TSTP Solution File: GRP021-1 by Beagle---0.9.51
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem : GRP021-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:39:38 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 2.73s 1.67s
% Output : CNFRefutation 2.80s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 16 ( 8 unt; 5 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 16 ( 6 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 12 ( 7 ~; 5 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 6 ( 3 >; 3 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 17 (; 17 !; 0 ?; 0 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ product > multiply > #nlpp > inverse > identity > a
%Foreground sorts:
%Background operators:
%Foreground operators:
tff(a,type,
a: $i ).
tff(product,type,
product: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(inverse,type,
inverse: $i > $i ).
tff(multiply,type,
multiply: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(identity,type,
identity: $i ).
tff(f_60,axiom,
! [X,Y] : product(X,Y,multiply(X,Y)),
file(unknown,unknown) ).
tff(f_57,axiom,
! [X] : product(X,inverse(X),identity),
file(unknown,unknown) ).
tff(f_69,axiom,
! [X,Y,Z,W] :
( ~ product(X,Y,Z)
| ~ product(X,Y,W)
| ( Z = W ) ),
file(unknown,unknown) ).
tff(f_95,axiom,
multiply(a,inverse(a)) != identity,
file(unknown,unknown) ).
tff(c_10,plain,
! [X_5,Y_6] : product(X_5,Y_6,multiply(X_5,Y_6)),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_60]) ).
tff(c_8,plain,
! [X_4] : product(X_4,inverse(X_4),identity),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_57]) ).
tff(c_24,plain,
! [Z_29,W_30,X_31,Y_32] :
( ( Z_29 = W_30 )
| ~ product(X_31,Y_32,W_30)
| ~ product(X_31,Y_32,Z_29) ),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_69]) ).
tff(c_149,plain,
! [Z_45,X_46] :
( ( identity = Z_45 )
| ~ product(X_46,inverse(X_46),Z_45) ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_8,c_24]) ).
tff(c_164,plain,
! [X_5] : ( multiply(X_5,inverse(X_5)) = identity ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_10,c_149]) ).
tff(c_18,plain,
multiply(a,inverse(a)) != identity,
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_95]) ).
tff(c_171,plain,
$false,
inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_164,c_18]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : GRP021-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.13/0.13 % Command : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Thu Aug 3 21:56:26 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 2.73/1.67 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.80/1.67
% 2.80/1.67 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.80/1.71
% 2.80/1.71 Inference rules
% 2.80/1.71 ----------------------
% 2.80/1.71 #Ref : 0
% 2.80/1.71 #Sup : 34
% 2.80/1.71 #Fact : 0
% 2.80/1.71 #Define : 0
% 2.80/1.71 #Split : 0
% 2.80/1.71 #Chain : 0
% 2.80/1.71 #Close : 0
% 2.80/1.71
% 2.80/1.71 Ordering : KBO
% 2.80/1.71
% 2.80/1.71 Simplification rules
% 2.80/1.71 ----------------------
% 2.80/1.71 #Subsume : 1
% 2.80/1.71 #Demod : 7
% 2.80/1.71 #Tautology : 19
% 2.80/1.71 #SimpNegUnit : 0
% 2.80/1.71 #BackRed : 1
% 2.80/1.71
% 2.80/1.71 #Partial instantiations: 0
% 2.80/1.71 #Strategies tried : 1
% 2.80/1.71
% 2.80/1.71 Timing (in seconds)
% 2.80/1.71 ----------------------
% 2.80/1.71 Preprocessing : 0.44
% 2.80/1.71 Parsing : 0.24
% 2.80/1.71 CNF conversion : 0.02
% 2.80/1.71 Main loop : 0.23
% 2.80/1.71 Inferencing : 0.09
% 2.80/1.71 Reduction : 0.06
% 2.80/1.71 Demodulation : 0.04
% 2.80/1.71 BG Simplification : 0.01
% 2.80/1.71 Subsumption : 0.05
% 2.80/1.71 Abstraction : 0.01
% 2.80/1.71 MUC search : 0.00
% 2.80/1.71 Cooper : 0.00
% 2.80/1.71 Total : 0.72
% 2.80/1.71 Index Insertion : 0.00
% 2.80/1.71 Index Deletion : 0.00
% 2.80/1.71 Index Matching : 0.00
% 2.80/1.72 BG Taut test : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------