TSTP Solution File: GEO221+2 by Zipperpin---2.1.9999
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : GEO221+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : NO INFORMATION
% Format : NO INFORMATION
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.pRX7hoMKRb true
% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 30 23:57:47 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.58s 0.89s
% Output : Refutation 0.58s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 11
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 23 ( 9 unt; 7 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 32 ( 0 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 138 ( 12 ~; 13 |; 0 &; 110 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 11 ( 7 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 8 ( 8 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 8 ( 7 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 28 ( 0 ^; 28 !; 0 ?; 28 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(sk__type,type,
sk_: $i ).
thf(unorthogonal_lines_type,type,
unorthogonal_lines: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(distinct_lines_type,type,
distinct_lines: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(sk__1_type,type,
sk__1: $i ).
thf(orthogonal_through_point_type,type,
orthogonal_through_point: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(apart_point_and_line_type,type,
apart_point_and_line: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(sk__2_type,type,
sk__2: $i ).
thf(con,conjecture,
! [A: $i,B: $i,L: $i] :
( ~ ( apart_point_and_line @ B @ ( orthogonal_through_point @ L @ A ) )
=> ~ ( distinct_lines @ ( orthogonal_through_point @ L @ A ) @ ( orthogonal_through_point @ L @ B ) ) ) ).
thf(zf_stmt_0,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [A: $i,B: $i,L: $i] :
( ~ ( apart_point_and_line @ B @ ( orthogonal_through_point @ L @ A ) )
=> ~ ( distinct_lines @ ( orthogonal_through_point @ L @ A ) @ ( orthogonal_through_point @ L @ B ) ) ),
inference('cnf.neg',[status(esa)],[con]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl26,plain,
~ ( apart_point_and_line @ sk__1 @ ( orthogonal_through_point @ sk__2 @ sk_ ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).
thf(ooc1,axiom,
! [A: $i,L: $i] :
~ ( unorthogonal_lines @ ( orthogonal_through_point @ L @ A ) @ L ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl23,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
~ ( unorthogonal_lines @ ( orthogonal_through_point @ X0 @ X1 ) @ X0 ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[ooc1]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl27,plain,
distinct_lines @ ( orthogonal_through_point @ sk__2 @ sk_ ) @ ( orthogonal_through_point @ sk__2 @ sk__1 ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).
thf(ouo1,axiom,
! [A: $i,L: $i,M: $i,N: $i] :
( ( distinct_lines @ L @ M )
=> ( ( apart_point_and_line @ A @ L )
| ( apart_point_and_line @ A @ M )
| ( unorthogonal_lines @ L @ N )
| ( unorthogonal_lines @ M @ N ) ) ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl25,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
( ( apart_point_and_line @ X0 @ X1 )
| ( apart_point_and_line @ X0 @ X2 )
| ~ ( distinct_lines @ X2 @ X1 )
| ( unorthogonal_lines @ X2 @ X3 )
| ( unorthogonal_lines @ X1 @ X3 ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[ouo1]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl87,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( ( unorthogonal_lines @ ( orthogonal_through_point @ sk__2 @ sk__1 ) @ X0 )
| ( unorthogonal_lines @ ( orthogonal_through_point @ sk__2 @ sk_ ) @ X0 )
| ( apart_point_and_line @ X1 @ ( orthogonal_through_point @ sk__2 @ sk_ ) )
| ( apart_point_and_line @ X1 @ ( orthogonal_through_point @ sk__2 @ sk__1 ) ) ),
inference('sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl27,zip_derived_cl25]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl697,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ( apart_point_and_line @ X0 @ ( orthogonal_through_point @ sk__2 @ sk__1 ) )
| ( apart_point_and_line @ X0 @ ( orthogonal_through_point @ sk__2 @ sk_ ) )
| ( unorthogonal_lines @ ( orthogonal_through_point @ sk__2 @ sk_ ) @ sk__2 ) ),
inference('sup+',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl23,zip_derived_cl87]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl23_001,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
~ ( unorthogonal_lines @ ( orthogonal_through_point @ X0 @ X1 ) @ X0 ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[ooc1]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl698,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ( apart_point_and_line @ X0 @ ( orthogonal_through_point @ sk__2 @ sk__1 ) )
| ( apart_point_and_line @ X0 @ ( orthogonal_through_point @ sk__2 @ sk_ ) ) ),
inference(demod,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl697,zip_derived_cl23]) ).
thf(ooc2,axiom,
! [A: $i,L: $i] :
~ ( apart_point_and_line @ A @ ( orthogonal_through_point @ L @ A ) ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl24,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
~ ( apart_point_and_line @ X0 @ ( orthogonal_through_point @ X1 @ X0 ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[ooc2]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl704,plain,
apart_point_and_line @ sk__1 @ ( orthogonal_through_point @ sk__2 @ sk_ ),
inference('sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl698,zip_derived_cl24]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl706,plain,
$false,
inference(demod,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl26,zip_derived_cl704]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : GEO221+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.pRX7hoMKRb true
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 23:19:11 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.35 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.13/0.35 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.35 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.13/0.35 % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.13/0.35 % Running in FO mode
% 0.42/0.65 % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.42/0.65 % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.42/0.65 % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.56/0.72 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.56/0.74 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.56/0.75 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.56/0.76 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.56/0.76 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.56/0.76 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.56/0.76 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 0.58/0.89 % Solved by fo/fo3_bce.sh.
% 0.58/0.89 % BCE start: 28
% 0.58/0.89 % BCE eliminated: 0
% 0.58/0.89 % PE start: 28
% 0.58/0.89 logic: neq
% 0.58/0.89 % PE eliminated: 1
% 0.58/0.89 % done 150 iterations in 0.123s
% 0.58/0.89 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.58/0.89 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.58/0.89
% 0.58/0.89
% 0.58/0.89 % Terminating...
% 0.61/0.96 % Runner terminated.
% 0.61/0.97 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------