TSTP Solution File: GRP123-8.004 by Etableau---0.67

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Etableau---0.67
% Problem  : GRP123-8.004 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 09:04:33 EDT 2022

% Result   : Satisfiable 0.19s 0.44s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem  : GRP123-8.004 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.2.0.
% 0.06/0.13  % Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Tue Jun 14 02:35:23 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.37  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.13/0.37  # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2SI
% 0.13/0.37  # and selection function SelectNewComplexAHP.
% 0.13/0.37  #
% 0.13/0.37  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.13/0.37  # Number of axioms: 48 Number of unprocessed: 48
% 0.13/0.37  # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.13/0.37  # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.13/0.37  # Hello from C++
% 0.19/0.43  # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 0.19/0.43  # Local unification is enabled...
% 0.19/0.43  # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 0.19/0.43  # 48 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 0.19/0.43  # Creating start rules for all 1 conjectures.
% 0.19/0.43  # There are 1 start rule candidates:
% 0.19/0.43  # Found 33 unit axioms.
% 0.19/0.43  # 1 start rule tableaux created.
% 0.19/0.43  # 15 extension rule candidate clauses
% 0.19/0.43  # 33 unit axiom clauses
% 0.19/0.43  
% 0.19/0.43  # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 0.19/0.43  # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 1
% 0.19/0.43  # 29775 Satisfiable branch
% 0.19/0.44  # Satisfiable branch found.
% 0.19/0.44  # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.19/0.44  # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.19/0.44  # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.19/0.44  # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.19/0.44  # There were 0 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.19/0.44  # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.19/0.44  # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.19/0.44  # There were 0 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.19/0.44  # SZS status Satisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.44  # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.44  # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.19/0.44  
% 0.19/0.44  # End clausification derivation
% 0.19/0.44  # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.19/0.44  cnf(i_0_70, plain, (group_element(e_1))).
% 0.19/0.44  cnf(i_0_71, plain, (group_element(e_2))).
% 0.19/0.44  cnf(i_0_72, plain, (group_element(e_3))).
% 0.19/0.44  cnf(i_0_73, plain, (group_element(e_4))).
% 0.19/0.44  cnf(i_0_49, plain, (next(e_0,e_1))).
% 0.19/0.44  cnf(i_0_50, plain, (next(e_1,e_2))).
% 0.19/0.44  cnf(i_0_51, plain, (next(e_2,e_3))).
% 0.19/0.44  cnf(i_0_52, plain, (next(e_3,e_4))).
% 0.19/0.44  cnf(i_0_53, plain, (greater(e_1,e_0))).
% 0.19/0.44  cnf(i_0_54, plain, (greater(e_2,e_0))).
% 0.19/0.44  cnf(i_0_57, plain, (greater(e_2,e_1))).
% 0.19/0.44  cnf(i_0_55, plain, (greater(e_3,e_0))).
% 0.19/0.44  cnf(i_0_58, plain, (greater(e_3,e_1))).
% 0.19/0.44  cnf(i_0_60, plain, (greater(e_3,e_2))).
% 0.19/0.44  cnf(i_0_56, plain, (greater(e_4,e_0))).
% 0.19/0.44  cnf(i_0_59, plain, (greater(e_4,e_1))).
% 0.19/0.44  cnf(i_0_61, plain, (greater(e_4,e_2))).
% 0.19/0.44  cnf(i_0_62, plain, (greater(e_4,e_3))).
% 0.19/0.44  cnf(i_0_65, plain, (cycle(e_4,e_0))).
% 0.19/0.44  cnf(i_0_90, plain, (product1(X1,X1,X1))).
% 0.19/0.44  cnf(i_0_95, plain, (product2(X1,X1,X1))).
% 0.19/0.44  cnf(i_0_74, plain, (~equalish(e_1,e_2))).
% 0.19/0.44  cnf(i_0_75, plain, (~equalish(e_1,e_3))).
% 0.19/0.44  cnf(i_0_76, plain, (~equalish(e_1,e_4))).
% 0.19/0.44  cnf(i_0_77, plain, (~equalish(e_2,e_1))).
% 0.19/0.44  cnf(i_0_78, plain, (~equalish(e_2,e_3))).
% 0.19/0.44  cnf(i_0_79, plain, (~equalish(e_2,e_4))).
% 0.19/0.44  cnf(i_0_80, plain, (~equalish(e_3,e_1))).
% 0.19/0.44  cnf(i_0_81, plain, (~equalish(e_3,e_2))).
% 0.19/0.44  cnf(i_0_82, plain, (~equalish(e_3,e_4))).
% 0.19/0.44  cnf(i_0_83, plain, (~equalish(e_4,e_1))).
% 0.19/0.44  cnf(i_0_84, plain, (~equalish(e_4,e_2))).
% 0.19/0.44  cnf(i_0_85, plain, (~equalish(e_4,e_3))).
% 0.19/0.44  cnf(i_0_68, plain, (~product(X1,e_1,X2)|~cycle(X1,e_0)|~greater(X2,X1))).
% 0.19/0.44  cnf(i_0_96, negated_conjecture, (product2(X1,X2,X3)|~product1(X4,X3,X1)|~product1(X2,X3,X4))).
% 0.19/0.44  cnf(i_0_63, plain, (equalish(X1,X2)|~cycle(X3,X2)|~cycle(X3,X1))).
% 0.19/0.44  cnf(i_0_87, plain, (equalish(X1,X2)|~product1(X3,X4,X2)|~product1(X3,X4,X1))).
% 0.19/0.44  cnf(i_0_92, plain, (equalish(X1,X2)|~product2(X3,X4,X2)|~product2(X3,X4,X1))).
% 0.19/0.44  cnf(i_0_64, plain, (cycle(X1,e_3)|cycle(X1,e_2)|cycle(X1,e_1)|cycle(X1,e_0)|~group_element(X1))).
% 0.19/0.44  cnf(i_0_88, plain, (equalish(X1,X2)|~product1(X3,X2,X4)|~product1(X3,X1,X4))).
% 0.19/0.44  cnf(i_0_93, plain, (equalish(X1,X2)|~product2(X3,X2,X4)|~product2(X3,X1,X4))).
% 0.19/0.44  cnf(i_0_89, plain, (equalish(X1,X2)|~product1(X2,X3,X4)|~product1(X1,X3,X4))).
% 0.19/0.44  cnf(i_0_94, plain, (equalish(X1,X2)|~product2(X2,X3,X4)|~product2(X1,X3,X4))).
% 0.19/0.44  cnf(i_0_67, plain, (~cycle(X1,e_0)|~cycle(X2,X3)|~cycle(X4,X5)|~greater(X1,X4)|~greater(X5,X3)|~next(X1,X2))).
% 0.19/0.44  cnf(i_0_69, plain, (equalish(X1,X2)|~product(X3,e_1,X1)|~cycle(X3,X4)|~greater(X4,e_0)|~next(X3,X2))).
% 0.19/0.44  cnf(i_0_66, plain, (equalish(X1,X2)|~cycle(X3,X4)|~cycle(X5,X1)|~greater(X1,e_0)|~next(X4,X2)|~next(X5,X3))).
% 0.19/0.44  cnf(i_0_86, plain, (product1(X1,X2,e_4)|product1(X1,X2,e_3)|product1(X1,X2,e_2)|product1(X1,X2,e_1)|~group_element(X2)|~group_element(X1))).
% 0.19/0.44  cnf(i_0_91, plain, (product2(X1,X2,e_4)|product2(X1,X2,e_3)|product2(X1,X2,e_2)|product2(X1,X2,e_1)|~group_element(X2)|~group_element(X1))).
% 0.19/0.44  # End listing active clauses.  There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.19/0.44  # Begin printing tableau
% 0.19/0.44  # Found 8 steps
% 0.19/0.44  cnf(i_0_96, negated_conjecture, (product2(e_1,e_1,e_1)|~product1(e_1,e_1,e_1)|~product1(e_1,e_1,e_1)), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.19/0.44  cnf(i_0_98, plain, (~product1(e_1,e_1,e_1)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_90])).
% 0.19/0.44  cnf(i_0_99, plain, (~product1(e_1,e_1,e_1)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_90])).
% 0.19/0.44  cnf(i_0_97, plain, (product2(e_1,e_1,e_1)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_94])).
% 0.19/0.44  cnf(i_0_126, plain, (equalish(e_1,e_2)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_74])).
% 0.19/0.44  cnf(i_0_127, plain, (~product2(e_2,e_1,e_1)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_91])).
% 0.19/0.44  cnf(i_0_217, plain, (~group_element(e_1)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_70])).
% 0.19/0.44  cnf(i_0_218, plain, (~group_element(e_2)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_71])).
% 0.19/0.44  # End printing tableau
% 0.19/0.44  # SZS output end
% 0.19/0.44  # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.19/0.44  # Returning from population with 6 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux.
% 0.19/0.44  # We now have 6 tableaux to operate on
% 0.19/0.44  # Found closed tableau during pool population.
% 0.19/0.44  # Proof search is over...
% 0.19/0.44  # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------