TSTP Solution File: GEO253+1 by SuperZenon---0.0.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SuperZenon---0.0.1
% Problem : GEO253+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v6.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_super_zenon -p0 -itptp -om -max-time %d %s
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 06:31:36 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.22s 0.44s
% Output : Proof 0.22s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.14 % Problem : GEO253+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v6.4.0.
% 0.14/0.14 % Command : run_super_zenon -p0 -itptp -om -max-time %d %s
% 0.14/0.36 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.36 % DateTime : Fri Jun 17 20:34:19 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.22/0.44 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.22/0.44 (* PROOF-FOUND *)
% 0.22/0.44 (* BEGIN-PROOF *)
% 0.22/0.44 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.22/0.44 1. (left_apart_point T_0 T_1) (-. (left_apart_point T_0 T_1)) ### Axiom
% 0.22/0.44 2. (-. ((left_apart_point T_0 T_1) \/ (left_apart_point T_0 (reverse_line T_1)))) (left_apart_point T_0 T_1) ### NotOr 1
% 0.22/0.44 3. (All L, (-. ((left_apart_point T_0 L) \/ (left_apart_point T_0 (reverse_line L))))) (left_apart_point T_0 T_1) ### All 2
% 0.22/0.44 4. (All A, (All L, (-. ((left_apart_point A L) \/ (left_apart_point A (reverse_line L)))))) (left_apart_point T_0 T_1) ### All 3
% 0.22/0.44 5. (left_apart_point T_0 (reverse_line T_1)) (-. (left_apart_point T_0 (reverse_line T_1))) ### Axiom
% 0.22/0.44 6. (-. ((left_apart_point T_0 T_1) \/ (left_apart_point T_0 (reverse_line T_1)))) (left_apart_point T_0 (reverse_line T_1)) ### NotOr 5
% 0.22/0.44 7. (All L, (-. ((left_apart_point T_0 L) \/ (left_apart_point T_0 (reverse_line L))))) (left_apart_point T_0 (reverse_line T_1)) ### All 6
% 0.22/0.44 8. (All A, (All L, (-. ((left_apart_point A L) \/ (left_apart_point A (reverse_line L)))))) (left_apart_point T_0 (reverse_line T_1)) ### All 7
% 0.22/0.44 9. (apart_point_and_line T_0 T_1) (All A, (All L, (-. ((left_apart_point A L) \/ (left_apart_point A (reverse_line L)))))) ### Extension/test/apt_def 4 8
% 0.22/0.44 10. (-. (((apart_point_and_line T_0 T_1) /\ (-. (apart_point_and_line T_2 (parallel_through_point T_1 T_0)))) => (apart_point_and_line T_2 T_1))) (All A, (All L, (-. ((left_apart_point A L) \/ (left_apart_point A (reverse_line L)))))) ### ConjTree 9
% 0.22/0.44 11. (-. (All L, (((apart_point_and_line T_0 L) /\ (-. (apart_point_and_line T_2 (parallel_through_point L T_0)))) => (apart_point_and_line T_2 L)))) (All A, (All L, (-. ((left_apart_point A L) \/ (left_apart_point A (reverse_line L)))))) ### NotAllEx 10
% 0.22/0.44 12. (-. (All B, (All L, (((apart_point_and_line T_0 L) /\ (-. (apart_point_and_line B (parallel_through_point L T_0)))) => (apart_point_and_line B L))))) (All A, (All L, (-. ((left_apart_point A L) \/ (left_apart_point A (reverse_line L)))))) ### NotAllEx 11
% 0.22/0.44 13. (-. (All A, (All B, (All L, (((apart_point_and_line A L) /\ (-. (apart_point_and_line B (parallel_through_point L A)))) => (apart_point_and_line B L)))))) (All A, (All L, (-. ((left_apart_point A L) \/ (left_apart_point A (reverse_line L)))))) ### NotAllEx 12
% 0.22/0.44 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.22/0.44 (* END-PROOF *)
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------