TSTP Solution File: GEO188+1 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : GEO188+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:38:31 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 5.75s 2.36s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 5.96s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :   17
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   50 (  18 unt;   9 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   94 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   75 (  22   ~;  42   |;   4   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   7  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   11 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   12 (   6   >;   6   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   51 (;  51   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ distinct_points > distinct_lines > convergent_lines > apart_point_and_line > line_connecting > intersection_point > #nlpp > #skF_2 > #skF_3 > #skF_1

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(line_connecting,type,
    line_connecting: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(distinct_points,type,
    distinct_points: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(intersection_point,type,
    intersection_point: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(apart_point_and_line,type,
    apart_point_and_line: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(convergent_lines,type,
    convergent_lines: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_2',type,
    '#skF_2': $i ).

tff('#skF_3',type,
    '#skF_3': $i ).

tff('#skF_1',type,
    '#skF_1': $i ).

tff(distinct_lines,type,
    distinct_lines: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(f_54,axiom,
    ! [X] : ~ distinct_points(X,X),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',apart1) ).

tff(f_146,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X,Y,Z] :
        ( ( distinct_points(X,Y)
          & distinct_points(X,Z)
          & distinct_points(Y,Z)
          & ~ apart_point_and_line(Z,line_connecting(X,Y)) )
       => ~ apart_point_and_line(X,line_connecting(Z,Y)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',con) ).

tff(f_66,axiom,
    ! [X,Y,Z] :
      ( distinct_points(X,Y)
     => ( distinct_points(X,Z)
        | distinct_points(Y,Z) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',apart4) ).

tff(f_125,axiom,
    ! [X,Y,Z] :
      ( apart_point_and_line(X,Y)
     => ( distinct_lines(Y,Z)
        | apart_point_and_line(X,Z) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',ceq2) ).

tff(f_112,axiom,
    ! [X,Y,U,V] :
      ( ( distinct_points(X,Y)
        & distinct_lines(U,V) )
     => ( apart_point_and_line(X,U)
        | apart_point_and_line(X,V)
        | apart_point_and_line(Y,U)
        | apart_point_and_line(Y,V) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',cu1) ).

tff(f_89,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( distinct_points(X,Y)
     => ~ apart_point_and_line(Y,line_connecting(X,Y)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',ci2) ).

tff(f_84,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( distinct_points(X,Y)
     => ~ apart_point_and_line(X,line_connecting(X,Y)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',ci1) ).

tff(f_119,axiom,
    ! [X,Y,Z] :
      ( apart_point_and_line(X,Y)
     => ( distinct_points(X,Z)
        | apart_point_and_line(Z,Y) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',ceq1) ).

tff(c_2,plain,
    ! [X_1] : ~ distinct_points(X_1,X_1),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_54]) ).

tff(c_38,plain,
    distinct_points('#skF_1','#skF_2'),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_146]) ).

tff(c_34,plain,
    distinct_points('#skF_2','#skF_3'),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_146]) ).

tff(c_46,plain,
    ! [Y_45,Z_46,X_47] :
      ( distinct_points(Y_45,Z_46)
      | distinct_points(X_47,Z_46)
      | ~ distinct_points(X_47,Y_45) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_66]) ).

tff(c_56,plain,
    ! [Z_48] :
      ( distinct_points('#skF_3',Z_48)
      | distinct_points('#skF_2',Z_48) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_34,c_46]) ).

tff(c_64,plain,
    distinct_points('#skF_3','#skF_2'),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_56,c_2]) ).

tff(c_30,plain,
    apart_point_and_line('#skF_1',line_connecting('#skF_3','#skF_2')),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_146]) ).

tff(c_89,plain,
    ! [X_54,Z_55,Y_56] :
      ( apart_point_and_line(X_54,Z_55)
      | distinct_lines(Y_56,Z_55)
      | ~ apart_point_and_line(X_54,Y_56) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_125]) ).

tff(c_92,plain,
    ! [Z_55] :
      ( apart_point_and_line('#skF_1',Z_55)
      | distinct_lines(line_connecting('#skF_3','#skF_2'),Z_55) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_30,c_89]) ).

tff(c_180,plain,
    ! [Y_70,V_71,U_72,X_73] :
      ( apart_point_and_line(Y_70,V_71)
      | apart_point_and_line(Y_70,U_72)
      | apart_point_and_line(X_73,V_71)
      | apart_point_and_line(X_73,U_72)
      | ~ distinct_lines(U_72,V_71)
      | ~ distinct_points(X_73,Y_70) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_112]) ).

tff(c_1382,plain,
    ! [Y_125,Z_126,X_127] :
      ( apart_point_and_line(Y_125,Z_126)
      | apart_point_and_line(Y_125,line_connecting('#skF_3','#skF_2'))
      | apart_point_and_line(X_127,Z_126)
      | apart_point_and_line(X_127,line_connecting('#skF_3','#skF_2'))
      | ~ distinct_points(X_127,Y_125)
      | apart_point_and_line('#skF_1',Z_126) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_92,c_180]) ).

tff(c_1606,plain,
    ! [Z_126] :
      ( apart_point_and_line('#skF_3',Z_126)
      | apart_point_and_line('#skF_3',line_connecting('#skF_3','#skF_2'))
      | apart_point_and_line('#skF_2',Z_126)
      | apart_point_and_line('#skF_2',line_connecting('#skF_3','#skF_2'))
      | apart_point_and_line('#skF_1',Z_126) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_34,c_1382]) ).

tff(c_2441,plain,
    apart_point_and_line('#skF_2',line_connecting('#skF_3','#skF_2')),
    inference(splitLeft,[status(thm)],[c_1606]) ).

tff(c_16,plain,
    ! [Y_16,X_15] :
      ( ~ apart_point_and_line(Y_16,line_connecting(X_15,Y_16))
      | ~ distinct_points(X_15,Y_16) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_89]) ).

tff(c_2448,plain,
    ~ distinct_points('#skF_3','#skF_2'),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2441,c_16]) ).

tff(c_2454,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_64,c_2448]) ).

tff(c_2455,plain,
    ! [Z_126] :
      ( apart_point_and_line('#skF_3',line_connecting('#skF_3','#skF_2'))
      | apart_point_and_line('#skF_3',Z_126)
      | apart_point_and_line('#skF_2',Z_126)
      | apart_point_and_line('#skF_1',Z_126) ),
    inference(splitRight,[status(thm)],[c_1606]) ).

tff(c_3103,plain,
    apart_point_and_line('#skF_3',line_connecting('#skF_3','#skF_2')),
    inference(splitLeft,[status(thm)],[c_2455]) ).

tff(c_14,plain,
    ! [X_13,Y_14] :
      ( ~ apart_point_and_line(X_13,line_connecting(X_13,Y_14))
      | ~ distinct_points(X_13,Y_14) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_84]) ).

tff(c_3110,plain,
    ~ distinct_points('#skF_3','#skF_2'),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_3103,c_14]) ).

tff(c_3116,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_64,c_3110]) ).

tff(c_3129,plain,
    ! [Z_171] :
      ( apart_point_and_line('#skF_3',Z_171)
      | apart_point_and_line('#skF_2',Z_171)
      | apart_point_and_line('#skF_1',Z_171) ),
    inference(splitRight,[status(thm)],[c_2455]) ).

tff(c_24,plain,
    ! [Z_27,Y_26,X_25] :
      ( apart_point_and_line(Z_27,Y_26)
      | distinct_points(X_25,Z_27)
      | ~ apart_point_and_line(X_25,Y_26) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_119]) ).

tff(c_3169,plain,
    ! [Z_172,Z_173] :
      ( apart_point_and_line(Z_172,Z_173)
      | distinct_points('#skF_2',Z_172)
      | apart_point_and_line('#skF_3',Z_173)
      | apart_point_and_line('#skF_1',Z_173) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_3129,c_24]) ).

tff(c_32,plain,
    ~ apart_point_and_line('#skF_3',line_connecting('#skF_1','#skF_2')),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_146]) ).

tff(c_3241,plain,
    ! [Z_172] :
      ( apart_point_and_line(Z_172,line_connecting('#skF_1','#skF_2'))
      | distinct_points('#skF_2',Z_172)
      | apart_point_and_line('#skF_1',line_connecting('#skF_1','#skF_2')) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_3169,c_32]) ).

tff(c_3588,plain,
    apart_point_and_line('#skF_1',line_connecting('#skF_1','#skF_2')),
    inference(splitLeft,[status(thm)],[c_3241]) ).

tff(c_3595,plain,
    ~ distinct_points('#skF_1','#skF_2'),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_3588,c_14]) ).

tff(c_3601,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_38,c_3595]) ).

tff(c_3606,plain,
    ! [Z_186] :
      ( apart_point_and_line(Z_186,line_connecting('#skF_1','#skF_2'))
      | distinct_points('#skF_2',Z_186) ),
    inference(splitRight,[status(thm)],[c_3241]) ).

tff(c_3617,plain,
    ( ~ distinct_points('#skF_1','#skF_2')
    | distinct_points('#skF_2','#skF_2') ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_3606,c_16]) ).

tff(c_3639,plain,
    distinct_points('#skF_2','#skF_2'),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_38,c_3617]) ).

tff(c_3641,plain,
    $false,
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_2,c_3639]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : GEO188+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.32  % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.32  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.32  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.32  % DateTime : Fri Aug  4 00:41:36 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.32  % CPUTime  : 
% 5.75/2.36  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 5.96/2.37  
% 5.96/2.37  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 5.96/2.40  
% 5.96/2.40  Inference rules
% 5.96/2.40  ----------------------
% 5.96/2.40  #Ref     : 0
% 5.96/2.40  #Sup     : 479
% 5.96/2.40  #Fact    : 198
% 5.96/2.40  #Define  : 0
% 5.96/2.40  #Split   : 3
% 5.96/2.40  #Chain   : 0
% 5.96/2.40  #Close   : 0
% 5.96/2.40  
% 5.96/2.40  Ordering : KBO
% 5.96/2.40  
% 5.96/2.40  Simplification rules
% 5.96/2.40  ----------------------
% 5.96/2.40  #Subsume      : 223
% 5.96/2.40  #Demod        : 180
% 5.96/2.40  #Tautology    : 167
% 5.96/2.40  #SimpNegUnit  : 79
% 5.96/2.40  #BackRed      : 0
% 5.96/2.40  
% 5.96/2.40  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 5.96/2.40  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 5.96/2.40  
% 5.96/2.40  Timing (in seconds)
% 5.96/2.40  ----------------------
% 5.96/2.40  Preprocessing        : 0.46
% 5.96/2.40  Parsing              : 0.26
% 5.96/2.40  CNF conversion       : 0.03
% 5.96/2.40  Main loop            : 1.01
% 5.96/2.40  Inferencing          : 0.37
% 5.96/2.40  Reduction            : 0.23
% 5.96/2.40  Demodulation         : 0.14
% 5.96/2.40  BG Simplification    : 0.03
% 5.96/2.40  Subsumption          : 0.33
% 5.96/2.40  Abstraction          : 0.03
% 5.96/2.40  MUC search           : 0.00
% 5.96/2.40  Cooper               : 0.00
% 5.96/2.40  Total                : 1.53
% 5.96/2.40  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 5.96/2.40  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 5.96/2.40  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 5.96/2.40  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------