TSTP Solution File: GRP123-1.003 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : GRP123-1.003 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 11:41:27 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 7.95s 8.18s
% Output : Refutation 7.95s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : GRP123-1.003 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.2.0.
% 0.12/0.13 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Jun 13 04:51:57 EDT 2022
% 0.19/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.35 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.19/0.35 The process was started by sandbox2 on n006.cluster.edu,
% 0.19/0.35 Mon Jun 13 04:51:57 2022
% 0.19/0.35 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 11178.
% 0.19/0.35
% 0.19/0.35 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.19/0.35 set(auto).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.19/0.35 clear(print_given).
% 0.19/0.35
% 0.19/0.35 list(usable).
% 0.19/0.35
% 0.19/0.35 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=5.
% 0.19/0.35
% 0.19/0.35 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.19/0.35 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.19/0.35 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.19/0.35 clauses in usable.
% 0.19/0.35
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.19/0.35
% 0.19/0.35 ------------> process usable:
% 0.19/0.35 Following clause subsumed by 2 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -equalish(e_2,e_1).
% 0.19/0.35 Following clause subsumed by 4 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -equalish(e_3,e_1).
% 0.19/0.35 Following clause subsumed by 6 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -equalish(e_3,e_2).
% 0.19/0.35
% 0.19/0.35 ------------> process sos:
% 0.19/0.35
% 0.19/0.35 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.19/0.38
% 0.19/0.38 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.38
% 0.19/0.38 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.19/0.38
% 0.19/0.38
% 0.19/0.38 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.19/0.38
% 0.19/0.38 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.19/0.38 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.19/0.38 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.19/0.38 number of clauses in intial UL: 17
% 0.19/0.38 number of clauses initially in problem: 21
% 0.19/0.38 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 80
% 0.19/0.38 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.19/0.38 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.19/0.38 absolute distinct symbol count: 6
% 0.19/0.38 distinct predicate count: 3
% 0.19/0.38 distinct function count: 0
% 0.19/0.38 distinct constant count: 3
% 0.19/0.38
% 0.19/0.38 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.19/0.38
% 0.19/0.38
% 0.19/0.38
% 0.19/0.38 =========== start of search ===========
% 7.95/8.18
% 7.95/8.18 -------- PROOF --------
% 7.95/8.18 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 7.95/8.18 % SZS output start Refutation
% 7.95/8.18
% 7.95/8.18 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 7.95/8.18
% 7.95/8.18 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 7.95/8.18
% 7.95/8.18 Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 7.95/8.18
% 7.95/8.18 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 7.95/8.18
% 7.95/8.18 Model 4 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 7.95/8.18
% 7.95/8.18 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 7.95/8.18
% 7.95/8.18 Model 5 [ 1 1 3619 ] (0.00 seconds, 55081 Inserts)
% 7.95/8.18
% 7.95/8.18 Model 6 [ 1 2 25981 ] (0.00 seconds, 52990 Inserts)
% 7.95/8.18
% 7.95/8.18 Model 7 [ 1 6 49878 ] (0.00 seconds, 82866 Inserts)
% 7.95/8.18
% 7.95/8.18 Model 8 [ 1 1 10108 ] (0.00 seconds, 44922 Inserts)
% 7.95/8.18
% 7.95/8.18 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 7.95/8.18
% 7.95/8.18 Model 9 [ 2 1 246 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 7.95/8.18
% 7.95/8.18 Model 10 [ 2 2 9498 ] (0.00 seconds, 68727 Inserts)
% 7.95/8.18
% 7.95/8.18 Model 11 [ 2 1 4381 ] (0.00 seconds, 63484 Inserts)
% 7.95/8.18
% 7.95/8.18 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 7.95/8.18
% 7.95/8.18 Model 12 [ 3 16 113544 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 7.95/8.18
% 7.95/8.18 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 7.95/8.18
% 7.95/8.18 Model 13 [ 2 13 126304 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 7.95/8.18
% 7.95/8.18 Model 14 [ 3 1 6010 ] (0.00 seconds, 104014 Inserts)
% 7.95/8.18
% 7.95/8.18 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 7.78 sec ----> 2189 [binary,2187.1,4.1] {+} $F.
% 7.95/8.18
% 7.95/8.18 Length of proof is 10. Level of proof is 5.
% 7.95/8.18
% 7.95/8.18 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 7.95/8.18 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 7.95/8.18 % SZS output start Refutation
% 7.95/8.18
% 7.95/8.18 3 [] {-} -equalish(e_1,e_3).
% 7.95/8.18 4 [copy,3,flip.1] {+} -equalish(e_3,e_1).
% 7.95/8.18 5 [] {-} -equalish(e_2,e_3).
% 7.95/8.18 6 [copy,5,flip.1] {+} -equalish(e_3,e_2).
% 7.95/8.18 7 [] {+} -group_element(A)| -group_element(B)|product(A,B,e_1)|product(A,B,e_2)|product(A,B,e_3).
% 7.95/8.18 10 [] {+} -product(A,B,C)| -product(D,B,C)|equalish(A,D).
% 7.95/8.18 12 [] {+} -product(A,B,C)| -product(D,E,C)| -product(F,B,A)| -product(F,E,D)|equalish(B,E).
% 7.95/8.18 20 [factor,12.2.4] {+} -product(A,B,C)| -product(C,D,C)| -product(C,B,A)|equalish(B,D).
% 7.95/8.18 21 [] {+} group_element(e_1).
% 7.95/8.18 22 [] {+} group_element(e_2).
% 7.95/8.18 23 [] {+} group_element(e_3).
% 7.95/8.18 24 [] {+} product(A,A,A).
% 7.95/8.18 46 [hyper,23,7,22] {+} product(e_2,e_3,e_1)|product(e_2,e_3,e_2)|product(e_2,e_3,e_3).
% 7.95/8.18 47 [hyper,23,7,21] {-} product(e_1,e_3,e_1)|product(e_1,e_3,e_2)|product(e_1,e_3,e_3).
% 7.95/8.18 2091 [hyper,46,20,46,24,unit_del,6,factor_simp,factor_simp] {-} product(e_2,e_3,e_1)|product(e_2,e_3,e_3).
% 7.95/8.18 2093 [hyper,2091,10,24,unit_del,6] {+} product(e_2,e_3,e_1).
% 7.95/8.18 2182 [hyper,47,20,47,24,unit_del,4,factor_simp,factor_simp] {-} product(e_1,e_3,e_2)|product(e_1,e_3,e_3).
% 7.95/8.18 2185 [hyper,2182,20,2093,24,unit_del,4] {+} product(e_1,e_3,e_3).
% 7.95/8.18 2187 [hyper,2185,10,24] {-} equalish(e_3,e_1).
% 7.95/8.18 2189 [binary,2187.1,4.1] {+} $F.
% 7.95/8.18
% 7.95/8.18 % SZS output end Refutation
% 7.95/8.18 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 7.95/8.18
% 7.95/8.18
% 7.95/8.18 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 7.95/8.18
% 7.95/8.18
% 7.95/8.18 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 7.95/8.18
% 7.95/8.18 ============ end of search ============
% 7.95/8.18
% 7.95/8.18 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 7.95/8.18
% 7.95/8.18 true clauses given 44 (69.8%)
% 7.95/8.18 false clauses given 19
% 7.95/8.18
% 7.95/8.18 FALSE TRUE
% 7.95/8.18 4 1 0
% 7.95/8.18 10 0 45
% 7.95/8.18 12 9 20
% 7.95/8.18 14 0 237
% 7.95/8.18 16 8 28
% 7.95/8.18 18 0 373
% 7.95/8.18 20 6 12
% 7.95/8.18 22 0 541
% 7.95/8.18 26 0 332
% 7.95/8.18 30 0 236
% 7.95/8.18 34 0 16
% 7.95/8.18 tot: 24 1840 (98.7% true)
% 7.95/8.18
% 7.95/8.18
% 7.95/8.18 Model 14 [ 3 1 6010 ] (0.00 seconds, 104014 Inserts)
% 7.95/8.18
% 7.95/8.18 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 7.95/8.18
% 7.95/8.18 Process 11178 finished Mon Jun 13 04:52:05 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------