TSTP Solution File: GEO248+3 by Zipperpin---2.1.9999
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : GEO248+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : NO INFORMATION
% Format : NO INFORMATION
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.qWVgEoVTDx true
% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 30 23:58:03 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.79s 0.76s
% Output : Refutation 0.79s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 12
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 21 ( 5 unt; 8 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 26 ( 0 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 79 ( 8 ~; 7 |; 2 &; 58 @)
% ( 2 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 10 ( 6 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 11 ( 11 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 9 ( 8 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 24 ( 0 ^; 24 !; 0 ?; 24 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(apart_point_and_line_type,type,
apart_point_and_line: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(incident_point_and_line_type,type,
incident_point_and_line: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(sk__type,type,
sk_: $i ).
thf(sk__2_type,type,
sk__2: $i ).
thf(right_apart_point_type,type,
right_apart_point: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(left_apart_point_type,type,
left_apart_point: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(parallel_lines_type,type,
parallel_lines: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(reverse_line_type,type,
reverse_line: $i > $i ).
thf(con,conjecture,
! [A: $i,B: $i,L: $i] :
( ( ( apart_point_and_line @ A @ L )
& ( incident_point_and_line @ B @ ( parallel_lines @ L @ A ) ) )
=> ( apart_point_and_line @ B @ L ) ) ).
thf(zf_stmt_0,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [A: $i,B: $i,L: $i] :
( ( ( apart_point_and_line @ A @ L )
& ( incident_point_and_line @ B @ ( parallel_lines @ L @ A ) ) )
=> ( apart_point_and_line @ B @ L ) ),
inference('cnf.neg',[status(esa)],[con]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl67,plain,
apart_point_and_line @ sk_ @ sk__2,
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).
thf(a6_defns,axiom,
! [A: $i,L: $i] :
( ( apart_point_and_line @ A @ L )
<=> ( ( left_apart_point @ A @ L )
| ( right_apart_point @ A @ L ) ) ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl10,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( ( right_apart_point @ X0 @ X1 )
| ( left_apart_point @ X0 @ X1 )
| ~ ( apart_point_and_line @ X0 @ X1 ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[a6_defns]) ).
thf(a2_defns,axiom,
! [X: $i,Y: $i] :
( ( right_apart_point @ X @ Y )
<=> ( left_apart_point @ X @ ( reverse_line @ Y ) ) ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl2,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( ( left_apart_point @ X0 @ ( reverse_line @ X1 ) )
| ~ ( right_apart_point @ X0 @ X1 ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[a2_defns]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl108,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( ~ ( apart_point_and_line @ X1 @ X0 )
| ( left_apart_point @ X1 @ X0 )
| ( left_apart_point @ X1 @ ( reverse_line @ X0 ) ) ),
inference('dp-resolution',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl10,zip_derived_cl2]) ).
thf(ax10_basics,axiom,
! [A: $i,L: $i] :
~ ( ( left_apart_point @ A @ L )
| ( left_apart_point @ A @ ( reverse_line @ L ) ) ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl47,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
~ ( left_apart_point @ X0 @ X1 ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[ax10_basics]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl47_001,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
~ ( left_apart_point @ X0 @ X1 ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[ax10_basics]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl203,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
~ ( apart_point_and_line @ X1 @ X0 ),
inference(demod,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl108,zip_derived_cl47,zip_derived_cl47]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl204,plain,
$false,
inference('s_sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl67,zip_derived_cl203]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : GEO248+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.07/0.14 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.qWVgEoVTDx true
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 19:20:39 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.35 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.13/0.35 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.35 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.13/0.35 % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.13/0.35 % Running in FO mode
% 0.20/0.68 % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.20/0.68 % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.20/0.68 % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.20/0.71 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.20/0.73 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.79/0.74 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.79/0.76 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.79/0.76 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.79/0.76 % Solved by fo/fo6_bce.sh.
% 0.79/0.76 % BCE start: 70
% 0.79/0.76 % BCE eliminated: 0
% 0.79/0.76 % PE start: 70
% 0.79/0.76 logic: neq
% 0.79/0.76 % PE eliminated: 32
% 0.79/0.76 % done 60 iterations in 0.031s
% 0.79/0.76 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.79/0.76 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.79/0.76
% 0.79/0.76
% 0.79/0.76 % Terminating...
% 1.48/0.86 % Runner terminated.
% 1.48/0.87 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------