TSTP Solution File: GEO216+1 by CSE---1.6
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE---1.6
% Problem : GEO216+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 30 22:43:46 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.20s 0.62s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : GEO216+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.13 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 19:22:17 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.56 start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.61 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.61 % File :CSE---1.6
% 0.20/0.61 % Problem :theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.61 % Transform :cnf
% 0.20/0.61 % Format :tptp:raw
% 0.20/0.61 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.20/0.61
% 0.20/0.61 % Result :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.20/0.61 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.20/0.61 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.61 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.61 % File : GEO216+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.20/0.61 % Domain : Geometry (Constructive)
% 0.20/0.61 % Problem : A line is not orthogonal to itself
% 0.20/0.61 % Version : [vPl95] axioms : Especial.
% 0.20/0.61 % English :
% 0.20/0.61
% 0.20/0.61 % Refs : [vPl95] von Plato (1995), The Axioms of Constructive Geometry
% 0.20/0.61 % : [ROK06] Raths et al. (2006), The ILTP Problem Library for Intu
% 0.20/0.61 % Source : [ILTP]
% 0.20/0.62 % Names : Theorem 8.7.o [vPl95]
% 0.20/0.62
% 0.20/0.62 % Status : Theorem
% 0.20/0.62 % Rating : 0.00 v6.1.0, 0.04 v6.0.0, 0.25 v5.5.0, 0.08 v5.4.0, 0.04 v5.3.0, 0.17 v5.2.0, 0.07 v5.0.0, 0.00 v3.3.0
% 0.20/0.62 % Syntax : Number of formulae : 18 ( 4 unt; 0 def)
% 0.20/0.62 % Number of atoms : 47 ( 0 equ)
% 0.20/0.62 % Maximal formula atoms : 6 ( 2 avg)
% 0.20/0.62 % Number of connectives : 50 ( 21 ~; 12 |; 4 &)
% 0.20/0.62 % ( 0 <=>; 13 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% 0.20/0.62 % Maximal formula depth : 9 ( 6 avg)
% 0.20/0.62 % Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% 0.20/0.62 % Number of predicates : 5 ( 5 usr; 0 prp; 2-2 aty)
% 0.20/0.62 % Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 0 con; 2-2 aty)
% 0.20/0.62 % Number of variables : 42 ( 42 !; 0 ?)
% 0.20/0.62 % SPC : FOF_THM_RFO_NEQ
% 0.20/0.62
% 0.20/0.62 % Comments : Definitions unfolded, hence Especial.
% 0.20/0.62 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.62 include('Axioms/GEO006+0.ax').
% 0.20/0.62 include('Axioms/GEO006+4.ax').
% 0.20/0.62 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.62 fof(con,conjecture,
% 0.20/0.62 ! [L] :
% 0.20/0.62 ~ ~ unorthogonal_lines(L,L) ).
% 0.20/0.62
% 0.20/0.62 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.62 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.62 % Proof found
% 0.20/0.62 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.62 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.20/0.62 %ClaNum:21(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.20/0.62 %VarNum:108(SingletonVarNum:47)
% 0.20/0.62 %MaxLitNum:6
% 0.20/0.62 %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 0.20/0.62 %SharedTerms:2
% 0.20/0.62 %goalClause: 1
% 0.20/0.62 %singleGoalClaCount:1
% 0.20/0.62 [1]~P1(a1,a1)
% 0.20/0.62 [2]~P2(x21,x21)
% 0.20/0.62 [3]~P3(x31,x31)
% 0.20/0.62 [4]~P4(x41,x41)
% 0.20/0.62 [5]P1(x51,x52)+P4(x51,x52)
% 0.20/0.62 [17]~P2(x171,x172)+~P5(x172,f2(x171,x172))
% 0.20/0.62 [18]~P2(x181,x182)+~P5(x181,f2(x181,x182))
% 0.20/0.62 [19]~P4(x191,x192)+~P5(f3(x191,x192),x192)
% 0.20/0.62 [20]~P4(x201,x202)+~P5(f3(x201,x202),x201)
% 0.20/0.62 [6]~P2(x63,x61)+P2(x61,x62)+P2(x63,x62)
% 0.20/0.62 [7]~P5(x71,x73)+P2(x71,x72)+P5(x72,x73)
% 0.20/0.62 [8]~P3(x83,x81)+P3(x81,x82)+P3(x83,x82)
% 0.20/0.62 [9]~P4(x93,x91)+P3(x91,x92)+P4(x93,x92)
% 0.20/0.62 [10]~P5(x103,x101)+P3(x101,x102)+P5(x103,x102)
% 0.20/0.62 [11]~P4(x113,x111)+P4(x111,x112)+P4(x113,x112)
% 0.20/0.62 [12]~P4(x123,x122)+P1(x121,x122)+P1(x121,x123)
% 0.20/0.62 [13]~P4(x132,x133)+~P1(x132,x133)+P4(x131,x132)+P4(x131,x133)
% 0.20/0.62 [14]~P4(x142,x143)+~P1(x142,x143)+P4(x141,x142)+P1(x141,x143)
% 0.20/0.62 [15]~P4(x153,x152)+~P1(x153,x152)+P4(x151,x152)+P1(x151,x153)
% 0.20/0.62 [21]P5(x214,x213)+~P2(x214,x211)+~P3(x213,x212)+P5(x211,x212)+P5(x211,x213)+P5(x214,x212)
% 0.20/0.62 %EqnAxiom
% 0.20/0.62
% 0.20/0.62 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.62 cnf(22,plain,
% 0.20/0.62 ($false),
% 0.20/0.62 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,4,5]),
% 0.20/0.62 ['proof']).
% 0.20/0.62 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.20/0.62 % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------