TSTP Solution File: GEO264+1 by CSE---1.6
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE---1.6
% Problem : GEO264+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v6.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 30 22:44:07 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.57s 0.68s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.57s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : GEO264+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v6.4.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 22:47:56 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.47/0.61 start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.57/0.67 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.57/0.67 % File :CSE---1.6
% 0.57/0.67 % Problem :theBenchmark
% 0.57/0.67 % Transform :cnf
% 0.57/0.67 % Format :tptp:raw
% 0.57/0.67 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.57/0.67
% 0.57/0.67 % Result :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.57/0.67 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.57/0.67 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.57/0.68 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.57/0.68 % File : GEO264+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v6.4.0.
% 0.57/0.68 % Domain : Geometry (Constructive)
% 0.57/0.68 % Problem : Traingle divides plane into seven regions
% 0.57/0.68 % Version : [vPl98] axioms : Especial.
% 0.57/0.68 % English :
% 0.57/0.68
% 0.57/0.68 % Refs : [vPl98] von Plato (1998), A Constructive Theory of Ordered Aff
% 0.57/0.68 % : [ROK06] Raths et al. (2006), The ILTP Problem Library for Intu
% 0.57/0.68 % Source : [ILTP]
% 0.57/0.68 % Names : Theorem 6.8 [vPl98]
% 0.57/0.68
% 0.57/0.68 % Status : Theorem
% 0.57/0.68 % Rating : 0.00 v6.4.0
% 0.57/0.68 % Syntax : Number of formulae : 32 ( 7 unt; 0 def)
% 0.57/0.68 % Number of atoms : 106 ( 0 equ)
% 0.57/0.68 % Maximal formula atoms : 10 ( 3 avg)
% 0.57/0.68 % Number of connectives : 90 ( 16 ~; 24 |; 26 &)
% 0.57/0.68 % ( 5 <=>; 19 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% 0.57/0.68 % Maximal formula depth : 13 ( 6 avg)
% 0.57/0.68 % Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% 0.57/0.68 % Number of predicates : 12 ( 12 usr; 0 prp; 1-4 aty)
% 0.57/0.68 % Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 0 con; 1-2 aty)
% 0.57/0.68 % Number of variables : 75 ( 75 !; 0 ?)
% 0.57/0.68 % SPC : FOF_THM_RFO_NEQ
% 0.57/0.68
% 0.57/0.68 % Comments : Definitions unfolded, hence Especial.
% 0.57/0.68 % Bugfixes : v6.4.0 - Bugfix in GEO007+1.ax
% 0.57/0.68 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.57/0.68 include('Axioms/GEO007+0.ax').
% 0.57/0.68 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.57/0.68 fof(con,conjecture,
% 0.57/0.68 ! [A,B,C,D] :
% 0.57/0.68 ( left_apart_point(C,line_connecting(A,B))
% 0.57/0.68 => ( ( left_apart_point(D,reverse_line(line_connecting(B,C)))
% 0.57/0.68 & left_apart_point(D,reverse_line(line_connecting(C,A))) )
% 0.57/0.68 => left_apart_point(D,line_connecting(A,B)) ) ) ).
% 0.57/0.68
% 0.57/0.68 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.57/0.68 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.57/0.68 % Proof found
% 0.57/0.68 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.57/0.68 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.57/0.68 %ClaNum:62(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.57/0.68 %VarNum:269(SingletonVarNum:105)
% 0.57/0.68 %MaxLitNum:10
% 0.57/0.68 %MaxfuncDepth:2
% 0.57/0.68 %SharedTerms:13
% 0.57/0.68 %goalClause: 1 2 3
% 0.57/0.68 %singleGoalClaCount:3
% 0.57/0.68 [1]P1(a1,f4(a2,a3))
% 0.57/0.68 [2]P1(a5,f7(f4(a3,a1)))
% 0.57/0.68 [3]P1(a5,f7(f4(a1,a2)))
% 0.57/0.68 [5]~P9(x51,x51)
% 0.57/0.68 [6]~P2(x61,x61)
% 0.57/0.68 [7]~P3(x71,x71)
% 0.57/0.68 [10]~P3(x101,f7(x101))
% 0.57/0.68 [4]~P1(x41,x42)
% 0.57/0.68 [8]~P10(x81,x82)
% 0.57/0.68 [13]~P4(x131,f8(x132,x131))
% 0.57/0.68 [14]~P9(f8(x141,x142),x141)
% 0.57/0.68 [15]~P9(f4(x151,x152),f7(f4(x152,x151)))
% 0.57/0.68 [16]~P11(x161)+P11(f7(x161))
% 0.57/0.68 [18]~P5(x181,x182)+P9(x181,x182)
% 0.57/0.68 [19]~P5(x191,x192)+P9(x191,f7(x192))
% 0.57/0.68 [33]~P2(x331,x332)+~P4(x332,f4(x331,x332))
% 0.57/0.68 [34]~P2(x341,x342)+~P4(x341,f4(x341,x342))
% 0.57/0.68 [41]P2(x411,x412)+~P6(x413,x411,x412)
% 0.57/0.68 [54]~P6(x541,x542,x543)+~P9(x541,f4(x542,x543))
% 0.57/0.68 [20]~P11(x201)+~P12(x202)+P11(f8(x201,x202))
% 0.57/0.68 [28]~P4(x281,x282)+P1(x281,x282)+P1(x281,f7(x282))
% 0.57/0.68 [30]~P9(x301,x302)+P5(x301,x302)+~P9(x301,f7(x302))
% 0.57/0.68 [49]~P9(x491,x492)+~P9(x491,f7(x492))+~P4(f6(x491,x492),x492)
% 0.57/0.68 [50]~P9(x501,x502)+~P9(x501,f7(x502))+~P4(f6(x501,x502),x501)
% 0.57/0.68 [24]~P9(x243,x241)+P9(x241,x242)+P9(x243,x242)
% 0.57/0.68 [26]~P2(x263,x261)+P2(x261,x262)+P2(x263,x262)
% 0.57/0.68 [27]~P3(x273,x271)+P3(x271,x272)+P3(x273,x272)
% 0.57/0.68 [46]~P8(x462,x461,x463)+P1(x461,x462)+P1(x463,x462)
% 0.57/0.68 [51]P1(x511,x512)+~P8(x512,x513,x511)+P1(x511,f7(x512))
% 0.57/0.68 [52]P1(x521,x522)+~P8(x522,x521,x523)+P1(x521,f7(x522))
% 0.57/0.68 [53]~P8(x532,x533,x531)+P1(x531,f7(x532))+P1(x533,f7(x532))
% 0.57/0.68 [57]~P6(x571,x573,x572)+~P6(x571,x574,x573)+P7(x571,x572,x573,x574)
% 0.57/0.68 [58]~P6(x581,x583,x584)+~P6(x581,x582,x583)+P7(x581,x582,x583,x584)
% 0.57/0.68 [59]~P7(x591,x592,x593,x594)+P6(x591,x592,x593)+P6(x591,x594,x593)
% 0.57/0.68 [60]P6(x601,x603,x602)+P6(x601,x602,x603)+~P7(x601,x604,x602,x603)
% 0.57/0.68 [61]P6(x611,x613,x612)+P6(x611,x612,x613)+~P7(x611,x612,x613,x614)
% 0.57/0.68 [62]~P7(x621,x624,x622,x623)+P6(x621,x622,x623)+P6(x621,x622,x624)
% 0.57/0.68 [22]~P11(x222)+~P11(x221)+P9(x221,x222)+P9(x221,f7(x222))
% 0.57/0.68 [29]~P12(x292)+~P12(x291)+~P2(x291,x292)+P11(f4(x291,x292))
% 0.57/0.68 [37]~P9(x371,x372)+P10(x371,x372)+P10(x371,f7(x372))+~P9(x371,f7(x372))
% 0.57/0.68 [35]~P9(x351,x353)+P9(x351,x352)+~P9(x351,f7(x353))+P9(x353,f7(x352))
% 0.57/0.68 [36]~P9(x363,x361)+P9(x361,x362)+~P9(x363,f7(x361))+P9(x363,f7(x362))
% 0.57/0.68 [39]~P11(x392)+~P11(x391)+~P9(x391,x392)+~P9(x391,f7(x392))+P12(f6(x391,x392))
% 0.57/0.68 [56]P6(x562,x563,x561)+~P2(x563,x561)+P1(x561,x562)+P1(x563,x562)+P1(x561,f7(x562))+P1(x563,f7(x562))+P9(x562,f4(x563,x561))
% 0.57/0.68 [55]P1(x554,x553)+~P2(x554,x551)+~P3(x553,x552)+P1(x551,x552)+P1(x551,x553)+P1(x554,x552)+P1(x551,f7(x552))+P1(x551,f7(x553))+P1(x554,f7(x552))+P1(x554,f7(x553))
% 0.57/0.68 %EqnAxiom
% 0.57/0.68
% 0.57/0.68 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.57/0.68 cnf(63,plain,
% 0.57/0.68 ($false),
% 0.57/0.68 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,4]),
% 0.57/0.68 ['proof']).
% 0.57/0.68 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.57/0.68 % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------