TSTP Solution File: GEO221+3 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : GEO221+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 03:44:36 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 7.91s 2.43s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 7.91s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   19 (  11 unt;   6 nHn;  13 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   35 (   0 equ;  13 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    5 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   27 (   4 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    ~ equal_lines(orthogonal_through_point(esk3_0,esk1_0),orthogonal_through_point(esk3_0,esk2_0)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-lnv9rbsr/input.p',i_0_26) ).

cnf(i_0_14,plain,
    ( distinct_lines(X1,X2)
    | equal_lines(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-lnv9rbsr/input.p',i_0_14) ).

cnf(i_0_46,plain,
    ( apart_point_and_line(X1,X2)
    | apart_point_and_line(X1,X3)
    | unorthogonal_lines(X2,X4)
    | unorthogonal_lines(X3,X4)
    | ~ distinct_lines(X3,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-lnv9rbsr/input.p',i_0_46) ).

cnf(i_0_4,plain,
    ( ~ incident_point_and_line(X1,X2)
    | ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-lnv9rbsr/input.p',i_0_4) ).

cnf(i_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    incident_point_and_line(esk2_0,orthogonal_through_point(esk3_0,esk1_0)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-lnv9rbsr/input.p',i_0_27) ).

cnf(i_0_44,plain,
    ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,orthogonal_through_point(X2,X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-lnv9rbsr/input.p',i_0_44) ).

cnf(i_0_43,plain,
    ~ unorthogonal_lines(orthogonal_through_point(X1,X2),X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-lnv9rbsr/input.p',i_0_43) ).

cnf(c_0_54,negated_conjecture,
    ~ equal_lines(orthogonal_through_point(esk3_0,esk1_0),orthogonal_through_point(esk3_0,esk2_0)),
    i_0_26 ).

cnf(c_0_55,plain,
    ( distinct_lines(X1,X2)
    | equal_lines(X1,X2) ),
    i_0_14 ).

cnf(c_0_56,plain,
    ( apart_point_and_line(X1,X2)
    | apart_point_and_line(X1,X3)
    | unorthogonal_lines(X2,X4)
    | unorthogonal_lines(X3,X4)
    | ~ distinct_lines(X3,X2) ),
    i_0_46 ).

cnf(c_0_57,negated_conjecture,
    distinct_lines(orthogonal_through_point(esk3_0,esk1_0),orthogonal_through_point(esk3_0,esk2_0)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_54,c_0_55]) ).

cnf(c_0_58,plain,
    ( ~ incident_point_and_line(X1,X2)
    | ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,X2) ),
    i_0_4 ).

cnf(c_0_59,negated_conjecture,
    incident_point_and_line(esk2_0,orthogonal_through_point(esk3_0,esk1_0)),
    i_0_27 ).

cnf(c_0_60,plain,
    ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,orthogonal_through_point(X2,X1)),
    i_0_44 ).

cnf(c_0_61,plain,
    ( unorthogonal_lines(orthogonal_through_point(esk3_0,esk1_0),X1)
    | unorthogonal_lines(orthogonal_through_point(esk3_0,esk2_0),X1)
    | apart_point_and_line(X2,orthogonal_through_point(esk3_0,esk1_0))
    | apart_point_and_line(X2,orthogonal_through_point(esk3_0,esk2_0)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_56,c_0_57]) ).

cnf(c_0_62,negated_conjecture,
    ~ apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,orthogonal_through_point(esk3_0,esk1_0)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_58,c_0_59]) ).

cnf(c_0_63,plain,
    ~ unorthogonal_lines(orthogonal_through_point(X1,X2),X1),
    i_0_43 ).

cnf(c_0_64,plain,
    ( unorthogonal_lines(orthogonal_through_point(esk3_0,esk2_0),X1)
    | unorthogonal_lines(orthogonal_through_point(esk3_0,esk1_0),X1) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_60,c_0_61]),c_0_62]) ).

cnf(c_0_65,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_63,c_0_64]),c_0_63]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem  : GEO221+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.06/0.12  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 18:36:55 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.44  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.19/0.45  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.45  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 0.19/0.45  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 0.19/0.45  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 7.91/2.43  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y:
% 7.91/2.43  # Version: 2.1pre011
% 7.91/2.43  # Preprocessing time       : 0.011 s
% 7.91/2.43  
% 7.91/2.43  # Proof found!
% 7.91/2.43  # SZS status Theorem
% 7.91/2.43  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.91/2.43  # Proof object total steps             : 19
% 7.91/2.43  # Proof object clause steps            : 12
% 7.91/2.43  # Proof object formula steps           : 7
% 7.91/2.43  # Proof object conjectures             : 6
% 7.91/2.43  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 4
% 7.91/2.43  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 2
% 7.91/2.43  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 7
% 7.91/2.43  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 7
% 7.91/2.43  # Proof object generating inferences   : 5
% 7.91/2.43  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 2
% 7.91/2.43  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.91/2.43  # Parsed axioms                        : 48
% 7.91/2.43  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 7.91/2.43  # Initial clauses                      : 48
% 7.91/2.43  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 7.91/2.43  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 48
% 7.91/2.43  # Processed clauses                    : 75
% 7.91/2.43  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 7.91/2.43  # ...subsumed                          : 6
% 7.91/2.43  # ...remaining for further processing  : 69
% 7.91/2.43  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 7.91/2.43  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 7.91/2.43  # Backward-subsumed                    : 1
% 7.91/2.43  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 7.91/2.43  # Generated clauses                    : 152
% 7.91/2.43  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 131
% 7.91/2.43  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 4
% 7.91/2.43  # Paramodulations                      : 150
% 7.91/2.43  # Factorizations                       : 2
% 7.91/2.43  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 7.91/2.43  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 7.91/2.43  # Propositional unsat check successes  : 0
% 7.91/2.43  # Current number of processed clauses  : 68
% 7.91/2.43  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 9
% 7.91/2.43  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 7.91/2.43  #    Negative unit clauses             : 9
% 7.91/2.43  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 50
% 7.91/2.43  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 88
% 7.91/2.43  # ...number of literals in the above   : 316
% 7.91/2.43  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 7.91/2.43  # Current number of archived clauses   : 1
% 7.91/2.43  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 461
% 7.91/2.43  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 268
% 7.91/2.43  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 11
% 7.91/2.43  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 51
% 7.91/2.43  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 7.91/2.43  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 2
% 7.91/2.43  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 7.91/2.43  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 7.91/2.43  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 7.91/2.43  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 3074
% 7.91/2.43  
% 7.91/2.43  # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.91/2.43  # User time                : 0.008 s
% 7.91/2.43  # System time              : 0.006 s
% 7.91/2.43  # Total time               : 0.014 s
% 7.91/2.43  # ...preprocessing         : 0.011 s
% 7.91/2.43  # ...main loop             : 0.003 s
% 7.91/2.43  # Maximum resident set size: 7128 pages
% 7.91/2.43  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------