TSTP Solution File: GEO211+1 by CSE---1.6
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE---1.6
% Problem : GEO211+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 30 22:43:43 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.19s 0.62s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : GEO211+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.12/0.13 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 21:53:56 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.56 start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.61 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.61 % File :CSE---1.6
% 0.19/0.61 % Problem :theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.61 % Transform :cnf
% 0.19/0.61 % Format :tptp:raw
% 0.19/0.61 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.19/0.61
% 0.19/0.61 % Result :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.19/0.61 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.19/0.61 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.61 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.61 % File : GEO211+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.19/0.61 % Domain : Geometry (Constructive)
% 0.19/0.61 % Problem : A line is not orthogonal to itself
% 0.19/0.61 % Version : [vPl95] axioms : Especial.
% 0.19/0.61 % English :
% 0.19/0.61
% 0.19/0.61 % Refs : [vPl95] von Plato (1995), The Axioms of Constructive Geometry
% 0.19/0.61 % : [ROK06] Raths et al. (2006), The ILTP Problem Library for Intu
% 0.19/0.61 % Source : [ILTP]
% 0.19/0.61 % Names : Theorem 8.2 [vPl95]
% 0.19/0.61
% 0.19/0.61 % Status : Theorem
% 0.19/0.61 % Rating : 0.00 v6.1.0, 0.04 v6.0.0, 0.25 v5.5.0, 0.04 v5.3.0, 0.13 v5.2.0, 0.07 v5.0.0, 0.00 v3.3.0
% 0.19/0.61 % Syntax : Number of formulae : 23 ( 8 unt; 0 def)
% 0.19/0.61 % Number of atoms : 57 ( 0 equ)
% 0.19/0.61 % Maximal formula atoms : 6 ( 2 avg)
% 0.19/0.61 % Number of connectives : 45 ( 11 ~; 16 |; 4 &)
% 0.19/0.61 % ( 0 <=>; 14 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% 0.19/0.61 % Maximal formula depth : 9 ( 5 avg)
% 0.19/0.61 % Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% 0.19/0.61 % Number of predicates : 5 ( 5 usr; 0 prp; 2-2 aty)
% 0.19/0.61 % Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 0 con; 2-2 aty)
% 0.19/0.61 % Number of variables : 54 ( 54 !; 0 ?)
% 0.19/0.61 % SPC : FOF_THM_RFO_NEQ
% 0.19/0.61
% 0.19/0.61 % Comments : Definitions unfolded, hence Especial.
% 0.19/0.61 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.61 include('Axioms/GEO006+0.ax').
% 0.19/0.61 include('Axioms/GEO006+2.ax').
% 0.19/0.61 include('Axioms/GEO006+3.ax').
% 0.19/0.61 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.61 fof(con,conjecture,
% 0.19/0.61 ! [L] : unorthogonal_lines(L,L) ).
% 0.19/0.61
% 0.19/0.61 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.61 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.62 % Proof found
% 0.19/0.62 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.62 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.19/0.62 %ClaNum:26(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.19/0.62 %VarNum:132(SingletonVarNum:59)
% 0.19/0.62 %MaxLitNum:6
% 0.19/0.62 %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 0.19/0.62 %SharedTerms:2
% 0.19/0.62 %goalClause: 1
% 0.19/0.62 %singleGoalClaCount:1
% 0.19/0.62 [1]~P1(a1,a1)
% 0.19/0.62 [2]~P2(x21,x21)
% 0.19/0.62 [3]~P3(x31,x31)
% 0.19/0.62 [4]~P4(x41,x41)
% 0.19/0.62 [5]~P5(x51,f2(x52,x51))
% 0.19/0.62 [6]~P5(x61,f3(x62,x61))
% 0.19/0.62 [7]~P4(f2(x71,x72),x71)
% 0.19/0.62 [8]~P1(f3(x81,x82),x81)
% 0.19/0.62 [9]P1(x91,x92)+P4(x91,x92)
% 0.19/0.62 [22]~P2(x221,x222)+~P5(x222,f4(x221,x222))
% 0.19/0.62 [23]~P2(x231,x232)+~P5(x231,f4(x231,x232))
% 0.19/0.62 [24]~P4(x241,x242)+~P5(f5(x241,x242),x242)
% 0.19/0.62 [25]~P4(x251,x252)+~P5(f5(x251,x252),x251)
% 0.19/0.62 [10]~P2(x103,x101)+P2(x101,x102)+P2(x103,x102)
% 0.19/0.62 [11]~P5(x111,x113)+P2(x111,x112)+P5(x112,x113)
% 0.19/0.62 [12]~P3(x123,x121)+P3(x121,x122)+P3(x123,x122)
% 0.19/0.62 [13]~P4(x133,x131)+P3(x131,x132)+P4(x133,x132)
% 0.19/0.62 [14]~P5(x143,x141)+P3(x141,x142)+P5(x143,x142)
% 0.19/0.62 [15]~P4(x153,x151)+P4(x151,x152)+P4(x153,x152)
% 0.19/0.62 [16]P5(x163,x161)+~P3(x161,x162)+P4(x161,x162)+P5(x163,x162)
% 0.19/0.62 [18]~P4(x181,x183)+~P1(x181,x183)+P4(x181,x182)+P1(x183,x182)
% 0.19/0.62 [19]~P4(x193,x191)+~P1(x193,x191)+P4(x191,x192)+P1(x193,x192)
% 0.19/0.62 [20]~P4(x201,x203)+~P1(x201,x203)+P1(x201,x202)+P1(x203,x202)
% 0.19/0.62 [21]P1(x213,x214)+~P3(x213,x212)+P5(x211,x212)+P5(x211,x213)+P1(x212,x214)
% 0.19/0.62 [26]P5(x264,x263)+~P2(x264,x261)+~P3(x263,x262)+P5(x261,x262)+P5(x261,x263)+P5(x264,x262)
% 0.19/0.62 %EqnAxiom
% 0.19/0.62
% 0.19/0.62 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.62 cnf(27,plain,
% 0.19/0.62 ($false),
% 0.19/0.62 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,4,9]),
% 0.19/0.62 ['proof']).
% 0.19/0.62 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.19/0.62 % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------