TSTP Solution File: GEO566+1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : GEO566+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 06:20:55 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 26.49s 26.71s
% Output : Refutation 26.49s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : GEO566+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.5.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 03:39:28 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.38 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.21/0.38 The process was started by sandbox2 on n029.cluster.edu,
% 0.21/0.38 Sat Jun 18 03:39:28 2022
% 0.21/0.38 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 30950.
% 0.21/0.38
% 0.21/0.38 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.21/0.38 set(auto).
% 0.21/0.38 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.21/0.38 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.21/0.38 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.21/0.38 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.21/0.38 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.21/0.38 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.21/0.38 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.21/0.38 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.21/0.38 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.21/0.38 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.21/0.38 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.21/0.38 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.21/0.38 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.21/0.38 clear(print_given).
% 0.21/0.38
% 0.21/0.38 formula_list(usable).
% 0.21/0.38
% 0.21/0.38 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=5.
% 0.21/0.38
% 0.21/0.38 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.21/0.38 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.21/0.38 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.21/0.38 clauses in usable.
% 0.21/0.38
% 0.21/0.38 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.21/0.38 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.21/0.38 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.21/0.38 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.21/0.38 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.21/0.38 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.21/0.38 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.21/0.38 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.21/0.38 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.21/0.38 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.21/0.38 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.21/0.38 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.21/0.38 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.21/0.38 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.21/0.38 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.21/0.38
% 0.21/0.38 ------------> process usable:
% 0.21/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 72 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -eqangle(A,B,C,D,C,D,A,B)|perp(A,B,C,D)|para(A,B,C,D).
% 0.21/0.38
% 0.21/0.38 ------------> process sos:
% 0.21/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 169 during input processing: 0 [copy,169,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.21/0.38 169 back subsumes 146.
% 0.21/0.38 169 back subsumes 145.
% 0.21/0.38 169 back subsumes 144.
% 0.21/0.38 169 back subsumes 143.
% 0.21/0.38
% 0.21/0.38 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.21/0.45
% 0.21/0.45
% 0.21/0.45 Failed to model usable list: disabling FINDER
% 0.21/0.45
% 0.21/0.45
% 0.21/0.45
% 0.21/0.45 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.21/0.45
% 0.21/0.45 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.21/0.45 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.21/0.45 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.21/0.45 number of clauses in intial UL: 154
% 0.21/0.45 number of clauses initially in problem: 165
% 0.21/0.45 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 93
% 0.21/0.45 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 87
% 0.21/0.45 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.21/0.45 absolute distinct symbol count: 40
% 0.21/0.45 distinct predicate count: 12
% 0.21/0.45 distinct function count: 20
% 0.21/0.45 distinct constant count: 8
% 0.21/0.45
% 0.21/0.45 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.21/0.45
% 0.21/0.45
% 0.21/0.45
% 0.21/0.45 =========== start of search ===========
% 7.29/7.54
% 7.29/7.54
% 7.29/7.54 Changing weight limit from 60 to 57.
% 7.29/7.54
% 7.29/7.54 Resetting weight limit to 57 after 255 givens.
% 7.29/7.54
% 7.86/8.08
% 7.86/8.08
% 7.86/8.08 Changing weight limit from 57 to 56.
% 7.86/8.08
% 7.86/8.08 Resetting weight limit to 56 after 260 givens.
% 7.86/8.08
% 10.39/10.61
% 10.39/10.61
% 10.39/10.61 Changing weight limit from 56 to 55.
% 10.39/10.61
% 10.39/10.61 Resetting weight limit to 55 after 275 givens.
% 10.39/10.61
% 12.92/13.10
% 12.92/13.10
% 12.92/13.10 Changing weight limit from 55 to 54.
% 12.92/13.10
% 12.92/13.10 Modelling stopped after 300 given clauses and 0.00 seconds
% 12.92/13.10
% 12.92/13.10
% 12.92/13.10 Resetting weight limit to 54 after 300 givens.
% 12.92/13.10
% 13.78/13.99
% 13.78/13.99
% 13.78/13.99 Changing weight limit from 54 to 52.
% 13.78/13.99
% 13.78/13.99 Resetting weight limit to 52 after 310 givens.
% 13.78/13.99
% 15.00/15.25
% 15.00/15.25
% 15.00/15.25 Changing weight limit from 52 to 51.
% 15.00/15.25
% 15.00/15.25 Resetting weight limit to 51 after 325 givens.
% 15.00/15.25
% 18.92/19.10
% 18.92/19.10
% 18.92/19.10 Changing weight limit from 51 to 50.
% 18.92/19.10
% 18.92/19.10 Resetting weight limit to 50 after 385 givens.
% 18.92/19.10
% 22.38/22.63
% 22.38/22.63
% 22.38/22.63 Changing weight limit from 50 to 49.
% 22.38/22.63
% 22.38/22.63 Resetting weight limit to 49 after 450 givens.
% 22.38/22.63
% 23.68/23.92
% 23.68/23.92
% 23.68/23.92 Changing weight limit from 49 to 47.
% 23.68/23.92
% 23.68/23.92 Resetting weight limit to 47 after 475 givens.
% 23.68/23.92
% 24.00/24.20
% 24.00/24.20
% 24.00/24.20 Changing weight limit from 47 to 46.
% 24.00/24.20
% 24.00/24.20 Resetting weight limit to 46 after 480 givens.
% 24.00/24.20
% 24.60/24.82
% 24.60/24.82
% 24.60/24.82 Changing weight limit from 46 to 45.
% 24.60/24.82
% 24.60/24.82 Resetting weight limit to 45 after 490 givens.
% 24.60/24.82
% 25.36/25.61
% 25.36/25.61
% 25.36/25.61 Changing weight limit from 45 to 44.
% 25.36/25.61
% 25.36/25.61 Resetting weight limit to 44 after 505 givens.
% 25.36/25.61
% 25.68/25.86
% 25.68/25.86
% 25.68/25.86 Changing weight limit from 44 to 31.
% 25.68/25.86
% 25.68/25.86 Resetting weight limit to 31 after 510 givens.
% 25.68/25.86
% 25.94/26.12
% 25.94/26.12
% 25.94/26.12 Changing weight limit from 31 to 30.
% 25.94/26.12
% 25.94/26.12 Resetting weight limit to 30 after 515 givens.
% 25.94/26.12
% 26.49/26.71
% 26.49/26.71 -- HEY sandbox2, WE HAVE A PROOF!! --
% 26.49/26.71
% 26.49/26.71 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 26.31 sec ----> 9133 [binary,9132.1,113.1] {-} $F.
% 26.49/26.71
% 26.49/26.71 Length of proof is 25. Level of proof is 8.
% 26.49/26.71
% 26.49/26.71 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 26.49/26.71 % SZS status Theorem
% 26.49/26.71 % SZS output start Refutation
% 26.49/26.71
% 26.49/26.71 1 [] {+} -coll(A,B,C)|coll(A,C,B).
% 26.49/26.71 2 [] {+} -coll(A,B,C)|coll(B,A,C).
% 26.49/26.71 3 [] {+} -coll(A,B,C)| -coll(A,B,D)|coll(C,D,A).
% 26.49/26.71 113 [] {+} -coll($c1,$c2,$c3).
% 26.49/26.71 114 [factor,3.1.2] {+} -coll(A,B,C)|coll(C,C,A).
% 26.49/26.71 160 [] {-} coll($c5,$c8,$c7).
% 26.49/26.71 164 [] {-} coll($c3,$c7,$c6).
% 26.49/26.71 166 [] {-} coll($c2,$c8,$c4).
% 26.49/26.71 168 [] {-} coll($c1,$c8,$c6).
% 26.49/26.71 189 [hyper,160,2] {-} coll($c8,$c5,$c7).
% 26.49/26.71 203 [hyper,164,114] {-} coll($c6,$c6,$c3).
% 26.49/26.71 204 [hyper,164,2] {-} coll($c7,$c3,$c6).
% 26.49/26.71 205 [hyper,164,1] {-} coll($c3,$c6,$c7).
% 26.49/26.71 220 [hyper,166,1] {-} coll($c2,$c4,$c8).
% 26.49/26.71 251 [hyper,168,114] {-} coll($c6,$c6,$c1).
% 26.49/26.71 280 [hyper,189,114] {-} coll($c7,$c7,$c8).
% 26.49/26.71 348 [hyper,204,114] {-} coll($c6,$c6,$c7).
% 26.49/26.71 362 [hyper,205,114] {-} coll($c7,$c7,$c3).
% 26.49/26.71 423 [hyper,220,114] {-} coll($c8,$c8,$c2).
% 26.49/26.71 439 [hyper,251,3,203] {-} coll($c1,$c3,$c6).
% 26.49/26.71 526 [hyper,280,114] {-} coll($c8,$c8,$c7).
% 26.49/26.71 646 [hyper,348,3,251] {-} coll($c1,$c7,$c6).
% 26.49/26.71 675 [hyper,362,3,280] {-} coll($c8,$c3,$c7).
% 26.49/26.71 1032 [hyper,439,1] {-} coll($c1,$c6,$c3).
% 26.49/26.71 1364 [hyper,526,3,423] {-} coll($c7,$c2,$c8).
% 26.49/26.71 1739 [hyper,646,1] {-} coll($c1,$c6,$c7).
% 26.49/26.71 1881 [hyper,675,1] {-} coll($c8,$c7,$c3).
% 26.49/26.71 3010 [hyper,1364,1] {-} coll($c7,$c8,$c2).
% 26.49/26.71 3349 [hyper,1739,3,1032] {-} coll($c3,$c7,$c1).
% 26.49/26.71 3439 [hyper,1881,2] {-} coll($c7,$c8,$c3).
% 26.49/26.71 5400 [hyper,3439,3,3010] {-} coll($c3,$c2,$c7).
% 26.49/26.71 7493 [hyper,5400,1] {-} coll($c3,$c7,$c2).
% 26.49/26.71 9132 [hyper,7493,3,3349] {-} coll($c1,$c2,$c3).
% 26.49/26.71 9133 [binary,9132.1,113.1] {-} $F.
% 26.49/26.71
% 26.49/26.71 % SZS output end Refutation
% 26.49/26.71 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 26.49/26.71
% 26.49/26.71
% 26.49/26.71 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 26.49/26.71
% 26.49/26.71
% 26.49/26.71 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 26.49/26.71
% 26.49/26.71 ============ end of search ============
% 26.49/26.71
% 26.49/26.71 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 26.49/26.71
% 26.49/26.71 Process 30950 finished Sat Jun 18 03:39:55 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------