TSTP Solution File: GRP042-2 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : GRP042-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:39:43 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 2.69s 1.68s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 2.94s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :   12
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   22 (   8 unt;   7 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   26 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   24 (  13   ~;  11   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    8 (   4   >;   4   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   24 (;  24   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ product > equalish > multiply > #nlpp > inverse > identity > b > a

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(a,type,
    a: $i ).

tff(product,type,
    product: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(inverse,type,
    inverse: $i > $i ).

tff(multiply,type,
    multiply: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(b,type,
    b: $i ).

tff(identity,type,
    identity: $i ).

tff(equalish,type,
    equalish: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(f_100,axiom,
    ~ equalish(b,a),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_98,axiom,
    equalish(a,b),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_51,axiom,
    ! [X] : product(identity,X,X),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_95,axiom,
    ! [X,Y,W,Z] :
      ( ~ equalish(X,Y)
      | ~ product(W,Z,X)
      | product(W,Z,Y) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_65,axiom,
    ! [X,Y,Z,W] :
      ( ~ product(X,Y,Z)
      | ~ product(X,Y,W)
      | equalish(Z,W) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(c_18,plain,
    ~ equalish(b,a),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_100]) ).

tff(c_16,plain,
    equalish(a,b),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_98]) ).

tff(c_2,plain,
    ! [X_1] : product(identity,X_1,X_1),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_51]) ).

tff(c_22,plain,
    ! [W_29,Z_30,Y_31,X_32] :
      ( product(W_29,Z_30,Y_31)
      | ~ product(W_29,Z_30,X_32)
      | ~ equalish(X_32,Y_31) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_95]) ).

tff(c_31,plain,
    ! [X_1,Y_31] :
      ( product(identity,X_1,Y_31)
      | ~ equalish(X_1,Y_31) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2,c_22]) ).

tff(c_41,plain,
    ! [Z_40,W_41,X_42,Y_43] :
      ( equalish(Z_40,W_41)
      | ~ product(X_42,Y_43,W_41)
      | ~ product(X_42,Y_43,Z_40) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_65]) ).

tff(c_57,plain,
    ! [Z_44,X_45] :
      ( equalish(Z_44,X_45)
      | ~ product(identity,X_45,Z_44) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2,c_41]) ).

tff(c_84,plain,
    ! [Y_48,X_49] :
      ( equalish(Y_48,X_49)
      | ~ equalish(X_49,Y_48) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_31,c_57]) ).

tff(c_90,plain,
    equalish(b,a),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_16,c_84]) ).

tff(c_97,plain,
    $false,
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_18,c_90]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : GRP042-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 21:28:22 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 2.69/1.68  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.69/1.68  
% 2.69/1.68  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.94/1.71  
% 2.94/1.71  Inference rules
% 2.94/1.71  ----------------------
% 2.94/1.71  #Ref     : 0
% 2.94/1.71  #Sup     : 18
% 2.94/1.71  #Fact    : 0
% 2.94/1.71  #Define  : 0
% 2.94/1.71  #Split   : 0
% 2.94/1.71  #Chain   : 0
% 2.94/1.71  #Close   : 0
% 2.94/1.71  
% 2.94/1.71  Ordering : KBO
% 2.94/1.71  
% 2.94/1.71  Simplification rules
% 2.94/1.71  ----------------------
% 2.94/1.71  #Subsume      : 0
% 2.94/1.71  #Demod        : 3
% 2.94/1.71  #Tautology    : 3
% 2.94/1.71  #SimpNegUnit  : 1
% 2.94/1.71  #BackRed      : 0
% 2.94/1.71  
% 2.94/1.71  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 2.94/1.71  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 2.94/1.71  
% 2.94/1.71  Timing (in seconds)
% 2.94/1.71  ----------------------
% 2.94/1.72  Preprocessing        : 0.42
% 2.94/1.72  Parsing              : 0.23
% 2.94/1.72  CNF conversion       : 0.02
% 2.94/1.72  Main loop            : 0.24
% 2.94/1.72  Inferencing          : 0.10
% 2.94/1.72  Reduction            : 0.06
% 2.94/1.72  Demodulation         : 0.04
% 2.94/1.72  BG Simplification    : 0.02
% 2.94/1.72  Subsumption          : 0.05
% 2.94/1.72  Abstraction          : 0.01
% 2.94/1.72  MUC search           : 0.00
% 2.94/1.72  Cooper               : 0.00
% 2.94/1.72  Total                : 0.70
% 2.94/1.72  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 2.94/1.72  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 2.94/1.72  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 2.94/1.72  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------