TSTP Solution File: GEO194+2 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : GEO194+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 06:18:59 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 16.24s 16.46s
% Output : Refutation 16.24s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : GEO194+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 00:29:27 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.37 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.13/0.37 The process was started by sandbox on n007.cluster.edu,
% 0.13/0.37 Sat Jun 18 00:29:27 2022
% 0.13/0.37 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 9996.
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.13/0.37 set(auto).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.13/0.37 clear(print_given).
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 formula_list(usable).
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=6.
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 This is a non-Horn set without equality. The strategy
% 0.13/0.37 will be ordered hyper_res, ur_res, unit deletion, and
% 0.13/0.37 factoring, with satellites in sos and nuclei in usable.
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 ------------> process usable:
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 ------------> process sos:
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.13/0.39
% 0.13/0.39 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.13/0.39
% 0.13/0.39 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.13/0.39
% 0.13/0.39
% 0.13/0.39 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.13/0.39
% 0.13/0.39 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.13/0.39 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.13/0.39 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.13/0.39 number of clauses in intial UL: 15
% 0.13/0.39 number of clauses initially in problem: 19
% 0.13/0.39 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 78
% 0.13/0.39 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.13/0.39 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.13/0.39 absolute distinct symbol count: 9
% 0.13/0.39 distinct predicate count: 4
% 0.13/0.39 distinct function count: 2
% 0.13/0.39 distinct constant count: 3
% 0.13/0.39
% 0.13/0.39 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.13/0.39
% 0.13/0.39
% 0.13/0.39
% 0.13/0.39 =========== start of search ===========
% 9.55/9.75
% 9.55/9.75
% 9.55/9.75 Changing weight limit from 60 to 32.
% 9.55/9.75
% 9.55/9.75 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 9.55/9.75
% 9.55/9.75 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 9.55/9.75
% 9.55/9.75 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.55/9.75
% 9.55/9.75 Model 3 [ 1 1 67 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 9.55/9.75
% 9.55/9.75 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.55/9.75
% 9.55/9.75 Model 4 [ 1 1 86 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 9.55/9.75
% 9.55/9.75 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.55/9.75
% 9.55/9.75 Model 5 [ 1 1 119 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 9.55/9.75
% 9.55/9.75 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.55/9.75
% 9.55/9.75 Model 6 [ 1 0 86 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 9.55/9.75
% 9.55/9.75 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.55/9.75
% 9.55/9.75 Model 7 [ 2 0 64 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 9.55/9.75
% 9.55/9.75 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.55/9.75
% 9.55/9.75 Model 8 [ 2 0 72 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 9.55/9.75
% 9.55/9.75 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.55/9.75
% 9.55/9.75 Model 9 [ 2 1 94 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 9.55/9.75
% 9.55/9.75 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.55/9.75
% 9.55/9.75 Model 10 [ 3 1 128 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 9.55/9.75
% 9.55/9.75 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.55/9.75
% 9.55/9.75 Model 11 [ 3 1 74 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 9.55/9.75
% 9.55/9.75 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.55/9.75
% 9.55/9.75 Model 12 [ 3 1 116 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 9.55/9.75
% 9.55/9.75 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.55/9.75
% 9.55/9.75 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.55/9.75
% 9.55/9.75 Model 13 [ 4 0 165 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 9.55/9.75
% 9.55/9.75 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.55/9.75
% 9.55/9.75 Model 14 [ 16 0 122 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 9.55/9.75
% 9.55/9.75 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.55/9.75
% 9.55/9.75 Model 15 [ 5 0 134 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 9.55/9.75
% 9.55/9.75 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.55/9.75
% 9.55/9.75 Model 16 [ 5 0 70 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 9.55/9.75
% 9.55/9.75 Model 17 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 9.55/9.75
% 9.55/9.75 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 9.55/9.75
% 9.55/9.75 Resetting weight limit to 32 after 130 givens.
% 9.55/9.75
% 10.63/10.86
% 10.63/10.86
% 10.63/10.86 Changing weight limit from 32 to 30.
% 10.63/10.86
% 10.63/10.86 Resetting weight limit to 30 after 135 givens.
% 10.63/10.86
% 16.24/16.45
% 16.24/16.45
% 16.24/16.45 Changing weight limit from 30 to 31.
% 16.24/16.45
% 16.24/16.45 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 16.24/16.45
% 16.24/16.45 Model 18 [ 6 0 65 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 16.24/16.45
% 16.24/16.45 Resetting weight limit to 31 after 155 givens.
% 16.24/16.45
% 16.24/16.46
% 16.24/16.46 -- HEY sandbox, WE HAVE A PROOF!! --
% 16.24/16.46
% 16.24/16.46 -----> EMPTY CLAUSE at 16.05 sec ----> 3633 [hyper,3617,9,182,unit_del,1,3] {-} $F.
% 16.24/16.46
% 16.24/16.46 Length of proof is 16. Level of proof is 8.
% 16.24/16.46
% 16.24/16.46 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 16.24/16.46 % SZS status Theorem
% 16.24/16.46 % SZS output start Refutation
% 16.24/16.46
% 16.24/16.46 1 [] {+} -distinct_points(A,A).
% 16.24/16.46 3 [] {+} -convergent_lines(A,A).
% 16.24/16.46 6 [] {+} -convergent_lines(A,B)|convergent_lines(A,C)|convergent_lines(B,C).
% 16.24/16.46 9 [] {+} -convergent_lines(A,B)| -apart_point_and_line(C,A)|distinct_points(C,intersection_point(A,B)).
% 16.24/16.46 10 [] {+} -convergent_lines(A,B)| -apart_point_and_line(C,B)|distinct_points(C,intersection_point(A,B)).
% 16.24/16.46 11 [] {+} -distinct_points(A,B)| -distinct_lines(C,D)|apart_point_and_line(A,C)|apart_point_and_line(A,D)|apart_point_and_line(B,C)|apart_point_and_line(B,D).
% 16.24/16.46 12 [] {+} -apart_point_and_line(A,B)|distinct_points(A,C)|apart_point_and_line(C,B).
% 16.24/16.46 14 [] {+} -convergent_lines(A,B)|distinct_lines(A,B).
% 16.24/16.46 15 [] {+} -apart_point_and_line(intersection_point($c3,$c1),$c2).
% 16.24/16.46 16 [] {+} convergent_lines($c3,$c2).
% 16.24/16.46 18 [] {+} convergent_lines($c3,$c1).
% 16.24/16.46 19 [] {-} apart_point_and_line(intersection_point($c3,$c2),$c1).
% 16.24/16.46 21 [hyper,16,6] {+} convergent_lines($c3,A)|convergent_lines($c2,A).
% 16.24/16.46 23 [hyper,18,6] {+} convergent_lines($c3,A)|convergent_lines($c1,A).
% 16.24/16.46 29 [hyper,19,12] {+} distinct_points(intersection_point($c3,$c2),A)|apart_point_and_line(A,$c1).
% 16.24/16.46 33 [hyper,21,6] {-} convergent_lines($c2,A)|convergent_lines($c3,B)|convergent_lines(A,B).
% 16.24/16.46 34 [hyper,21,3] {+} convergent_lines($c2,$c3).
% 16.24/16.46 38 [hyper,34,14] {+} distinct_lines($c2,$c3).
% 16.24/16.46 40 [hyper,23,6] {+} convergent_lines($c1,A)|convergent_lines($c3,B)|convergent_lines(A,B).
% 16.24/16.46 69 [hyper,29,11,38] {-} apart_point_and_line(A,$c1)|apart_point_and_line(intersection_point($c3,$c2),$c2)|apart_point_and_line(intersection_point($c3,$c2),$c3)|apart_point_and_line(A,$c2)|apart_point_and_line(A,$c3).
% 16.24/16.46 81 [hyper,33,6] {+} convergent_lines($c2,A)|convergent_lines($c3,B)|convergent_lines(A,C)|convergent_lines(B,C).
% 16.24/16.46 82 [factor,81.1.3,unit_del,3] {+} convergent_lines($c3,A)|convergent_lines(A,$c2).
% 16.24/16.46 181 [hyper,40,6] {-} convergent_lines($c1,A)|convergent_lines($c3,B)|convergent_lines(A,C)|convergent_lines(B,C).
% 16.24/16.46 182 [factor,181.1.3,unit_del,3] {+} convergent_lines($c3,A)|convergent_lines(A,$c1).
% 16.24/16.46 2532 [hyper,69,10,82,unit_del,1,3] {-} apart_point_and_line(A,$c1)|apart_point_and_line(intersection_point($c3,$c2),$c3)|apart_point_and_line(A,$c2)|apart_point_and_line(A,$c3).
% 16.24/16.46 3517 [hyper,2532,9,82,unit_del,1,3] {-} apart_point_and_line(A,$c1)|apart_point_and_line(A,$c2)|apart_point_and_line(A,$c3).
% 16.24/16.46 3573 [hyper,3517,15] {-} apart_point_and_line(intersection_point($c3,$c1),$c1)|apart_point_and_line(intersection_point($c3,$c1),$c3).
% 16.24/16.46 3617 [hyper,3573,10,182,unit_del,1,3] {+} apart_point_and_line(intersection_point($c3,$c1),$c3).
% 16.24/16.46 3633 [hyper,3617,9,182,unit_del,1,3] {-} $F.
% 16.24/16.46
% 16.24/16.46 % SZS output end Refutation
% 16.24/16.46 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 16.24/16.46
% 16.24/16.46
% 16.24/16.46 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 16.24/16.46
% 16.24/16.46
% 16.24/16.46 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 16.24/16.46
% 16.24/16.46 ============ end of search ============
% 16.24/16.46
% 16.24/16.46 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 16.24/16.46
% 16.24/16.46 true clauses given 51 (32.9%)
% 16.24/16.46 false clauses given 104
% 16.24/16.46
% 16.24/16.46 FALSE TRUE
% 16.24/16.46 5 0 1
% 16.24/16.46 9 12 23
% 16.24/16.46 11 6 4
% 16.24/16.46 12 18 27
% 16.24/16.46 14 22 0
% 16.24/16.46 15 0 4
% 16.24/16.46 16 32 16
% 16.24/16.46 17 22 0
% 16.24/16.46 18 0 6
% 16.24/16.46 19 0 16
% 16.24/16.46 20 4 1
% 16.24/16.46 21 6 8
% 16.24/16.46 22 12 40
% 16.24/16.46 23 65 12
% 16.24/16.46 24 154 91
% 16.24/16.46 25 137 114
% 16.24/16.46 26 205 17
% 16.24/16.46 27 516 238
% 16.24/16.46 28 180 126
% 16.24/16.46 29 208 9
% 16.24/16.46 30 137 39
% 16.24/16.46 tot: 1736 792 (31.3% true)
% 16.24/16.46
% 16.24/16.46
% 16.24/16.46 Model 18 [ 6 0 65 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 16.24/16.46
% 16.24/16.46 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 16.24/16.46
% 16.24/16.46 Process 9996 finished Sat Jun 18 00:29:44 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------