TSTP Solution File: GEO198+2 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : GEO198+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 06:19:02 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 12.39s 12.56s
% Output   : Refutation 12.39s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12  % Problem  : GEO198+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.04/0.13  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.14/0.34  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.34  % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 07:20:58 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.14/0.36  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.14/0.36  The process was started by sandbox2 on n015.cluster.edu,
% 0.14/0.36  Sat Jun 18 07:20:58 2022
% 0.14/0.36  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 18864.
% 0.14/0.36  
% 0.14/0.36  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.14/0.36  set(auto).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.14/0.36  clear(print_given).
% 0.14/0.36  
% 0.14/0.36  formula_list(usable).
% 0.14/0.36  
% 0.14/0.36  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=6.
% 0.14/0.36  
% 0.14/0.36  This is a non-Horn set without equality.  The strategy
% 0.14/0.36  will be ordered hyper_res, ur_res, unit deletion, and
% 0.14/0.36  factoring, with satellites in sos and nuclei in usable.
% 0.14/0.36  
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.14/0.36  
% 0.14/0.36  ------------> process usable:
% 0.14/0.36  
% 0.14/0.36  ------------> process sos:
% 0.14/0.36  
% 0.14/0.36  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.20/0.40  
% 0.20/0.40  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.20/0.40  
% 0.20/0.40  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.20/0.40  
% 0.20/0.40  
% 0.20/0.40  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.20/0.40  
% 0.20/0.40  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.20/0.40  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.20/0.40  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.20/0.40  number of clauses in intial UL: 15
% 0.20/0.40  number of clauses initially in problem: 19
% 0.20/0.40  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 78
% 0.20/0.40  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.20/0.40  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.20/0.40  absolute distinct symbol count: 9
% 0.20/0.40     distinct predicate count: 4
% 0.20/0.40     distinct function count: 2
% 0.20/0.40     distinct constant count: 3
% 0.20/0.40  
% 0.20/0.40  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.20/0.40  
% 0.20/0.40  
% 0.20/0.40  
% 0.20/0.40  Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.20/0.40  
% 0.20/0.40  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.20/0.40  
% 0.20/0.40  =========== start of search ===========
% 12.39/12.56  
% 12.39/12.56  -- HEY sandbox2, WE HAVE A PROOF!! -- 
% 12.39/12.56  
% 12.39/12.56  Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 12.39/12.56  
% 12.39/12.56  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 12.39/12.56  
% 12.39/12.56  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 12.39/12.56  
% 12.39/12.56  Model 4 [ 1 0 89 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 12.39/12.56  
% 12.39/12.56  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 12.39/12.56  
% 12.39/12.56  Model 5 [ 1 0 63 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 12.39/12.56  
% 12.39/12.56  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 12.39/12.56  
% 12.39/12.56  Model 6 [ 3 0 63 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 12.39/12.56  
% 12.39/12.56  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 12.39/12.56  
% 12.39/12.56  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 12.39/12.56  
% 12.39/12.56  Model 7 [ 1 0 119 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 12.39/12.56  
% 12.39/12.56  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 12.39/12.56  
% 12.39/12.56  Model 8 [ 2 0 114 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 12.39/12.56  
% 12.39/12.56  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 12.39/12.56  
% 12.39/12.56  Model 9 [ 3 0 119 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 12.39/12.56  
% 12.39/12.56  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 12.39/12.56  
% 12.39/12.56  Model 10 [ 3 0 121 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 12.39/12.56  
% 12.39/12.56  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 12.39/12.56  
% 12.39/12.56  Model 11 [ 3 0 71 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 12.39/12.56  
% 12.39/12.56  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 12.39/12.56  
% 12.39/12.56  Model 12 [ 15 0 126 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 12.39/12.56  
% 12.39/12.56  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 12.39/12.56  
% 12.39/12.56  Model 13 [ 4 0 63 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 12.39/12.56  
% 12.39/12.56  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 12.39/12.56  
% 12.39/12.56  Model 14 [ 4 0 76 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 12.39/12.56  
% 12.39/12.56  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 12.39/12.56  
% 12.39/12.56  Model 15 [ 5 0 128 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 12.39/12.56  
% 12.39/12.56  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 12.39/12.56  
% 12.39/12.56  Model 16 [ 5 1 68 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 12.39/12.56  
% 12.39/12.56  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 12.39/12.56  
% 12.39/12.56  Model 17 [ 5 0 84 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 12.39/12.56  
% 12.39/12.56  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 12.39/12.56  
% 12.39/12.56  Model 18 [ 4 0 65 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 12.39/12.56  
% 12.39/12.56  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 12.39/12.56  
% 12.39/12.56  Model 19 [ 6 1 63 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 12.39/12.56  
% 12.39/12.56  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 12.39/12.56  
% 12.39/12.56  Model 20 [ 4 1 67 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 12.39/12.56  
% 12.39/12.56  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 12.39/12.56  
% 12.39/12.56  Model 21 [ 7 1 121 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 12.39/12.56  
% 12.39/12.56  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 12.39/12.56  
% 12.39/12.56  Model 22 [ 7 1 68 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 12.39/12.56  
% 12.39/12.56  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 12.39/12.56  
% 12.39/12.56  Model 23 [ 7 1 117 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 12.39/12.56  
% 12.39/12.56  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 12.39/12.56  
% 12.39/12.56  Model 24 [ 8 0 63 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 12.39/12.56  
% 12.39/12.56  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 12.39/12.56  
% 12.39/12.56  Model 25 [ 7 0 80 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 12.39/12.56  
% 12.39/12.56  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 12.39/12.56  
% 12.39/12.56  Model 26 [ 8 0 123 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 12.39/12.56  
% 12.39/12.56  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 12.39/12.56  
% 12.39/12.56  Model 27 [ 9 0 117 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 12.39/12.56  
% 12.39/12.56  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 12.39/12.56  
% 12.39/12.56  Model 28 [ 9 1 68 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 12.39/12.56  
% 12.39/12.56  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 12.39/12.56  
% 12.39/12.56  Model 29 [ 9 1 121 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 12.39/12.56  
% 12.39/12.56  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 12.39/12.56  
% 12.39/12.56  Model 30 [ 10 0 74 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 12.39/12.56  
% 12.39/12.56  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 12.39/12.56  
% 12.39/12.56  Model 31 [ 10 1 155 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 12.39/12.56  
% 12.39/12.56  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 12.39/12.56  
% 12.39/12.56  Model 32 [ 10 0 454 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 12.39/12.56  
% 12.39/12.56  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 12.39/12.56  
% 12.39/12.56  Model 33 [ 11 1 160 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 12.39/12.56  
% 12.39/12.56  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 12.39/12.56  
% 12.39/12.56  Model 34 [ 11 0 152 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 12.39/12.56  
% 12.39/12.56  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 12.39/12.56  
% 12.39/12.56  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 12.39/12.56  
% 12.39/12.56  Model 35 [ 50 1 63 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 12.39/12.56  
% 12.39/12.56  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 12.39/12.56  
% 12.39/12.56  Model 36 [ 12 0 84 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 12.39/12.56  
% 12.39/12.56  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 12.39/12.56  
% 12.39/12.56  Model 37 [ 12 0 81 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 12.39/12.56  
% 12.39/12.56  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 12.39/12.56  
% 12.39/12.56  Model 38 [ 13 0 116 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 12.39/12.56  
% 12.39/12.56  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 12.39/12.56  
% 12.39/12.56  Model 39 [ 52 0 77 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 12.39/12.56  
% 12.39/12.56  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 12.39/12.56  
% 12.39/12.56  Model 40 [ 13 0 68 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 12.39/12.56  
% 12.39/12.56  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 12.39/12.56  
% 12.39/12.56  Model 41 [ 14 0 122 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 12.39/12.56  
% 12.39/12.56  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 12.39/12.56  
% 12.39/12.56  Model 42 [ 14 1 125 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 12.39/12.56  
% 12.39/12.56  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 12.39/12.56  
% 12.39/12.56  Model 43 [ 61 0 78 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 12.39/12.56  
% 12.39/12.56  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 12.39/12.56  
% 12.39/12.56  Model 44 [ 15 1 124 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 12.39/12.56  
% 12.39/12.56  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 12.39/12.56  
% 12.39/12.56  Model 45 [ 15 1 63 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 12.39/12.56  
% 12.39/12.56  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 12.39/12.56  
% 12.39/12.56  Model 46 [ 64 1 343 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 12.39/12.56  
% 12.39/12.56  -----> EMPTY CLAUSE at  12.17 sec ----> 2462 [hyper,2422,9,465,unit_del,1,3] {-} $F.
% 12.39/12.56  
% 12.39/12.56  Length of proof is 18.  Level of proof is 6.
% 12.39/12.56  
% 12.39/12.56  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 12.39/12.56  % SZS status Theorem
% 12.39/12.56  % SZS output start Refutation
% 12.39/12.56  
% 12.39/12.56  1 [] {+} -distinct_points(A,A).
% 12.39/12.56  3 [] {+} -convergent_lines(A,A).
% 12.39/12.56  6 [] {+} -convergent_lines(A,B)|convergent_lines(A,C)|convergent_lines(B,C).
% 12.39/12.56  9 [] {+} -convergent_lines(A,B)| -apart_point_and_line(C,A)|distinct_points(C,intersection_point(A,B)).
% 12.39/12.56  10 [] {+} -convergent_lines(A,B)| -apart_point_and_line(C,B)|distinct_points(C,intersection_point(A,B)).
% 12.39/12.56  11 [] {+} -distinct_points(A,B)| -distinct_lines(C,D)|apart_point_and_line(A,C)|apart_point_and_line(A,D)|apart_point_and_line(B,C)|apart_point_and_line(B,D).
% 12.39/12.56  14 [] {+} -convergent_lines(A,B)|distinct_lines(A,B).
% 12.39/12.56  15 [] {+} -apart_point_and_line(intersection_point($c3,$c2),$c1).
% 12.39/12.56  16 [] {+} convergent_lines($c3,$c2).
% 12.39/12.56  18 [] {+} convergent_lines($c3,$c1).
% 12.39/12.56  19 [] {+} apart_point_and_line(intersection_point($c3,$c1),$c2).
% 12.39/12.56  21 [hyper,16,6] {+} convergent_lines($c3,A)|convergent_lines($c2,A).
% 12.39/12.56  23 [hyper,18,6] {+} convergent_lines($c3,A)|convergent_lines($c1,A).
% 12.39/12.56  31 [hyper,19,10,16] {-} distinct_points(intersection_point($c3,$c1),intersection_point($c3,$c2)).
% 12.39/12.56  34 [hyper,21,6] {-} convergent_lines($c2,A)|convergent_lines($c3,B)|convergent_lines(A,B).
% 12.39/12.56  48 [hyper,23,6] {-} convergent_lines($c1,A)|convergent_lines($c3,B)|convergent_lines(A,B).
% 12.39/12.56  49 [hyper,23,3] {+} convergent_lines($c1,$c3).
% 12.39/12.56  54 [hyper,49,14] {+} distinct_lines($c1,$c3).
% 12.39/12.56  72 [hyper,48,3] {+} convergent_lines($c1,A)|convergent_lines(A,$c3).
% 12.39/12.56  74 [hyper,48,6] {+} convergent_lines($c1,A)|convergent_lines($c3,B)|convergent_lines(A,C)|convergent_lines(B,C).
% 12.39/12.56  75 [factor,74.1.3,unit_del,3] {+} convergent_lines($c3,A)|convergent_lines(A,$c1).
% 12.39/12.56  77 [hyper,72,6] {-} convergent_lines(A,$c3)|convergent_lines($c1,B)|convergent_lines(A,B).
% 12.39/12.56  98 [hyper,31,11,54,unit_del,15] {-} apart_point_and_line(intersection_point($c3,$c1),$c1)|apart_point_and_line(intersection_point($c3,$c1),$c3)|apart_point_and_line(intersection_point($c3,$c2),$c3).
% 12.39/12.56  133 [hyper,34,3] {+} convergent_lines($c2,A)|convergent_lines(A,$c3).
% 12.39/12.56  139 [hyper,133,6] {-} convergent_lines(A,$c3)|convergent_lines($c2,B)|convergent_lines(A,B).
% 12.39/12.56  426 [hyper,77,3] {+} convergent_lines(A,$c3)|convergent_lines(A,$c1).
% 12.39/12.56  465 [hyper,139,3] {+} convergent_lines(A,$c3)|convergent_lines(A,$c2).
% 12.39/12.56  2366 [hyper,98,10,75,unit_del,1,3] {-} apart_point_and_line(intersection_point($c3,$c1),$c3)|apart_point_and_line(intersection_point($c3,$c2),$c3).
% 12.39/12.56  2422 [hyper,2366,9,426,unit_del,1,3] {+} apart_point_and_line(intersection_point($c3,$c2),$c3).
% 12.39/12.56  2462 [hyper,2422,9,465,unit_del,1,3] {-} $F.
% 12.39/12.56  
% 12.39/12.56  % SZS output end Refutation
% 12.39/12.56  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 12.39/12.56  
% 12.39/12.56  
% 12.39/12.56  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 12.39/12.56  
% 12.39/12.56  
% 12.39/12.56  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 12.39/12.56  
% 12.39/12.56  ============ end of search ============
% 12.39/12.56  
% 12.39/12.56  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 12.39/12.56  
% 12.39/12.56  true clauses given          29      (16.8%)
% 12.39/12.56  false clauses given        144
% 12.39/12.56  
% 12.39/12.56        FALSE     TRUE
% 12.39/12.56     5  0         1
% 12.39/12.56     9  20        2
% 12.39/12.56    12  80        10
% 12.39/12.56    13  24        0
% 12.39/12.56    14  0         5
% 12.39/12.56    15  11        9
% 12.39/12.56    18  4         2
% 12.39/12.56    19  4         4
% 12.39/12.56    20  0         1
% 12.39/12.56    21  8         8
% 12.39/12.56    22  8         9
% 12.39/12.56    23  14        21
% 12.39/12.56    24  28        48
% 12.39/12.56    25  0         39
% 12.39/12.56    26  121       116
% 12.39/12.56    27  121       162
% 12.39/12.56    28  0         39
% 12.39/12.56    29  128       155
% 12.39/12.56    30  0         91
% 12.39/12.56    31  0         10
% 12.39/12.56    32  0         80
% 12.39/12.56    39  0         1
% 12.39/12.56    40  0         4
% 12.39/12.56    41  0         2
% 12.39/12.56  tot:  571       819      (58.9% true)
% 12.39/12.56  
% 12.39/12.56  
% 12.39/12.56  Model 46 [ 64 1 343 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 12.39/12.56  
% 12.39/12.56  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 12.39/12.56  
% 12.39/12.56  Process 18864 finished Sat Jun 18 07:21:10 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------