TSTP Solution File: GEO524+1 by SInE---0.4

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SInE---0.4
% Problem  : GEO524+1 : TPTP v7.0.0. Released v7.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : Source/sine.py -e eprover -t %d %s

% Computer : n112.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 2.40GHz
% Memory   : 32218.75MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-327.36.3.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Jan 20 10:18:36 EST 2017

% Result   : Theorem 0.07s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.07s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   17 (   7 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   32 (  11 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   26 (  11   ~;   9   |;   6   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   4 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   25 (   0 sgn  14   !;   8   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(70,axiom,
    ! [X10,X13,X11] :
      ( equal(X10,X13)
      | equal(reflect(X10,X13,reflect(X10,X13,X11)),X11) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp2xzijt/sel_theBenchmark.p_1',aSatz10_5) ).

fof(194,conjecture,
    ! [X10,X13,X11,X14] :
      ( equal(X10,X13)
      | ~ equal(reflect(X10,X13,X11),reflect(X10,X13,X14))
      | equal(X11,X14) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp2xzijt/sel_theBenchmark.p_1',aSatz10_7) ).

fof(205,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X10,X13,X11,X14] :
        ( equal(X10,X13)
        | ~ equal(reflect(X10,X13,X11),reflect(X10,X13,X14))
        | equal(X11,X14) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[194]) ).

fof(555,plain,
    ! [X14,X15,X16] :
      ( equal(X14,X15)
      | equal(reflect(X14,X15,reflect(X14,X15,X16)),X16) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[70]) ).

cnf(556,plain,
    ( reflect(X1,X2,reflect(X1,X2,X3)) = X3
    | X1 = X2 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[555]) ).

fof(839,negated_conjecture,
    ? [X10,X13,X11,X14] :
      ( ~ equal(X10,X13)
      & equal(reflect(X10,X13,X11),reflect(X10,X13,X14))
      & ~ equal(X11,X14) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[205]) ).

fof(840,negated_conjecture,
    ? [X15,X16,X17,X18] :
      ( ~ equal(X15,X16)
      & equal(reflect(X15,X16,X17),reflect(X15,X16,X18))
      & ~ equal(X17,X18) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[839]) ).

fof(841,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ equal(esk1_0,esk2_0)
    & equal(reflect(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0),reflect(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk4_0))
    & ~ equal(esk3_0,esk4_0) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[840]) ).

cnf(842,negated_conjecture,
    esk3_0 != esk4_0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[841]) ).

cnf(843,negated_conjecture,
    reflect(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0) = reflect(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk4_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[841]) ).

cnf(844,negated_conjecture,
    esk1_0 != esk2_0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[841]) ).

cnf(884,negated_conjecture,
    ( reflect(esk1_0,esk2_0,reflect(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk4_0)) = esk3_0
    | esk1_0 = esk2_0 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[556,843,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(885,negated_conjecture,
    reflect(esk1_0,esk2_0,reflect(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk4_0)) = esk3_0,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[884,844,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(2114,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk3_0 = esk4_0
    | esk1_0 = esk2_0 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[556,885,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(2119,negated_conjecture,
    esk2_0 = esk1_0,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[2114,842,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(2120,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[2119,844,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(2121,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    2120,
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : GEO524+1 : TPTP v7.0.0. Released v7.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : Source/sine.py -e eprover -t %d %s
% 0.03/0.23  % Computer : n112.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% 0.03/0.23  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.03/0.23  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 @ 2.40GHz
% 0.03/0.23  % Memory   : 32218.75MB
% 0.03/0.23  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-327.36.3.el7.x86_64
% 0.03/0.23  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.03/0.23  % DateTime : Fri Jan 20 05:40:47 CST 2017
% 0.03/0.23  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.07/0.29  % SZS status Started for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.07/0.29  --creating new selector for [GEO011+0.ax]
% 0.07/0.43  -running prover on /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp2xzijt/sel_theBenchmark.p_1 with time limit 29
% 0.07/0.43  -running prover with command ['/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/Source/./Source/PROVER/eproof.working', '-s', '-tLPO4', '-xAuto', '-tAuto', '--memory-limit=768', '--tptp3-format', '--cpu-limit=29', '/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp2xzijt/sel_theBenchmark.p_1']
% 0.07/0.43  -prover status Theorem
% 0.07/0.43  Problem theBenchmark.p solved in phase 0.
% 0.07/0.43  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.07/0.43  % SZS status Ended for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.07/0.44  Solved 1 out of 1.
% 0.07/0.44  # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% 0.07/0.44  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.07/0.44  # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% See solution above
% 0.07/0.44  # SZS output end CNFRefutation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------