TSTP Solution File: GEO250+1 by Vampire-SAT---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire-SAT---4.8
% Problem : GEO250+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v6.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s
% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun May 5 05:16:24 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.15s 0.38s
% Output : Refutation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 11 ( 3 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 21 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 20 ( 10 ~; 1 |; 5 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 4 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 21 ( 15 !; 6 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f140,plain,
$false,
inference(resolution,[],[f126,f103]) ).
fof(f103,plain,
left_apart_point(sK2,parallel_through_point(sK3,sK1)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f100]) ).
fof(f100,plain,
( ~ left_apart_point(sK1,reverse_line(parallel_through_point(sK3,sK2)))
& left_apart_point(sK2,parallel_through_point(sK3,sK1)) ),
inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK1,sK2,sK3])],[f61,f99]) ).
fof(f99,plain,
( ? [X0,X1,X2] :
( ~ left_apart_point(X0,reverse_line(parallel_through_point(X2,X1)))
& left_apart_point(X1,parallel_through_point(X2,X0)) )
=> ( ~ left_apart_point(sK1,reverse_line(parallel_through_point(sK3,sK2)))
& left_apart_point(sK2,parallel_through_point(sK3,sK1)) ) ),
introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).
fof(f61,plain,
? [X0,X1,X2] :
( ~ left_apart_point(X0,reverse_line(parallel_through_point(X2,X1)))
& left_apart_point(X1,parallel_through_point(X2,X0)) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f34]) ).
fof(f34,plain,
~ ! [X0,X1,X2] :
( left_apart_point(X1,parallel_through_point(X2,X0))
=> left_apart_point(X0,reverse_line(parallel_through_point(X2,X1))) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f33]) ).
fof(f33,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X0,X3,X1] :
( left_apart_point(X3,parallel_through_point(X1,X0))
=> left_apart_point(X0,reverse_line(parallel_through_point(X1,X3))) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f32]) ).
fof(f32,conjecture,
! [X0,X3,X1] :
( left_apart_point(X3,parallel_through_point(X1,X0))
=> left_apart_point(X0,reverse_line(parallel_through_point(X1,X3))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',con) ).
fof(f126,plain,
! [X0,X1] : ~ left_apart_point(X0,X1),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f78]) ).
fof(f78,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ left_apart_point(X0,reverse_line(X1))
& ~ left_apart_point(X0,X1) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f15]) ).
fof(f15,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
~ ( left_apart_point(X0,reverse_line(X1))
| left_apart_point(X0,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',oag10) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12 % Problem : GEO250+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v6.4.0.
% 0.12/0.14 % Command : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.35 % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35 % DateTime : Fri May 3 21:58:08 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.35 % (17946)Running in auto input_syntax mode. Trying TPTP
% 0.15/0.36 % (17948)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbas=expand:fmbksg=on:fmbsr=1.3_569 on theBenchmark for (569ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.37 TRYING [1,1]
% 0.15/0.37 TRYING [2,1]
% 0.15/0.37 TRYING [3,1]
% 0.15/0.37 TRYING [2,2]
% 0.15/0.37 TRYING [3,2]
% 0.15/0.37 TRYING [4,1]
% 0.15/0.37 % (17947)fmb+10_1_fmbas=off:fmbsr=1.3:nm=2_1451 on theBenchmark for (1451ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.37 % (17949)dis-2_2:3_amm=sco:anc=none:bce=on:fsr=off:gsp=on:nm=16:nwc=1.2:nicw=on:sac=on:sp=weighted_frequency_476 on theBenchmark for (476ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.37 % (17950)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbas=expand:fmbksg=on:fmbsr=1.3:gsp=on:nm=4_470 on theBenchmark for (470ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.37 % (17951)dis+1_20_av=off:lcm=predicate:nm=2:nwc=2.0_396 on theBenchmark for (396ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.37 % (17953)fmb+10_1_fmbas=off:fmbsr=1.3:nm=2:si=on:rtra=on:rawr=on:rp=on:fmbksg=on_1451 on theBenchmark for (1451ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.37 TRYING [4,2]
% 0.15/0.37 % (17952)dis+11_4:5_nm=4_216 on theBenchmark for (216ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.37 % (17951)First to succeed.
% 0.15/0.37 % (17952)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.15/0.37 TRYING [1]
% 0.15/0.37 % (17951)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-17946"
% 0.15/0.37 % (17949)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.15/0.37 TRYING [2]
% 0.15/0.37 Cannot enumerate next child to try in an incomplete setup
% 0.15/0.37 % (17948)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (17948)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.37 % (17948)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.15/0.37 % (17948)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.15/0.37
% 0.15/0.37 % (17948)Memory used [KB]: 949
% 0.15/0.37 % (17948)Time elapsed: 0.011 s
% 0.15/0.37 % (17948)Instructions burned: 38 (million)
% 0.15/0.37 % (17948)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.37 % (17948)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.38 % (17951)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.15/0.38 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.15/0.38 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.38 % (17951)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.38 % (17951)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.15/0.38 % (17951)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.15/0.38
% 0.15/0.38 % (17951)Memory used [KB]: 830
% 0.15/0.38 % (17951)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.15/0.38 % (17951)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.15/0.38 % (17946)Success in time 0.021 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------