TSTP Solution File: GEO502+1 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : GEO502+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 03:46:01 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 7.99s 2.44s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.99s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 22 ( 16 unt; 0 nHn; 22 RR)
% Number of literals : 45 ( 0 equ; 26 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-7 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 7 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 37 ( 12 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_164,plain,
( s_kf(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5,X6,X7)
| ~ s_t(X3,X4,X5)
| ~ s_t(X1,X4,X7)
| ~ s_m(X7,X6,X5)
| ~ s_m(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ s_e(X4,X7,X4,X5)
| ~ s_e(X4,X1,X4,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-a4_9moyv/lgb.p',i_0_164) ).
cnf(i_0_118,negated_conjecture,
s_m(esk3_0,esk7_0,esk5_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-a4_9moyv/lgb.p',i_0_118) ).
cnf(i_0_119,negated_conjecture,
s_m(esk1_0,esk6_0,esk4_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-a4_9moyv/lgb.p',i_0_119) ).
cnf(i_0_117,negated_conjecture,
~ s_t(esk6_0,esk2_0,esk7_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-a4_9moyv/lgb.p',i_0_117) ).
cnf(i_0_116,plain,
( s_t(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ s_kf(X4,X1,X5,X2,X6,X3,X7) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-a4_9moyv/lgb.p',i_0_116) ).
cnf(i_0_120,negated_conjecture,
s_e(esk2_0,esk3_0,esk2_0,esk5_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-a4_9moyv/lgb.p',i_0_120) ).
cnf(i_0_122,negated_conjecture,
s_t(esk4_0,esk2_0,esk5_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-a4_9moyv/lgb.p',i_0_122) ).
cnf(i_0_123,negated_conjecture,
s_t(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-a4_9moyv/lgb.p',i_0_123) ).
cnf(i_0_121,negated_conjecture,
s_e(esk2_0,esk1_0,esk2_0,esk4_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-a4_9moyv/lgb.p',i_0_121) ).
cnf(c_0_174,plain,
( s_kf(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5,X6,X7)
| ~ s_t(X3,X4,X5)
| ~ s_t(X1,X4,X7)
| ~ s_m(X7,X6,X5)
| ~ s_m(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ s_e(X4,X7,X4,X5)
| ~ s_e(X4,X1,X4,X3) ),
i_0_164 ).
cnf(c_0_175,negated_conjecture,
s_m(esk3_0,esk7_0,esk5_0),
i_0_118 ).
cnf(c_0_176,negated_conjecture,
( s_kf(X1,X2,X3,X4,esk5_0,esk7_0,esk3_0)
| ~ s_m(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ s_t(X3,X4,esk5_0)
| ~ s_t(X1,X4,esk3_0)
| ~ s_e(X4,esk3_0,X4,esk5_0)
| ~ s_e(X4,X1,X4,X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_174,c_0_175]) ).
cnf(c_0_177,negated_conjecture,
s_m(esk1_0,esk6_0,esk4_0),
i_0_119 ).
cnf(c_0_178,negated_conjecture,
~ s_t(esk6_0,esk2_0,esk7_0),
i_0_117 ).
cnf(c_0_179,plain,
( s_t(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ s_kf(X4,X1,X5,X2,X6,X3,X7) ),
i_0_116 ).
cnf(c_0_180,negated_conjecture,
( s_kf(esk1_0,esk6_0,esk4_0,X1,esk5_0,esk7_0,esk3_0)
| ~ s_t(esk4_0,X1,esk5_0)
| ~ s_t(esk1_0,X1,esk3_0)
| ~ s_e(X1,esk3_0,X1,esk5_0)
| ~ s_e(X1,esk1_0,X1,esk4_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_176,c_0_177]) ).
cnf(c_0_181,negated_conjecture,
s_e(esk2_0,esk3_0,esk2_0,esk5_0),
i_0_120 ).
cnf(c_0_182,negated_conjecture,
s_t(esk4_0,esk2_0,esk5_0),
i_0_122 ).
cnf(c_0_183,negated_conjecture,
s_t(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0),
i_0_123 ).
cnf(c_0_184,negated_conjecture,
s_e(esk2_0,esk1_0,esk2_0,esk4_0),
i_0_121 ).
cnf(c_0_185,negated_conjecture,
~ s_kf(X1,esk6_0,X2,esk2_0,X3,esk7_0,X4),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_178,c_0_179]) ).
cnf(c_0_186,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_180,c_0_181]),c_0_182]),c_0_183]),c_0_184])]),c_0_185]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11 % Problem : GEO502+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.0.0.
% 0.06/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 03:45:04 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.44 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.18/0.45 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.45 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.18/0.45 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.18/0.45 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 7.99/2.44 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 7.99/2.44 # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.99/2.44 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.99/2.44 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___107_B42_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S0YI
% 7.99/2.44 # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred.
% 7.99/2.44 #
% 7.99/2.44 # Preprocessing time : 0.023 s
% 7.99/2.44 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 7.99/2.44
% 7.99/2.44 # Proof found!
% 7.99/2.44 # SZS status Theorem
% 7.99/2.44 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.99/2.44 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.99/2.44
% 7.99/2.44 # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.99/2.44 # User time : 0.036 s
% 7.99/2.44 # System time : 0.003 s
% 7.99/2.44 # Total time : 0.039 s
% 7.99/2.44 # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 7.99/2.44
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------