TSTP Solution File: GRP032-3 by Metis---2.4
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Metis---2.4
% Problem : GRP032-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : metis --show proof --show saturation %s
% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 10:32:34 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.18s 0.38s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.18s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 10 ( 7 unt; 0 nHn; 8 RR)
% Number of literals : 16 ( 0 equ; 9 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 2 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 8 ( 2 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(right_inverse,axiom,
product(X,inverse(X),identity) ).
cnf(closure_of_product_and_inverse,axiom,
( ~ subgroup_member(A)
| ~ subgroup_member(B)
| ~ product(A,inverse(B),C)
| subgroup_member(C) ) ).
cnf(a_is_in_subgroup,hypothesis,
subgroup_member(a) ).
cnf(prove_identity_is_in_subgroup,negated_conjecture,
~ subgroup_member(identity) ).
cnf(refute_0_0,plain,
product(X_75,inverse(X_75),identity),
inference(subst,[],[right_inverse:[bind(X,$fot(X_75))]]) ).
cnf(refute_0_1,plain,
( ~ product(X_75,inverse(X_75),identity)
| ~ subgroup_member(X_75)
| subgroup_member(identity) ),
inference(subst,[],[closure_of_product_and_inverse:[bind(A,$fot(X_75)),bind(B,$fot(X_75)),bind(C,$fot(identity))]]) ).
cnf(refute_0_2,plain,
( ~ subgroup_member(X_75)
| subgroup_member(identity) ),
inference(resolve,[$cnf( product(X_75,inverse(X_75),identity) )],[refute_0_0,refute_0_1]) ).
cnf(refute_0_3,plain,
~ subgroup_member(X_75),
inference(resolve,[$cnf( subgroup_member(identity) )],[refute_0_2,prove_identity_is_in_subgroup]) ).
cnf(refute_0_4,plain,
~ subgroup_member(a),
inference(subst,[],[refute_0_3:[bind(X_75,$fot(a))]]) ).
cnf(refute_0_5,plain,
$false,
inference(resolve,[$cnf( subgroup_member(a) )],[a_is_in_subgroup,refute_0_4]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11 % Problem : GRP032-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : metis --show proof --show saturation %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Tue Jun 14 01:04:08 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.33 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
% 0.18/0.38 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.38
% 0.18/0.38 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 0.18/0.38
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------