TSTP Solution File: GEO244+1 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : GEO244+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v6.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May 4 07:42:36 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.23s 0.55s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.23s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 8 ( 3 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 16 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 14 ( 6 ~; 1 |; 3 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 4 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 12 ( 2 sgn 10 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(con,conjecture,
! [X1,X4,X5] :
( distinct_points(X1,X4)
=> ( left_apart_point(X5,reverse_line(line_connecting(X1,X4)))
=> left_apart_point(X5,line_connecting(X4,X1)) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.b5yLPaH22w/E---3.1_28511.p',con) ).
fof(oag10,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
~ ( left_apart_point(X1,X2)
| left_apart_point(X1,reverse_line(X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.b5yLPaH22w/E---3.1_28511.p',oag10) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1,X4,X5] :
( distinct_points(X1,X4)
=> ( left_apart_point(X5,reverse_line(line_connecting(X1,X4)))
=> left_apart_point(X5,line_connecting(X4,X1)) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[con]) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
( distinct_points(esk1_0,esk2_0)
& left_apart_point(esk3_0,reverse_line(line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0)))
& ~ left_apart_point(esk3_0,line_connecting(esk2_0,esk1_0)) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_4,plain,
! [X10,X11] :
( ~ left_apart_point(X10,X11)
& ~ left_apart_point(X10,reverse_line(X11)) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[oag10])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
left_apart_point(esk3_0,reverse_line(line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0))),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
~ left_apart_point(X1,X2),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.16 % Problem : GEO244+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v6.4.0.
% 0.08/0.17 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.16/0.39 % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.39 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.39 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.39 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.39 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.39 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.39 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.16/0.39 % DateTime : Fri May 3 18:38:38 EDT 2024
% 0.16/0.39 % CPUTime :
% 0.23/0.54 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.23/0.54 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.b5yLPaH22w/E---3.1_28511.p
% 0.23/0.55 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.23/0.55 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.23/0.55 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.55 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/0.55 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.55 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.55 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.55 # new_bool_1 with pid 28591 completed with status 0
% 0.23/0.55 # Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.23/0.55 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.23/0.55 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.55 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/0.55 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.55 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.55 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.23/0.55 # Search class: FGHNF-FFMF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.23/0.55 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.23/0.55 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2mI with 181s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.55 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2mI with pid 28593 completed with status 0
% 0.23/0.55 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2mI
% 0.23/0.55 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.23/0.55 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.55 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/0.55 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.55 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.55 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.23/0.55 # Search class: FGHNF-FFMF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.23/0.55 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.23/0.55 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2mI with 181s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.55 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.23/0.55 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.23/0.55
% 0.23/0.55 # Proof found!
% 0.23/0.55 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.23/0.55 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.23/0.55 # Parsed axioms : 32
% 0.23/0.55 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 14
% 0.23/0.55 # Initial clauses : 28
% 0.23/0.55 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.23/0.55 # Initial clauses in saturation : 28
% 0.23/0.55 # Processed clauses : 4
% 0.23/0.55 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.23/0.55 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.23/0.55 # ...remaining for further processing : 4
% 0.23/0.55 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.23/0.55 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.23/0.55 # Backward-subsumed : 1
% 0.23/0.55 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.23/0.55 # Generated clauses : 1
% 0.23/0.55 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.23/0.55 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.23/0.55 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.23/0.55 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.23/0.55 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.23/0.55 # NegExts : 0
% 0.23/0.55 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.23/0.55 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.23/0.55 # Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.23/0.55 # ...of those cached : 0
% 0.23/0.55 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.23/0.55 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.23/0.55 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.23/0.55 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.23/0.55 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.23/0.55 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.23/0.55 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.55 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.55 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.55 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.55 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.55 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.55 # Current number of processed clauses : 2
% 0.23/0.55 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 1
% 0.23/0.55 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.23/0.55 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.23/0.55 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.23/0.55 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 24
% 0.23/0.55 # ...number of literals in the above : 58
% 0.23/0.55 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.23/0.55 # Current number of archived clauses : 2
% 0.23/0.55 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.23/0.55 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.23/0.55 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.23/0.55 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.23/0.55 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.23/0.55 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.23/0.55 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.23/0.55 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.23/0.55 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.23/0.55 # Termbank termtop insertions : 1714
% 0.23/0.55 # Search garbage collected termcells : 412
% 0.23/0.55
% 0.23/0.55 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/0.55 # User time : 0.002 s
% 0.23/0.55 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.23/0.55 # Total time : 0.005 s
% 0.23/0.55 # Maximum resident set size: 1860 pages
% 0.23/0.55
% 0.23/0.55 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/0.55 # User time : 0.005 s
% 0.23/0.55 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.23/0.55 # Total time : 0.009 s
% 0.23/0.55 # Maximum resident set size: 1728 pages
% 0.23/0.55 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.23/0.56 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------