TSTP Solution File: GEO566+1 by Princess---230619
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Princess---230619
% Problem : GEO566+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 30 23:23:43 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 169.49s 23.25s
% Output : Proof 169.49s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : GEO566+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.5.0.
% 0.00/0.13 % Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 21:32:41 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.60 ________ _____
% 0.20/0.60 ___ __ \_________(_)________________________________
% 0.20/0.60 __ /_/ /_ ___/_ /__ __ \ ___/ _ \_ ___/_ ___/
% 0.20/0.60 _ ____/_ / _ / _ / / / /__ / __/(__ )_(__ )
% 0.20/0.60 /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/
% 0.20/0.60
% 0.20/0.60 A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic
% 0.20/0.60 (2023-06-19)
% 0.20/0.60
% 0.20/0.60 (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023
% 0.20/0.60 Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen,
% 0.20/0.60 Amanda Stjerna.
% 0.20/0.60 Free software under BSD-3-Clause.
% 0.20/0.60
% 0.20/0.60 For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml
% 0.20/0.60
% 0.20/0.60 Loading /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.20/0.62 Running up to 7 provers in parallel.
% 0.20/0.63 Prover 1: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423
% 0.20/0.63 Prover 2: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994
% 0.20/0.63 Prover 0: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893
% 0.20/0.63 Prover 3: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996
% 0.20/0.63 Prover 4: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696
% 0.20/0.63 Prover 5: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288
% 0.20/0.63 Prover 6: Options: -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365
% 4.00/1.45 Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 4.00/1.45 Prover 4: Preprocessing ...
% 4.00/1.50 Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 4.00/1.50 Prover 3: Preprocessing ...
% 4.00/1.50 Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 4.00/1.50 Prover 5: Preprocessing ...
% 4.00/1.50 Prover 6: Preprocessing ...
% 9.33/2.04 Prover 5: Proving ...
% 9.33/2.04 Prover 2: Proving ...
% 10.33/2.25 Prover 3: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 10.33/2.27 Prover 1: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 10.33/2.30 Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ...
% 10.33/2.34 Prover 6: Proving ...
% 11.62/2.36 Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 13.58/2.64 Prover 0: Proving ...
% 13.58/2.66 Prover 4: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 14.10/2.70 Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ...
% 72.56/10.39 Prover 2: stopped
% 72.56/10.39 Prover 7: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470
% 74.08/10.59 Prover 7: Preprocessing ...
% 74.88/10.68 Prover 7: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 74.88/10.70 Prover 7: Constructing countermodel ...
% 99.41/13.96 Prover 5: stopped
% 100.18/13.97 Prover 8: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-200781089
% 101.76/14.21 Prover 8: Preprocessing ...
% 102.78/14.47 Prover 8: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 102.78/14.48 Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ...
% 115.18/15.97 Prover 1: stopped
% 115.18/15.97 Prover 9: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1423531889
% 116.25/16.12 Prover 9: Preprocessing ...
% 117.51/16.42 Prover 9: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 117.51/16.43 Prover 9: Constructing countermodel ...
% 129.71/17.93 Prover 6: stopped
% 129.71/17.93 Prover 10: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=919308125
% 130.55/18.00 Prover 10: Preprocessing ...
% 130.55/18.04 Prover 10: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 131.00/18.06 Prover 10: Constructing countermodel ...
% 169.08/23.23 Prover 10: Found proof (size 25)
% 169.43/23.23 Prover 10: proved (5297ms)
% 169.43/23.23 Prover 0: stopped
% 169.43/23.23 Prover 7: stopped
% 169.43/23.23 Prover 8: stopped
% 169.43/23.24 Prover 3: stopped
% 169.43/23.24 Prover 4: stopped
% 169.49/23.25 Prover 9: stopped
% 169.49/23.25
% 169.49/23.25 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 169.49/23.25
% 169.49/23.26 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 169.49/23.26 Assumptions after simplification:
% 169.49/23.26 ---------------------------------
% 169.49/23.26
% 169.49/23.26 (exemplo6GDDFULL214028)
% 169.49/23.27 ? [v0: $i] : ? [v1: $i] : ? [v2: $i] : ? [v3: $i] : ? [v4: $i] : ? [v5:
% 169.49/23.27 $i] : ? [v6: $i] : ? [v7: $i] : ($i(v7) & $i(v6) & $i(v5) & $i(v4) &
% 169.49/23.27 $i(v3) & $i(v2) & $i(v1) & $i(v0) & perp(v7, v3, v0, v2) & perp(v6, v3, v0,
% 169.49/23.27 v4) & perp(v5, v3, v1, v2) & perp(v3, v2, v0, v1) & perp(v1, v2, v0, v4) &
% 169.49/23.27 perp(v0, v2, v1, v4) & coll(v7, v0, v2) & coll(v6, v0, v4) & coll(v5, v1,
% 169.49/23.27 v2) & coll(v3, v0, v1) & ~ coll(v7, v6, v5))
% 169.49/23.27
% 169.49/23.27 (ruleD1)
% 169.49/23.27 ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ $i(v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) |
% 169.49/23.27 ~ coll(v0, v1, v2) | coll(v0, v2, v1))
% 169.49/23.27
% 169.49/23.27 (ruleD3)
% 169.49/23.27 ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: $i] : ( ~ $i(v3) | ~ $i(v2)
% 169.49/23.27 | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ~ coll(v0, v1, v3) | ~ coll(v0, v1, v2) |
% 169.49/23.27 coll(v2, v3, v0))
% 169.49/23.27
% 169.49/23.27 (ruleD66)
% 169.49/23.27 ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ $i(v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) |
% 169.49/23.27 ~ para(v0, v1, v0, v2) | coll(v0, v1, v2))
% 169.49/23.27
% 169.49/23.27 (ruleD8)
% 169.49/23.27 ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: $i] : ( ~ $i(v3) | ~ $i(v2)
% 169.49/23.27 | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ~ perp(v0, v1, v2, v3) | perp(v2, v3, v0, v1))
% 169.49/23.27
% 169.49/23.27 (ruleD9)
% 169.49/23.28 ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: $i] : ! [v4: $i] : ! [v5:
% 169.49/23.28 $i] : ( ~ $i(v5) | ~ $i(v4) | ~ $i(v3) | ~ $i(v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0)
% 169.49/23.28 | ~ perp(v2, v3, v4, v5) | ~ perp(v0, v1, v2, v3) | para(v0, v1, v4, v5))
% 169.49/23.28
% 169.49/23.28 Further assumptions not needed in the proof:
% 169.49/23.28 --------------------------------------------
% 169.49/23.28 ruleD10, ruleD11, ruleD12, ruleD13, ruleD14, ruleD15, ruleD16, ruleD17, ruleD18,
% 169.49/23.28 ruleD19, ruleD2, ruleD20, ruleD21, ruleD22, ruleD23, ruleD24, ruleD25, ruleD26,
% 169.49/23.28 ruleD27, ruleD28, ruleD29, ruleD30, ruleD31, ruleD32, ruleD33, ruleD34, ruleD35,
% 169.49/23.28 ruleD36, ruleD37, ruleD38, ruleD39, ruleD4, ruleD40, ruleD41, ruleD42a,
% 169.49/23.28 ruleD42b, ruleD43, ruleD44, ruleD45, ruleD46, ruleD47, ruleD48, ruleD49, ruleD5,
% 169.49/23.28 ruleD50, ruleD51, ruleD52, ruleD53, ruleD54, ruleD55, ruleD56, ruleD57, ruleD58,
% 169.49/23.28 ruleD59, ruleD6, ruleD60, ruleD61, ruleD62, ruleD63, ruleD64, ruleD65, ruleD67,
% 169.49/23.28 ruleD68, ruleD69, ruleD7, ruleD70, ruleD71, ruleD72, ruleD73, ruleD74, ruleD75,
% 169.49/23.28 ruleX1, ruleX10, ruleX11, ruleX12, ruleX13, ruleX14, ruleX15, ruleX16, ruleX17,
% 169.49/23.28 ruleX18, ruleX2, ruleX3, ruleX4, ruleX5, ruleX6, ruleX7, ruleX8, ruleX9
% 169.49/23.28
% 169.49/23.28 Those formulas are unsatisfiable:
% 169.49/23.28 ---------------------------------
% 169.49/23.28
% 169.49/23.28 Begin of proof
% 169.49/23.28 |
% 169.49/23.28 | DELTA: instantiating (exemplo6GDDFULL214028) with fresh symbols all_97_0,
% 169.49/23.28 | all_97_1, all_97_2, all_97_3, all_97_4, all_97_5, all_97_6, all_97_7
% 169.49/23.28 | gives:
% 169.49/23.28 | (1) $i(all_97_0) & $i(all_97_1) & $i(all_97_2) & $i(all_97_3) &
% 169.49/23.28 | $i(all_97_4) & $i(all_97_5) & $i(all_97_6) & $i(all_97_7) &
% 169.49/23.28 | perp(all_97_0, all_97_4, all_97_7, all_97_5) & perp(all_97_1, all_97_4,
% 169.49/23.28 | all_97_7, all_97_3) & perp(all_97_2, all_97_4, all_97_6, all_97_5) &
% 169.49/23.28 | perp(all_97_4, all_97_5, all_97_7, all_97_6) & perp(all_97_6, all_97_5,
% 169.49/23.28 | all_97_7, all_97_3) & perp(all_97_7, all_97_5, all_97_6, all_97_3) &
% 169.49/23.28 | coll(all_97_0, all_97_7, all_97_5) & coll(all_97_1, all_97_7, all_97_3)
% 169.49/23.28 | & coll(all_97_2, all_97_6, all_97_5) & coll(all_97_4, all_97_7,
% 169.49/23.28 | all_97_6) & ~ coll(all_97_0, all_97_1, all_97_2)
% 169.49/23.28 |
% 169.49/23.28 | ALPHA: (1) implies:
% 169.49/23.28 | (2) ~ coll(all_97_0, all_97_1, all_97_2)
% 169.49/23.28 | (3) coll(all_97_2, all_97_6, all_97_5)
% 169.49/23.28 | (4) coll(all_97_0, all_97_7, all_97_5)
% 169.49/23.28 | (5) perp(all_97_2, all_97_4, all_97_6, all_97_5)
% 169.49/23.28 | (6) perp(all_97_1, all_97_4, all_97_7, all_97_3)
% 169.49/23.28 | (7) perp(all_97_0, all_97_4, all_97_7, all_97_5)
% 169.49/23.28 | (8) $i(all_97_7)
% 169.49/23.28 | (9) $i(all_97_6)
% 169.49/23.28 | (10) $i(all_97_5)
% 169.49/23.28 | (11) $i(all_97_4)
% 169.49/23.28 | (12) $i(all_97_3)
% 169.49/23.28 | (13) $i(all_97_2)
% 169.49/23.28 | (14) $i(all_97_1)
% 169.49/23.28 | (15) $i(all_97_0)
% 169.49/23.28 |
% 169.49/23.29 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (ruleD3) with all_97_2, all_97_6, all_97_5,
% 169.49/23.29 | all_97_5, simplifying with (3), (9), (10), (13) gives:
% 169.49/23.29 | (16) coll(all_97_5, all_97_5, all_97_2)
% 169.49/23.29 |
% 169.49/23.29 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (ruleD3) with all_97_0, all_97_7, all_97_5,
% 169.49/23.29 | all_97_5, simplifying with (4), (8), (10), (15) gives:
% 169.49/23.29 | (17) coll(all_97_5, all_97_5, all_97_0)
% 169.49/23.29 |
% 169.49/23.29 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (ruleD8) with all_97_2, all_97_4, all_97_6,
% 169.49/23.29 | all_97_5, simplifying with (5), (9), (10), (11), (13) gives:
% 169.49/23.29 | (18) perp(all_97_6, all_97_5, all_97_2, all_97_4)
% 169.49/23.29 |
% 169.49/23.29 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (ruleD8) with all_97_1, all_97_4, all_97_7,
% 169.49/23.29 | all_97_3, simplifying with (6), (8), (11), (12), (14) gives:
% 169.49/23.29 | (19) perp(all_97_7, all_97_3, all_97_1, all_97_4)
% 169.49/23.29 |
% 169.49/23.29 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (ruleD8) with all_97_0, all_97_4, all_97_7,
% 169.49/23.29 | all_97_5, simplifying with (7), (8), (10), (11), (15) gives:
% 169.49/23.29 | (20) perp(all_97_7, all_97_5, all_97_0, all_97_4)
% 169.49/23.29 |
% 169.49/23.29 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (ruleD3) with all_97_5, all_97_5, all_97_2,
% 169.49/23.29 | all_97_0, simplifying with (10), (13), (15), (16), (17) gives:
% 169.49/23.29 | (21) coll(all_97_2, all_97_0, all_97_5)
% 169.49/23.29 |
% 169.49/23.29 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (ruleD9) with all_97_0, all_97_4, all_97_7,
% 169.49/23.29 | all_97_5, all_97_0, all_97_4, simplifying with (7), (8), (10),
% 169.49/23.29 | (11), (15), (20) gives:
% 169.49/23.29 | (22) para(all_97_0, all_97_4, all_97_0, all_97_4)
% 169.49/23.29 |
% 169.49/23.29 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (ruleD9) with all_97_1, all_97_4, all_97_7,
% 169.49/23.29 | all_97_3, all_97_1, all_97_4, simplifying with (6), (8), (11),
% 169.49/23.29 | (12), (14), (19) gives:
% 169.49/23.29 | (23) para(all_97_1, all_97_4, all_97_1, all_97_4)
% 169.49/23.29 |
% 169.49/23.29 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (ruleD9) with all_97_2, all_97_4, all_97_6,
% 169.49/23.29 | all_97_5, all_97_2, all_97_4, simplifying with (5), (9), (10),
% 169.49/23.29 | (11), (13), (18) gives:
% 169.49/23.29 | (24) para(all_97_2, all_97_4, all_97_2, all_97_4)
% 169.49/23.29 |
% 169.49/23.29 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (ruleD1) with all_97_2, all_97_0, all_97_5,
% 169.49/23.29 | simplifying with (10), (13), (15), (21) gives:
% 169.49/23.29 | (25) coll(all_97_2, all_97_5, all_97_0)
% 169.49/23.29 |
% 169.49/23.29 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (ruleD66) with all_97_2, all_97_4, all_97_4,
% 169.49/23.29 | simplifying with (11), (13), (24) gives:
% 169.49/23.29 | (26) coll(all_97_2, all_97_4, all_97_4)
% 169.49/23.29 |
% 169.49/23.29 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (ruleD66) with all_97_1, all_97_4, all_97_4,
% 169.49/23.29 | simplifying with (11), (14), (23) gives:
% 169.49/23.29 | (27) coll(all_97_1, all_97_4, all_97_4)
% 169.49/23.29 |
% 169.49/23.29 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (ruleD66) with all_97_0, all_97_4, all_97_4,
% 169.49/23.29 | simplifying with (11), (15), (22) gives:
% 169.49/23.29 | (28) coll(all_97_0, all_97_4, all_97_4)
% 169.49/23.29 |
% 169.49/23.29 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (ruleD3) with all_97_2, all_97_5, all_97_0,
% 169.49/23.30 | all_97_0, simplifying with (10), (13), (15), (25) gives:
% 169.49/23.30 | (29) coll(all_97_0, all_97_0, all_97_2)
% 169.49/23.30 |
% 169.49/23.30 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (ruleD3) with all_97_2, all_97_4, all_97_4,
% 169.49/23.30 | all_97_4, simplifying with (11), (13), (26) gives:
% 169.49/23.30 | (30) coll(all_97_4, all_97_4, all_97_2)
% 169.49/23.30 |
% 169.49/23.30 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (ruleD3) with all_97_1, all_97_4, all_97_4,
% 169.49/23.30 | all_97_4, simplifying with (11), (14), (27) gives:
% 169.49/23.30 | (31) coll(all_97_4, all_97_4, all_97_1)
% 169.49/23.30 |
% 169.49/23.30 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (ruleD3) with all_97_0, all_97_4, all_97_4,
% 169.49/23.30 | all_97_4, simplifying with (11), (15), (28) gives:
% 169.49/23.30 | (32) coll(all_97_4, all_97_4, all_97_0)
% 169.49/23.30 |
% 169.49/23.30 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (ruleD3) with all_97_4, all_97_4, all_97_2,
% 169.49/23.30 | all_97_1, simplifying with (11), (13), (14), (30), (31) gives:
% 169.49/23.30 | (33) coll(all_97_2, all_97_1, all_97_4)
% 169.49/23.30 |
% 169.49/23.30 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (ruleD3) with all_97_4, all_97_4, all_97_0,
% 169.49/23.30 | all_97_0, simplifying with (11), (15), (32) gives:
% 169.49/23.30 | (34) coll(all_97_0, all_97_0, all_97_4)
% 169.49/23.30 |
% 169.49/23.30 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (ruleD1) with all_97_2, all_97_1, all_97_4,
% 169.49/23.30 | simplifying with (11), (13), (14), (33) gives:
% 169.49/23.30 | (35) coll(all_97_2, all_97_4, all_97_1)
% 169.49/23.30 |
% 169.49/23.30 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (ruleD3) with all_97_0, all_97_0, all_97_2,
% 169.49/23.30 | all_97_4, simplifying with (11), (13), (15), (29), (34) gives:
% 169.49/23.30 | (36) coll(all_97_2, all_97_4, all_97_0)
% 169.49/23.30 |
% 169.49/23.30 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (ruleD3) with all_97_2, all_97_4, all_97_0,
% 169.49/23.30 | all_97_1, simplifying with (2), (11), (13), (14), (15), (35),
% 169.49/23.30 | (36) gives:
% 169.49/23.30 | (37) $false
% 169.49/23.30 |
% 169.49/23.30 | CLOSE: (37) is inconsistent.
% 169.49/23.30 |
% 169.49/23.30 End of proof
% 169.49/23.30 % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 169.49/23.30
% 169.49/23.30 22698ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------