TSTP Solution File: GEO264+1 by SInE---0.4
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SInE---0.4
% Problem : GEO264+1 : TPTP v6.4.0. Bugfixed v6.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : Source/sine.py -e eprover -t %d %s
% Computer : n025.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 2.40GHz
% Memory : 16091.75MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-327.10.1.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Apr 1 13:39:18 EDT 2016
% Result : Theorem 0.07s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.07s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 12 ( 4 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 30 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 28 ( 10 ~; 1 |; 13 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 4 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 9 ( 5 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 24 ( 2 sgn 14 !; 8 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(7,axiom,
! [X1,X3] :
~ ( left_apart_point(X1,X3)
| left_apart_point(X1,reverse_line(X3)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmpii51ce/sel_theBenchmark.p_1',oag10) ).
fof(9,conjecture,
! [X1,X2,X6,X7] :
( left_apart_point(X6,line_connecting(X1,X2))
=> ( ( left_apart_point(X7,reverse_line(line_connecting(X2,X6)))
& left_apart_point(X7,reverse_line(line_connecting(X6,X1))) )
=> left_apart_point(X7,line_connecting(X1,X2)) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmpii51ce/sel_theBenchmark.p_1',con) ).
fof(10,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1,X2,X6,X7] :
( left_apart_point(X6,line_connecting(X1,X2))
=> ( ( left_apart_point(X7,reverse_line(line_connecting(X2,X6)))
& left_apart_point(X7,reverse_line(line_connecting(X6,X1))) )
=> left_apart_point(X7,line_connecting(X1,X2)) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[9]) ).
fof(33,plain,
! [X1,X3] :
( ~ left_apart_point(X1,X3)
& ~ left_apart_point(X1,reverse_line(X3)) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[7]) ).
fof(34,plain,
! [X4,X5] :
( ~ left_apart_point(X4,X5)
& ~ left_apart_point(X4,reverse_line(X5)) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[33]) ).
cnf(36,plain,
~ left_apart_point(X1,X2),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[34]) ).
fof(40,negated_conjecture,
? [X1,X2,X6,X7] :
( left_apart_point(X6,line_connecting(X1,X2))
& left_apart_point(X7,reverse_line(line_connecting(X2,X6)))
& left_apart_point(X7,reverse_line(line_connecting(X6,X1)))
& ~ left_apart_point(X7,line_connecting(X1,X2)) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[10]) ).
fof(41,negated_conjecture,
? [X8,X9,X10,X11] :
( left_apart_point(X10,line_connecting(X8,X9))
& left_apart_point(X11,reverse_line(line_connecting(X9,X10)))
& left_apart_point(X11,reverse_line(line_connecting(X10,X8)))
& ~ left_apart_point(X11,line_connecting(X8,X9)) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[40]) ).
fof(42,negated_conjecture,
( left_apart_point(esk3_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0))
& left_apart_point(esk4_0,reverse_line(line_connecting(esk2_0,esk3_0)))
& left_apart_point(esk4_0,reverse_line(line_connecting(esk3_0,esk1_0)))
& ~ left_apart_point(esk4_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0)) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[41]) ).
cnf(46,negated_conjecture,
left_apart_point(esk3_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[42]) ).
cnf(47,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[46,36,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(48,negated_conjecture,
$false,
47,
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : GEO264+1 : TPTP v6.4.0. Bugfixed v6.4.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : Source/sine.py -e eprover -t %d %s
% 0.03/0.23 % Computer : n025.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% 0.03/0.23 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.03/0.23 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 @ 2.40GHz
% 0.03/0.23 % Memory : 16091.75MB
% 0.03/0.23 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-327.10.1.el7.x86_64
% 0.03/0.23 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.03/0.23 % DateTime : Fri Apr 1 11:34:22 CDT 2016
% 0.03/0.23 % CPUTime :
% 0.03/0.27 % SZS status Started for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.03/0.28 --creating new selector for [GEO007+0.ax]
% 0.07/0.33 -running prover on /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmpii51ce/sel_theBenchmark.p_1 with time limit 29
% 0.07/0.33 -running prover with command ['/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/Source/./Source/PROVER/eproof.working', '-s', '-tLPO4', '-xAuto', '-tAuto', '--memory-limit=768', '--tptp3-format', '--cpu-limit=29', '/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmpii51ce/sel_theBenchmark.p_1']
% 0.07/0.33 -prover status Theorem
% 0.07/0.33 Problem theBenchmark.p solved in phase 0.
% 0.07/0.33 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.07/0.33 % SZS status Ended for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.07/0.34 Solved 1 out of 1.
% 0.07/0.34 # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% 0.07/0.34 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.07/0.34 # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% See solution above
% 0.07/0.34 # SZS output end CNFRefutation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------