TSTP Solution File: GEO227+3 by SnakeForV-SAT---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
% Problem  : GEO227+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s

% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 16:12:23 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 1.25s 0.53s
% Output   : Refutation 1.25s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   31 (   7 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   61 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   54 (  24   ~;  13   |;  10   &)
%                                         (   4 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   2 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   46 (  40   !;   6   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f186,plain,
    $false,
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f185,f177]) ).

fof(f177,plain,
    ~ unequally_directed_lines(sK1,sK0),
    inference(resolution,[],[f137,f161]) ).

fof(f161,plain,
    equally_directed_lines(sK1,sK0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f129]) ).

fof(f129,plain,
    ( equally_directed_lines(sK1,sK0)
    & equally_directed_opposite_lines(sK1,sK0) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1])],[f127,f128]) ).

fof(f128,plain,
    ( ? [X0,X1] :
        ( equally_directed_lines(X1,X0)
        & equally_directed_opposite_lines(X1,X0) )
   => ( equally_directed_lines(sK1,sK0)
      & equally_directed_opposite_lines(sK1,sK0) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f127,plain,
    ? [X0,X1] :
      ( equally_directed_lines(X1,X0)
      & equally_directed_opposite_lines(X1,X0) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f80]) ).

fof(f80,plain,
    ? [X1,X0] :
      ( equally_directed_lines(X0,X1)
      & equally_directed_opposite_lines(X0,X1) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f61]) ).

fof(f61,plain,
    ~ ! [X1,X0] :
        ~ ( equally_directed_lines(X0,X1)
          & equally_directed_opposite_lines(X0,X1) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f38]) ).

fof(f38,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X3,X4] :
        ~ ( equally_directed_lines(X3,X4)
          & equally_directed_opposite_lines(X3,X4) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f37]) ).

fof(f37,conjecture,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ~ ( equally_directed_lines(X3,X4)
        & equally_directed_opposite_lines(X3,X4) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',con) ).

fof(f137,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ equally_directed_lines(X0,X1)
      | ~ unequally_directed_lines(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f116]) ).

fof(f116,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( ~ unequally_directed_lines(X0,X1)
        | ~ equally_directed_lines(X0,X1) )
      & ( equally_directed_lines(X0,X1)
        | unequally_directed_lines(X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f115]) ).

fof(f115,plain,
    ! [X1,X0] :
      ( ( ~ unequally_directed_lines(X1,X0)
        | ~ equally_directed_lines(X1,X0) )
      & ( equally_directed_lines(X1,X0)
        | unequally_directed_lines(X1,X0) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f60]) ).

fof(f60,plain,
    ! [X1,X0] :
      ( ~ unequally_directed_lines(X1,X0)
    <=> equally_directed_lines(X1,X0) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f4]) ).

fof(f4,axiom,
    ! [X1,X0] :
      ( ~ unequally_directed_lines(X0,X1)
    <=> equally_directed_lines(X0,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a4_defns) ).

fof(f185,plain,
    unequally_directed_lines(sK1,sK0),
    inference(resolution,[],[f184,f140]) ).

fof(f140,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( unequally_directed_lines(X1,reverse_line(X0))
      | unequally_directed_lines(X1,X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f118]) ).

fof(f118,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( unequally_directed_lines(X1,X0)
      | unequally_directed_lines(X1,reverse_line(X0)) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f72]) ).

fof(f72,plain,
    ! [X1,X0] :
      ( unequally_directed_lines(X0,X1)
      | unequally_directed_lines(X0,reverse_line(X1)) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f18]) ).

fof(f18,axiom,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( unequally_directed_lines(X3,X4)
      | unequally_directed_lines(X3,reverse_line(X4)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax8_basics) ).

fof(f184,plain,
    ~ unequally_directed_lines(sK1,reverse_line(sK0)),
    inference(resolution,[],[f163,f181]) ).

fof(f181,plain,
    ~ unequally_directed_opposite_lines(sK1,sK0),
    inference(resolution,[],[f145,f160]) ).

fof(f160,plain,
    equally_directed_opposite_lines(sK1,sK0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f129]) ).

fof(f145,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ equally_directed_opposite_lines(X0,X1)
      | ~ unequally_directed_opposite_lines(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f96]) ).

fof(f96,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ equally_directed_opposite_lines(X0,X1)
      | ~ unequally_directed_opposite_lines(X0,X1) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f75]) ).

fof(f75,plain,
    ! [X1,X0] :
      ( equally_directed_opposite_lines(X0,X1)
     => ~ unequally_directed_opposite_lines(X0,X1) ),
    inference(unused_predicate_definition_removal,[],[f5]) ).

fof(f5,axiom,
    ! [X1,X0] :
      ( equally_directed_opposite_lines(X0,X1)
    <=> ~ unequally_directed_opposite_lines(X0,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a5_defns) ).

fof(f163,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( unequally_directed_opposite_lines(X0,X1)
      | ~ unequally_directed_lines(X0,reverse_line(X1)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f97]) ).

fof(f97,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ unequally_directed_lines(X0,reverse_line(X1))
      | unequally_directed_opposite_lines(X0,X1) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f76]) ).

fof(f76,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( unequally_directed_lines(X0,reverse_line(X1))
     => unequally_directed_opposite_lines(X0,X1) ),
    inference(unused_predicate_definition_removal,[],[f1]) ).

fof(f1,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( unequally_directed_opposite_lines(X0,X1)
    <=> unequally_directed_lines(X0,reverse_line(X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a1_defns) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem    : GEO227+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime   : Mon Aug 29 21:33:11 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.19/0.51  % (10405)dis+34_1:32_abs=on:add=off:bsr=on:gsp=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=48:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/48Mi)
% 0.19/0.51  % (10400)fmb+10_1:1_bce=on:fmbsr=1.5:nm=4:skr=on:i=191324:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/191324Mi)
% 1.25/0.52  % (10422)dis+21_1:1_av=off:er=filter:slsq=on:slsqc=0:slsqr=1,1:sp=frequency:to=lpo:i=498:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/498Mi)
% 1.25/0.52  % (10401)ott+10_1:32_abs=on:br=off:urr=ec_only:i=50:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/50Mi)
% 1.25/0.52  % (10403)ott+10_1:32_bd=off:fsr=off:newcnf=on:tgt=full:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/51Mi)
% 1.25/0.52  % (10420)ott+10_1:8_bsd=on:fsd=on:lcm=predicate:nwc=5.0:s2a=on:s2at=1.5:spb=goal_then_units:i=176:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/176Mi)
% 1.25/0.52  % (10428)ott+33_1:4_s2a=on:tgt=ground:i=439:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/439Mi)
% 1.25/0.52  % (10404)ott+33_1:4_s2a=on:tgt=ground:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/51Mi)
% 1.25/0.52  % (10411)ott+10_1:32_bd=off:fsr=off:newcnf=on:tgt=full:i=100:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/100Mi)
% 1.25/0.52  % (10422)First to succeed.
% 1.25/0.52  TRYING [1]
% 1.25/0.52  TRYING [2]
% 1.25/0.53  % (10426)ins+10_1:1_awrs=decay:awrsf=30:bsr=unit_only:foolp=on:igrr=8/457:igs=10:igwr=on:nwc=1.5:sp=weighted_frequency:to=lpo:uhcvi=on:i=68:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/68Mi)
% 1.25/0.53  % (10421)ott+3_1:1_gsp=on:lcm=predicate:i=138:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/138Mi)
% 1.25/0.53  % (10404)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 1.25/0.53  TRYING [3]
% 1.25/0.53  % (10429)ott+10_7:2_awrs=decay:awrsf=8:bd=preordered:drc=off:fd=preordered:fde=unused:fsr=off:slsq=on:slsqc=2:slsqr=5,8:sp=const_min:spb=units:to=lpo:i=355:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/355Mi)
% 1.25/0.53  % (10422)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 1.25/0.53  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 1.25/0.53  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 1.25/0.53  % (10422)------------------------------
% 1.25/0.53  % (10422)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 1.25/0.53  % (10422)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 1.25/0.53  % (10422)Termination reason: Refutation
% 1.25/0.53  
% 1.25/0.53  % (10422)Memory used [KB]: 1023
% 1.25/0.53  % (10422)Time elapsed: 0.078 s
% 1.25/0.53  % (10422)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 1.25/0.53  % (10422)------------------------------
% 1.25/0.53  % (10422)------------------------------
% 1.25/0.53  % (10399)Success in time 0.176 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------