TSTP Solution File: GEO197+1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : GEO197+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 06:19:01 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 112.54s 112.74s
% Output : Refutation 112.54s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.14 % Problem : GEO197+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.08/0.15 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.15/0.36 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.15/0.36 % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 10:13:53 EDT 2022
% 0.15/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.39 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.15/0.39 The process was started by sandbox2 on n011.cluster.edu,
% 0.15/0.39 Sat Jun 18 10:13:53 2022
% 0.15/0.39 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 12684.
% 0.15/0.39
% 0.15/0.39 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.15/0.39 set(auto).
% 0.15/0.39 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.15/0.39 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.15/0.39 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.15/0.39 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.15/0.39 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.15/0.39 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.15/0.39 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.15/0.39 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.15/0.39 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.15/0.39 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.15/0.39 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.15/0.39 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.15/0.39 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.15/0.39 clear(print_given).
% 0.15/0.39
% 0.15/0.39 formula_list(usable).
% 0.15/0.39
% 0.15/0.39 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=6.
% 0.15/0.39
% 0.15/0.39 This is a non-Horn set without equality. The strategy
% 0.15/0.39 will be ordered hyper_res, ur_res, unit deletion, and
% 0.15/0.39 factoring, with satellites in sos and nuclei in usable.
% 0.15/0.39
% 0.15/0.39 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.15/0.39 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.15/0.39 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.15/0.39
% 0.15/0.39 ------------> process usable:
% 0.15/0.39
% 0.15/0.39 ------------> process sos:
% 0.15/0.39
% 0.15/0.39 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.23/0.42
% 0.23/0.42 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.23/0.42
% 0.23/0.42 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.23/0.42
% 0.23/0.42
% 0.23/0.42 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.23/0.42
% 0.23/0.42 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.23/0.42 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.23/0.42 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.23/0.42 number of clauses in intial UL: 15
% 0.23/0.42 number of clauses initially in problem: 19
% 0.23/0.42 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 78
% 0.23/0.42 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.23/0.42 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.23/0.42 absolute distinct symbol count: 9
% 0.23/0.42 distinct predicate count: 4
% 0.23/0.42 distinct function count: 2
% 0.23/0.42 distinct constant count: 3
% 0.23/0.42
% 0.23/0.42 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.23/0.42
% 0.23/0.42
% 0.23/0.42
% 0.23/0.42 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.23/0.42
% 0.23/0.42 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.23/0.42
% 0.23/0.42 =========== start of search ===========
% 96.15/96.35
% 96.15/96.35
% 96.15/96.35 Changing weight limit from 60 to 43.
% 96.15/96.35
% 96.15/96.35 Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 96.15/96.35
% 96.15/96.35 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 96.15/96.35
% 96.15/96.35 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 96.15/96.35
% 96.15/96.35 Model 4 [ 1 1 89 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 96.15/96.35
% 96.15/96.35 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 96.15/96.35
% 96.15/96.35 Model 5 [ 1 0 63 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 96.15/96.35
% 96.15/96.35 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 96.15/96.35
% 96.15/96.35 Model 6 [ 1 0 155 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 96.15/96.35
% 96.15/96.35 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 96.15/96.35
% 96.15/96.35 Model 7 [ 2 0 121 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 96.15/96.35
% 96.15/96.35 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 96.15/96.35
% 96.15/96.35 Model 8 [ 2 1 107 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 96.15/96.35
% 96.15/96.35 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 96.15/96.35
% 96.15/96.35 Model 9 [ 2 0 126 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 96.15/96.35
% 96.15/96.35 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 96.15/96.35
% 96.15/96.35 Model 10 [ 3 1 63 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 96.15/96.35
% 96.15/96.35 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 96.15/96.35
% 96.15/96.35 Model 11 [ 3 0 72 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 96.15/96.35
% 96.15/96.35 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 96.15/96.35
% 96.15/96.35 Model 12 [ 3 0 117 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 96.15/96.35
% 96.15/96.35 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 96.15/96.35
% 96.15/96.35 Model 13 [ 4 1 124 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 96.15/96.35
% 96.15/96.35 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 96.15/96.35
% 96.15/96.35 Model 14 [ 4 1 72 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 96.15/96.35
% 96.15/96.35 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 96.15/96.35
% 96.15/96.35 Model 15 [ 4 1 3848 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 96.15/96.35
% 96.15/96.35 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 96.15/96.35
% 96.15/96.35 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 96.15/96.35
% 96.15/96.35 Model 16 [ 5 1 125 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 96.15/96.35
% 96.15/96.35 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 96.15/96.35
% 96.15/96.35 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 96.15/96.35
% 96.15/96.35 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 96.15/96.35
% 96.15/96.35 Model 17 [ 30 0 81 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 96.15/96.35
% 96.15/96.35 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 96.15/96.35
% 96.15/96.35 Model 18 [ 5 1 123 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 96.15/96.35
% 96.15/96.35 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 96.15/96.35
% 96.15/96.35 Model 19 [ 6 0 75 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 96.15/96.35
% 96.15/96.35 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 96.15/96.35
% 96.15/96.35 Model 20 [ 35 0 374 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 96.15/96.35
% 96.15/96.35 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 96.15/96.35
% 96.15/96.35 Model 21 [ 36 0 79 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 96.15/96.35
% 96.15/96.35 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 96.15/96.35
% 96.15/96.35 Model 22 [ 36 1 63 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 96.15/96.35
% 96.15/96.35 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 96.15/96.35
% 96.15/96.35 Model 23 [ 7 0 96 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 96.15/96.35
% 96.15/96.35 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 96.15/96.35
% 96.15/96.35 Model 24 [ 7 1 68 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 96.15/96.35
% 96.15/96.35 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 96.15/96.35
% 96.15/96.35 Model 25 [ 8 1 70 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 96.15/96.35
% 96.15/96.35 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 96.15/96.35
% 96.15/96.35 Model 26 [ 42 0 82 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 96.15/96.35
% 96.15/96.35 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 96.15/96.35
% 96.15/96.35 Model 27 [ 8 0 164 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 96.15/96.35
% 96.15/96.35 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 96.15/96.35
% 96.15/96.35 Model 28 [ 9 1 152 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 96.15/96.35
% 96.15/96.35 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 96.15/96.35
% 96.15/96.35 Model 29 [ 9 0 90 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 96.15/96.35
% 96.15/96.35 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 96.15/96.35
% 96.15/96.35 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 96.15/96.35
% 96.15/96.35 Model 30 [ 10 0 67 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 96.15/96.35
% 96.15/96.35 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 96.15/96.35
% 96.15/96.35 Model 31 [ 10 0 75 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 96.15/96.35
% 96.15/96.35 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 96.15/96.35
% 96.15/96.35 Model 32 [ 12 0 119 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 96.15/96.35
% 96.15/96.35 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 96.15/96.35
% 96.15/96.35 Model 33 [ 11 1 121 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 96.15/96.35
% 96.15/96.35 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 96.15/96.35
% 96.15/96.35 Model 34 [ 12 1 130 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 96.15/96.35
% 96.15/96.35 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 96.15/96.35
% 96.15/96.35 Model 35 [ 12 1 78 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 96.15/96.35
% 96.15/96.35 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 96.15/96.35
% 96.15/96.35 Model 36 [ 55 1 112 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 96.15/96.35
% 96.15/96.35 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 96.15/96.35
% 96.15/96.35 Model 37 [ 13 1 93 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 96.15/96.35
% 96.15/96.35 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 96.15/96.35
% 96.15/96.35 Model 38 [ 11 1 67 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 96.15/96.35
% 96.15/96.35 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 96.15/96.35
% 96.15/96.35 Model 39 [ 14 1 63 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 96.15/96.35
% 96.15/96.35 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 96.15/96.35
% 96.15/96.35 Model 40 [ 14 0 65 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 96.15/96.35
% 96.15/96.35 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 96.15/96.35
% 96.15/96.35 Model 41 [ 14 1 163 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 96.15/96.35
% 96.15/96.35 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 96.15/96.35
% 96.15/96.35 Model 42 [ 15 0 118 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 96.15/96.35
% 96.15/96.35 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 96.15/96.35
% 96.15/96.35 Model 43 [ 13 0 88 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 96.15/96.35
% 96.15/96.35 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 96.15/96.35
% 96.15/96.35 Model 44 [ 15 0 64 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 96.15/96.35
% 96.15/96.35 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 96.15/96.35
% 96.15/96.35 Model 45 [ 16 0 148 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 96.15/96.35
% 96.15/96.35 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 96.15/96.35
% 96.15/96.35 Model 46 [ 16 1 74 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 96.15/96.35
% 96.15/96.35 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 96.15/96.35
% 96.15/96.35 Model 47 [ 16 0 77 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 96.15/96.35
% 96.15/96.35 Resetting weight limit to 43 after 305 givens.
% 96.15/96.35
% 112.54/112.74
% 112.54/112.74 -- HEY sandbox2, WE HAVE A PROOF!! --
% 112.54/112.74
% 112.54/112.74 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 112.31 sec ----> 3934 [binary,3933.1,3.1] {-} $F.
% 112.54/112.74
% 112.54/112.74 Length of proof is 25. Level of proof is 10.
% 112.54/112.74
% 112.54/112.74 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 112.54/112.74 % SZS status Theorem
% 112.54/112.74 % SZS output start Refutation
% 112.54/112.74
% 112.54/112.74 3 [] {+} -convergent_lines(A,A).
% 112.54/112.74 6 [] {+} -convergent_lines(A,B)|convergent_lines(A,C)|convergent_lines(B,C).
% 112.54/112.74 9 [] {+} -convergent_lines(A,B)| -apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(A,B),A).
% 112.54/112.74 10 [] {+} -convergent_lines(A,B)| -apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(A,B),B).
% 112.54/112.74 11 [] {+} -distinct_points(A,B)| -distinct_lines(C,D)|apart_point_and_line(A,C)|apart_point_and_line(A,D)|apart_point_and_line(B,C)|apart_point_and_line(B,D).
% 112.54/112.74 12 [] {+} -apart_point_and_line(A,B)|distinct_points(A,C)|apart_point_and_line(C,B).
% 112.54/112.74 14 [] {+} -convergent_lines(A,B)|distinct_lines(B,C)|convergent_lines(A,C).
% 112.54/112.74 15 [] {+} -apart_point_and_line(intersection_point($c3,$c2),$c1).
% 112.54/112.74 16 [] {+} convergent_lines($c3,$c2).
% 112.54/112.74 17 [] {+} convergent_lines($c1,$c2).
% 112.54/112.74 19 [] {-} apart_point_and_line(intersection_point($c1,$c2),$c3).
% 112.54/112.74 21 [hyper,16,6] {+} convergent_lines($c3,A)|convergent_lines($c2,A).
% 112.54/112.74 25 [hyper,17,6] {+} convergent_lines($c1,A)|convergent_lines($c2,A).
% 112.54/112.74 27 [hyper,19,12] {-} distinct_points(intersection_point($c1,$c2),A)|apart_point_and_line(A,$c3).
% 112.54/112.74 32 [hyper,21,6] {-} convergent_lines($c2,A)|convergent_lines($c3,B)|convergent_lines(A,B).
% 112.54/112.74 38 [hyper,25,6] {-} convergent_lines($c2,A)|convergent_lines($c1,B)|convergent_lines(A,B).
% 112.54/112.74 74 [hyper,32,3] {-} convergent_lines($c2,A)|convergent_lines(A,$c3).
% 112.54/112.74 76 [hyper,32,6] {+} convergent_lines($c2,A)|convergent_lines($c3,B)|convergent_lines(A,C)|convergent_lines(B,C).
% 112.54/112.74 77 [factor,76.1.3,unit_del,3] {+} convergent_lines($c3,A)|convergent_lines(A,$c2).
% 112.54/112.74 79 [hyper,74,6] {-} convergent_lines(A,$c3)|convergent_lines($c2,B)|convergent_lines(A,B).
% 112.54/112.74 98 [hyper,38,3] {-} convergent_lines($c2,A)|convergent_lines(A,$c1).
% 112.54/112.74 100 [hyper,38,6] {+} convergent_lines($c2,A)|convergent_lines($c1,B)|convergent_lines(A,C)|convergent_lines(B,C).
% 112.54/112.74 103 [hyper,98,6] {-} convergent_lines(A,$c1)|convergent_lines($c2,B)|convergent_lines(A,B).
% 112.54/112.74 104 [hyper,98,14] {-} convergent_lines($c2,A)|distinct_lines($c1,B)|convergent_lines(A,B).
% 112.54/112.74 105 [factor,104.1.3,unit_del,3] {+} distinct_lines($c1,$c2).
% 112.54/112.74 106 [hyper,105,11,27] {+} apart_point_and_line(intersection_point($c1,$c2),$c1)|apart_point_and_line(intersection_point($c1,$c2),$c2)|apart_point_and_line(A,$c1)|apart_point_and_line(A,$c2)|apart_point_and_line(A,$c3).
% 112.54/112.74 155 [hyper,79,6] {-} convergent_lines(A,$c3)|convergent_lines(A,B)|convergent_lines($c2,C)|convergent_lines(B,C).
% 112.54/112.74 353 [hyper,103,3] {+} convergent_lines(A,$c1)|convergent_lines(A,$c2).
% 112.54/112.74 695 [hyper,100,6] {+} convergent_lines($c2,A)|convergent_lines($c1,B)|convergent_lines(B,C)|convergent_lines(A,D)|convergent_lines(C,D).
% 112.54/112.74 698 [factor,695.1.4,unit_del,3] {+} convergent_lines($c1,A)|convergent_lines(A,B)|convergent_lines(B,$c2).
% 112.54/112.74 716 [hyper,106,9,353,unit_del,3] {-} apart_point_and_line(intersection_point($c1,$c2),$c2)|apart_point_and_line(A,$c1)|apart_point_and_line(A,$c2)|apart_point_and_line(A,$c3).
% 112.54/112.74 921 [hyper,155,3] {-} convergent_lines(A,$c3)|convergent_lines(A,B)|convergent_lines(B,$c2).
% 112.54/112.74 927 [hyper,921,6] {-} convergent_lines(A,$c3)|convergent_lines(B,$c2)|convergent_lines(A,C)|convergent_lines(B,C).
% 112.54/112.74 3554 [hyper,716,10,698,unit_del,3,3] {-} apart_point_and_line(A,$c1)|apart_point_and_line(A,$c2)|apart_point_and_line(A,$c3).
% 112.54/112.74 3820 [hyper,3554,10,77,unit_del,15,3] {+} apart_point_and_line(intersection_point($c3,$c2),$c3).
% 112.54/112.74 3933 [hyper,3820,9,927,unit_del,3,factor_simp] {-} convergent_lines(A,$c2).
% 112.54/112.74 3934 [binary,3933.1,3.1] {-} $F.
% 112.54/112.74
% 112.54/112.74 % SZS output end Refutation
% 112.54/112.74 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 112.54/112.74
% 112.54/112.74
% 112.54/112.74 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 112.54/112.74
% 112.54/112.74
% 112.54/112.74 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 112.54/112.74
% 112.54/112.74 ============ end of search ============
% 112.54/112.74
% 112.54/112.74 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 112.54/112.74
% 112.54/112.74 true clauses given 45 (14.6%)
% 112.54/112.74 false clauses given 264
% 112.54/112.74
% 112.54/112.74 FALSE TRUE
% 112.54/112.74 5 0 1
% 112.54/112.74 9 0 2
% 112.54/112.74 10 6 2
% 112.54/112.74 12 6 83
% 112.54/112.74 13 16 8
% 112.54/112.74 14 4 0
% 112.54/112.74 15 158 71
% 112.54/112.74 16 24 16
% 112.54/112.74 17 8 0
% 112.54/112.74 19 16 22
% 112.54/112.74 22 6 0
% 112.54/112.74 23 29 0
% 112.54/112.74 25 68 0
% 112.54/112.74 26 192 0
% 112.54/112.74 28 241 0
% 112.54/112.74 29 441 0
% 112.54/112.74 30 1 0
% 112.54/112.74 31 288 0
% 112.54/112.74 32 332 0
% 112.54/112.74 33 10 0
% 112.54/112.74 34 238 0
% 112.54/112.74 36 36 0
% 112.54/112.74 37 149 2
% 112.54/112.74 39 45 0
% 112.54/112.74 40 230 3
% 112.54/112.74 42 40 0
% 112.54/112.74 43 54 1
% 112.54/112.74 tot: 2638 211 (7.4% true)
% 112.54/112.74
% 112.54/112.74
% 112.54/112.74 Model 47 [ 16 0 77 ] (0.01 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 112.54/112.74
% 112.54/112.74 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 112.54/112.74
% 112.54/112.74 Process 12684 finished Sat Jun 18 10:15:45 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------