TSTP Solution File: GEO511+1 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : GEO511+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 03:46:03 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 8.72s 2.62s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 8.72s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :   14
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   43 (  24 unt;   0 nHn;  35 RR)
%            Number of literals    :  109 (  17 equ;  71 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    8 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    7 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   6 con; 0-5 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   91 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_113,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ s_m(X3,X2,X4)
    | ~ s_m(X3,X1,X4) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-o0251n_a/lgb.p',i_0_113) ).

cnf(i_0_125,plain,
    s_m(X1,X2,s(X2,X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-o0251n_a/lgb.p',i_0_125) ).

cnf(i_0_128,plain,
    s(X1,s(X1,X2)) = X2,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-o0251n_a/lgb.p',i_0_128) ).

cnf(i_0_127,plain,
    ( X1 = s(X2,X3)
    | ~ s_m(X3,X2,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-o0251n_a/lgb.p',i_0_127) ).

cnf(i_0_162,plain,
    s_m(X1,midpoint(X1,X2),X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-o0251n_a/lgb.p',i_0_162) ).

cnf(i_0_164,plain,
    ( s_m(X1,X2,X3)
    | X2 != ip(X4,X5,X6,X3,X7)
    | ~ s_t(X3,X7,X6)
    | ~ s_t(X4,X5,X6)
    | ~ s_col(X1,X3,X5)
    | ~ s_e(X1,X4,X3,X7)
    | ~ perp(X6,X3,X1,X3)
    | ~ perp(X4,X1,X1,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-o0251n_a/lgb.p',i_0_164) ).

cnf(i_0_165,plain,
    ( s_m(X1,X2,X3)
    | X2 != ip(X1,X4,X5,X6,X3)
    | ~ s_t(X6,X3,X5)
    | ~ s_t(X1,X4,X5)
    | ~ s_col(X7,X6,X4)
    | ~ s_e(X7,X1,X6,X3)
    | ~ perp(X5,X6,X7,X6)
    | ~ perp(X1,X7,X7,X6) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-o0251n_a/lgb.p',i_0_165) ).

cnf(i_0_167,negated_conjecture,
    s_e(esk2_0,esk1_0,esk3_0,esk6_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-o0251n_a/lgb.p',i_0_167) ).

cnf(i_0_172,negated_conjecture,
    perp(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk2_0,esk3_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-o0251n_a/lgb.p',i_0_172) ).

cnf(i_0_166,negated_conjecture,
    ~ s_m(esk1_0,midpoint(esk2_0,esk3_0),esk6_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-o0251n_a/lgb.p',i_0_166) ).

cnf(i_0_171,negated_conjecture,
    perp(esk4_0,esk3_0,esk2_0,esk3_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-o0251n_a/lgb.p',i_0_171) ).

cnf(i_0_168,negated_conjecture,
    s_t(esk3_0,esk6_0,esk4_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-o0251n_a/lgb.p',i_0_168) ).

cnf(i_0_169,negated_conjecture,
    s_t(esk1_0,esk5_0,esk4_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-o0251n_a/lgb.p',i_0_169) ).

cnf(i_0_170,negated_conjecture,
    s_col(esk2_0,esk3_0,esk5_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-o0251n_a/lgb.p',i_0_170) ).

cnf(c_0_187,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ s_m(X3,X2,X4)
    | ~ s_m(X3,X1,X4) ),
    i_0_113 ).

cnf(c_0_188,plain,
    s_m(X1,X2,s(X2,X1)),
    i_0_125 ).

cnf(c_0_189,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ s_m(X3,X1,s(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_187,c_0_188]) ).

cnf(c_0_190,plain,
    s(X1,s(X1,X2)) = X2,
    i_0_128 ).

cnf(c_0_191,plain,
    ( X1 = s(X2,X3)
    | ~ s_m(X3,X2,X1) ),
    i_0_127 ).

cnf(c_0_192,plain,
    s_m(X1,midpoint(X1,X2),X2),
    i_0_162 ).

cnf(c_0_193,plain,
    ( s_m(X1,X2,X3)
    | X2 != ip(X4,X5,X6,X3,X7)
    | ~ s_t(X3,X7,X6)
    | ~ s_t(X4,X5,X6)
    | ~ s_col(X1,X3,X5)
    | ~ s_e(X1,X4,X3,X7)
    | ~ perp(X6,X3,X1,X3)
    | ~ perp(X4,X1,X1,X3) ),
    i_0_164 ).

cnf(c_0_194,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ s_m(s(X2,X3),X1,X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_189,c_0_190]) ).

cnf(c_0_195,plain,
    s(midpoint(X1,X2),X1) = X2,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_191,c_0_192]) ).

cnf(c_0_196,plain,
    ( s_m(X1,X2,X3)
    | X2 != ip(X1,X4,X5,X6,X3)
    | ~ s_t(X6,X3,X5)
    | ~ s_t(X1,X4,X5)
    | ~ s_col(X7,X6,X4)
    | ~ s_e(X7,X1,X6,X3)
    | ~ perp(X5,X6,X7,X6)
    | ~ perp(X1,X7,X7,X6) ),
    i_0_165 ).

cnf(c_0_197,plain,
    ( s_m(X1,ip(X2,X3,X4,X5,X6),X5)
    | ~ s_e(X1,X2,X5,X6)
    | ~ s_t(X2,X3,X4)
    | ~ s_t(X5,X6,X4)
    | ~ s_col(X1,X5,X3)
    | ~ perp(X4,X5,X1,X5)
    | ~ perp(X2,X1,X1,X5) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_193]) ).

cnf(c_0_198,negated_conjecture,
    s_e(esk2_0,esk1_0,esk3_0,esk6_0),
    i_0_167 ).

cnf(c_0_199,negated_conjecture,
    perp(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk2_0,esk3_0),
    i_0_172 ).

cnf(c_0_200,plain,
    ( X1 = midpoint(X2,X3)
    | ~ s_m(X3,X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_194,c_0_195]) ).

cnf(c_0_201,plain,
    ( s_m(X1,ip(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5),X5)
    | ~ s_e(X6,X1,X4,X5)
    | ~ s_t(X4,X5,X3)
    | ~ s_t(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ s_col(X6,X4,X2)
    | ~ perp(X3,X4,X6,X4)
    | ~ perp(X1,X6,X6,X4) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_196]) ).

cnf(c_0_202,plain,
    ( X1 = midpoint(X2,X3)
    | ~ s_m(X2,X1,X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_187,c_0_192]) ).

cnf(c_0_203,negated_conjecture,
    ( s_m(esk2_0,ip(esk1_0,X1,X2,esk3_0,esk6_0),esk3_0)
    | ~ s_t(esk3_0,esk6_0,X2)
    | ~ s_t(esk1_0,X1,X2)
    | ~ s_col(esk2_0,esk3_0,X1)
    | ~ perp(X2,esk3_0,esk2_0,esk3_0) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_197,c_0_198]),c_0_199])]) ).

cnf(c_0_204,plain,
    midpoint(X1,X2) = midpoint(X2,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_200,c_0_192]) ).

cnf(c_0_205,negated_conjecture,
    ~ s_m(esk1_0,midpoint(esk2_0,esk3_0),esk6_0),
    i_0_166 ).

cnf(c_0_206,negated_conjecture,
    ( s_m(esk1_0,ip(esk1_0,X1,X2,esk3_0,esk6_0),esk6_0)
    | ~ s_t(esk3_0,esk6_0,X2)
    | ~ s_t(esk1_0,X1,X2)
    | ~ s_col(esk2_0,esk3_0,X1)
    | ~ perp(X2,esk3_0,esk2_0,esk3_0) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_201,c_0_198]),c_0_199])]) ).

cnf(c_0_207,plain,
    ( ip(esk1_0,X1,X2,esk3_0,esk6_0) = midpoint(esk3_0,esk2_0)
    | ~ s_t(esk3_0,esk6_0,X2)
    | ~ s_t(esk1_0,X1,X2)
    | ~ s_col(esk2_0,esk3_0,X1)
    | ~ perp(X2,esk3_0,esk2_0,esk3_0) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_202,c_0_203]),c_0_204]) ).

cnf(c_0_208,negated_conjecture,
    ~ s_m(esk1_0,midpoint(esk3_0,esk2_0),esk6_0),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_205,c_0_204]) ).

cnf(c_0_209,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ s_t(esk3_0,esk6_0,X1)
    | ~ s_t(esk1_0,X2,X1)
    | ~ s_col(esk2_0,esk3_0,X2)
    | ~ perp(X1,esk3_0,esk2_0,esk3_0) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_206,c_0_207]),c_0_208]) ).

cnf(c_0_210,negated_conjecture,
    perp(esk4_0,esk3_0,esk2_0,esk3_0),
    i_0_171 ).

cnf(c_0_211,negated_conjecture,
    s_t(esk3_0,esk6_0,esk4_0),
    i_0_168 ).

cnf(c_0_212,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ s_t(esk1_0,X1,esk4_0)
    | ~ s_col(esk2_0,esk3_0,X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_209,c_0_210]),c_0_211])]) ).

cnf(c_0_213,negated_conjecture,
    s_t(esk1_0,esk5_0,esk4_0),
    i_0_169 ).

cnf(c_0_214,negated_conjecture,
    s_col(esk2_0,esk3_0,esk5_0),
    i_0_170 ).

cnf(c_0_215,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_212,c_0_213]),c_0_214])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.13  % Problem  : GEO511+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.0.0.
% 0.04/0.14  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 14:44:24 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.46  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.20/0.48  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.48  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 0.20/0.48  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 0.20/0.48  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 8.72/2.62  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 8.72/2.62  # No SInE strategy applied
% 8.72/2.62  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 8.72/2.62  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 8.72/2.62  # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 8.72/2.62  #
% 8.72/2.62  # Preprocessing time       : 0.024 s
% 8.72/2.62  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 8.72/2.62  
% 8.72/2.62  # Proof found!
% 8.72/2.62  # SZS status Theorem
% 8.72/2.62  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 8.72/2.62  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 8.72/2.62  
% 8.72/2.62  # -------------------------------------------------
% 8.72/2.62  # User time                : 0.204 s
% 8.72/2.62  # System time              : 0.010 s
% 8.72/2.62  # Total time               : 0.215 s
% 8.72/2.62  # Maximum resident set size: 7128 pages
% 8.72/2.62  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------