TSTP Solution File: GEO223+1 by Prover9---1109a

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---1109a
% Problem  : GEO223+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 05:55:16 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.82s 1.12s
% Output   : Refutation 0.82s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem  : GEO223+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.06/0.13  % Command  : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 11:49:23 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.44/1.07  ============================== Prover9 ===============================
% 0.44/1.07  Prover9 (32) version 2009-11A, November 2009.
% 0.44/1.07  Process 15643 was started by sandbox2 on n010.cluster.edu,
% 0.44/1.07  Sat Jun 18 11:49:24 2022
% 0.44/1.07  The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -t 300 -f /tmp/Prover9_15480_n010.cluster.edu".
% 0.44/1.07  ============================== end of head ===========================
% 0.44/1.07  
% 0.44/1.07  ============================== INPUT =================================
% 0.44/1.07  
% 0.44/1.07  % Reading from file /tmp/Prover9_15480_n010.cluster.edu
% 0.44/1.07  
% 0.44/1.07  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.44/1.07  set(auto2).
% 0.44/1.07      % set(auto2) -> set(auto).
% 0.44/1.07      % set(auto) -> set(auto_inference).
% 0.44/1.07      % set(auto) -> set(auto_setup).
% 0.44/1.07      % set(auto_setup) -> set(predicate_elim).
% 0.44/1.07      % set(auto_setup) -> assign(eq_defs, unfold).
% 0.44/1.07      % set(auto) -> set(auto_limits).
% 0.44/1.07      % set(auto_limits) -> assign(max_weight, "100.000").
% 0.44/1.07      % set(auto_limits) -> assign(sos_limit, 20000).
% 0.44/1.07      % set(auto) -> set(auto_denials).
% 0.44/1.07      % set(auto) -> set(auto_process).
% 0.44/1.07      % set(auto2) -> assign(new_constants, 1).
% 0.44/1.07      % set(auto2) -> assign(fold_denial_max, 3).
% 0.44/1.07      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_weight, "200.000").
% 0.44/1.07      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_hours, 1).
% 0.44/1.07      % assign(max_hours, 1) -> assign(max_seconds, 3600).
% 0.44/1.07      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_seconds, 0).
% 0.44/1.07      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_minutes, 5).
% 0.44/1.07      % assign(max_minutes, 5) -> assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.44/1.07      % set(auto2) -> set(sort_initial_sos).
% 0.44/1.07      % set(auto2) -> assign(sos_limit, -1).
% 0.44/1.07      % set(auto2) -> assign(lrs_ticks, 3000).
% 0.44/1.07      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_megs, 400).
% 0.44/1.07      % set(auto2) -> assign(stats, some).
% 0.44/1.07      % set(auto2) -> clear(echo_input).
% 0.44/1.07      % set(auto2) -> set(quiet).
% 0.44/1.07      % set(auto2) -> clear(print_initial_clauses).
% 0.44/1.07      % set(auto2) -> clear(print_given).
% 0.44/1.07  assign(lrs_ticks,-1).
% 0.44/1.07  assign(sos_limit,10000).
% 0.44/1.07  assign(order,kbo).
% 0.44/1.07  set(lex_order_vars).
% 0.44/1.07  clear(print_given).
% 0.44/1.07  
% 0.44/1.07  % formulas(sos).  % not echoed (23 formulas)
% 0.44/1.07  
% 0.44/1.07  ============================== end of input ==========================
% 0.44/1.07  
% 0.44/1.07  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.44/1.07  
% 0.44/1.07  ============================== PROCESS NON-CLAUSAL FORMULAS ==========
% 0.44/1.07  
% 0.44/1.07  % Formulas that are not ordinary clauses:
% 0.44/1.07  1 (all X -distinct_points(X,X)) # label(apart1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.44/1.07  2 (all X -distinct_lines(X,X)) # label(apart2) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.44/1.07  3 (all X -convergent_lines(X,X)) # label(apart3) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.44/1.07  4 (all X all Y all Z (distinct_points(X,Y) -> distinct_points(X,Z) | distinct_points(Y,Z))) # label(apart4) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.44/1.07  5 (all X all Y all Z (distinct_lines(X,Y) -> distinct_lines(X,Z) | distinct_lines(Y,Z))) # label(apart5) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.44/1.07  6 (all X all Y all Z (convergent_lines(X,Y) -> convergent_lines(X,Z) | convergent_lines(Y,Z))) # label(ax6) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.44/1.07  7 (all X all Y (distinct_points(X,Y) -> -apart_point_and_line(X,line_connecting(X,Y)))) # label(ci1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.44/1.07  8 (all X all Y (distinct_points(X,Y) -> -apart_point_and_line(Y,line_connecting(X,Y)))) # label(ci2) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.44/1.07  9 (all X all Y (convergent_lines(X,Y) -> -apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(X,Y),X))) # label(ci3) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.44/1.07  10 (all X all Y (convergent_lines(X,Y) -> -apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(X,Y),Y))) # label(ci4) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.44/1.07  11 (all X all Y all U all V (distinct_points(X,Y) & distinct_lines(U,V) -> apart_point_and_line(X,U) | apart_point_and_line(X,V) | apart_point_and_line(Y,U) | apart_point_and_line(Y,V))) # label(cu1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.44/1.07  12 (all X all Y all Z (apart_point_and_line(X,Y) -> distinct_points(X,Z) | apart_point_and_line(Z,Y))) # label(ceq1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.44/1.07  13 (all X all Y all Z (apart_point_and_line(X,Y) -> distinct_lines(Y,Z) | apart_point_and_line(X,Z))) # label(ceq2) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.82/1.12  14 (all X all Y all Z (convergent_lines(X,Y) -> distinct_lines(Y,Z) | convergent_lines(X,Z))) # label(ceq3) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.82/1.12  15 (all X all Y -convergent_lines(parallel_through_point(Y,X),Y)) # label(cp1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.82/1.12  16 (all X all Y -apart_point_and_line(X,parallel_through_point(Y,X))) # label(cp2) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.82/1.12  17 (all X all Y all Z (distinct_lines(Y,Z) -> apart_point_and_line(X,Y) | apart_point_and_line(X,Z) | convergent_lines(Y,Z))) # label(cup1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.82/1.12  18 (all L all M (convergent_lines(L,M) | unorthogonal_lines(L,M))) # label(occu1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.82/1.12  19 (all L all M all N (convergent_lines(L,M) & unorthogonal_lines(L,M) -> convergent_lines(L,N) & unorthogonal_lines(L,N) | convergent_lines(M,N) & unorthogonal_lines(M,N))) # label(oac1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.82/1.12  20 (all A all L -unorthogonal_lines(orthogonal_through_point(L,A),L)) # label(ooc1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.82/1.12  21 (all A all L -apart_point_and_line(A,orthogonal_through_point(L,A))) # label(ooc2) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.82/1.12  22 (all A all L all M all N (distinct_lines(L,M) -> apart_point_and_line(A,L) | apart_point_and_line(A,M) | unorthogonal_lines(L,N) | unorthogonal_lines(M,N))) # label(ouo1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.82/1.12  23 -(all A all L -distinct_lines(parallel_through_point(L,A),orthogonal_through_point(orthogonal_through_point(L,A),A))) # label(con) # label(negated_conjecture) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.82/1.12  
% 0.82/1.12  ============================== end of process non-clausal formulas ===
% 0.82/1.12  
% 0.82/1.12  ============================== PROCESS INITIAL CLAUSES ===============
% 0.82/1.12  
% 0.82/1.12  ============================== PREDICATE ELIMINATION =================
% 0.82/1.12  
% 0.82/1.12  ============================== end predicate elimination =============
% 0.82/1.12  
% 0.82/1.12  Auto_denials:  (non-Horn, no changes).
% 0.82/1.12  
% 0.82/1.12  Term ordering decisions:
% 0.82/1.12  Function symbol KB weights:  c1=1. c2=1. orthogonal_through_point=1. parallel_through_point=1. intersection_point=1. line_connecting=1.
% 0.82/1.12  
% 0.82/1.12  ============================== end of process initial clauses ========
% 0.82/1.12  
% 0.82/1.12  ============================== CLAUSES FOR SEARCH ====================
% 0.82/1.12  
% 0.82/1.12  ============================== end of clauses for search =============
% 0.82/1.12  
% 0.82/1.12  ============================== SEARCH ================================
% 0.82/1.12  
% 0.82/1.12  % Starting search at 0.02 seconds.
% 0.82/1.12  
% 0.82/1.12  ============================== PROOF =================================
% 0.82/1.12  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.82/1.12  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.82/1.12  
% 0.82/1.12  % Proof 1 at 0.07 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.82/1.12  % Length of proof is 36.
% 0.82/1.12  % Level of proof is 9.
% 0.82/1.12  % Maximum clause weight is 15.000.
% 0.82/1.12  % Given clauses 90.
% 0.82/1.12  
% 0.82/1.12  2 (all X -distinct_lines(X,X)) # label(apart2) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.82/1.12  3 (all X -convergent_lines(X,X)) # label(apart3) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.82/1.12  5 (all X all Y all Z (distinct_lines(X,Y) -> distinct_lines(X,Z) | distinct_lines(Y,Z))) # label(apart5) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.82/1.12  6 (all X all Y all Z (convergent_lines(X,Y) -> convergent_lines(X,Z) | convergent_lines(Y,Z))) # label(ax6) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.82/1.12  15 (all X all Y -convergent_lines(parallel_through_point(Y,X),Y)) # label(cp1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.82/1.12  16 (all X all Y -apart_point_and_line(X,parallel_through_point(Y,X))) # label(cp2) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.82/1.12  18 (all L all M (convergent_lines(L,M) | unorthogonal_lines(L,M))) # label(occu1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.82/1.12  19 (all L all M all N (convergent_lines(L,M) & unorthogonal_lines(L,M) -> convergent_lines(L,N) & unorthogonal_lines(L,N) | convergent_lines(M,N) & unorthogonal_lines(M,N))) # label(oac1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.82/1.12  20 (all A all L -unorthogonal_lines(orthogonal_through_point(L,A),L)) # label(ooc1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.82/1.12  21 (all A all L -apart_point_and_line(A,orthogonal_through_point(L,A))) # label(ooc2) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.82/1.12  22 (all A all L all M all N (distinct_lines(L,M) -> apart_point_and_line(A,L) | apart_point_and_line(A,M) | unorthogonal_lines(L,N) | unorthogonal_lines(M,N))) # label(ouo1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.82/1.12  23 -(all A all L -distinct_lines(parallel_through_point(L,A),orthogonal_through_point(orthogonal_through_point(L,A),A))) # label(con) # label(negated_conjecture) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.82/1.12  24 convergent_lines(A,B) | unorthogonal_lines(A,B) # label(occu1) # label(axiom).  [clausify(18)].
% 0.82/1.12  25 distinct_lines(parallel_through_point(c2,c1),orthogonal_through_point(orthogonal_through_point(c2,c1),c1)) # label(con) # label(negated_conjecture).  [clausify(23)].
% 0.82/1.12  27 -distinct_lines(A,A) # label(apart2) # label(axiom).  [clausify(2)].
% 0.82/1.12  28 -convergent_lines(A,A) # label(apart3) # label(axiom).  [clausify(3)].
% 0.82/1.12  29 -convergent_lines(parallel_through_point(A,B),A) # label(cp1) # label(axiom).  [clausify(15)].
% 0.82/1.12  30 -apart_point_and_line(A,parallel_through_point(B,A)) # label(cp2) # label(axiom).  [clausify(16)].
% 0.82/1.12  31 -unorthogonal_lines(orthogonal_through_point(A,B),A) # label(ooc1) # label(axiom).  [clausify(20)].
% 0.82/1.12  32 -apart_point_and_line(A,orthogonal_through_point(B,A)) # label(ooc2) # label(axiom).  [clausify(21)].
% 0.82/1.12  38 -distinct_lines(A,B) | distinct_lines(A,C) | distinct_lines(B,C) # label(apart5) # label(axiom).  [clausify(5)].
% 0.82/1.12  39 -convergent_lines(A,B) | convergent_lines(A,C) | convergent_lines(B,C) # label(ax6) # label(axiom).  [clausify(6)].
% 0.82/1.12  44 -convergent_lines(A,B) | -unorthogonal_lines(A,B) | convergent_lines(A,C) | unorthogonal_lines(B,C) # label(oac1) # label(axiom).  [clausify(19)].
% 0.82/1.12  47 -distinct_lines(A,B) | apart_point_and_line(C,A) | apart_point_and_line(C,B) | unorthogonal_lines(A,D) | unorthogonal_lines(B,D) # label(ouo1) # label(axiom).  [clausify(22)].
% 0.82/1.12  49 convergent_lines(orthogonal_through_point(A,B),A).  [resolve(31,a,24,b)].
% 0.82/1.12  50 distinct_lines(parallel_through_point(c2,c1),A) | distinct_lines(orthogonal_through_point(orthogonal_through_point(c2,c1),c1),A).  [resolve(38,a,25,a)].
% 0.82/1.12  52 -convergent_lines(A,parallel_through_point(A,B)).  [ur(39,b,28,a,c,29,a)].
% 0.82/1.12  58 convergent_lines(orthogonal_through_point(A,B),C) | convergent_lines(A,C).  [resolve(49,a,39,a)].
% 0.82/1.12  85 convergent_lines(A,B) | convergent_lines(orthogonal_through_point(A,C),D) | convergent_lines(B,D).  [resolve(58,a,39,a)].
% 0.82/1.12  98 distinct_lines(parallel_through_point(c2,c1),A) | distinct_lines(orthogonal_through_point(orthogonal_through_point(c2,c1),c1),B) | distinct_lines(A,B).  [resolve(50,b,38,a)].
% 0.82/1.12  99 distinct_lines(orthogonal_through_point(orthogonal_through_point(c2,c1),c1),parallel_through_point(c2,c1)).  [factor(98,a,c),unit_del(a,27)].
% 0.82/1.12  325 convergent_lines(orthogonal_through_point(A,B),C) | convergent_lines(parallel_through_point(A,D),C).  [resolve(85,a,52,a)].
% 0.82/1.12  499 convergent_lines(parallel_through_point(A,B),orthogonal_through_point(A,C)).  [resolve(325,a,28,a)].
% 0.82/1.12  630 -unorthogonal_lines(parallel_through_point(A,B),orthogonal_through_point(A,C)).  [ur(44,a,499,a,c,29,a,d,31,a)].
% 0.82/1.12  673 -distinct_lines(orthogonal_through_point(orthogonal_through_point(A,B),C),parallel_through_point(A,C)).  [ur(47,b,32,a,c,30,a,d,31,a,e,630,a)].
% 0.82/1.12  674 $F.  [resolve(673,a,99,a)].
% 0.82/1.12  
% 0.82/1.12  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.82/1.12  ============================== end of proof ==========================
% 0.82/1.12  
% 0.82/1.12  ============================== STATISTICS ============================
% 0.82/1.12  
% 0.82/1.12  Given=90. Generated=1335. Kept=650. proofs=1.
% 0.82/1.12  Usable=83. Sos=492. Demods=0. Limbo=14, Disabled=86. Hints=0.
% 0.82/1.12  Megabytes=0.67.
% 0.82/1.12  User_CPU=0.07, System_CPU=0.00, Wall_clock=0.
% 0.82/1.12  
% 0.82/1.12  ============================== end of statistics =====================
% 0.82/1.12  
% 0.82/1.12  ============================== end of search =========================
% 0.82/1.12  
% 0.82/1.12  THEOREM PROVED
% 0.82/1.12  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.82/1.12  
% 0.82/1.12  Exiting with 1 proof.
% 0.82/1.12  
% 0.82/1.12  Process 15643 exit (max_proofs) Sat Jun 18 11:49:24 2022
% 0.82/1.12  Prover9 interrupted
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------