TSTP Solution File: GRP123-8.004 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : GRP123-8.004 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v1.2.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art09.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat Nov 27 20:52:30 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.05s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP6488/GRP/GRP123-8.004+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ................................................ done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 98] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 33]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 614] [nf = 16] [nu = 318] [ut = 107]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1286] [nf = 200] [nu = 660] [ut = 107]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 3470] [nf = 384] [nu = 2034] [ut = 107]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 6098] [nf = 1360] [nu = 3408] [ut = 107]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 12158] [nf = 2336] [nu = 6846] [ut = 107]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 18218] [nf = 3312] [nu = 10284] [ut = 107]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 24278] [nf = 4288] [nu = 13722] [ut = 107]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 30338] [nf = 5264] [nu = 17160] [ut = 107]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 36398] [nf = 6240] [nu = 20598] [ut = 107]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 42458] [nf = 7216] [nu = 24036] [ut = 107]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 48518] [nf = 8192] [nu = 27474] [ut = 107]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 54578] [nf = 9168] [nu = 30912] [ut = 107]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 60638] [nf = 10144] [nu = 34350] [ut = 107]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 66698] [nf = 11120] [nu = 37788] [ut = 107]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 72758] [nf = 12096] [nu = 41226] [ut = 107]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 78818] [nf = 13072] [nu = 44664] [ut = 107]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 84878] [nf = 14048] [nu = 48102] [ut = 107]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 90938] [nf = 15024] [nu = 51540] [ut = 107]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 96998] [nf = 16000] [nu = 54978] [ut = 107]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 21 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 103058] [nf = 16976] [nu = 58416] [ut = 107]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 22 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 109118] [nf = 17952] [nu = 61854] [ut = 107]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 23 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 115178] [nf = 18928] [nu = 65292] [ut = 107]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 24 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 121238] [nf = 19904] [nu = 68730] [ut = 107]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 25 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 127298] [nf = 20880] [nu = 72168] [ut = 107]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 26 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 133358] [nf = 21856] [nu = 75606] [ut = 107]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 27 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 139418] [nf = 22832] [nu = 79044] [ut = 107]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 28 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 145478] [nf = 23808] [nu = 82482] [ut = 107]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 29 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 151538] [nf = 24784] [nu = 85920] [ut = 107]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 30 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 157598] [nf = 25760] [nu = 89358] [ut = 107]
% Restarting search with different parameters.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 157696] [nf = 25760] [nu = 89358] [ut = 107]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 158272] [nf = 25776] [nu = 89700] [ut = 107]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 158954] [nf = 25960] [nu = 90042] [ut = 107]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 162535] [nf = 26304] [nu = 92172] [ut = 107]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 179520] [nf = 29484] [nu = 96726] [ut = 118]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 391957] [nf = 34296] [nu = 205712] [ut = 122]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 8 secs [nr = 1390864] [nf = 40194] [nu = 584458] [ut = 122]
% Looking for a pro
% of at depth = 8 ...
% t = 24 secs [nr = 7317691] [nf = 1632192] [nu = 963204] [ut = 122]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 53156106
% resolvents: 50944277 factors: 2211829
% Number of unit clauses generated: 11327138
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 21.31
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 33 [2] = 74 [5] = 11 [6] = 4
% Total = 122
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 11327138 [2] = 21574500 [3] = 14223065 [4] = 5046300 [5] = 985103
% Average size of a generated clause: 3.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] group_element_1 (+)4 (-)0
% [1] cycle_2 (+)1 (-)3
% [2] equalish_2 (+)6 (-)12
% [3] greater_2 (+)10 (-)0
% [4] next_2 (+)4 (-)0
% [5] product1_3 (+)5 (-)36
% [6] product2_3 (+)5 (-)36
% [7] product_3 (+)0 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)35 (-)87
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 122
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 277243665
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 0
% Number of successful unifications: 53156106
% Number of unification failures: 1074145751
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 435
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 10983922
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 10883923
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 40778994
% Max entries in substitution set: 15
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 10576091
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 3
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 1
% Number of states in UCFA table: 94
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 322
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.29
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 47
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 1127301857
% ConstructUnitClause() = 10576180
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 11.58 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 177187
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 302 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------