TSTP Solution File: GEO204+1 by SPASS---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : GEO204+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 06:23:22 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.18s 0.44s
% Output   : Refutation 0.18s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   29 (  15 unt;   9 nHn;  29 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   55 (   0 equ;  20 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    6 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   7 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
    distinct_points(skc5,skc3),
    file('GEO204+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(2,axiom,
    ~ distinct_points(skc3,skc4),
    file('GEO204+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(4,axiom,
    ~ distinct_lines(u,u),
    file('GEO204+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(6,axiom,
    ( ~ distinct_points(u,v)
    | distinct_points(v,w)
    | distinct_points(u,w) ),
    file('GEO204+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(7,axiom,
    ( ~ distinct_lines(u,v)
    | distinct_lines(v,w)
    | distinct_lines(u,w) ),
    file('GEO204+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(9,axiom,
    ( ~ distinct_points(u,v)
    | ~ apart_point_and_line(u,line_connecting(u,v)) ),
    file('GEO204+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(10,axiom,
    ( ~ distinct_points(u,v)
    | ~ apart_point_and_line(v,line_connecting(u,v)) ),
    file('GEO204+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(13,axiom,
    ( ~ apart_point_and_line(u,v)
    | apart_point_and_line(w,v)
    | distinct_points(u,w) ),
    file('GEO204+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(16,axiom,
    ( ~ distinct_points(skc5,skc4)
    | distinct_lines(line_connecting(skc5,skc3),line_connecting(skc5,skc4)) ),
    file('GEO204+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(17,axiom,
    ( ~ distinct_lines(u,v)
    | ~ distinct_points(w,x)
    | apart_point_and_line(x,u)
    | apart_point_and_line(x,v)
    | apart_point_and_line(w,v)
    | apart_point_and_line(w,u) ),
    file('GEO204+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(18,plain,
    ( ~ distinct_lines(u,v)
    | apart_point_and_line(skc3,u)
    | apart_point_and_line(skc3,v)
    | apart_point_and_line(skc5,v)
    | apart_point_and_line(skc5,u) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[1,17]),
    [iquote('0:Res:1.0,17.0')] ).

cnf(20,plain,
    ~ apart_point_and_line(skc5,line_connecting(skc5,skc3)),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[1,9]),
    [iquote('0:Res:1.0,9.0')] ).

cnf(21,plain,
    ~ apart_point_and_line(skc3,line_connecting(skc5,skc3)),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[1,10]),
    [iquote('0:Res:1.0,10.0')] ).

cnf(23,plain,
    ( ~ apart_point_and_line(skc3,u)
    | apart_point_and_line(skc4,u) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[13,2]),
    [iquote('0:Res:13.1,2.0')] ).

cnf(24,plain,
    ( ~ distinct_points(u,skc3)
    | distinct_points(u,skc4) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[6,2]),
    [iquote('0:Res:6.2,2.0')] ).

cnf(25,plain,
    distinct_points(skc5,skc4),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[1,24]),
    [iquote('0:Res:1.0,24.0')] ).

cnf(29,plain,
    distinct_lines(line_connecting(skc5,skc3),line_connecting(skc5,skc4)),
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[16,25]),
    [iquote('0:MRR:16.0,25.0')] ).

cnf(38,plain,
    ( distinct_lines(line_connecting(skc5,skc4),u)
    | distinct_lines(line_connecting(skc5,skc3),u) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[29,7]),
    [iquote('0:Res:29.0,7.0')] ).

cnf(39,plain,
    distinct_lines(line_connecting(skc5,skc4),line_connecting(skc5,skc3)),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[38,4]),
    [iquote('0:Res:38.1,4.0')] ).

cnf(155,plain,
    ( apart_point_and_line(skc3,line_connecting(skc5,skc4))
    | apart_point_and_line(skc3,line_connecting(skc5,skc3))
    | apart_point_and_line(skc5,line_connecting(skc5,skc3))
    | apart_point_and_line(skc5,line_connecting(skc5,skc4)) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[39,18]),
    [iquote('0:Res:39.0,18.0')] ).

cnf(157,plain,
    ( apart_point_and_line(skc3,line_connecting(skc5,skc4))
    | apart_point_and_line(skc5,line_connecting(skc5,skc4)) ),
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[155,21,20]),
    [iquote('0:MRR:155.1,155.2,21.0,20.0')] ).

cnf(229,plain,
    ( apart_point_and_line(skc5,line_connecting(skc5,skc4))
    | apart_point_and_line(skc4,line_connecting(skc5,skc4)) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[157,23]),
    [iquote('0:Res:157.0,23.0')] ).

cnf(232,plain,
    apart_point_and_line(skc5,line_connecting(skc5,skc4)),
    inference(spt,[spt(split,[position(s1)])],[229]),
    [iquote('1:Spt:229.0')] ).

cnf(233,plain,
    ~ distinct_points(skc5,skc4),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[232,9]),
    [iquote('1:Res:232.0,9.1')] ).

cnf(236,plain,
    $false,
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[233,25]),
    [iquote('1:MRR:233.0,25.0')] ).

cnf(237,plain,
    ~ apart_point_and_line(skc5,line_connecting(skc5,skc4)),
    inference(spt,[spt(split,[position(sa)])],[236,232]),
    [iquote('1:Spt:236.0,229.0,232.0')] ).

cnf(238,plain,
    apart_point_and_line(skc4,line_connecting(skc5,skc4)),
    inference(spt,[spt(split,[position(s2)])],[229]),
    [iquote('1:Spt:236.0,229.1')] ).

cnf(242,plain,
    ~ distinct_points(skc5,skc4),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[238,10]),
    [iquote('1:Res:238.0,10.1')] ).

cnf(245,plain,
    $false,
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[242,25]),
    [iquote('1:MRR:242.0,25.0')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11  % Problem  : GEO204+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.06/0.12  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 08:34:53 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.44  
% 0.18/0.44  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.18/0.44  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.18/0.44  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.18/0.44  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.18/0.44  SPASS derived 199 clauses, backtracked 6 clauses, performed 1 splits and kept 88 clauses.
% 0.18/0.44  SPASS allocated 85209 KBytes.
% 0.18/0.44  SPASS spent	0:00:00.10 on the problem.
% 0.18/0.44  		0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.18/0.44  		0:00:00.03 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.18/0.44  		0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.18/0.44  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.18/0.44  		0:00:00.01 for the reduction.
% 0.18/0.44  
% 0.18/0.44  
% 0.18/0.44  Here is a proof with depth 6, length 29 :
% 0.18/0.44  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.18/0.44  Formulae used in the proof : con apart2 apart4 apart5 ci1 ci2 ceq1 cu1
% 0.18/0.44  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------