TSTP Solution File: GEO655+1 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : GEO655+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 06:21:21 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 22.64s 22.87s
% Output   : Refutation 22.64s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11  % Problem  : GEO655+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.5.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 07:38:54 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.36  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.18/0.36  The process was started by sandbox on n026.cluster.edu,
% 0.18/0.36  Sat Jun 18 07:38:54 2022
% 0.18/0.36  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 24696.
% 0.18/0.36  
% 0.18/0.36  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.18/0.36  set(auto).
% 0.18/0.36     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.18/0.36     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.18/0.36     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.18/0.36     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.18/0.36     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.18/0.36     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.18/0.36     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.18/0.36     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.18/0.36     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.18/0.36     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.18/0.36     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.18/0.36     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.18/0.36     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.18/0.36  clear(print_given).
% 0.18/0.36  
% 0.18/0.36  formula_list(usable).
% 0.18/0.36  
% 0.18/0.36  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=5.
% 0.18/0.36  
% 0.18/0.36  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 0.18/0.36  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.18/0.36  unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.18/0.36  clauses in usable.
% 0.18/0.36  
% 0.18/0.36     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.18/0.36     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.18/0.36     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.18/0.36     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.18/0.36     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.18/0.36     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.18/0.36     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.18/0.36     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.18/0.36     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.18/0.36     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.18/0.36     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.18/0.36     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.18/0.36     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.18/0.36     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.18/0.36     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.18/0.36  
% 0.18/0.36  ------------> process usable:
% 0.18/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 72 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -eqangle(A,B,C,D,C,D,A,B)|perp(A,B,C,D)|para(A,B,C,D).
% 0.18/0.36  
% 0.18/0.36  ------------> process sos:
% 0.18/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 170 during input processing: 0 [copy,170,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.18/0.36  170 back subsumes 146.
% 0.18/0.36  170 back subsumes 145.
% 0.18/0.36  170 back subsumes 144.
% 0.18/0.36  170 back subsumes 143.
% 0.18/0.36  
% 0.18/0.36  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.18/0.45  
% 0.18/0.45  
% 0.18/0.45  Failed to model usable list: disabling FINDER
% 0.18/0.45  
% 0.18/0.45  
% 0.18/0.45  
% 0.18/0.45  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.18/0.45  
% 0.18/0.45  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.18/0.45  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.18/0.45  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.18/0.45  number of clauses in intial UL: 154
% 0.18/0.45  number of clauses initially in problem: 166
% 0.18/0.45  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 92
% 0.18/0.45  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 83
% 0.18/0.45  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.18/0.45  absolute distinct symbol count: 43
% 0.18/0.45     distinct predicate count: 12
% 0.18/0.45     distinct function count: 20
% 0.18/0.45     distinct constant count: 11
% 0.18/0.45  
% 0.18/0.45  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.18/0.45  
% 0.18/0.45  
% 0.18/0.45  
% 0.18/0.45  =========== start of search ===========
% 3.15/3.35  
% 3.15/3.35  
% 3.15/3.35  Changing weight limit from 60 to 56.
% 3.15/3.35  
% 3.15/3.35  Resetting weight limit to 56 after 235 givens.
% 3.15/3.35  
% 3.60/3.82  
% 3.60/3.82  
% 3.60/3.82  Changing weight limit from 56 to 55.
% 3.60/3.82  
% 3.60/3.82  Resetting weight limit to 55 after 240 givens.
% 3.60/3.82  
% 4.48/4.71  
% 4.48/4.71  
% 4.48/4.71  Changing weight limit from 55 to 54.
% 4.48/4.71  
% 4.48/4.71  Resetting weight limit to 54 after 250 givens.
% 4.48/4.71  
% 5.01/5.23  
% 5.01/5.23  
% 5.01/5.23  Changing weight limit from 54 to 51.
% 5.01/5.23  
% 5.01/5.23  Resetting weight limit to 51 after 260 givens.
% 5.01/5.23  
% 5.63/5.86  
% 5.63/5.86  
% 5.63/5.86  Changing weight limit from 51 to 50.
% 5.63/5.86  
% 5.63/5.86  Resetting weight limit to 50 after 270 givens.
% 5.63/5.86  
% 7.06/7.25  
% 7.06/7.25  
% 7.06/7.25  Changing weight limit from 50 to 49.
% 7.06/7.25  
% 7.06/7.25  Resetting weight limit to 49 after 290 givens.
% 7.06/7.25  
% 7.43/7.64  
% 7.43/7.64  
% 7.43/7.64  Changing weight limit from 49 to 46.
% 7.43/7.64  
% 7.43/7.64  Resetting weight limit to 46 after 295 givens.
% 7.43/7.64  
% 7.78/8.05  
% 7.78/8.05  
% 7.78/8.05  Changing weight limit from 46 to 37.
% 7.78/8.05  
% 7.78/8.05  Modelling stopped after 300 given clauses and 0.00 seconds
% 7.78/8.05  
% 7.78/8.05  
% 7.78/8.05  Resetting weight limit to 37 after 300 givens.
% 7.78/8.05  
% 8.31/8.52  
% 8.31/8.52  
% 8.31/8.52  Changing weight limit from 37 to 36.
% 8.31/8.52  
% 8.31/8.52  Resetting weight limit to 36 after 310 givens.
% 8.31/8.52  
% 9.01/9.20  
% 9.01/9.20  
% 9.01/9.20  Changing weight limit from 36 to 35.
% 9.01/9.20  
% 9.01/9.20  Resetting weight limit to 35 after 330 givens.
% 9.01/9.20  
% 9.89/10.10  
% 9.89/10.10  
% 9.89/10.10  Changing weight limit from 35 to 31.
% 9.89/10.10  
% 9.89/10.10  Resetting weight limit to 31 after 350 givens.
% 9.89/10.10  
% 10.14/10.34  
% 10.14/10.34  
% 10.14/10.34  Changing weight limit from 31 to 30.
% 10.14/10.34  
% 10.14/10.34  Resetting weight limit to 30 after 355 givens.
% 10.14/10.34  
% 13.96/14.16  
% 13.96/14.16  
% 13.96/14.16  Changing weight limit from 30 to 29.
% 13.96/14.16  
% 13.96/14.16  Resetting weight limit to 29 after 560 givens.
% 13.96/14.16  
% 14.91/15.17  
% 14.91/15.17  
% 14.91/15.17  Changing weight limit from 29 to 23.
% 14.91/15.17  
% 14.91/15.17  Resetting weight limit to 23 after 690 givens.
% 14.91/15.17  
% 15.13/15.35  
% 15.13/15.35  
% 15.13/15.35  Changing weight limit from 23 to 17.
% 15.13/15.35  
% 15.13/15.35  Resetting weight limit to 17 after 695 givens.
% 15.13/15.35  
% 15.24/15.48  
% 15.24/15.48  
% 15.24/15.48  Changing weight limit from 17 to 15.
% 15.24/15.48  
% 15.24/15.48  Resetting weight limit to 15 after 700 givens.
% 15.24/15.48  
% 15.32/15.52  
% 15.32/15.52  
% 15.32/15.52  Changing weight limit from 15 to 11.
% 15.32/15.52  
% 15.32/15.52  Resetting weight limit to 11 after 705 givens.
% 15.32/15.52  
% 15.32/15.57  
% 15.32/15.57  
% 15.32/15.57  Changing weight limit from 11 to 10.
% 15.32/15.57  
% 15.32/15.57  Resetting weight limit to 10 after 730 givens.
% 15.32/15.57  
% 17.88/18.08  
% 17.88/18.08  
% 17.88/18.08  Changing weight limit from 10 to 9.
% 17.88/18.08  
% 17.88/18.08  Resetting weight limit to 9 after 1760 givens.
% 17.88/18.08  
% 22.64/22.87  
% 22.64/22.87  -- HEY sandbox, WE HAVE A PROOF!! -- 
% 22.64/22.87  
% 22.64/22.87  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at  22.14 sec ----> 125020 [binary,125019.1,113.1] {-} $F.
% 22.64/22.87  
% 22.64/22.87  Length of proof is 50.  Level of proof is 13.
% 22.64/22.87  
% 22.64/22.87  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 22.64/22.87  % SZS status Theorem
% 22.64/22.87  % SZS output start Refutation
% 22.64/22.87  
% 22.64/22.87  1 [] {+} -coll(A,B,C)|coll(A,C,B).
% 22.64/22.87  2 [] {+} -coll(A,B,C)|coll(B,A,C).
% 22.64/22.87  3 [] {+} -coll(A,B,C)| -coll(A,B,D)|coll(C,D,A).
% 22.64/22.87  5 [] {+} -para(A,B,C,D)|para(C,D,A,B).
% 22.64/22.87  8 [] {+} -perp(A,B,C,D)|perp(C,D,A,B).
% 22.64/22.87  9 [] {+} -perp(A,B,C,D)| -perp(C,D,E,F)|para(A,B,E,F).
% 22.64/22.87  10 [] {+} -para(A,B,C,D)| -perp(C,D,E,F)|perp(A,B,E,F).
% 22.64/22.87  11 [] {+} -midp(A,B,C)|midp(A,C,B).
% 22.64/22.87  12 [] {+} -cong(A,B,A,C)| -cong(A,B,A,D)|circle(A,B,C,D).
% 22.64/22.87  23 [] {+} -cong(A,B,C,D)|cong(A,B,D,C).
% 22.64/22.87  24 [] {+} -cong(A,B,C,D)|cong(C,D,A,B).
% 22.64/22.87  25 [] {+} -cong(A,B,C,D)| -cong(C,D,E,F)|cong(A,B,E,F).
% 22.64/22.87  45 [] {+} -midp(A,B,C)| -midp(D,B,E)|para(A,D,C,E).
% 22.64/22.87  46 [] {+} -midp(A,B,C)| -para(A,D,C,E)| -coll(D,B,E)|midp(D,B,E).
% 22.64/22.87  54 [] {+} -circle(A,B,C,D)| -coll(A,B,D)|perp(B,C,C,D).
% 22.64/22.87  57 [] {+} -cong(A,B,C,B)| -cong(A,D,C,D)|perp(A,C,B,D).
% 22.64/22.87  64 [] {+} -midp(A,B,C)| -midp(A,D,E)|para(B,D,C,E).
% 22.64/22.87  65 [] {+} -midp(A,B,C)| -para(B,D,C,E)| -para(B,E,C,D)|midp(A,D,E).
% 22.64/22.87  68 [] {+} -cong(A,B,A,C)| -coll(A,B,C)|midp(A,B,C).
% 22.64/22.87  69 [] {+} -midp(A,B,C)|cong(A,B,A,C).
% 22.64/22.87  70 [] {+} -midp(A,B,C)|coll(A,B,C).
% 22.64/22.87  113 [] {+} -para($c6,$c5,$c11,$c9).
% 22.64/22.87  114 [factor,3.1.2] {+} -coll(A,B,C)|coll(C,C,A).
% 22.64/22.87  116 [factor,12.1.2] {+} -cong(A,B,A,C)|circle(A,B,C,C).
% 22.64/22.87  129 [factor,65.2.3] {+} -midp(A,B,C)| -para(B,D,C,D)|midp(A,D,D).
% 22.64/22.87  159 [] {-} midp($c4,$c10,$c11).
% 22.64/22.87  160 [] {-} perp($c10,$c11,$c4,$c8).
% 22.64/22.87  161 [] {-} midp($c3,$c10,$c9).
% 22.64/22.87  162 [] {-} perp($c10,$c9,$c3,$c8).
% 22.64/22.87  165 [] {-} coll($c7,$c11,$c9).
% 22.64/22.87  169 [] {-} perp($c8,$c6,$c6,$c5).
% 22.64/22.87  177 [hyper,159,70] {-} coll($c4,$c10,$c11).
% 22.64/22.87  178 [hyper,159,69] {-} cong($c4,$c10,$c4,$c11).
% 22.64/22.87  179 [hyper,159,11] {-} midp($c4,$c11,$c10).
% 22.64/22.87  206 [hyper,161,70] {-} coll($c3,$c10,$c9).
% 22.64/22.87  207 [hyper,161,69] {-} cong($c3,$c10,$c3,$c9).
% 22.64/22.87  209 [hyper,161,45,159] {-} para($c3,$c4,$c9,$c11).
% 22.64/22.87  210 [hyper,161,11] {-} midp($c3,$c9,$c10).
% 22.64/22.87  261 [hyper,165,2] {-} coll($c11,$c7,$c9).
% 22.64/22.87  275 [hyper,160,8] {-} perp($c4,$c8,$c10,$c11).
% 22.64/22.87  308 [hyper,177,114] {-} coll($c11,$c11,$c4).
% 22.64/22.87  372 [hyper,206,1] {-} coll($c3,$c9,$c10).
% 22.64/22.87  385 [hyper,162,8] {-} perp($c3,$c8,$c10,$c9).
% 22.64/22.87  441 [hyper,210,69] {-} cong($c3,$c9,$c3,$c10).
% 22.64/22.87  566 [hyper,261,114] {-} coll($c9,$c9,$c11).
% 22.64/22.87  672 [hyper,308,114] {-} coll($c4,$c4,$c11).
% 22.64/22.87  761 [hyper,372,114] {-} coll($c10,$c10,$c3).
% 22.64/22.87  793 [hyper,169,8] {-} perp($c6,$c5,$c8,$c6).
% 22.64/22.87  907 [hyper,566,114] {-} coll($c11,$c11,$c9).
% 22.64/22.87  1185 [hyper,672,1] {-} coll($c4,$c11,$c4).
% 22.64/22.87  1433 [hyper,761,1] {-} coll($c10,$c3,$c10).
% 22.64/22.87  1460 [hyper,178,116] {-} circle($c4,$c10,$c11,$c11).
% 22.64/22.87  1462 [hyper,178,23] {-} cong($c4,$c10,$c11,$c4).
% 22.64/22.87  1883 [hyper,907,3,308] {-} coll($c4,$c9,$c11).
% 22.64/22.87  2473 [hyper,1185,2] {-} coll($c11,$c4,$c4).
% 22.64/22.87  3305 [hyper,1433,2] {-} coll($c3,$c10,$c10).
% 22.64/22.87  10088 [hyper,275,9,160] {-} para($c4,$c8,$c4,$c8).
% 22.64/22.87  12303 [hyper,385,9,162] {-} para($c10,$c9,$c10,$c9).
% 22.64/22.87  12596 [hyper,441,25,207] {-} cong($c3,$c10,$c3,$c10).
% 22.64/22.87  13732 [hyper,793,9,169] {-} para($c8,$c6,$c8,$c6).
% 22.64/22.87  13733 [hyper,793,9,169] {-} para($c6,$c5,$c6,$c5).
% 22.64/22.87  13890 [hyper,1460,54,177] {-} perp($c10,$c11,$c11,$c11).
% 22.64/22.87  13896 [hyper,1462,24] {-} cong($c11,$c4,$c4,$c10).
% 22.64/22.87  19893 [hyper,12596,68,3305] {-} midp($c3,$c10,$c10).
% 22.64/22.87  19899 [hyper,19893,129,12303] {-} midp($c3,$c9,$c9).
% 22.64/22.87  20038 [hyper,19899,46,209,1883] {-} midp($c4,$c9,$c11).
% 22.64/22.87  20276 [hyper,20038,64,179] {-} para($c11,$c9,$c10,$c11).
% 22.64/22.87  27802 [hyper,13896,25,1462] {-} cong($c11,$c4,$c11,$c4).
% 22.64/22.87  57443 [hyper,20276,10,13890] {-} perp($c11,$c9,$c11,$c11).
% 22.64/22.87  62465 [hyper,27802,68,2473] {-} midp($c11,$c4,$c4).
% 22.64/22.87  62469 [hyper,62465,129,10088] {-} midp($c11,$c8,$c8).
% 22.64/22.87  62696 [hyper,62469,129,13732] {-} midp($c11,$c6,$c6).
% 22.64/22.87  63111 [hyper,62696,129,13733] {-} midp($c11,$c5,$c5).
% 22.64/22.87  63201 [hyper,62696,69] {-} cong($c11,$c6,$c11,$c6).
% 22.64/22.87  63300 [hyper,63111,69] {-} cong($c11,$c5,$c11,$c5).
% 22.64/22.87  76383 [hyper,63300,57,63201] {-} perp($c11,$c11,$c6,$c5).
% 22.64/22.87  90042 [hyper,76383,9,57443] {-} para($c11,$c9,$c6,$c5).
% 22.64/22.87  125019 [hyper,90042,5] {-} para($c6,$c5,$c11,$c9).
% 22.64/22.87  125020 [binary,125019.1,113.1] {-} $F.
% 22.64/22.87  
% 22.64/22.87  % SZS output end Refutation
% 22.64/22.87  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 22.64/22.87  
% 22.64/22.87  
% 22.64/22.87  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 22.64/22.87  
% 22.64/22.87  
% 22.64/22.87  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 22.64/22.87  
% 22.64/22.87  ============ end of search ============
% 22.64/22.87  
% 22.64/22.87  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 22.64/22.87  
% 22.64/22.87  Process 24696 finished Sat Jun 18 07:39:17 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------