TSTP Solution File: GRA010+2 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : GRA010+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:39:25 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 5.61s 2.43s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 5.61s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :   38
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   52 (   4 unt;  36 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   49 (  11 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   56 (  23   ~;  22   |;   6   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   5  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   13 (   6 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   64 (  26   >;  38   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :   13 (  11 usr;   2 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   25 (  25 usr;   9 con; 0-5 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   41 (;  39   !;   2   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ triangle > shortest_path > precedes > path > sequential > on_path > less_or_equal > in_path > vertex > edge > path_cons > number_of_in > minus > #nlpp > tail_of > length_of > head_of > triangles > sequential_pairs > n1 > graph > empty > edges > complete > #skF_11 > #skF_6 > #skF_5 > #skF_13 > #skF_10 > #skF_2 > #skF_7 > #skF_4 > #skF_3 > #skF_9 > #skF_8 > #skF_1 > #skF_12

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(head_of,type,
    head_of: $i > $i ).

tff(less_or_equal,type,
    less_or_equal: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(triangle,type,
    triangle: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(triangles,type,
    triangles: $i ).

tff('#skF_11',type,
    '#skF_11': $i ).

tff('#skF_6',type,
    '#skF_6': ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(number_of_in,type,
    number_of_in: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(on_path,type,
    on_path: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_5',type,
    '#skF_5': ( $i * $i * $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_13',type,
    '#skF_13': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_10',type,
    '#skF_10': $i ).

tff(vertex,type,
    vertex: $i > $o ).

tff(n1,type,
    n1: $i ).

tff(length_of,type,
    length_of: $i > $i ).

tff(sequential_pairs,type,
    sequential_pairs: $i ).

tff(edge,type,
    edge: $i > $o ).

tff('#skF_2',type,
    '#skF_2': ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(precedes,type,
    precedes: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(graph,type,
    graph: $i ).

tff('#skF_7',type,
    '#skF_7': ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_4',type,
    '#skF_4': ( $i * $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(in_path,type,
    in_path: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(sequential,type,
    sequential: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_3',type,
    '#skF_3': ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_9',type,
    '#skF_9': ( $i * $i * $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(tail_of,type,
    tail_of: $i > $i ).

tff(edges,type,
    edges: $i ).

tff(complete,type,
    complete: $o ).

tff(path_cons,type,
    path_cons: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_8',type,
    '#skF_8': ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(empty,type,
    empty: $i ).

tff(shortest_path,type,
    shortest_path: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_1',type,
    '#skF_1': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_12',type,
    '#skF_12': $i ).

tff(path,type,
    path: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(minus,type,
    minus: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(f_284,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( complete
     => ! [P,V1,V2] :
          ( ( path(V1,V2,P)
            & ! [E1,E2] :
                ( ( on_path(E1,P)
                  & on_path(E2,P)
                  & sequential(E1,E2) )
               => ? [E3] : triangle(E1,E2,E3) ) )
         => ( number_of_in(sequential_pairs,P) = number_of_in(triangles,P) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',complete_means_sequential_pairs_and_triangles) ).

tff(f_254,axiom,
    ! [P,V1,V2] :
      ( ( path(V1,V2,P)
        & ! [E1,E2] :
            ( ( on_path(E1,P)
              & on_path(E2,P)
              & sequential(E1,E2) )
           => ? [E3] : triangle(E1,E2,E3) ) )
     => ( number_of_in(sequential_pairs,P) = number_of_in(triangles,P) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sequential_pairs_and_triangles) ).

tff(c_144,plain,
    number_of_in(triangles,'#skF_10') != number_of_in(sequential_pairs,'#skF_10'),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_284]) ).

tff(c_136,plain,
    ! [P_84,V1_85,V2_86] :
      ( on_path('#skF_8'(P_84,V1_85,V2_86),P_84)
      | ( number_of_in(triangles,P_84) = number_of_in(sequential_pairs,P_84) )
      | ~ path(V1_85,V2_86,P_84) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_254]) ).

tff(c_138,plain,
    ! [P_84,V1_85,V2_86] :
      ( on_path('#skF_7'(P_84,V1_85,V2_86),P_84)
      | ( number_of_in(triangles,P_84) = number_of_in(sequential_pairs,P_84) )
      | ~ path(V1_85,V2_86,P_84) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_254]) ).

tff(c_134,plain,
    ! [P_84,V1_85,V2_86] :
      ( sequential('#skF_7'(P_84,V1_85,V2_86),'#skF_8'(P_84,V1_85,V2_86))
      | ( number_of_in(triangles,P_84) = number_of_in(sequential_pairs,P_84) )
      | ~ path(V1_85,V2_86,P_84) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_254]) ).

tff(c_146,plain,
    ! [E1_105,E2_106] :
      ( triangle(E1_105,E2_106,'#skF_13'(E1_105,E2_106))
      | ~ sequential(E1_105,E2_106)
      | ~ on_path(E2_106,'#skF_10')
      | ~ on_path(E1_105,'#skF_10') ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_284]) ).

tff(c_1148,plain,
    ! [P_374,V1_375,V2_376,E3_377] :
      ( ~ triangle('#skF_7'(P_374,V1_375,V2_376),'#skF_8'(P_374,V1_375,V2_376),E3_377)
      | ( number_of_in(triangles,P_374) = number_of_in(sequential_pairs,P_374) )
      | ~ path(V1_375,V2_376,P_374) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_254]) ).

tff(c_1228,plain,
    ! [P_389,V1_390,V2_391] :
      ( ( number_of_in(triangles,P_389) = number_of_in(sequential_pairs,P_389) )
      | ~ path(V1_390,V2_391,P_389)
      | ~ sequential('#skF_7'(P_389,V1_390,V2_391),'#skF_8'(P_389,V1_390,V2_391))
      | ~ on_path('#skF_8'(P_389,V1_390,V2_391),'#skF_10')
      | ~ on_path('#skF_7'(P_389,V1_390,V2_391),'#skF_10') ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_146,c_1148]) ).

tff(c_1373,plain,
    ! [P_425,V1_426,V2_427] :
      ( ~ on_path('#skF_8'(P_425,V1_426,V2_427),'#skF_10')
      | ~ on_path('#skF_7'(P_425,V1_426,V2_427),'#skF_10')
      | ( number_of_in(triangles,P_425) = number_of_in(sequential_pairs,P_425) )
      | ~ path(V1_426,V2_427,P_425) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_134,c_1228]) ).

tff(c_1377,plain,
    ! [V1_85,V2_86] :
      ( ~ on_path('#skF_8'('#skF_10',V1_85,V2_86),'#skF_10')
      | ( number_of_in(triangles,'#skF_10') = number_of_in(sequential_pairs,'#skF_10') )
      | ~ path(V1_85,V2_86,'#skF_10') ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_138,c_1373]) ).

tff(c_1381,plain,
    ! [V1_428,V2_429] :
      ( ~ on_path('#skF_8'('#skF_10',V1_428,V2_429),'#skF_10')
      | ~ path(V1_428,V2_429,'#skF_10') ),
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_144,c_144,c_1377]) ).

tff(c_1385,plain,
    ! [V1_85,V2_86] :
      ( ( number_of_in(triangles,'#skF_10') = number_of_in(sequential_pairs,'#skF_10') )
      | ~ path(V1_85,V2_86,'#skF_10') ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_136,c_1381]) ).

tff(c_1388,plain,
    ! [V1_85,V2_86] : ~ path(V1_85,V2_86,'#skF_10'),
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_144,c_1385]) ).

tff(c_148,plain,
    path('#skF_11','#skF_12','#skF_10'),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_284]) ).

tff(c_1390,plain,
    $false,
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_1388,c_148]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem  : GRA010+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.14  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.36  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 18:22:29 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 5.61/2.43  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 5.61/2.43  
% 5.61/2.43  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 5.61/2.46  
% 5.61/2.46  Inference rules
% 5.61/2.46  ----------------------
% 5.61/2.46  #Ref     : 2
% 5.61/2.46  #Sup     : 316
% 5.61/2.46  #Fact    : 4
% 5.61/2.46  #Define  : 0
% 5.61/2.46  #Split   : 4
% 5.61/2.46  #Chain   : 0
% 5.61/2.46  #Close   : 0
% 5.61/2.46  
% 5.61/2.46  Ordering : KBO
% 5.61/2.46  
% 5.61/2.46  Simplification rules
% 5.61/2.46  ----------------------
% 5.61/2.46  #Subsume      : 60
% 5.61/2.46  #Demod        : 7
% 5.61/2.46  #Tautology    : 75
% 5.61/2.46  #SimpNegUnit  : 5
% 5.61/2.46  #BackRed      : 3
% 5.61/2.46  
% 5.61/2.46  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 5.61/2.46  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 5.61/2.46  
% 5.61/2.46  Timing (in seconds)
% 5.61/2.46  ----------------------
% 5.61/2.46  Preprocessing        : 0.64
% 5.61/2.46  Parsing              : 0.29
% 5.61/2.46  CNF conversion       : 0.05
% 5.61/2.46  Main loop            : 0.67
% 5.61/2.46  Inferencing          : 0.25
% 5.61/2.46  Reduction            : 0.16
% 5.61/2.46  Demodulation         : 0.10
% 5.61/2.46  BG Simplification    : 0.05
% 5.61/2.46  Subsumption          : 0.17
% 5.61/2.46  Abstraction          : 0.03
% 5.61/2.46  MUC search           : 0.00
% 5.61/2.46  Cooper               : 0.00
% 5.61/2.46  Total                : 1.36
% 5.61/2.46  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 5.61/2.46  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 5.61/2.46  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 5.61/2.46  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------