TSTP Solution File: GRP072-1 by E-SAT---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem  : GRP072-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v2.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May  4 07:56:22 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 2.44s 0.84s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 2.44s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   17
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   40 (  33 unt;   0 nHn;   9 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   53 (  52 equ;  21 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    8 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   7 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  120 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(single_axiom,axiom,
    divide(divide(inverse(divide(X1,X2)),divide(divide(X3,X4),X1)),divide(X4,X3)) = X2,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.ySnirqUTX6/E---3.1_30032.p',single_axiom) ).

cnf(prove_these_axioms,negated_conjecture,
    ( multiply(inverse(a1),a1) != multiply(inverse(b1),b1)
    | multiply(multiply(inverse(b2),b2),a2) != a2
    | multiply(multiply(a3,b3),c3) != multiply(a3,multiply(b3,c3)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.ySnirqUTX6/E---3.1_30032.p',prove_these_axioms) ).

cnf(multiply,axiom,
    multiply(X1,X2) = divide(X1,inverse(X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.ySnirqUTX6/E---3.1_30032.p',multiply) ).

cnf(c_0_3,axiom,
    divide(divide(inverse(divide(X1,X2)),divide(divide(X3,X4),X1)),divide(X4,X3)) = X2,
    single_axiom ).

cnf(c_0_4,plain,
    divide(divide(inverse(divide(divide(X1,X2),X3)),X4),divide(divide(divide(X2,X1),X5),inverse(divide(X5,X4)))) = X3,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_5,plain,
    divide(divide(inverse(X1),divide(divide(X2,X3),divide(inverse(divide(X4,X1)),divide(divide(X5,X6),X4)))),divide(X3,X2)) = divide(X6,X5),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,plain,
    divide(divide(inverse(X1),divide(divide(X2,X3),divide(inverse(divide(divide(X4,X5),X1)),X6))),divide(X3,X2)) = divide(divide(divide(X5,X4),X7),inverse(divide(X7,X6))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    divide(divide(divide(X1,X2),X3),inverse(divide(X3,divide(divide(X4,X5),divide(X2,X1))))) = divide(X5,X4),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    divide(divide(X1,X2),divide(inverse(X3),divide(divide(X2,X1),divide(inverse(divide(X4,X3)),divide(divide(X5,X6),X4))))) = divide(X5,X6),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_5]),c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    divide(divide(inverse(divide(X1,X2)),divide(X3,X1)),divide(divide(X4,X5),divide(inverse(divide(X6,X3)),divide(divide(X5,X4),X6)))) = X2,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    divide(inverse(divide(X1,divide(divide(X2,X3),divide(X4,X5)))),divide(divide(X5,X4),X1)) = divide(X2,X3),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_7]),c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    divide(divide(inverse(divide(divide(X1,X2),X3)),divide(divide(divide(X4,X5),X6),inverse(divide(X6,X7)))),divide(divide(divide(X2,X1),divide(inverse(divide(divide(X5,X4),X8)),X7)),inverse(X8))) = X3,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    divide(divide(X1,X2),divide(inverse(X3),divide(divide(X2,X1),divide(inverse(divide(X4,X3)),divide(X5,X4))))) = X5,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    divide(inverse(divide(X1,divide(X2,divide(X3,X4)))),divide(divide(X4,X3),X1)) = X2,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    divide(divide(X1,X2),divide(inverse(divide(X3,divide(X4,X5))),divide(divide(X2,X1),X3))) = divide(X5,X4),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    divide(inverse(divide(X1,X2)),divide(divide(X3,divide(X4,X5)),X1)) = inverse(divide(X3,divide(X2,divide(X5,X4)))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    divide(divide(inverse(divide(X1,X2)),divide(X2,X1)),divide(X3,X4)) = divide(X4,X3),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_14]),c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    divide(inverse(divide(X1,X2)),divide(divide(X3,X4),X1)) = inverse(divide(divide(X3,X4),X2)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    ( multiply(inverse(a1),a1) != multiply(inverse(b1),b1)
    | multiply(multiply(inverse(b2),b2),a2) != a2
    | multiply(multiply(a3,b3),c3) != multiply(a3,multiply(b3,c3)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_these_axioms]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    inverse(divide(X1,divide(divide(X2,divide(divide(X3,X4),X1)),divide(X4,X3)))) = X2,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    inverse(divide(divide(X1,X2),divide(X3,divide(X2,X1)))) = X3,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    ( multiply(inverse(a1),a1) != multiply(inverse(b1),b1)
    | multiply(multiply(inverse(b2),b2),a2) != a2
    | multiply(multiply(a3,b3),c3) != multiply(a3,multiply(b3,c3)) ),
    c_0_18 ).

cnf(c_0_22,axiom,
    multiply(X1,X2) = divide(X1,inverse(X2)),
    multiply ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    divide(X1,divide(divide(X2,X3),divide(X2,X3))) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    ( divide(divide(inverse(b2),inverse(b2)),inverse(a2)) != a2
    | divide(inverse(b1),inverse(b1)) != divide(inverse(a1),inverse(a1))
    | divide(divide(a3,inverse(b3)),inverse(c3)) != divide(a3,inverse(divide(b3,inverse(c3)))) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]),c_0_22]),c_0_22]),c_0_22]),c_0_22]),c_0_22]),c_0_22]),c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    inverse(divide(X1,X2)) = divide(X2,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    divide(X1,divide(X2,X2)) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    ( divide(divide(a3,inverse(b3)),inverse(c3)) != divide(a3,divide(inverse(c3),b3))
    | divide(inverse(a1),inverse(a1)) != divide(inverse(b1),inverse(b1))
    | divide(divide(inverse(b2),inverse(b2)),inverse(a2)) != a2 ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    divide(divide(X1,X1),X2) = inverse(X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    divide(divide(X1,divide(X2,X3)),divide(X3,X2)) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    ( divide(divide(a3,inverse(b3)),inverse(c3)) != divide(a3,divide(inverse(c3),b3))
    | divide(inverse(a1),inverse(a1)) != divide(inverse(b1),inverse(b1))
    | inverse(inverse(a2)) != a2 ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    inverse(inverse(X1)) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_28]),c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    divide(divide(X1,X2),inverse(X2)) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_28]),c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    ( divide(divide(a3,inverse(b3)),inverse(c3)) != divide(a3,divide(inverse(c3),b3))
    | divide(inverse(a1),inverse(a1)) != divide(inverse(b1),inverse(b1)) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31])]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    divide(X1,X1) = divide(X2,X2),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_28]),c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    divide(divide(X1,divide(X2,X3)),X4) = divide(X1,divide(X4,divide(X3,X2))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_17]),c_0_25]),c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    divide(inverse(X1),divide(X2,X1)) = inverse(X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
    divide(divide(a3,inverse(b3)),inverse(c3)) != divide(a3,divide(inverse(c3),b3)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]),c_0_34])]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,plain,
    divide(divide(X1,inverse(X2)),X3) = divide(X1,divide(X3,X2)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_36]),c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_38])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem    : GRP072-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v2.3.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime   : Fri May  3 15:58:38 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.19/0.48  Running first-order model finding
% 0.19/0.48  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.ySnirqUTX6/E---3.1_30032.p
% 2.44/0.84  # Version: 3.1.0
% 2.44/0.84  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 2.44/0.84  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 2.44/0.84  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 2.44/0.84  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 2.44/0.84  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 2.44/0.84  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 2.44/0.84  # G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 30111 completed with status 0
% 2.44/0.84  # Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 2.44/0.84  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 2.44/0.84  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 2.44/0.84  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 2.44/0.84  # No SInE strategy applied
% 2.44/0.84  # Search class: FUHPF-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 2.44/0.84  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 2.44/0.84  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 2.44/0.84  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 2.44/0.84  # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 2.44/0.84  # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 2.44/0.84  # Starting sh5l with 136s (1) cores
% 2.44/0.84  # G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 30119 completed with status 0
% 2.44/0.84  # Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 2.44/0.84  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 2.44/0.84  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 2.44/0.84  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 2.44/0.84  # No SInE strategy applied
% 2.44/0.84  # Search class: FUHPF-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 2.44/0.84  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 2.44/0.84  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 2.44/0.84  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 2.44/0.84  # Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 2.44/0.84  
% 2.44/0.84  # Proof found!
% 2.44/0.84  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 2.44/0.84  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 2.44/0.84  # Parsed axioms                        : 3
% 2.44/0.84  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 2.44/0.84  # Initial clauses                      : 3
% 2.44/0.84  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 1
% 2.44/0.84  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 2
% 2.44/0.84  # Processed clauses                    : 123
% 2.44/0.84  # ...of these trivial                  : 13
% 2.44/0.84  # ...subsumed                          : 41
% 2.44/0.84  # ...remaining for further processing  : 69
% 2.44/0.84  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 2.44/0.84  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 2.44/0.84  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 2.44/0.84  # Backward-rewritten                   : 45
% 2.44/0.84  # Generated clauses                    : 13593
% 2.44/0.84  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 12666
% 2.44/0.84  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 2.44/0.84  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 2.44/0.84  # Paramodulations                      : 13593
% 2.44/0.84  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 2.44/0.84  # NegExts                              : 0
% 2.44/0.84  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 2.44/0.84  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 2.44/0.84  # Total rewrite steps                  : 21979
% 2.44/0.84  # ...of those cached                   : 12684
% 2.44/0.84  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 2.44/0.84  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 2.44/0.84  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 2.44/0.84  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 2.44/0.84  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 2.44/0.84  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 2.44/0.84  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 2.44/0.84  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 2.44/0.84  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 2.44/0.84  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 2.44/0.84  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 2.44/0.84  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 2.44/0.84  # Current number of processed clauses  : 24
% 2.44/0.84  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 22
% 2.44/0.84  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 2
% 2.44/0.84  #    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 2.44/0.84  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 2.44/0.84  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 12405
% 2.44/0.84  # ...number of literals in the above   : 12405
% 2.44/0.84  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 2.44/0.84  # Current number of archived clauses   : 46
% 2.44/0.84  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 2.44/0.84  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 2.44/0.84  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 2.44/0.84  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 58
% 2.44/0.84  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 2.44/0.84  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 525
% 2.44/0.84  # BW rewrite match successes           : 87
% 2.44/0.84  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 2.44/0.84  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 2.44/0.84  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 338061
% 2.44/0.84  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 8
% 2.44/0.84  
% 2.44/0.84  # -------------------------------------------------
% 2.44/0.84  # User time                : 0.326 s
% 2.44/0.84  # System time              : 0.017 s
% 2.44/0.84  # Total time               : 0.343 s
% 2.44/0.84  # Maximum resident set size: 1592 pages
% 2.44/0.84  
% 2.44/0.84  # -------------------------------------------------
% 2.44/0.84  # User time                : 1.679 s
% 2.44/0.84  # System time              : 0.028 s
% 2.44/0.84  # Total time               : 1.707 s
% 2.44/0.84  # Maximum resident set size: 1696 pages
% 2.44/0.84  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------