TSTP Solution File: GEO226+3 by iProver---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9
% Problem  : GEO226+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May  3 02:17:07 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 2.29s 1.19s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 2.29s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   32 (   3 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   95 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   12 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  103 (  40   ~;  23   |;  29   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;  10  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   50 (   0 sgn  32   !;   9   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f9,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( convergent_lines(X0,X1)
     => ~ apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(X0,X1),X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ci3) ).

fof(f10,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( convergent_lines(X0,X1)
     => ~ apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(X0,X1),X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ci4) ).

fof(f34,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( incident_point_and_line(X0,X1)
    <=> ~ apart_point_and_line(X0,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a4) ).

fof(f36,conjecture,
    ! [X5,X6] :
      ( ( convergent_lines(X5,X6)
        & line(X6)
        & line(X5) )
     => ? [X0] :
          ( point(X0)
         => ( incident_point_and_line(X0,X6)
            & incident_point_and_line(X0,X5) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',con) ).

fof(f37,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X5,X6] :
        ( ( convergent_lines(X5,X6)
          & line(X6)
          & line(X5) )
       => ? [X0] :
            ( point(X0)
           => ( incident_point_and_line(X0,X6)
              & incident_point_and_line(X0,X5) ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f36]) ).

fof(f51,plain,
    ~ ! [X0,X1] :
        ( ( convergent_lines(X0,X1)
          & line(X1)
          & line(X0) )
       => ? [X2] :
            ( point(X2)
           => ( incident_point_and_line(X2,X1)
              & incident_point_and_line(X2,X0) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f37]) ).

fof(f52,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ apart_point_and_line(X0,X1)
     => incident_point_and_line(X0,X1) ),
    inference(unused_predicate_definition_removal,[],[f34]) ).

fof(f61,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(X0,X1),X0)
      | ~ convergent_lines(X0,X1) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

fof(f62,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(X0,X1),X1)
      | ~ convergent_lines(X0,X1) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f10]) ).

fof(f91,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( incident_point_and_line(X0,X1)
      | apart_point_and_line(X0,X1) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f52]) ).

fof(f92,plain,
    ? [X0,X1] :
      ( ! [X2] :
          ( ( ~ incident_point_and_line(X2,X1)
            | ~ incident_point_and_line(X2,X0) )
          & point(X2) )
      & convergent_lines(X0,X1)
      & line(X1)
      & line(X0) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f51]) ).

fof(f93,plain,
    ? [X0,X1] :
      ( ! [X2] :
          ( ( ~ incident_point_and_line(X2,X1)
            | ~ incident_point_and_line(X2,X0) )
          & point(X2) )
      & convergent_lines(X0,X1)
      & line(X1)
      & line(X0) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f92]) ).

fof(f94,plain,
    ( ? [X0,X1] :
        ( ! [X2] :
            ( ( ~ incident_point_and_line(X2,X1)
              | ~ incident_point_and_line(X2,X0) )
            & point(X2) )
        & convergent_lines(X0,X1)
        & line(X1)
        & line(X0) )
   => ( ! [X2] :
          ( ( ~ incident_point_and_line(X2,sK1)
            | ~ incident_point_and_line(X2,sK0) )
          & point(X2) )
      & convergent_lines(sK0,sK1)
      & line(sK1)
      & line(sK0) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f95,plain,
    ( ! [X2] :
        ( ( ~ incident_point_and_line(X2,sK1)
          | ~ incident_point_and_line(X2,sK0) )
        & point(X2) )
    & convergent_lines(sK0,sK1)
    & line(sK1)
    & line(sK0) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1])],[f93,f94]) ).

fof(f104,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(X0,X1),X0)
      | ~ convergent_lines(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f61]) ).

fof(f105,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(X0,X1),X1)
      | ~ convergent_lines(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f62]) ).

fof(f132,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( incident_point_and_line(X0,X1)
      | apart_point_and_line(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f91]) ).

fof(f135,plain,
    convergent_lines(sK0,sK1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f95]) ).

fof(f137,plain,
    ! [X2] :
      ( ~ incident_point_and_line(X2,sK1)
      | ~ incident_point_and_line(X2,sK0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f95]) ).

cnf(c_57,plain,
    ( ~ apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(X0,X1),X0)
    | ~ convergent_lines(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f104]) ).

cnf(c_58,plain,
    ( ~ apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(X0,X1),X1)
    | ~ convergent_lines(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f105]) ).

cnf(c_85,plain,
    ( apart_point_and_line(X0,X1)
    | incident_point_and_line(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f132]) ).

cnf(c_86,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ incident_point_and_line(X0,sK1)
    | ~ incident_point_and_line(X0,sK0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f137]) ).

cnf(c_88,negated_conjecture,
    convergent_lines(sK0,sK1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f135]) ).

cnf(c_456,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ incident_point_and_line(X0,sK1)
    | ~ incident_point_and_line(X0,sK0) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_86]) ).

cnf(c_457,plain,
    ( ~ apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(sK0,sK1),sK0)
    | ~ convergent_lines(sK0,sK1) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_57]) ).

cnf(c_458,plain,
    ( ~ apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(sK0,sK1),sK1)
    | ~ convergent_lines(sK0,sK1) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_58]) ).

cnf(c_512,plain,
    ( apart_point_and_line(X0,sK1)
    | incident_point_and_line(X0,sK1) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_85]) ).

cnf(c_580,plain,
    ( apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(sK0,sK1),sK1)
    | incident_point_and_line(intersection_point(sK0,sK1),sK1) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_512]) ).

cnf(c_729,plain,
    ( apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(sK0,sK1),sK0)
    | incident_point_and_line(intersection_point(sK0,sK1),sK0) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_85]) ).

cnf(c_1410,plain,
    ( ~ incident_point_and_line(intersection_point(sK0,sK1),sK1)
    | ~ incident_point_and_line(intersection_point(sK0,sK1),sK0) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_456]) ).

cnf(c_1411,plain,
    $false,
    inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_1410,c_729,c_580,c_458,c_457,c_88]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : GEO226+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.15/0.34  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.15/0.34  % DateTime : Fri May  3 01:40:21 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.21/0.47  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.21/0.47  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --heuristic_context casc_unsat --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 2.29/1.19  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 2.29/1.19  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 2.29/1.19  
% 2.29/1.19  %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 2.29/1.19  
% 2.29/1.19  ------  iProver source info
% 2.29/1.19  
% 2.29/1.19  git: date: 2024-05-02 19:28:25 +0000
% 2.29/1.19  git: sha1: a33b5eb135c74074ba803943bb12f2ebd971352f
% 2.29/1.19  git: non_committed_changes: false
% 2.29/1.19  
% 2.29/1.19  ------ Parsing...
% 2.29/1.19  ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...
% 2.29/1.19  
% 2.29/1.19  ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 6 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e 
% 2.29/1.19  
% 2.29/1.19  ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e 
% 2.29/1.19  ------ Proving...
% 2.29/1.19  ------ Problem Properties 
% 2.29/1.19  
% 2.29/1.19  
% 2.29/1.19  clauses                                 31
% 2.29/1.19  conjectures                             2
% 2.29/1.19  EPR                                     23
% 2.29/1.19  Horn                                    14
% 2.29/1.19  unary                                   8
% 2.29/1.19  binary                                  8
% 2.29/1.19  lits                                    80
% 2.29/1.19  lits eq                                 0
% 2.29/1.19  fd_pure                                 0
% 2.29/1.19  fd_pseudo                               0
% 2.29/1.19  fd_cond                                 0
% 2.29/1.19  fd_pseudo_cond                          0
% 2.29/1.19  AC symbols                              0
% 2.29/1.19  
% 2.29/1.19  ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 2.29/1.19  
% 2.29/1.19  ------ no equalities: superposition off 
% 2.29/1.19  
% 2.29/1.19  ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 2.29/1.19  
% 2.29/1.19  
% 2.29/1.19  ------ 
% 2.29/1.19  Current options:
% 2.29/1.19  ------ 
% 2.29/1.19  
% 2.29/1.19  
% 2.29/1.19  
% 2.29/1.19  
% 2.29/1.19  ------ Proving...
% 2.29/1.19  
% 2.29/1.19  
% 2.29/1.19  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 2.29/1.19  
% 2.29/1.19  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.29/1.19  
% 2.29/1.19  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------