf = 20832] [nu = 72072] [ut = 91]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 26 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 132544] [nf = 21806] [nu = 75506] [ut = 91]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 27 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 138572] [nf = 22780] [nu = 78940] [ut = 91]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 28 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 144600] [nf = 23754] [nu = 82374] [ut = 91]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 29 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 150628] [nf = 24728] [nu = 85808] [ut = 91]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 30 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 156656] [nf = 25702] [nu = 89242] [ut = 91]
% Restarting search with different parameters.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 156740] [nf = 25702] [nu = 89242] [ut = 91]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 157284] [nf = 25716] [nu = 89580] [ut = 91]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 157930] [nf = 25898] [nu = 89918] [ut = 91]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 161418] [nf = 26080] [nu = 92044] [ut = 91]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 170714] [nf = 29086] [nu = 96234] [ut = 99]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 374864] [nf = 33724] [nu = 204856] [ut = 103]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 8 secs [nr = 1360040] [nf = 38362] [nu = 583238] [ut = 103]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 24 secs [nr = 7229348] [nf =
% 1615484] [nu = 961620] [ut = 103]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 56100983
% resolvents: 53887916 factors: 2213067
% Number of unit clauses generated: 12435628
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 22.17
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 18 [2] = 73 [5] = 8 [6] = 4
% Total = 103
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 12435628 [2] = 22930534 [3] = 14658394 [4] = 5094018 [5] = 982409
% Average size of a generated clause: 3.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] group_element_1 (+)4 (-)0
% [1] equalish_2 (+)5 (-)12
% [2] product1_3 (+)5 (-)36
% [3] product2_3 (+)5 (-)36
% [4] product_3 (+)0 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)19 (-)84
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 103
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 256809427
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 0
% Number of successful unifications: 56100983
% Number of unification failures: 1120246771
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 420
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 11022185
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 8784487
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 42714648
% Max entries in substitution set: 15
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 11670675
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 3
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 1
% Number of states in UCFA table: 79
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 284
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.28
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 43
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 1176347754
% ConstructUnitClause() = 11670760
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 11.93 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 187003
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 303 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------