TSTP Solution File: GEO204+1 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : GEO204+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:38:39 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 3.77s 2.12s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.77s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :   15
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   51 (  21 unt;   9 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   86 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   67 (  23   ~;  35   |;   3   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   6  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   11 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   12 (   6   >;   6   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   35 (;  35   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ distinct_points > distinct_lines > convergent_lines > apart_point_and_line > line_connecting > intersection_point > #nlpp > #skF_2 > #skF_3 > #skF_1

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(line_connecting,type,
    line_connecting: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(distinct_points,type,
    distinct_points: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(intersection_point,type,
    intersection_point: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(apart_point_and_line,type,
    apart_point_and_line: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(convergent_lines,type,
    convergent_lines: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_2',type,
    '#skF_2': $i ).

tff('#skF_3',type,
    '#skF_3': $i ).

tff('#skF_1',type,
    '#skF_1': $i ).

tff(distinct_lines,type,
    distinct_lines: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(f_144,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X,Y,Z] :
        ( ( distinct_points(X,Y)
          & ~ distinct_points(Y,Z) )
       => ( distinct_points(X,Z)
          & ~ distinct_lines(line_connecting(X,Y),line_connecting(X,Z)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',con) ).

tff(f_66,axiom,
    ! [X,Y,Z] :
      ( distinct_points(X,Y)
     => ( distinct_points(X,Z)
        | distinct_points(Y,Z) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',apart4) ).

tff(f_112,axiom,
    ! [X,Y,U,V] :
      ( ( distinct_points(X,Y)
        & distinct_lines(U,V) )
     => ( apart_point_and_line(X,U)
        | apart_point_and_line(X,V)
        | apart_point_and_line(Y,U)
        | apart_point_and_line(Y,V) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',cu1) ).

tff(f_84,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( distinct_points(X,Y)
     => ~ apart_point_and_line(X,line_connecting(X,Y)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',ci1) ).

tff(f_119,axiom,
    ! [X,Y,Z] :
      ( apart_point_and_line(X,Y)
     => ( distinct_points(X,Z)
        | apart_point_and_line(Z,Y) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',ceq1) ).

tff(f_89,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( distinct_points(X,Y)
     => ~ apart_point_and_line(Y,line_connecting(X,Y)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',ci2) ).

tff(c_34,plain,
    distinct_points('#skF_1','#skF_2'),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_144]) ).

tff(c_30,plain,
    ( distinct_lines(line_connecting('#skF_1','#skF_2'),line_connecting('#skF_1','#skF_3'))
    | ~ distinct_points('#skF_1','#skF_3') ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_144]) ).

tff(c_42,plain,
    ~ distinct_points('#skF_1','#skF_3'),
    inference(splitLeft,[status(thm)],[c_30]) ).

tff(c_45,plain,
    ! [Y_51,Z_52,X_53] :
      ( distinct_points(Y_51,Z_52)
      | distinct_points(X_53,Z_52)
      | ~ distinct_points(X_53,Y_51) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_66]) ).

tff(c_49,plain,
    ! [Z_54] :
      ( distinct_points('#skF_2',Z_54)
      | distinct_points('#skF_1',Z_54) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_34,c_45]) ).

tff(c_32,plain,
    ~ distinct_points('#skF_2','#skF_3'),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_144]) ).

tff(c_58,plain,
    distinct_points('#skF_1','#skF_3'),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_49,c_32]) ).

tff(c_65,plain,
    $false,
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_42,c_58]) ).

tff(c_67,plain,
    distinct_points('#skF_1','#skF_3'),
    inference(splitRight,[status(thm)],[c_30]) ).

tff(c_66,plain,
    distinct_lines(line_connecting('#skF_1','#skF_2'),line_connecting('#skF_1','#skF_3')),
    inference(splitRight,[status(thm)],[c_30]) ).

tff(c_428,plain,
    ! [Y_89,V_90,U_91,X_92] :
      ( apart_point_and_line(Y_89,V_90)
      | apart_point_and_line(Y_89,U_91)
      | apart_point_and_line(X_92,V_90)
      | apart_point_and_line(X_92,U_91)
      | ~ distinct_lines(U_91,V_90)
      | ~ distinct_points(X_92,Y_89) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_112]) ).

tff(c_518,plain,
    ! [Y_95,X_96] :
      ( apart_point_and_line(Y_95,line_connecting('#skF_1','#skF_3'))
      | apart_point_and_line(Y_95,line_connecting('#skF_1','#skF_2'))
      | apart_point_and_line(X_96,line_connecting('#skF_1','#skF_3'))
      | apart_point_and_line(X_96,line_connecting('#skF_1','#skF_2'))
      | ~ distinct_points(X_96,Y_95) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_66,c_428]) ).

tff(c_587,plain,
    ( apart_point_and_line('#skF_2',line_connecting('#skF_1','#skF_3'))
    | apart_point_and_line('#skF_2',line_connecting('#skF_1','#skF_2'))
    | apart_point_and_line('#skF_1',line_connecting('#skF_1','#skF_3'))
    | apart_point_and_line('#skF_1',line_connecting('#skF_1','#skF_2')) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_34,c_518]) ).

tff(c_1030,plain,
    apart_point_and_line('#skF_1',line_connecting('#skF_1','#skF_2')),
    inference(splitLeft,[status(thm)],[c_587]) ).

tff(c_14,plain,
    ! [X_13,Y_14] :
      ( ~ apart_point_and_line(X_13,line_connecting(X_13,Y_14))
      | ~ distinct_points(X_13,Y_14) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_84]) ).

tff(c_1037,plain,
    ~ distinct_points('#skF_1','#skF_2'),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1030,c_14]) ).

tff(c_1043,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_34,c_1037]) ).

tff(c_1045,plain,
    ~ apart_point_and_line('#skF_1',line_connecting('#skF_1','#skF_2')),
    inference(splitRight,[status(thm)],[c_587]) ).

tff(c_586,plain,
    ( apart_point_and_line('#skF_3',line_connecting('#skF_1','#skF_3'))
    | apart_point_and_line('#skF_3',line_connecting('#skF_1','#skF_2'))
    | apart_point_and_line('#skF_1',line_connecting('#skF_1','#skF_3'))
    | apart_point_and_line('#skF_1',line_connecting('#skF_1','#skF_2')) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_67,c_518]) ).

tff(c_1443,plain,
    ( apart_point_and_line('#skF_3',line_connecting('#skF_1','#skF_3'))
    | apart_point_and_line('#skF_3',line_connecting('#skF_1','#skF_2'))
    | apart_point_and_line('#skF_1',line_connecting('#skF_1','#skF_3')) ),
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_1045,c_586]) ).

tff(c_1444,plain,
    apart_point_and_line('#skF_1',line_connecting('#skF_1','#skF_3')),
    inference(splitLeft,[status(thm)],[c_1443]) ).

tff(c_1451,plain,
    ~ distinct_points('#skF_1','#skF_3'),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1444,c_14]) ).

tff(c_1457,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_67,c_1451]) ).

tff(c_1459,plain,
    ~ apart_point_and_line('#skF_1',line_connecting('#skF_1','#skF_3')),
    inference(splitRight,[status(thm)],[c_1443]) ).

tff(c_1044,plain,
    ( apart_point_and_line('#skF_1',line_connecting('#skF_1','#skF_3'))
    | apart_point_and_line('#skF_2',line_connecting('#skF_1','#skF_2'))
    | apart_point_and_line('#skF_2',line_connecting('#skF_1','#skF_3')) ),
    inference(splitRight,[status(thm)],[c_587]) ).

tff(c_1392,plain,
    apart_point_and_line('#skF_2',line_connecting('#skF_1','#skF_3')),
    inference(splitLeft,[status(thm)],[c_1044]) ).

tff(c_24,plain,
    ! [Z_27,Y_26,X_25] :
      ( apart_point_and_line(Z_27,Y_26)
      | distinct_points(X_25,Z_27)
      | ~ apart_point_and_line(X_25,Y_26) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_119]) ).

tff(c_1412,plain,
    ! [Z_121] :
      ( apart_point_and_line(Z_121,line_connecting('#skF_1','#skF_3'))
      | distinct_points('#skF_2',Z_121) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1392,c_24]) ).

tff(c_16,plain,
    ! [Y_16,X_15] :
      ( ~ apart_point_and_line(Y_16,line_connecting(X_15,Y_16))
      | ~ distinct_points(X_15,Y_16) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_89]) ).

tff(c_1424,plain,
    ( ~ distinct_points('#skF_1','#skF_3')
    | distinct_points('#skF_2','#skF_3') ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1412,c_16]) ).

tff(c_1438,plain,
    distinct_points('#skF_2','#skF_3'),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_67,c_1424]) ).

tff(c_1440,plain,
    $false,
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_32,c_1438]) ).

tff(c_1441,plain,
    ( apart_point_and_line('#skF_2',line_connecting('#skF_1','#skF_2'))
    | apart_point_and_line('#skF_1',line_connecting('#skF_1','#skF_3')) ),
    inference(splitRight,[status(thm)],[c_1044]) ).

tff(c_1460,plain,
    apart_point_and_line('#skF_2',line_connecting('#skF_1','#skF_2')),
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_1459,c_1441]) ).

tff(c_1467,plain,
    ~ distinct_points('#skF_1','#skF_2'),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1460,c_16]) ).

tff(c_1473,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_34,c_1467]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.14  % Problem  : GEO204+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.15  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.36  % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % DateTime : Fri Aug  4 01:07:41 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 3.77/2.12  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.77/2.13  
% 3.77/2.13  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.77/2.16  
% 3.77/2.16  Inference rules
% 3.77/2.16  ----------------------
% 3.77/2.16  #Ref     : 0
% 3.77/2.16  #Sup     : 213
% 3.77/2.16  #Fact    : 66
% 3.77/2.16  #Define  : 0
% 3.77/2.16  #Split   : 4
% 3.77/2.16  #Chain   : 0
% 3.77/2.16  #Close   : 0
% 3.77/2.16  
% 3.77/2.16  Ordering : KBO
% 3.77/2.16  
% 3.77/2.16  Simplification rules
% 3.77/2.16  ----------------------
% 3.77/2.16  #Subsume      : 62
% 3.77/2.16  #Demod        : 70
% 3.77/2.16  #Tautology    : 66
% 3.77/2.16  #SimpNegUnit  : 21
% 3.77/2.16  #BackRed      : 0
% 3.77/2.16  
% 3.77/2.16  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 3.77/2.16  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 3.77/2.16  
% 3.77/2.16  Timing (in seconds)
% 3.77/2.16  ----------------------
% 3.77/2.16  Preprocessing        : 0.47
% 3.77/2.16  Parsing              : 0.27
% 3.77/2.16  CNF conversion       : 0.03
% 3.77/2.16  Main loop            : 0.60
% 3.77/2.16  Inferencing          : 0.23
% 3.77/2.16  Reduction            : 0.14
% 3.77/2.16  Demodulation         : 0.09
% 3.77/2.16  BG Simplification    : 0.03
% 3.77/2.16  Subsumption          : 0.16
% 3.77/2.16  Abstraction          : 0.02
% 3.77/2.16  MUC search           : 0.00
% 3.77/2.16  Cooper               : 0.00
% 3.77/2.16  Total                : 1.13
% 3.77/2.16  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 3.77/2.16  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 3.77/2.16  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 3.77/2.16  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------