TSTP Solution File: GEO187+3 by ePrincess---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ePrincess---1.0
% Problem  : GEO187+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : ePrincess-casc -timeout=%d %s

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 03:48:24 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 16.74s 4.51s
% Output   : Proof 40.89s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem  : GEO187+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.06/0.12  % Command  : ePrincess-casc -timeout=%d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 05:19:28 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.58          ____       _                          
% 0.19/0.58    ___  / __ \_____(_)___  ________  __________
% 0.19/0.58   / _ \/ /_/ / ___/ / __ \/ ___/ _ \/ ___/ ___/
% 0.19/0.58  /  __/ ____/ /  / / / / / /__/  __(__  |__  ) 
% 0.19/0.58  \___/_/   /_/  /_/_/ /_/\___/\___/____/____/  
% 0.19/0.58  
% 0.19/0.58  A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic
% 0.19/0.58  (ePrincess v.1.0)
% 0.19/0.58  
% 0.19/0.58  (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2015
% 0.19/0.58  (c) Peter Backeman, 2014-2015
% 0.19/0.58  (contributions by Angelo Brillout, Peter Baumgartner)
% 0.19/0.58  Free software under GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL).
% 0.19/0.58  Bug reports to peter@backeman.se
% 0.19/0.58  
% 0.19/0.58  For more information, visit http://user.uu.se/~petba168/breu/
% 0.19/0.58  
% 0.19/0.59  Loading /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.75/0.63  Prover 0: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 1.79/0.96  Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 2.22/1.17  Prover 0: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 2.52/1.20  Prover 0: Constructing countermodel ...
% 13.91/3.88  Prover 0: gave up
% 13.91/3.88  Prover 1: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -resolutionMethod=normal +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 14.06/3.92  Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 14.52/4.04  Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 14.85/4.08  Prover 1: gave up
% 14.85/4.08  Prover 2: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 14.85/4.12  Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 15.57/4.30  Prover 2: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 15.57/4.31  Prover 2: Constructing countermodel ...
% 16.74/4.51  Prover 2: proved (428ms)
% 16.74/4.51  
% 16.74/4.51  No countermodel exists, formula is valid
% 16.74/4.51  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 16.74/4.51  
% 16.74/4.51  Generating proof ... Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 39.36/12.40  found it (size 1126)
% 39.36/12.40  
% 39.36/12.40  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 39.36/12.40  Assumed formulas after preprocessing and simplification: 
% 39.36/12.40  | (0)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (incident_point_and_line(v1, v4) = 0 & incident_point_and_line(v0, v4) = 0 & line_connecting(v2, v3) = v4 & line_connecting(v0, v1) = v5 & distinct_points(v2, v3) = 0 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0 &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v13 = 0 | v12 = 0 |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v10, v11) = v13) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v8, v10) = v12) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v9, v10) = 0) |  ? [v14] : ((v14 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v9, v11) = 0) | (v14 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v8, v9) = 0))) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v13 = 0 | v12 = 0 |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v10, v11) = v13) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v8, v9) = v12) |  ? [v14] : ((v14 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v9, v11) = 0) | (v14 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v8, v10) = 0) | ( ~ (v14 = 0) & distinct_lines(v9, v10) = v14))) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v13 = 0 | v12 = 0 |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v9, v11) = v13) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v8, v10) = v12) |  ? [v14] : ((v14 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v10, v11) = 0) | (v14 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v8, v9) = 0) | ( ~ (v14 = 0) & distinct_lines(v9, v10) = v14))) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v13 = 0 | v12 = 0 |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v9, v11) = v13) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v8, v9) = v12) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v9, v10) = 0) |  ? [v14] : ((v14 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v10, v11) = 0) | (v14 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v8, v10) = 0))) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v13 = 0 | v12 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v9, v11) = v13) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v9, v10) = v12) |  ~ (distinct_points(v8, v9) = 0) |  ? [v14] : ((v14 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v8, v11) = 0) | (v14 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v8, v10) = 0) | ( ~ (v14 = 0) & distinct_lines(v10, v11) = v14))) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v13 = 0 | v12 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v9, v11) = v13) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v8, v11) = v12) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v10, v11) = 0) |  ? [v14] : ((v14 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v9, v10) = 0) | (v14 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v8, v10) = 0) | ( ~ (v14 = 0) & distinct_points(v8, v9) = v14))) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v13 = 0 | v12 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v9, v11) = v13) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v8, v10) = v12) |  ? [v14] : ((v14 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v9, v10) = 0) | (v14 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v8, v11) = 0) | ( ~ (v14 = 0) & distinct_lines(v10, v11) = v14) | ( ~ (v14 = 0) & distinct_points(v8, v9) = v14))) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v13 = 0 | v12 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v9, v10) = v13) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v8, v11) = v12) |  ? [v14] : ((v14 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v9, v11) = 0) | (v14 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v8, v10) = 0) | ( ~ (v14 = 0) & distinct_lines(v10, v11) = v14) | ( ~ (v14 = 0) & distinct_points(v8, v9) = v14))) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v13 = 0 | v12 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v9, v10) = v13) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v8, v10) = v12) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v10, v11) = 0) |  ? [v14] : ((v14 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v9, v11) = 0) | (v14 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v8, v11) = 0) | ( ~ (v14 = 0) & distinct_points(v8, v9) = v14))) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v13 = 0 | v12 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v8, v11) = v13) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v8, v10) = v12) |  ~ (distinct_points(v8, v9) = 0) |  ? [v14] : ((v14 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v9, v11) = 0) | (v14 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v9, v10) = 0) | ( ~ (v14 = 0) & distinct_lines(v10, v11) = v14))) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] : (v12 = 0 | v11 = 0 |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v8, v10) = v12) |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v8, v9) = v11) |  ? [v13] : ( ~ (v13 = 0) & convergent_lines(v9, v10) = v13)) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] : (v12 = 0 | v11 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v10, v9) = v12) |  ~ (distinct_points(v8, v10) = v11) |  ? [v13] : ( ~ (v13 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v8, v9) = v13)) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] : (v12 = 0 | v11 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v8, v10) = v12) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v8, v9) = v11) |  ? [v13] : ((v13 = 0 & convergent_lines(v9, v10) = 0) | ( ~ (v13 = 0) & distinct_lines(v9, v10) = v13))) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] : (v12 = 0 | v11 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v8, v10) = v12) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v9, v10) = v11) |  ? [v13] : ( ~ (v13 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v8, v9) = v13)) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] : (v12 = 0 | v11 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v8, v10) = v11) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v9, v10) = v12) |  ? [v13] : ((v13 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v8, v9) = 0) | ( ~ (v13 = 0) & distinct_lines(v9, v10) = v13))) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] : (v12 = 0 | v11 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v8, v9) = v11) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v9, v10) = v12) |  ? [v13] : ((v13 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v8, v10) = 0) | ( ~ (v13 = 0) & distinct_lines(v9, v10) = v13))) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] : (v12 = 0 | v11 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v9, v10) = v12) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v8, v10) = v11) |  ? [v13] : ( ~ (v13 = 0) & convergent_lines(v8, v9) = v13)) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] : (v12 = 0 | v11 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v8, v10) = v12) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v9, v10) = v11) |  ? [v13] : ( ~ (v13 = 0) & convergent_lines(v8, v9) = v13)) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] : (v12 = 0 | v11 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v9, v10) = v12) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v8, v10) = v11) |  ? [v13] : ( ~ (v13 = 0) & distinct_lines(v8, v9) = v13)) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] : (v12 = 0 | v11 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v9, v10) = v12) |  ~ (distinct_points(v8, v10) = v11) |  ? [v13] : ( ~ (v13 = 0) & distinct_points(v8, v9) = v13)) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v9, v10) = v12) |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v8, v10) = v11) |  ? [v13] : ((v13 = 0 & v12 = 0 & convergent_lines(v9, v10) = 0) | (v13 = 0 & v11 = 0 & convergent_lines(v8, v10) = 0) | ( ~ (v13 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v8, v9) = v13) | ( ~ (v13 = 0) & convergent_lines(v8, v9) = v13))) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v9, v10) = v12) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v8, v10) = v11) |  ? [v13] : ((v13 = 0 & v12 = 0 & convergent_lines(v9, v10) = 0) | (v13 = 0 & v11 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v8, v10) = 0) | ( ~ (v13 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v8, v9) = v13) | ( ~ (v13 = 0) & convergent_lines(v8, v9) = v13))) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v8, v10) = v12) |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v8, v9) = v11) |  ? [v13] : ((v13 = 0 & v12 = 0 & convergent_lines(v8, v10) = 0) | (v13 = 0 & v11 = 0 & convergent_lines(v8, v9) = 0) | ( ~ (v13 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v9, v10) = v13) | ( ~ (v13 = 0) & convergent_lines(v9, v10) = v13))) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v8, v10) = v12) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v8, v9) = v11) |  ? [v13] : ((v13 = 0 & v12 = 0 & convergent_lines(v8, v10) = 0) | (v13 = 0 & v11 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v8, v9) = 0) | ( ~ (v13 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v9, v10) = v13) | ( ~ (v13 = 0) & convergent_lines(v9, v10) = v13))) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v8, v10) = v11) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v9, v10) = v12) |  ? [v13] : ((v13 = 0 & v12 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v9, v10) = 0) | (v13 = 0 & v11 = 0 & convergent_lines(v8, v10) = 0) | ( ~ (v13 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v8, v9) = v13) | ( ~ (v13 = 0) & convergent_lines(v8, v9) = v13))) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v8, v9) = v11) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v8, v10) = v12) |  ? [v13] : ((v13 = 0 & v12 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v8, v10) = 0) | (v13 = 0 & v11 = 0 & convergent_lines(v8, v9) = 0) | ( ~ (v13 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v9, v10) = v13) | ( ~ (v13 = 0) & convergent_lines(v9, v10) = v13))) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v9, v10) = v12) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v8, v10) = v11) |  ? [v13] : ((v13 = 0 & v12 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v9, v10) = 0) | (v13 = 0 & v11 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v8, v10) = 0) | ( ~ (v13 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v8, v9) = v13) | ( ~ (v13 = 0) & convergent_lines(v8, v9) = v13))) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v8, v10) = v12) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v8, v9) = v11) |  ? [v13] : ((v13 = 0 & v12 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v8, v10) = 0) | (v13 = 0 & v11 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v8, v9) = 0) | ( ~ (v13 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v9, v10) = v13) | ( ~ (v13 = 0) & convergent_lines(v9, v10) = v13))) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : (v11 = 0 |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v8, v10) = v11) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v9, v10) = 0) | unorthogonal_lines(v8, v9) = 0) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : (v11 = 0 |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v8, v9) = v11) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v9, v10) = 0) | unorthogonal_lines(v8, v10) = 0) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : (v11 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v10, v9) = v11) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v8, v9) = 0) | distinct_points(v8, v10) = 0) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : (v11 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v8, v10) = v11) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v8, v9) = 0) | distinct_lines(v9, v10) = 0) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : (v11 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v8, v10) = v11) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v9, v10) = 0) |  ? [v12] : ((v12 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v8, v9) = 0) | (v12 = 0 & convergent_lines(v9, v10) = 0))) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : (v11 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v8, v9) = v11) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v9, v10) = 0) |  ? [v12] : ((v12 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v8, v10) = 0) | (v12 = 0 & convergent_lines(v9, v10) = 0))) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : (v11 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v8, v9) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v9, v10) = v11) | apart_point_and_line(v8, v10) = 0) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : (v11 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v8, v9) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_points(v8, v10) = v11) | apart_point_and_line(v10, v9) = 0) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : (v11 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v9, v10) = v11) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v8, v9) = 0) | convergent_lines(v8, v10) = 0) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : (v11 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v8, v10) = v11) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v8, v9) = 0) | convergent_lines(v9, v10) = 0) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : (v11 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v8, v10) = v11) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v8, v9) = 0) | distinct_lines(v9, v10) = 0) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : (v11 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v8, v9) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v9, v10) = v11) | convergent_lines(v8, v10) = 0) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : (v11 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v9, v10) = v11) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v8, v9) = 0) | distinct_lines(v8, v10) = 0) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : (v11 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v8, v10) = v11) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v8, v9) = 0) | distinct_lines(v9, v10) = 0) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : (v11 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v9, v10) = v11) |  ~ (distinct_points(v8, v9) = 0) | distinct_points(v8, v10) = 0) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : (v11 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v8, v10) = v11) |  ~ (distinct_points(v8, v9) = 0) | distinct_points(v9, v10) = 0) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : (v9 = v8 |  ~ (orthogonal_lines(v11, v10) = v9) |  ~ (orthogonal_lines(v11, v10) = v8)) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : (v9 = v8 |  ~ (incident_point_and_line(v11, v10) = v9) |  ~ (incident_point_and_line(v11, v10) = v8)) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : (v9 = v8 |  ~ (parallel_lines(v11, v10) = v9) |  ~ (parallel_lines(v11, v10) = v8)) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : (v9 = v8 |  ~ (equal_lines(v11, v10) = v9) |  ~ (equal_lines(v11, v10) = v8)) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : (v9 = v8 |  ~ (equal_points(v11, v10) = v9) |  ~ (equal_points(v11, v10) = v8)) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : (v9 = v8 |  ~ (orthogonal_through_point(v11, v10) = v9) |  ~ (orthogonal_through_point(v11, v10) = v8)) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : (v9 = v8 |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v11, v10) = v9) |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v11, v10) = v8)) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : (v9 = v8 |  ~ (parallel_through_point(v11, v10) = v9) |  ~ (parallel_through_point(v11, v10) = v8)) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : (v9 = v8 |  ~ (intersection_point(v11, v10) = v9) |  ~ (intersection_point(v11, v10) = v8)) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : (v9 = v8 |  ~ (line_connecting(v11, v10) = v9) |  ~ (line_connecting(v11, v10) = v8)) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : (v9 = v8 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v11, v10) = v9) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v11, v10) = v8)) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : (v9 = v8 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v11, v10) = v9) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v11, v10) = v8)) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : (v9 = v8 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v11, v10) = v9) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v11, v10) = v8)) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : (v9 = v8 |  ~ (distinct_points(v11, v10) = v9) |  ~ (distinct_points(v11, v10) = v8)) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v9, v10) = v11) |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v8, v9) = 0) |  ? [v12] :  ? [v13] : ((v13 = 0 & v12 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v8, v10) = 0 & convergent_lines(v8, v10) = 0) | (v12 = 0 & v11 = 0 & convergent_lines(v9, v10) = 0) | ( ~ (v12 = 0) & convergent_lines(v8, v9) = v12))) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v9, v10) = v11) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v8, v9) = 0) |  ? [v12] :  ? [v13] : ((v13 = 0 & v12 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v8, v10) = 0 & convergent_lines(v8, v10) = 0) | (v12 = 0 & v11 = 0 & convergent_lines(v9, v10) = 0) | ( ~ (v12 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v8, v9) = v12))) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v9, v10) = 0) |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v8, v10) = v11) |  ? [v12] :  ? [v13] : ((v13 = 0 & v12 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v8, v9) = 0 & convergent_lines(v8, v9) = 0) | (v12 = 0 & v11 = 0 & convergent_lines(v8, v10) = 0) | ( ~ (v12 = 0) & convergent_lines(v9, v10) = v12))) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v9, v10) = 0) |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v8, v9) = v11) |  ? [v12] :  ? [v13] : ((v13 = 0 & v12 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v8, v10) = 0 & convergent_lines(v8, v10) = 0) | (v12 = 0 & v11 = 0 & convergent_lines(v8, v9) = 0) | ( ~ (v12 = 0) & convergent_lines(v9, v10) = v12))) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v9, v10) = 0) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v8, v10) = v11) |  ? [v12] :  ? [v13] : ((v13 = 0 & v12 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v8, v9) = 0 & convergent_lines(v8, v9) = 0) | (v12 = 0 & v11 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v8, v10) = 0) | ( ~ (v12 = 0) & convergent_lines(v9, v10) = v12))) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v9, v10) = 0) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v8, v9) = v11) |  ? [v12] :  ? [v13] : ((v13 = 0 & v12 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v8, v10) = 0 & convergent_lines(v8, v10) = 0) | (v12 = 0 & v11 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v8, v9) = 0) | ( ~ (v12 = 0) & convergent_lines(v9, v10) = v12))) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v8, v10) = v11) |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v8, v9) = 0) |  ? [v12] :  ? [v13] : ((v13 = 0 & v12 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v9, v10) = 0 & convergent_lines(v9, v10) = 0) | (v12 = 0 & v11 = 0 & convergent_lines(v8, v10) = 0) | ( ~ (v12 = 0) & convergent_lines(v8, v9) = v12))) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v8, v10) = v11) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v9, v10) = 0) |  ? [v12] :  ? [v13] : ((v13 = 0 & v12 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v8, v9) = 0 & convergent_lines(v8, v9) = 0) | (v12 = 0 & v11 = 0 & convergent_lines(v8, v10) = 0) | ( ~ (v12 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v9, v10) = v12))) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v8, v10) = v11) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v8, v9) = 0) |  ? [v12] :  ? [v13] : ((v13 = 0 & v12 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v9, v10) = 0 & convergent_lines(v9, v10) = 0) | (v12 = 0 & v11 = 0 & convergent_lines(v8, v10) = 0) | ( ~ (v12 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v8, v9) = v12))) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v8, v9) = v11) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v9, v10) = 0) |  ? [v12] :  ? [v13] : ((v13 = 0 & v12 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v8, v10) = 0 & convergent_lines(v8, v10) = 0) | (v12 = 0 & v11 = 0 & convergent_lines(v8, v9) = 0) | ( ~ (v12 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v9, v10) = v12))) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v8, v9) = 0) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v9, v10) = v11) |  ? [v12] :  ? [v13] : ((v13 = 0 & v12 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v8, v10) = 0 & convergent_lines(v8, v10) = 0) | (v12 = 0 & v11 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v9, v10) = 0) | ( ~ (v12 = 0) & convergent_lines(v8, v9) = v12))) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v8, v9) = 0) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v8, v10) = v11) |  ? [v12] :  ? [v13] : ((v13 = 0 & v12 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v9, v10) = 0 & convergent_lines(v9, v10) = 0) | (v12 = 0 & v11 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v8, v10) = 0) | ( ~ (v12 = 0) & convergent_lines(v8, v9) = v12))) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v9, v10) = v11) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v8, v9) = 0) |  ? [v12] :  ? [v13] : ((v13 = 0 & v12 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v8, v10) = 0 & convergent_lines(v8, v10) = 0) | (v12 = 0 & v11 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v9, v10) = 0) | ( ~ (v12 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v8, v9) = v12))) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v9, v10) = 0) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v8, v10) = v11) |  ? [v12] :  ? [v13] : ((v13 = 0 & v12 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v8, v9) = 0 & convergent_lines(v8, v9) = 0) | (v12 = 0 & v11 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v8, v10) = 0) | ( ~ (v12 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v9, v10) = v12))) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v9, v10) = 0) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v8, v9) = v11) |  ? [v12] :  ? [v13] : ((v13 = 0 & v12 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v8, v10) = 0 & convergent_lines(v8, v10) = 0) | (v12 = 0 & v11 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v8, v9) = 0) | ( ~ (v12 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v9, v10) = v12))) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v8, v10) = v11) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v8, v9) = 0) |  ? [v12] :  ? [v13] : ((v13 = 0 & v12 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v9, v10) = 0 & convergent_lines(v9, v10) = 0) | (v12 = 0 & v11 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v8, v10) = 0) | ( ~ (v12 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v8, v9) = v12))) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : ( ~ (distinct_lines(v10, v11) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_points(v8, v9) = 0) |  ? [v12] : ((v12 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v9, v11) = 0) | (v12 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v9, v10) = 0) | (v12 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v8, v11) = 0) | (v12 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v8, v10) = 0))) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] : (v10 = 0 |  ~ (orthogonal_lines(v8, v9) = v10) | unorthogonal_lines(v8, v9) = 0) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] : (v10 = 0 |  ~ (incident_point_and_line(v8, v9) = v10) | apart_point_and_line(v8, v9) = 0) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] : (v10 = 0 |  ~ (parallel_lines(v8, v9) = v10) | convergent_lines(v8, v9) = 0) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] : (v10 = 0 |  ~ (equal_lines(v8, v9) = v10) | distinct_lines(v8, v9) = 0) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] : (v10 = 0 |  ~ (equal_points(v8, v9) = v10) | distinct_points(v8, v9) = 0) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] : (v10 = 0 |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v8, v9) = v10) | orthogonal_lines(v8, v9) = 0) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] : (v10 = 0 |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v8, v9) = v10) | convergent_lines(v8, v9) = 0) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] : (v10 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v8, v9) = v10) | incident_point_and_line(v8, v9) = 0) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] : (v10 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v8, v9) = v10) | parallel_lines(v8, v9) = 0) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] : (v10 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v8, v9) = v10) | unorthogonal_lines(v8, v9) = 0) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] : (v10 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v8, v9) = v10) |  ? [v11] : ( ~ (v11 = 0) & distinct_lines(v8, v9) = v11)) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] : (v10 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v8, v9) = v10) | equal_lines(v8, v9) = 0) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] : (v10 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v8, v9) = v10) | equal_points(v8, v9) = 0) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] : (v9 = v8 |  ~ (point(v10) = v9) |  ~ (point(v10) = v8)) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] : (v9 = v8 |  ~ (line(v10) = v9) |  ~ (line(v10) = v8)) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] : ( ~ (orthogonal_through_point(v9, v8) = v10) |  ? [v11] : ( ~ (v11 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v10, v9) = v11)) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] : ( ~ (orthogonal_through_point(v9, v8) = v10) |  ? [v11] : ( ~ (v11 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v8, v10) = v11)) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] : ( ~ (orthogonal_through_point(v8, v9) = v10) |  ? [v11] : ((v11 = 0 & line(v10) = 0) | ( ~ (v11 = 0) & point(v9) = v11) | ( ~ (v11 = 0) & line(v8) = v11))) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] : ( ~ (parallel_through_point(v9, v8) = v10) |  ? [v11] : ( ~ (v11 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v8, v10) = v11)) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] : ( ~ (parallel_through_point(v9, v8) = v10) |  ? [v11] : ( ~ (v11 = 0) & convergent_lines(v10, v9) = v11)) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] : ( ~ (parallel_through_point(v8, v9) = v10) |  ? [v11] : ((v11 = 0 & line(v10) = 0) | ( ~ (v11 = 0) & point(v9) = v11) | ( ~ (v11 = 0) & line(v8) = v11))) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] : ( ~ (intersection_point(v8, v9) = v10) |  ? [v11] : ((v11 = 0 & point(v10) = 0) | ( ~ (v11 = 0) & line(v9) = v11) | ( ~ (v11 = 0) & line(v8) = v11) | ( ~ (v11 = 0) & convergent_lines(v8, v9) = v11))) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] : ( ~ (intersection_point(v8, v9) = v10) |  ? [v11] : (( ~ (v11 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v10, v9) = v11) | ( ~ (v11 = 0) & convergent_lines(v8, v9) = v11))) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] : ( ~ (intersection_point(v8, v9) = v10) |  ? [v11] : (( ~ (v11 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v10, v8) = v11) | ( ~ (v11 = 0) & convergent_lines(v8, v9) = v11))) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] : ( ~ (line_connecting(v8, v9) = v10) |  ? [v11] : ((v11 = 0 & line(v10) = 0) | ( ~ (v11 = 0) & point(v9) = v11) | ( ~ (v11 = 0) & point(v8) = v11) | ( ~ (v11 = 0) & distinct_points(v8, v9) = v11))) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] : ( ~ (line_connecting(v8, v9) = v10) |  ? [v11] : (( ~ (v11 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v9, v10) = v11) | ( ~ (v11 = 0) & distinct_points(v8, v9) = v11))) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] : ( ~ (line_connecting(v8, v9) = v10) |  ? [v11] : (( ~ (v11 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v8, v10) = v11) | ( ~ (v11 = 0) & distinct_points(v8, v9) = v11))) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] : ( ~ (orthogonal_lines(v8, v9) = 0) |  ? [v10] : ( ~ (v10 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v8, v9) = v10)) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] : ( ~ (incident_point_and_line(v8, v9) = 0) |  ? [v10] : ( ~ (v10 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v8, v9) = v10)) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] : ( ~ (parallel_lines(v8, v9) = 0) |  ? [v10] : ( ~ (v10 = 0) & convergent_lines(v8, v9) = v10)) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] : ( ~ (equal_lines(v8, v9) = 0) |  ? [v10] : ( ~ (v10 = 0) & distinct_lines(v8, v9) = v10)) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] : ( ~ (equal_points(v8, v9) = 0) |  ? [v10] : ( ~ (v10 = 0) & distinct_points(v8, v9) = v10)) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v8, v9) = 0) |  ? [v10] : ( ~ (v10 = 0) & orthogonal_lines(v8, v9) = v10)) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] : ( ~ (apart_point_and_line(v8, v9) = 0) |  ? [v10] : ( ~ (v10 = 0) & incident_point_and_line(v8, v9) = v10)) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v8, v9) = 0) |  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] : ( ~ (v11 = 0) & intersection_point(v8, v9) = v10 & apart_point_and_line(v10, v9) = v11)) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v8, v9) = 0) |  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] : ( ~ (v11 = 0) & intersection_point(v8, v9) = v10 & apart_point_and_line(v10, v8) = v11)) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v8, v9) = 0) |  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] : ((v11 = 0 & point(v10) = 0 & intersection_point(v8, v9) = v10) | ( ~ (v10 = 0) & line(v9) = v10) | ( ~ (v10 = 0) & line(v8) = v10))) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v8, v9) = 0) |  ? [v10] : ( ~ (v10 = 0) & parallel_lines(v8, v9) = v10)) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] : ( ~ (distinct_lines(v8, v9) = 0) | convergent_lines(v8, v9) = 0) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] : ( ~ (distinct_lines(v8, v9) = 0) |  ? [v10] : ( ~ (v10 = 0) & equal_lines(v8, v9) = v10)) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] : ( ~ (distinct_points(v8, v9) = 0) |  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] : ( ~ (v11 = 0) & line_connecting(v8, v9) = v10 & apart_point_and_line(v9, v10) = v11)) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] : ( ~ (distinct_points(v8, v9) = 0) |  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] : ( ~ (v11 = 0) & line_connecting(v8, v9) = v10 & apart_point_and_line(v8, v10) = v11)) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] : ( ~ (distinct_points(v8, v9) = 0) |  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] : ((v11 = 0 & line(v10) = 0 & line_connecting(v8, v9) = v10) | ( ~ (v10 = 0) & point(v9) = v10) | ( ~ (v10 = 0) & point(v8) = v10))) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] : ( ~ (distinct_points(v8, v9) = 0) |  ? [v10] : ( ~ (v10 = 0) & equal_points(v8, v9) = v10)) &  ! [v8] :  ~ (convergent_lines(v8, v8) = 0) &  ! [v8] :  ~ (distinct_lines(v8, v8) = 0) &  ! [v8] :  ~ (distinct_points(v8, v8) = 0) &  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] :  ? [v10] : orthogonal_lines(v9, v8) = v10 &  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] :  ? [v10] : incident_point_and_line(v9, v8) = v10 &  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] :  ? [v10] : parallel_lines(v9, v8) = v10 &  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] :  ? [v10] : equal_lines(v9, v8) = v10 &  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] :  ? [v10] : equal_points(v9, v8) = v10 &  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] :  ? [v10] : orthogonal_through_point(v9, v8) = v10 &  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] :  ? [v10] : unorthogonal_lines(v9, v8) = v10 &  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] :  ? [v10] : parallel_through_point(v9, v8) = v10 &  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] :  ? [v10] : intersection_point(v9, v8) = v10 &  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] :  ? [v10] : line_connecting(v9, v8) = v10 &  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] :  ? [v10] : apart_point_and_line(v9, v8) = v10 &  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] :  ? [v10] : convergent_lines(v9, v8) = v10 &  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] :  ? [v10] : distinct_lines(v9, v8) = v10 &  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] :  ? [v10] : distinct_points(v9, v8) = v10 &  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] : point(v8) = v9 &  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] : line(v8) = v9 & (( ~ (v7 = 0) & incident_point_and_line(v3, v5) = v7) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & incident_point_and_line(v2, v5) = v6)))
% 39.52/12.49  | Instantiating (0) with all_0_0_0, all_0_1_1, all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4, all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7 yields:
% 39.52/12.49  | (1) incident_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0 & incident_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0 & line_connecting(all_0_5_5, all_0_4_4) = all_0_3_3 & line_connecting(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_0_2_2 & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_4_4) = 0 & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = 0 &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v2, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = 0) |  ? [v6] : ((v6 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v3) = 0) | (v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v2, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v4) |  ? [v6] : ((v6 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v3) = 0) | (v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v6))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v1, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ? [v6] : ((v6 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v2, v3) = 0) | (v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v6))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v1, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = 0) |  ? [v6] : ((v6 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v2, v3) = 0) | (v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v6] : ((v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = 0) | (v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_lines(v2, v3) = v6))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v2, v3) = 0) |  ? [v6] : ((v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = 0) | (v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v6))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ? [v6] : ((v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = 0) | (v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = 0) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_lines(v2, v3) = v6) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v6))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v4) |  ? [v6] : ((v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = 0) | (v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_lines(v2, v3) = v6) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v6))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v2, v3) = 0) |  ? [v6] : ((v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = 0) | (v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = 0) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v6))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v6] : ((v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = 0) | (v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_lines(v2, v3) = v6))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v5)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v5)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v5))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v5)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v4) |  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v5))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v4) |  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v5))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & distinct_lines(v0, v1) = v5)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v5)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | (v5 = 0 & v3 = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v5) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | (v5 = 0 & v3 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v5) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | (v5 = 0 & v3 = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = v5) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v5))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | (v5 = 0 & v3 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = v5) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v5))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v4) |  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | (v5 = 0 & v3 = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v5) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v4) |  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | (v5 = 0 & v3 = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = v5) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v5))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | (v5 = 0 & v3 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v5) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | (v5 = 0 & v3 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = v5) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v5))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v3) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_points(v0, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_lines(v1, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = 0) |  ? [v4] : ((v4 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = 0) |  ? [v4] : ((v4 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v3) | apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v2) = v3) | apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_lines(v1, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v3) | convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_lines(v0, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_lines(v1, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_points(v0, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_points(v1, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (orthogonal_lines(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (orthogonal_lines(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (incident_point_and_line(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (incident_point_and_line(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (parallel_lines(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (parallel_lines(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (equal_lines(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (equal_lines(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (equal_points(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (equal_points(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (orthogonal_through_point(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (orthogonal_through_point(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (parallel_through_point(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (parallel_through_point(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (intersection_point(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (intersection_point(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (line_connecting(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (line_connecting(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (distinct_points(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v4))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v4))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = 0) |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v4))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = 0) |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v3) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v4))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = 0) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v4))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = 0) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v3) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v4))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = 0 & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v4))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = v4))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = 0 & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v4))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = v4))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v4))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = 0 & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v4))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v4))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = v4))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v3) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = v4))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = 0 & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v4))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (distinct_lines(v2, v3) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] : ((v4 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (orthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v2) | unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (incident_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v2) | apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (parallel_lines(v0, v1) = v2) | convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (equal_lines(v0, v1) = v2) | distinct_lines(v0, v1) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (equal_points(v0, v1) = v2) | distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v2) | orthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v2) | convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v2) | incident_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v2) | parallel_lines(v0, v1) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v2) | unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & distinct_lines(v0, v1) = v3)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v1) = v2) | equal_lines(v0, v1) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = v2) | equal_points(v0, v1) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (point(v2) = v1) |  ~ (point(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (line(v2) = v1) |  ~ (line(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (orthogonal_through_point(v1, v0) = v2) |  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v2, v1) = v3)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (orthogonal_through_point(v1, v0) = v2) |  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v3)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (orthogonal_through_point(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] : ((v3 = 0 & line(v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & point(v1) = v3) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & line(v0) = v3))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (parallel_through_point(v1, v0) = v2) |  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v3)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (parallel_through_point(v1, v0) = v2) |  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & convergent_lines(v2, v1) = v3)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (parallel_through_point(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] : ((v3 = 0 & line(v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & point(v1) = v3) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & line(v0) = v3))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (intersection_point(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] : ((v3 = 0 & point(v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & line(v1) = v3) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & line(v0) = v3) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v3))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (intersection_point(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] : (( ~ (v3 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v3) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v3))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (intersection_point(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] : (( ~ (v3 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v2, v0) = v3) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v3))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (line_connecting(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] : ((v3 = 0 & line(v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & point(v1) = v3) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & point(v0) = v3) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v3))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (line_connecting(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] : (( ~ (v3 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v3) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v3))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (line_connecting(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] : (( ~ (v3 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v3) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v3))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (orthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v2)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (incident_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v2)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (parallel_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v2)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (equal_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & distinct_lines(v0, v1) = v2)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (equal_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v2)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & orthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v2)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & incident_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v2)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & intersection_point(v0, v1) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v3)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & intersection_point(v0, v1) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(v2, v0) = v3)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ((v3 = 0 & point(v2) = 0 & intersection_point(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & line(v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & line(v0) = v2))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & parallel_lines(v0, v1) = v2)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & equal_lines(v0, v1) = v2)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & line_connecting(v0, v1) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v3)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & line_connecting(v0, v1) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v3)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ((v3 = 0 & line(v2) = 0 & line_connecting(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & point(v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & point(v0) = v2))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & equal_points(v0, v1) = v2)) &  ! [v0] :  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v0) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v0) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v0) = 0) &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : orthogonal_lines(v1, v0) = v2 &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : incident_point_and_line(v1, v0) = v2 &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : parallel_lines(v1, v0) = v2 &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : equal_lines(v1, v0) = v2 &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : equal_points(v1, v0) = v2 &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : orthogonal_through_point(v1, v0) = v2 &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : unorthogonal_lines(v1, v0) = v2 &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : parallel_through_point(v1, v0) = v2 &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : intersection_point(v1, v0) = v2 &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : line_connecting(v1, v0) = v2 &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : apart_point_and_line(v1, v0) = v2 &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : convergent_lines(v1, v0) = v2 &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : distinct_lines(v1, v0) = v2 &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : distinct_points(v1, v0) = v2 &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : point(v0) = v1 &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : line(v0) = v1 & (( ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0) & incident_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = all_0_0_0) | ( ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0) & incident_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_0_1_1))
% 39.96/12.52  |
% 39.96/12.52  | Applying alpha-rule on (1) yields:
% 39.96/12.52  | (2)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : line(v0) = v1
% 39.96/12.52  | (3)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0)
% 39.96/12.52  | (4)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (orthogonal_through_point(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (orthogonal_through_point(v3, v2) = v0))
% 39.96/12.52  | (5)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v4) |  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | (v5 = 0 & v3 = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = v5) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v5)))
% 39.96/12.52  | (6)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (parallel_through_point(v1, v0) = v2) |  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & convergent_lines(v2, v1) = v3))
% 39.96/12.52  | (7)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v2) | incident_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0)
% 39.96/12.52  | (8)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (incident_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v2) | apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0)
% 39.96/12.52  | (9)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v3, v2) = v0))
% 39.96/12.52  | (10)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (orthogonal_through_point(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] : ((v3 = 0 & line(v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & point(v1) = v3) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & line(v0) = v3)))
% 39.96/12.53  | (11)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (intersection_point(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (intersection_point(v3, v2) = v0))
% 39.96/12.53  | (12)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = 0) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v3) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v4)))
% 39.96/12.53  | (13)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5))
% 39.96/12.53  | (14)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ((v3 = 0 & point(v2) = 0 & intersection_point(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & line(v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & line(v0) = v2)))
% 39.96/12.53  | (15)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : orthogonal_lines(v1, v0) = v2
% 39.96/12.53  | (16)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v3, v2) = v0))
% 39.96/12.53  | (17)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (orthogonal_through_point(v1, v0) = v2) |  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v3))
% 39.96/12.53  | (18) line_connecting(all_0_5_5, all_0_4_4) = all_0_3_3
% 39.96/12.53  | (19)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v3, v2) = v0))
% 39.96/12.53  | (20)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | (v5 = 0 & v3 = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v5) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5)))
% 39.96/12.53  | (21)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = 0 & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v4)))
% 39.96/12.53  | (22)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = 0 & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v4)))
% 39.96/12.53  | (23)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & line_connecting(v0, v1) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v3))
% 39.96/12.53  | (24)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (line_connecting(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] : (( ~ (v3 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v3) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v3)))
% 39.96/12.53  | (25)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v5))
% 39.96/12.53  | (26)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v1, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = 0) |  ? [v6] : ((v6 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v2, v3) = 0) | (v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0)))
% 39.96/12.53  | (27)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (parallel_through_point(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] : ((v3 = 0 & line(v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & point(v1) = v3) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & line(v0) = v3)))
% 39.96/12.53  | (28)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (orthogonal_through_point(v1, v0) = v2) |  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v2, v1) = v3))
% 39.96/12.53  | (29)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v5)))
% 39.96/12.53  | (30)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (intersection_point(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] : (( ~ (v3 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v3) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v3)))
% 39.96/12.53  | (31)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : intersection_point(v1, v0) = v2
% 39.96/12.53  | (32)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (distinct_points(v3, v2) = v0))
% 39.96/12.53  | (33)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = 0) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v4)))
% 39.96/12.53  | (34)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & distinct_lines(v0, v1) = v3))
% 39.96/12.53  | (35)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | (v5 = 0 & v3 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v5) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5)))
% 39.96/12.53  | (36)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v3) | apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0)
% 39.96/12.53  | (37)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0)
% 39.96/12.54  | (38) distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = 0
% 39.96/12.54  | (39)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : apart_point_and_line(v1, v0) = v2
% 39.96/12.54  | (40)  ! [v0] :  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v0) = 0)
% 39.96/12.54  | (41)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : point(v0) = v1
% 39.96/12.54  | (42)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_points(v1, v2) = 0)
% 39.96/12.54  | (43)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = v4)))
% 39.96/12.54  | (44) line_connecting(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_0_2_2
% 39.96/12.54  | (45)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (line_connecting(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] : (( ~ (v3 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v3) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v3)))
% 39.96/12.54  | (46)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & parallel_lines(v0, v1) = v2))
% 39.96/12.54  | (47)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (parallel_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v2))
% 39.96/12.54  | (48)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = 0 & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v4)))
% 39.96/12.54  | (49)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v2, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v4) |  ? [v6] : ((v6 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v3) = 0) | (v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v6)))
% 39.96/12.54  | (50)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | (v5 = 0 & v3 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = v5) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v5)))
% 39.96/12.54  | (51)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = 0) |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v3) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v4)))
% 39.96/12.54  | (52)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & intersection_point(v0, v1) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v3))
% 39.96/12.54  | (53)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : line_connecting(v1, v0) = v2
% 39.96/12.54  | (54)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : unorthogonal_lines(v1, v0) = v2
% 39.96/12.54  | (55)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0)
% 39.96/12.54  | (56)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : orthogonal_through_point(v1, v0) = v2
% 39.96/12.54  | (57)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : parallel_lines(v1, v0) = v2
% 39.96/12.54  | (58)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | (v5 = 0 & v3 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v5) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5)))
% 39.96/12.54  | (59)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v6] : ((v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = 0) | (v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_lines(v2, v3) = v6)))
% 39.96/12.54  | (60)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (parallel_through_point(v1, v0) = v2) |  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v3))
% 39.96/12.54  | (61)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & orthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v2))
% 39.96/12.54  | (62)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (orthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v2))
% 39.96/12.54  | (63)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (line_connecting(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (line_connecting(v3, v2) = v0))
% 39.96/12.54  | (64)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = v2) | equal_points(v0, v1) = 0)
% 39.96/12.54  | (65)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (equal_points(v0, v1) = v2) | distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0)
% 39.96/12.54  | (66)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = 0) |  ? [v4] : ((v4 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0)))
% 39.96/12.55  | (67)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v2) | unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0)
% 39.96/12.55  | (68)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v2) | convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0)
% 39.96/12.55  | (69)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v1, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ? [v6] : ((v6 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v2, v3) = 0) | (v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v6)))
% 39.96/12.55  | (70)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v3) | convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0)
% 39.96/12.55  | (71) incident_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0
% 39.96/12.55  | (72)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (equal_points(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (equal_points(v3, v2) = v0))
% 39.96/12.55  | (73)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v3) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = v4)))
% 39.96/12.55  | (74)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (intersection_point(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] : (( ~ (v3 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v2, v0) = v3) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v3)))
% 39.96/12.55  | (75)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (orthogonal_lines(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (orthogonal_lines(v3, v2) = v0))
% 39.96/12.55  | (76)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v5))
% 39.96/12.55  | (77)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & distinct_lines(v0, v1) = v5))
% 39.96/12.55  | (78)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : equal_points(v1, v0) = v2
% 39.96/12.55  | (79)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v4)))
% 39.96/12.55  | (80)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0)
% 39.96/12.55  | (81)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (line_connecting(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] : ((v3 = 0 & line(v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & point(v1) = v3) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & point(v0) = v3) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v3)))
% 39.96/12.55  | (82)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & equal_points(v0, v1) = v2))
% 39.96/12.55  | (83)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (equal_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v2))
% 39.96/12.55  | (84)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & line_connecting(v0, v1) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v3))
% 39.96/12.55  | (85)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v2, v3) = 0) |  ? [v6] : ((v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = 0) | (v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v6)))
% 39.96/12.55  | (86)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = 0) |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v4)))
% 39.96/12.55  | (87)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v4) |  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v5)))
% 39.96/12.55  | (88)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : convergent_lines(v1, v0) = v2
% 39.96/12.55  | (89)  ! [v0] :  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v0) = 0)
% 39.96/12.55  | (90)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v3, v2) = v0))
% 39.96/12.55  | (91)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : distinct_lines(v1, v0) = v2
% 39.96/12.55  | (92)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_lines(v0, v2) = 0)
% 39.96/12.55  | (93)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | (v5 = 0 & v3 = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = v5) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v5)))
% 39.96/12.55  | (94)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = 0) |  ? [v4] : ((v4 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0)))
% 39.96/12.55  | (95)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ((v3 = 0 & line(v2) = 0 & line_connecting(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & point(v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & point(v0) = v2)))
% 39.96/12.55  | (96)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : parallel_through_point(v1, v0) = v2
% 39.96/12.55  | (97)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : distinct_points(v1, v0) = v2
% 39.96/12.55  | (98)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v4) |  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v5)))
% 39.96/12.55  | (99)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v4)))
% 39.96/12.55  | (100)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v4) |  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | (v5 = 0 & v3 = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v5) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5)))
% 39.96/12.56  | (101)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & incident_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v2))
% 39.96/12.56  | (102)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (incident_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v2))
% 39.96/12.56  | (103)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = v4)))
% 39.96/12.56  | (104)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v2) | parallel_lines(v0, v1) = 0)
% 39.96/12.56  | (105)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (parallel_lines(v0, v1) = v2) | convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0)
% 39.96/12.56  | (106) incident_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0
% 39.96/12.56  | (107)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v4)))
% 39.96/12.56  | (108)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v4)))
% 39.96/12.56  | (109)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & intersection_point(v0, v1) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(v2, v0) = v3))
% 39.96/12.56  | (110)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v2, v3) = 0) |  ? [v6] : ((v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = 0) | (v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = 0) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v6)))
% 39.96/12.56  | (111)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ? [v6] : ((v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = 0) | (v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = 0) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_lines(v2, v3) = v6) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v6)))
% 39.96/12.56  | (112)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_lines(v1, v2) = 0)
% 39.96/12.56  | (113)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_lines(v1, v2) = 0)
% 39.96/12.56  | (114)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v2) = v3) | apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = 0)
% 39.96/12.56  | (115)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v5))
% 39.96/12.56  | (116)  ! [v0] :  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v0) = 0)
% 39.96/12.56  | (117)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v4) |  ? [v6] : ((v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = 0) | (v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_lines(v2, v3) = v6) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v6)))
% 39.96/12.56  | (118)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : equal_lines(v1, v0) = v2
% 39.96/12.56  | (119)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (parallel_lines(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (parallel_lines(v3, v2) = v0))
% 39.96/12.56  | (120)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (equal_lines(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (equal_lines(v3, v2) = v0))
% 39.96/12.56  | (121)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (parallel_through_point(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (parallel_through_point(v3, v2) = v0))
% 39.96/12.56  | (122)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | (v5 = 0 & v3 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = v5) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v5)))
% 39.96/12.56  | (123)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (incident_point_and_line(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (incident_point_and_line(v3, v2) = v0))
% 39.96/12.56  | (124)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v1) = v2) | equal_lines(v0, v1) = 0)
% 39.96/12.56  | (125)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (equal_lines(v0, v1) = v2) | distinct_lines(v0, v1) = 0)
% 39.96/12.56  | (126)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v2) | orthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0)
% 39.96/12.56  | (127)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (orthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v2) | unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0)
% 39.96/12.56  | (128)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (point(v2) = v1) |  ~ (point(v2) = v0))
% 39.96/12.56  | (129)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0)
% 39.96/12.56  | (130)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (intersection_point(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] : ((v3 = 0 & point(v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & line(v1) = v3) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & line(v0) = v3) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v3)))
% 39.96/12.56  | (131) distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_4_4) = 0
% 39.96/12.56  | (132) ( ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0) & incident_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = all_0_0_0) | ( ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0) & incident_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_0_1_1)
% 39.96/12.56  | (133)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = 0 & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v4)))
% 39.96/12.56  | (134)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v2, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = 0) |  ? [v6] : ((v6 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v3) = 0) | (v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0)))
% 39.96/12.56  | (135)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v6] : ((v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = 0) | (v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_lines(v2, v3) = v6)))
% 39.96/12.56  | (136)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = v4)))
% 39.96/12.57  | (137)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5))
% 39.96/12.57  | (138)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_points(v0, v2) = 0)
% 39.96/12.57  | (139)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (distinct_lines(v2, v3) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] : ((v4 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0)))
% 39.96/12.57  | (140)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : incident_point_and_line(v1, v0) = v2
% 39.96/12.57  | (141)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (line(v2) = v1) |  ~ (line(v2) = v0))
% 39.96/12.57  | (142)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v3) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_points(v0, v2) = 0)
% 39.96/12.57  | (143)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v5))
% 39.96/12.57  | (144)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & equal_lines(v0, v1) = v2))
% 39.96/12.57  | (145)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (equal_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & distinct_lines(v0, v1) = v2))
% 39.96/12.57  | (146)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_lines(v1, v2) = 0)
% 39.96/12.57  |
% 39.96/12.57  | Instantiating formula (102) with all_0_3_3, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms incident_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0, yields:
% 39.96/12.57  | (147)  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = v0)
% 39.96/12.57  |
% 39.96/12.57  | Instantiating formula (102) with all_0_3_3, all_0_7_7 and discharging atoms incident_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0, yields:
% 39.96/12.57  | (148)  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = v0)
% 39.96/12.57  |
% 39.96/12.57  | Instantiating formula (45) with all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms line_connecting(all_0_5_5, all_0_4_4) = all_0_3_3, yields:
% 39.96/12.57  | (149)  ? [v0] : (( ~ (v0 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_4_4) = v0))
% 39.96/12.57  |
% 39.96/12.57  | Instantiating formula (24) with all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms line_connecting(all_0_5_5, all_0_4_4) = all_0_3_3, yields:
% 39.96/12.57  | (150)  ? [v0] : (( ~ (v0 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_4_4) = v0))
% 39.96/12.57  |
% 39.96/12.57  | Instantiating formula (45) with all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7 and discharging atoms line_connecting(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_0_2_2, yields:
% 39.96/12.57  | (151)  ? [v0] : (( ~ (v0 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 39.96/12.57  |
% 39.96/12.57  | Instantiating formula (24) with all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7 and discharging atoms line_connecting(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_0_2_2, yields:
% 39.96/12.57  | (152)  ? [v0] : (( ~ (v0 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 39.96/12.57  |
% 39.96/12.57  | Instantiating formula (84) with all_0_4_4, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_4_4) = 0, yields:
% 39.96/12.57  | (153)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & line_connecting(all_0_5_5, all_0_4_4) = v0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, v0) = v1)
% 39.96/12.57  |
% 39.96/12.57  | Instantiating formula (23) with all_0_4_4, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_4_4) = 0, yields:
% 39.96/12.57  | (154)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & line_connecting(all_0_5_5, all_0_4_4) = v0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, v0) = v1)
% 39.96/12.57  |
% 39.96/12.57  | Instantiating formula (84) with all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = 0, yields:
% 39.96/12.57  | (155)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & line_connecting(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = v0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, v0) = v1)
% 39.96/12.57  |
% 39.96/12.57  | Instantiating formula (23) with all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = 0, yields:
% 39.96/12.57  | (156)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & line_connecting(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = v0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, v0) = v1)
% 39.96/12.57  |
% 39.96/12.57  | Instantiating (156) with all_43_0_57, all_43_1_58 yields:
% 39.96/12.57  | (157)  ~ (all_43_0_57 = 0) & line_connecting(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_43_1_58 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_43_1_58) = all_43_0_57
% 39.96/12.57  |
% 39.96/12.57  | Applying alpha-rule on (157) yields:
% 39.96/12.57  | (158)  ~ (all_43_0_57 = 0)
% 39.96/12.57  | (159) line_connecting(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_43_1_58
% 39.96/12.57  | (160) apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_43_1_58) = all_43_0_57
% 39.96/12.57  |
% 39.96/12.57  | Instantiating (153) with all_46_0_61, all_46_1_62 yields:
% 39.96/12.57  | (161)  ~ (all_46_0_61 = 0) & line_connecting(all_0_5_5, all_0_4_4) = all_46_1_62 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_46_1_62) = all_46_0_61
% 39.96/12.57  |
% 39.96/12.57  | Applying alpha-rule on (161) yields:
% 39.96/12.57  | (162)  ~ (all_46_0_61 = 0)
% 39.96/12.57  | (163) line_connecting(all_0_5_5, all_0_4_4) = all_46_1_62
% 39.96/12.57  | (164) apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_46_1_62) = all_46_0_61
% 39.96/12.57  |
% 39.96/12.57  | Instantiating (152) with all_48_0_63 yields:
% 39.96/12.57  | (165) ( ~ (all_48_0_63 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = all_48_0_63) | ( ~ (all_48_0_63 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_48_0_63)
% 39.96/12.57  |
% 39.96/12.57  | Instantiating (154) with all_49_0_64, all_49_1_65 yields:
% 39.96/12.57  | (166)  ~ (all_49_0_64 = 0) & line_connecting(all_0_5_5, all_0_4_4) = all_49_1_65 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_49_1_65) = all_49_0_64
% 39.96/12.57  |
% 39.96/12.57  | Applying alpha-rule on (166) yields:
% 39.96/12.57  | (167)  ~ (all_49_0_64 = 0)
% 39.96/12.57  | (168) line_connecting(all_0_5_5, all_0_4_4) = all_49_1_65
% 39.96/12.57  | (169) apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_49_1_65) = all_49_0_64
% 39.96/12.57  |
% 39.96/12.57  | Instantiating (155) with all_51_0_66, all_51_1_67 yields:
% 39.96/12.57  | (170)  ~ (all_51_0_66 = 0) & line_connecting(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_51_1_67 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_51_1_67) = all_51_0_66
% 39.96/12.57  |
% 39.96/12.57  | Applying alpha-rule on (170) yields:
% 39.96/12.57  | (171)  ~ (all_51_0_66 = 0)
% 39.96/12.57  | (172) line_connecting(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_51_1_67
% 39.96/12.57  | (173) apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_51_1_67) = all_51_0_66
% 39.96/12.57  |
% 39.96/12.57  | Instantiating (151) with all_55_0_69 yields:
% 39.96/12.57  | (174) ( ~ (all_55_0_69 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = all_55_0_69) | ( ~ (all_55_0_69 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_55_0_69)
% 39.96/12.57  |
% 39.96/12.57  | Instantiating (148) with all_58_0_72 yields:
% 39.96/12.57  | (175)  ~ (all_58_0_72 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = all_58_0_72
% 39.96/12.57  |
% 39.96/12.57  | Applying alpha-rule on (175) yields:
% 39.96/12.57  | (176)  ~ (all_58_0_72 = 0)
% 39.96/12.57  | (177) apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = all_58_0_72
% 39.96/12.57  |
% 39.96/12.57  | Instantiating (147) with all_60_0_73 yields:
% 39.96/12.57  | (178)  ~ (all_60_0_73 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = all_60_0_73
% 39.96/12.57  |
% 39.96/12.57  | Applying alpha-rule on (178) yields:
% 39.96/12.57  | (179)  ~ (all_60_0_73 = 0)
% 39.96/12.57  | (180) apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = all_60_0_73
% 39.96/12.57  |
% 39.96/12.57  | Instantiating (150) with all_62_0_74 yields:
% 39.96/12.57  | (181) ( ~ (all_62_0_74 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_3_3) = all_62_0_74) | ( ~ (all_62_0_74 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_4_4) = all_62_0_74)
% 39.96/12.57  |
% 39.96/12.57  | Instantiating (149) with all_63_0_75 yields:
% 39.96/12.57  | (182) ( ~ (all_63_0_75 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = all_63_0_75) | ( ~ (all_63_0_75 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_4_4) = all_63_0_75)
% 39.96/12.57  |
% 39.96/12.57  +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (165), into two cases.
% 39.96/12.57  |-Branch one:
% 39.96/12.57  | (183)  ~ (all_48_0_63 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = all_48_0_63
% 39.96/12.57  |
% 39.96/12.57  	| Applying alpha-rule on (183) yields:
% 39.96/12.57  	| (184)  ~ (all_48_0_63 = 0)
% 39.96/12.57  	| (185) apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = all_48_0_63
% 39.96/12.57  	|
% 39.96/12.57  	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (181), into two cases.
% 39.96/12.57  	|-Branch one:
% 39.96/12.57  	| (186)  ~ (all_62_0_74 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_3_3) = all_62_0_74
% 39.96/12.57  	|
% 39.96/12.57  		| Applying alpha-rule on (186) yields:
% 39.96/12.57  		| (187)  ~ (all_62_0_74 = 0)
% 39.96/12.57  		| (188) apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_3_3) = all_62_0_74
% 39.96/12.57  		|
% 39.96/12.57  		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (174), into two cases.
% 39.96/12.57  		|-Branch one:
% 39.96/12.57  		| (189)  ~ (all_55_0_69 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = all_55_0_69
% 39.96/12.57  		|
% 39.96/12.57  			| Applying alpha-rule on (189) yields:
% 39.96/12.57  			| (190)  ~ (all_55_0_69 = 0)
% 39.96/12.57  			| (191) apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = all_55_0_69
% 39.96/12.58  			|
% 39.96/12.58  			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (182), into two cases.
% 39.96/12.58  			|-Branch one:
% 39.96/12.58  			| (192)  ~ (all_63_0_75 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = all_63_0_75
% 39.96/12.58  			|
% 39.96/12.58  				| Applying alpha-rule on (192) yields:
% 39.96/12.58  				| (193)  ~ (all_63_0_75 = 0)
% 39.96/12.58  				| (194) apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = all_63_0_75
% 39.96/12.58  				|
% 39.96/12.58  				| Instantiating formula (63) with all_0_5_5, all_0_4_4, all_49_1_65, all_0_3_3 and discharging atoms line_connecting(all_0_5_5, all_0_4_4) = all_49_1_65, line_connecting(all_0_5_5, all_0_4_4) = all_0_3_3, yields:
% 39.96/12.58  				| (195) all_49_1_65 = all_0_3_3
% 39.96/12.58  				|
% 39.96/12.58  				| Instantiating formula (63) with all_0_5_5, all_0_4_4, all_46_1_62, all_49_1_65 and discharging atoms line_connecting(all_0_5_5, all_0_4_4) = all_49_1_65, line_connecting(all_0_5_5, all_0_4_4) = all_46_1_62, yields:
% 39.96/12.58  				| (196) all_49_1_65 = all_46_1_62
% 39.96/12.58  				|
% 39.96/12.58  				| Instantiating formula (63) with all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6, all_51_1_67, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms line_connecting(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_51_1_67, line_connecting(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_0_2_2, yields:
% 39.96/12.58  				| (197) all_51_1_67 = all_0_2_2
% 39.96/12.58  				|
% 39.96/12.58  				| Instantiating formula (63) with all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6, all_43_1_58, all_51_1_67 and discharging atoms line_connecting(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_51_1_67, line_connecting(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_43_1_58, yields:
% 39.96/12.58  				| (198) all_51_1_67 = all_43_1_58
% 39.96/12.58  				|
% 39.96/12.58  				| Combining equations (197,198) yields a new equation:
% 39.96/12.58  				| (199) all_43_1_58 = all_0_2_2
% 39.96/12.58  				|
% 39.96/12.58  				| Combining equations (196,195) yields a new equation:
% 39.96/12.58  				| (200) all_46_1_62 = all_0_3_3
% 39.96/12.58  				|
% 39.96/12.58  				| Simplifying 200 yields:
% 39.96/12.58  				| (201) all_46_1_62 = all_0_3_3
% 39.96/12.58  				|
% 39.96/12.58  				| Combining equations (199,198) yields a new equation:
% 39.96/12.58  				| (197) all_51_1_67 = all_0_2_2
% 39.96/12.58  				|
% 39.96/12.58  				| From (201) and (164) follows:
% 39.96/12.58  				| (203) apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = all_46_0_61
% 39.96/12.58  				|
% 39.96/12.58  				| From (195) and (169) follows:
% 39.96/12.58  				| (204) apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_3_3) = all_49_0_64
% 39.96/12.58  				|
% 39.96/12.58  				| From (197) and (173) follows:
% 39.96/12.58  				| (205) apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = all_51_0_66
% 39.96/12.58  				|
% 39.96/12.58  				| From (199) and (160) follows:
% 39.96/12.58  				| (206) apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = all_43_0_57
% 39.96/12.58  				|
% 39.96/12.58  				| Instantiating formula (19) with all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3, all_46_0_61, all_63_0_75 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = all_63_0_75, apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = all_46_0_61, yields:
% 39.96/12.58  				| (207) all_63_0_75 = all_46_0_61
% 39.96/12.58  				|
% 39.96/12.58  				| Instantiating formula (19) with all_0_5_5, all_0_3_3, all_49_0_64, all_62_0_74 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_3_3) = all_62_0_74, apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_3_3) = all_49_0_64, yields:
% 39.96/12.58  				| (208) all_62_0_74 = all_49_0_64
% 39.96/12.58  				|
% 39.96/12.58  				| Instantiating formula (19) with all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2, all_51_0_66, all_55_0_69 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = all_55_0_69, apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = all_51_0_66, yields:
% 39.96/12.58  				| (209) all_55_0_69 = all_51_0_66
% 39.96/12.58  				|
% 39.96/12.58  				| Instantiating formula (19) with all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2, all_43_0_57, all_48_0_63 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = all_48_0_63, apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = all_43_0_57, yields:
% 39.96/12.58  				| (210) all_48_0_63 = all_43_0_57
% 39.96/12.58  				|
% 39.96/12.58  				| Equations (207) can reduce 193 to:
% 39.96/12.58  				| (162)  ~ (all_46_0_61 = 0)
% 39.96/12.58  				|
% 39.96/12.58  				| Equations (208) can reduce 187 to:
% 39.96/12.58  				| (167)  ~ (all_49_0_64 = 0)
% 39.96/12.58  				|
% 39.96/12.58  				| Equations (209) can reduce 190 to:
% 39.96/12.58  				| (171)  ~ (all_51_0_66 = 0)
% 39.96/12.58  				|
% 39.96/12.58  				| Equations (210) can reduce 184 to:
% 39.96/12.58  				| (158)  ~ (all_43_0_57 = 0)
% 39.96/12.58  				|
% 39.96/12.58  				| From (207) and (194) follows:
% 39.96/12.58  				| (203) apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = all_46_0_61
% 39.96/12.58  				|
% 39.96/12.58  				| From (208) and (188) follows:
% 39.96/12.58  				| (204) apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_3_3) = all_49_0_64
% 39.96/12.58  				|
% 39.96/12.58  				| From (209) and (191) follows:
% 39.96/12.58  				| (205) apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = all_51_0_66
% 39.96/12.58  				|
% 39.96/12.58  				| From (210) and (185) follows:
% 39.96/12.58  				| (206) apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = all_43_0_57
% 39.96/12.58  				|
% 39.96/12.58  				| Instantiating formula (135) with all_46_0_61, all_46_0_61, all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = all_46_0_61, distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_4_4) = 0, yields:
% 39.96/12.58  				| (219) all_46_0_61 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = v0))
% 39.96/12.58  				|
% 39.96/12.58  				| Instantiating formula (29) with all_46_0_61, all_46_0_61, all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = all_46_0_61, yields:
% 39.96/12.58  				| (220) all_46_0_61 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = v0))
% 39.96/12.58  				|
% 39.96/12.58  				| Instantiating formula (111) with all_46_0_61, all_46_0_61, all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = all_46_0_61, yields:
% 39.96/12.58  				| (221) all_46_0_61 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = v0))
% 39.96/12.58  				|
% 39.96/12.58  				| Instantiating formula (111) with all_49_0_64, all_46_0_61, all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3, all_0_5_5, all_0_4_4 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = all_46_0_61, apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_3_3) = all_49_0_64, yields:
% 39.96/12.58  				| (222) all_49_0_64 = 0 | all_46_0_61 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_4_4, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 39.96/12.58  				|
% 39.96/12.58  				| Instantiating formula (59) with all_49_0_64, all_49_0_64, all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_3_3) = all_49_0_64, distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_4_4) = 0, yields:
% 39.96/12.58  				| (223) all_49_0_64 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = v0))
% 39.96/12.58  				|
% 39.96/12.58  				| Instantiating formula (29) with all_49_0_64, all_49_0_64, all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_3_3) = all_49_0_64, yields:
% 39.96/12.58  				| (224) all_49_0_64 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = v0))
% 39.96/12.58  				|
% 39.96/12.58  				| Instantiating formula (111) with all_49_0_64, all_49_0_64, all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3, all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_3_3) = all_49_0_64, yields:
% 39.96/12.58  				| (225) all_49_0_64 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 39.96/12.58  				|
% 39.96/12.58  				| Instantiating formula (111) with all_51_0_66, all_46_0_61, all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3, all_0_6_6, all_0_4_4 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = all_46_0_61, apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = all_51_0_66, yields:
% 39.96/12.58  				| (226) all_51_0_66 = 0 | all_46_0_61 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_4_4, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 39.96/12.58  				|
% 39.96/12.58  				| Instantiating formula (111) with all_46_0_61, all_51_0_66, all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2, all_0_4_4, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = all_46_0_61, apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = all_51_0_66, yields:
% 39.96/12.58  				| (227) all_51_0_66 = 0 | all_46_0_61 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_4_4) = v0))
% 39.96/12.58  				|
% 39.96/12.58  				| Instantiating formula (117) with all_51_0_66, all_46_0_61, all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6, all_0_4_4 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = all_46_0_61, apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = all_51_0_66, yields:
% 39.96/12.58  				| (228) all_51_0_66 = 0 | all_46_0_61 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_4_4, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 39.96/12.58  				|
% 39.96/12.58  				| Instantiating formula (117) with all_46_0_61, all_51_0_66, all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = all_46_0_61, apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = all_51_0_66, yields:
% 39.96/12.58  				| (229) all_51_0_66 = 0 | all_46_0_61 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_4_4) = v0))
% 39.96/12.58  				|
% 39.96/12.58  				| Instantiating formula (111) with all_51_0_66, all_49_0_64, all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3, all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_3_3) = all_49_0_64, apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = all_51_0_66, yields:
% 39.96/12.58  				| (230) all_51_0_66 = 0 | all_49_0_64 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 39.96/12.58  				|
% 39.96/12.58  				| Instantiating formula (111) with all_49_0_64, all_51_0_66, all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_3_3) = all_49_0_64, apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = all_51_0_66, yields:
% 39.96/12.58  				| (231) all_51_0_66 = 0 | all_49_0_64 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 39.96/12.59  				|
% 39.96/12.59  				| Instantiating formula (117) with all_51_0_66, all_49_0_64, all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_3_3) = all_49_0_64, apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = all_51_0_66, yields:
% 39.96/12.59  				| (232) all_51_0_66 = 0 | all_49_0_64 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 39.96/12.59  				|
% 39.96/12.59  				| Instantiating formula (117) with all_49_0_64, all_51_0_66, all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3, all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_3_3) = all_49_0_64, apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = all_51_0_66, yields:
% 39.96/12.59  				| (233) all_51_0_66 = 0 | all_49_0_64 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 39.96/12.59  				|
% 39.96/12.59  				| Instantiating formula (29) with all_51_0_66, all_51_0_66, all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = all_51_0_66, yields:
% 39.96/12.59  				| (234) all_51_0_66 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 39.96/12.59  				|
% 39.96/12.59  				| Instantiating formula (111) with all_51_0_66, all_51_0_66, all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = all_51_0_66, yields:
% 39.96/12.59  				| (235) all_51_0_66 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 39.96/12.59  				|
% 39.96/12.59  				| Instantiating formula (111) with all_60_0_73, all_46_0_61, all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3, all_0_6_6, all_0_4_4 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = all_46_0_61, apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = all_60_0_73, yields:
% 39.96/12.59  				| (236) all_60_0_73 = 0 | all_46_0_61 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_4_4, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 39.96/12.59  				|
% 39.96/12.59  				| Instantiating formula (111) with all_46_0_61, all_60_0_73, all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = all_46_0_61, apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = all_60_0_73, yields:
% 39.96/12.59  				| (237) all_60_0_73 = 0 | all_46_0_61 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_4_4) = v0))
% 39.96/12.59  				|
% 39.96/12.59  				| Instantiating formula (111) with all_60_0_73, all_49_0_64, all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3, all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_3_3) = all_49_0_64, apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = all_60_0_73, yields:
% 39.96/12.59  				| (238) all_60_0_73 = 0 | all_49_0_64 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 39.96/12.59  				|
% 39.96/12.59  				| Instantiating formula (111) with all_49_0_64, all_60_0_73, all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3, all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_3_3) = all_49_0_64, apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = all_60_0_73, yields:
% 39.96/12.59  				| (239) all_60_0_73 = 0 | all_49_0_64 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 39.96/12.59  				|
% 39.96/12.59  				| Instantiating formula (135) with all_60_0_73, all_51_0_66, all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = all_51_0_66, apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = all_60_0_73, distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = 0, yields:
% 39.96/12.59  				| (240) all_60_0_73 = 0 | all_51_0_66 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0))
% 39.96/12.59  				|
% 39.96/12.59  				| Instantiating formula (135) with all_51_0_66, all_60_0_73, all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3, all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = all_51_0_66, apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = all_60_0_73, distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = 0, yields:
% 39.96/12.59  				| (241) all_60_0_73 = 0 | all_51_0_66 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 39.96/12.59  				|
% 39.96/12.59  				| Instantiating formula (29) with all_60_0_73, all_51_0_66, all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = all_51_0_66, apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = all_60_0_73, yields:
% 39.96/12.59  				| (242) all_60_0_73 = 0 | all_51_0_66 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0))
% 39.96/12.59  				|
% 39.96/12.59  				| Instantiating formula (29) with all_51_0_66, all_60_0_73, all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = all_51_0_66, apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = all_60_0_73, yields:
% 39.96/12.59  				| (243) all_60_0_73 = 0 | all_51_0_66 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 39.96/12.59  				|
% 39.96/12.59  				| Instantiating formula (111) with all_60_0_73, all_51_0_66, all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = all_51_0_66, apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = all_60_0_73, yields:
% 39.96/12.59  				| (244) all_60_0_73 = 0 | all_51_0_66 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 39.96/12.59  				|
% 39.96/12.59  				| Instantiating formula (111) with all_51_0_66, all_60_0_73, all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3, all_0_6_6, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = all_51_0_66, apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = all_60_0_73, yields:
% 39.96/12.59  				| (245) all_60_0_73 = 0 | all_51_0_66 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 39.96/12.59  				|
% 39.96/12.59  				| Instantiating formula (29) with all_60_0_73, all_60_0_73, all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = all_60_0_73, yields:
% 39.96/12.59  				| (246) all_60_0_73 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = v0))
% 39.96/12.59  				|
% 39.96/12.59  				| Instantiating formula (111) with all_60_0_73, all_60_0_73, all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3, all_0_6_6, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = all_60_0_73, yields:
% 39.96/12.59  				| (247) all_60_0_73 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 39.96/12.59  				|
% 39.96/12.59  				| Instantiating formula (111) with all_43_0_57, all_46_0_61, all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3, all_0_7_7, all_0_4_4 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = all_46_0_61, apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = all_43_0_57, yields:
% 39.96/12.59  				| (248) all_46_0_61 = 0 | all_43_0_57 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_4_4, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 39.96/12.59  				|
% 39.96/12.59  				| Instantiating formula (111) with all_46_0_61, all_43_0_57, all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2, all_0_4_4, all_0_7_7 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = all_46_0_61, apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = all_43_0_57, yields:
% 39.96/12.59  				| (249) all_46_0_61 = 0 | all_43_0_57 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_4_4) = v0))
% 39.96/12.59  				|
% 39.96/12.59  				| Instantiating formula (117) with all_43_0_57, all_46_0_61, all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7, all_0_4_4 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = all_46_0_61, apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = all_43_0_57, yields:
% 39.96/12.59  				| (250) all_46_0_61 = 0 | all_43_0_57 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_4_4, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 40.42/12.59  				|
% 40.42/12.59  				| Instantiating formula (117) with all_46_0_61, all_43_0_57, all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4, all_0_7_7 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = all_46_0_61, apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = all_43_0_57, yields:
% 40.42/12.59  				| (251) all_46_0_61 = 0 | all_43_0_57 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_4_4) = v0))
% 40.42/12.59  				|
% 40.42/12.59  				| Instantiating formula (111) with all_43_0_57, all_49_0_64, all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3, all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_3_3) = all_49_0_64, apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = all_43_0_57, yields:
% 40.42/12.59  				| (252) all_49_0_64 = 0 | all_43_0_57 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 40.42/12.59  				|
% 40.42/12.59  				| Instantiating formula (111) with all_49_0_64, all_43_0_57, all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_3_3) = all_49_0_64, apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = all_43_0_57, yields:
% 40.42/12.59  				| (253) all_49_0_64 = 0 | all_43_0_57 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 40.42/12.59  				|
% 40.42/12.59  				| Instantiating formula (117) with all_43_0_57, all_49_0_64, all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_3_3) = all_49_0_64, apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = all_43_0_57, yields:
% 40.42/12.59  				| (254) all_49_0_64 = 0 | all_43_0_57 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 40.42/12.59  				|
% 40.42/12.59  				| Instantiating formula (117) with all_49_0_64, all_43_0_57, all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3, all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_3_3) = all_49_0_64, apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = all_43_0_57, yields:
% 40.42/12.59  				| (255) all_49_0_64 = 0 | all_43_0_57 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 40.42/12.59  				|
% 40.42/12.59  				| Instantiating formula (111) with all_43_0_57, all_51_0_66, all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = all_51_0_66, apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = all_43_0_57, yields:
% 40.42/12.59  				| (256) all_51_0_66 = 0 | all_43_0_57 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 40.42/12.60  				|
% 40.42/12.60  				| Instantiating formula (111) with all_51_0_66, all_43_0_57, all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = all_51_0_66, apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = all_43_0_57, yields:
% 40.42/12.60  				| (257) all_51_0_66 = 0 | all_43_0_57 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 40.42/12.60  				|
% 40.42/12.60  				| Instantiating formula (111) with all_43_0_57, all_60_0_73, all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3, all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = all_60_0_73, apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = all_43_0_57, yields:
% 40.42/12.60  				| (258) all_60_0_73 = 0 | all_43_0_57 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 40.42/12.60  				|
% 40.42/12.60  				| Instantiating formula (111) with all_60_0_73, all_43_0_57, all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = all_60_0_73, apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = all_43_0_57, yields:
% 40.42/12.60  				| (259) all_60_0_73 = 0 | all_43_0_57 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 40.42/12.60  				|
% 40.42/12.60  				| Instantiating formula (117) with all_43_0_57, all_60_0_73, all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = all_60_0_73, apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = all_43_0_57, yields:
% 40.42/12.60  				| (260) all_60_0_73 = 0 | all_43_0_57 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 40.42/12.60  				|
% 40.42/12.60  				| Instantiating formula (117) with all_60_0_73, all_43_0_57, all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3, all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = all_60_0_73, apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = all_43_0_57, yields:
% 40.42/12.60  				| (261) all_60_0_73 = 0 | all_43_0_57 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 40.42/12.60  				|
% 40.42/12.60  				| Instantiating formula (59) with all_43_0_57, all_43_0_57, all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = all_43_0_57, distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = 0, yields:
% 40.42/12.60  				| (262) all_43_0_57 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 40.42/12.60  				|
% 40.42/12.60  				| Instantiating formula (29) with all_43_0_57, all_43_0_57, all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = all_43_0_57, yields:
% 40.42/12.60  				| (263) all_43_0_57 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 40.42/12.60  				|
% 40.42/12.60  				| Instantiating formula (111) with all_43_0_57, all_43_0_57, all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7, all_0_7_7 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = all_43_0_57, yields:
% 40.42/12.60  				| (264) all_43_0_57 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 40.42/12.60  				|
% 40.42/12.60  				| Instantiating formula (111) with all_58_0_72, all_46_0_61, all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3, all_0_7_7, all_0_4_4 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = all_46_0_61, apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = all_58_0_72, yields:
% 40.42/12.60  				| (265) all_58_0_72 = 0 | all_46_0_61 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_4_4, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 40.42/12.60  				|
% 40.42/12.60  				| Instantiating formula (111) with all_46_0_61, all_58_0_72, all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4, all_0_7_7 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = all_46_0_61, apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = all_58_0_72, yields:
% 40.42/12.60  				| (266) all_58_0_72 = 0 | all_46_0_61 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_4_4) = v0))
% 40.42/12.60  				|
% 40.42/12.60  				| Instantiating formula (111) with all_58_0_72, all_49_0_64, all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3, all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_3_3) = all_49_0_64, apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = all_58_0_72, yields:
% 40.42/12.60  				| (267) all_58_0_72 = 0 | all_49_0_64 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 40.42/12.60  				|
% 40.42/12.60  				| Instantiating formula (111) with all_49_0_64, all_58_0_72, all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3, all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_3_3) = all_49_0_64, apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = all_58_0_72, yields:
% 40.42/12.60  				| (268) all_58_0_72 = 0 | all_49_0_64 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 40.42/12.60  				|
% 40.42/12.60  				| Instantiating formula (111) with all_58_0_72, all_51_0_66, all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = all_51_0_66, apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = all_58_0_72, yields:
% 40.42/12.60  				| (269) all_58_0_72 = 0 | all_51_0_66 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 40.42/12.60  				|
% 40.42/12.60  				| Instantiating formula (111) with all_51_0_66, all_58_0_72, all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3, all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = all_51_0_66, apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = all_58_0_72, yields:
% 40.42/12.60  				| (270) all_58_0_72 = 0 | all_51_0_66 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 40.42/12.60  				|
% 40.42/12.60  				| Instantiating formula (117) with all_58_0_72, all_51_0_66, all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3, all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = all_51_0_66, apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = all_58_0_72, yields:
% 40.42/12.60  				| (271) all_58_0_72 = 0 | all_51_0_66 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 40.42/12.60  				|
% 40.42/12.60  				| Instantiating formula (117) with all_51_0_66, all_58_0_72, all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = all_51_0_66, apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = all_58_0_72, yields:
% 40.42/12.60  				| (272) all_58_0_72 = 0 | all_51_0_66 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 40.42/12.60  				|
% 40.42/12.60  				| Instantiating formula (111) with all_58_0_72, all_60_0_73, all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3, all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = all_60_0_73, apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = all_58_0_72, yields:
% 40.42/12.60  				| (273) all_60_0_73 = 0 | all_58_0_72 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 40.42/12.60  				|
% 40.42/12.60  				| Instantiating formula (111) with all_60_0_73, all_58_0_72, all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3, all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = all_60_0_73, apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = all_58_0_72, yields:
% 40.42/12.60  				| (274) all_60_0_73 = 0 | all_58_0_72 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 40.42/12.60  				|
% 40.42/12.60  				| Instantiating formula (59) with all_58_0_72, all_43_0_57, all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = all_43_0_57, apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = all_58_0_72, distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = 0, yields:
% 40.42/12.60  				| (275) all_58_0_72 = 0 | all_43_0_57 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0))
% 40.42/12.60  				|
% 40.42/12.60  				| Instantiating formula (59) with all_43_0_57, all_58_0_72, all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3, all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = all_43_0_57, apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = all_58_0_72, distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = 0, yields:
% 40.42/12.60  				| (276) all_58_0_72 = 0 | all_43_0_57 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 40.42/12.60  				|
% 40.42/12.60  				| Instantiating formula (29) with all_58_0_72, all_43_0_57, all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = all_43_0_57, apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = all_58_0_72, yields:
% 40.42/12.60  				| (277) all_58_0_72 = 0 | all_43_0_57 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0))
% 40.42/12.60  				|
% 40.42/12.60  				| Instantiating formula (29) with all_43_0_57, all_58_0_72, all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3, all_0_7_7 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = all_43_0_57, apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = all_58_0_72, yields:
% 40.42/12.60  				| (278) all_58_0_72 = 0 | all_43_0_57 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 40.42/12.60  				|
% 40.42/12.60  				| Instantiating formula (111) with all_58_0_72, all_43_0_57, all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7, all_0_7_7 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = all_43_0_57, apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = all_58_0_72, yields:
% 40.42/12.60  				| (279) all_58_0_72 = 0 | all_43_0_57 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 40.42/12.60  				|
% 40.42/12.60  				| Instantiating formula (111) with all_43_0_57, all_58_0_72, all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3, all_0_7_7, all_0_7_7 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = all_43_0_57, apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = all_58_0_72, yields:
% 40.42/12.60  				| (280) all_58_0_72 = 0 | all_43_0_57 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 40.42/12.60  				|
% 40.42/12.60  				| Instantiating formula (59) with all_58_0_72, all_58_0_72, all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3, all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = all_58_0_72, distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = 0, yields:
% 40.42/12.61  				| (281) all_58_0_72 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = v0))
% 40.42/12.61  				|
% 40.42/12.61  				| Instantiating formula (29) with all_58_0_72, all_58_0_72, all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3, all_0_7_7 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = all_58_0_72, yields:
% 40.42/12.61  				| (282) all_58_0_72 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = v0))
% 40.42/12.61  				|
% 40.42/12.61  				| Instantiating formula (111) with all_58_0_72, all_58_0_72, all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3, all_0_7_7, all_0_7_7 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = all_58_0_72, yields:
% 40.42/12.61  				| (283) all_58_0_72 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 40.42/12.61  				|
% 40.42/12.61  				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (132), into two cases.
% 40.42/12.61  				|-Branch one:
% 40.42/12.61  				| (284)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0) & incident_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = all_0_0_0
% 40.42/12.61  				|
% 40.42/12.61  					| Applying alpha-rule on (284) yields:
% 40.42/12.61  					| (285)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0)
% 40.42/12.61  					| (286) incident_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = all_0_0_0
% 40.42/12.61  					|
% 40.42/12.61  					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (246), into two cases.
% 40.42/12.61  					|-Branch one:
% 40.42/12.61  					| (287) all_60_0_73 = 0
% 40.42/12.61  					|
% 40.42/12.61  						| Equations (287) can reduce 179 to:
% 40.42/12.61  						| (288) $false
% 40.42/12.61  						|
% 40.42/12.61  						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.42/12.61  					|-Branch two:
% 40.42/12.61  					| (179)  ~ (all_60_0_73 = 0)
% 40.42/12.61  					| (290)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = v0))
% 40.42/12.61  					|
% 40.42/12.61  						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (263), into two cases.
% 40.42/12.61  						|-Branch one:
% 40.42/12.61  						| (291) all_43_0_57 = 0
% 40.42/12.61  						|
% 40.42/12.61  							| Equations (291) can reduce 158 to:
% 40.42/12.61  							| (288) $false
% 40.42/12.61  							|
% 40.42/12.61  							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.42/12.61  						|-Branch two:
% 40.42/12.61  						| (158)  ~ (all_43_0_57 = 0)
% 40.42/12.61  						| (294)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 40.42/12.61  						|
% 40.42/12.61  							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (282), into two cases.
% 40.42/12.61  							|-Branch one:
% 40.42/12.61  							| (295) all_58_0_72 = 0
% 40.42/12.61  							|
% 40.42/12.61  								| Equations (295) can reduce 176 to:
% 40.42/12.61  								| (288) $false
% 40.42/12.61  								|
% 40.42/12.61  								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.42/12.61  							|-Branch two:
% 40.42/12.61  							| (176)  ~ (all_58_0_72 = 0)
% 40.42/12.61  							| (290)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = v0))
% 40.42/12.61  							|
% 40.42/12.61  								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (262), into two cases.
% 40.42/12.61  								|-Branch one:
% 40.42/12.61  								| (291) all_43_0_57 = 0
% 40.42/12.61  								|
% 40.42/12.61  									| Equations (291) can reduce 158 to:
% 40.42/12.61  									| (288) $false
% 40.42/12.61  									|
% 40.42/12.61  									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.42/12.61  								|-Branch two:
% 40.42/12.61  								| (158)  ~ (all_43_0_57 = 0)
% 40.42/12.61  								| (302)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 40.42/12.61  								|
% 40.42/12.61  									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (247), into two cases.
% 40.42/12.61  									|-Branch one:
% 40.42/12.61  									| (287) all_60_0_73 = 0
% 40.42/12.61  									|
% 40.42/12.61  										| Equations (287) can reduce 179 to:
% 40.42/12.61  										| (288) $false
% 40.42/12.61  										|
% 40.42/12.61  										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.42/12.61  									|-Branch two:
% 40.42/12.61  									| (179)  ~ (all_60_0_73 = 0)
% 40.42/12.61  									| (306)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 40.42/12.61  									|
% 40.42/12.61  										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (281), into two cases.
% 40.42/12.61  										|-Branch one:
% 40.42/12.61  										| (295) all_58_0_72 = 0
% 40.42/12.61  										|
% 40.42/12.61  											| Equations (295) can reduce 176 to:
% 40.42/12.61  											| (288) $false
% 40.42/12.61  											|
% 40.42/12.61  											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.42/12.61  										|-Branch two:
% 40.42/12.61  										| (176)  ~ (all_58_0_72 = 0)
% 40.42/12.61  										| (310)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = v0))
% 40.42/12.61  										|
% 40.42/12.61  											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (283), into two cases.
% 40.42/12.61  											|-Branch one:
% 40.42/12.61  											| (295) all_58_0_72 = 0
% 40.42/12.61  											|
% 40.42/12.61  												| Equations (295) can reduce 176 to:
% 40.42/12.61  												| (288) $false
% 40.42/12.61  												|
% 40.42/12.61  												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.42/12.61  											|-Branch two:
% 40.42/12.61  											| (176)  ~ (all_58_0_72 = 0)
% 40.42/12.61  											| (314)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 40.42/12.61  											|
% 40.42/12.61  												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (277), into two cases.
% 40.42/12.61  												|-Branch one:
% 40.42/12.61  												| (295) all_58_0_72 = 0
% 40.42/12.61  												|
% 40.42/12.61  													| Equations (295) can reduce 176 to:
% 40.42/12.61  													| (288) $false
% 40.42/12.61  													|
% 40.42/12.61  													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.42/12.61  												|-Branch two:
% 40.42/12.61  												| (176)  ~ (all_58_0_72 = 0)
% 40.42/12.61  												| (318) all_43_0_57 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0))
% 40.42/12.61  												|
% 40.42/12.61  													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (243), into two cases.
% 40.42/12.61  													|-Branch one:
% 40.42/12.61  													| (287) all_60_0_73 = 0
% 40.42/12.61  													|
% 40.42/12.61  														| Equations (287) can reduce 179 to:
% 40.42/12.61  														| (288) $false
% 40.42/12.61  														|
% 40.42/12.61  														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.42/12.61  													|-Branch two:
% 40.42/12.61  													| (179)  ~ (all_60_0_73 = 0)
% 40.42/12.61  													| (322) all_51_0_66 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 40.51/12.61  													|
% 40.51/12.61  														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (242), into two cases.
% 40.51/12.61  														|-Branch one:
% 40.51/12.61  														| (287) all_60_0_73 = 0
% 40.51/12.61  														|
% 40.51/12.61  															| Equations (287) can reduce 179 to:
% 40.51/12.61  															| (288) $false
% 40.51/12.61  															|
% 40.51/12.61  															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.51/12.61  														|-Branch two:
% 40.51/12.61  														| (179)  ~ (all_60_0_73 = 0)
% 40.51/12.61  														| (326) all_51_0_66 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0))
% 40.51/12.61  														|
% 40.51/12.61  															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (278), into two cases.
% 40.51/12.61  															|-Branch one:
% 40.51/12.61  															| (295) all_58_0_72 = 0
% 40.51/12.61  															|
% 40.51/12.61  																| Equations (295) can reduce 176 to:
% 40.51/12.61  																| (288) $false
% 40.51/12.61  																|
% 40.51/12.61  																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.51/12.61  															|-Branch two:
% 40.51/12.61  															| (176)  ~ (all_58_0_72 = 0)
% 40.51/12.61  															| (330) all_43_0_57 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 40.51/12.61  															|
% 40.51/12.61  																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (239), into two cases.
% 40.51/12.61  																|-Branch one:
% 40.51/12.61  																| (287) all_60_0_73 = 0
% 40.51/12.61  																|
% 40.51/12.61  																	| Equations (287) can reduce 179 to:
% 40.51/12.61  																	| (288) $false
% 40.51/12.61  																	|
% 40.51/12.61  																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.51/12.61  																|-Branch two:
% 40.51/12.61  																| (179)  ~ (all_60_0_73 = 0)
% 40.51/12.61  																| (334) all_49_0_64 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 40.51/12.61  																|
% 40.51/12.61  																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (254), into two cases.
% 40.51/12.61  																	|-Branch one:
% 40.51/12.61  																	| (335) all_49_0_64 = 0
% 40.51/12.61  																	|
% 40.51/12.61  																		| Equations (335) can reduce 167 to:
% 40.51/12.61  																		| (288) $false
% 40.51/12.61  																		|
% 40.51/12.61  																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.51/12.61  																	|-Branch two:
% 40.51/12.61  																	| (167)  ~ (all_49_0_64 = 0)
% 40.51/12.61  																	| (338) all_43_0_57 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 40.51/12.61  																	|
% 40.51/12.61  																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (256), into two cases.
% 40.51/12.61  																		|-Branch one:
% 40.51/12.61  																		| (339) all_51_0_66 = 0
% 40.51/12.61  																		|
% 40.51/12.61  																			| Equations (339) can reduce 171 to:
% 40.51/12.61  																			| (288) $false
% 40.51/12.61  																			|
% 40.51/12.61  																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.51/12.61  																		|-Branch two:
% 40.51/12.61  																		| (171)  ~ (all_51_0_66 = 0)
% 40.51/12.61  																		| (342) all_43_0_57 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 40.51/12.61  																		|
% 40.51/12.61  																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (245), into two cases.
% 40.51/12.61  																			|-Branch one:
% 40.51/12.61  																			| (287) all_60_0_73 = 0
% 40.51/12.61  																			|
% 40.51/12.61  																				| Equations (287) can reduce 179 to:
% 40.51/12.61  																				| (288) $false
% 40.51/12.61  																				|
% 40.51/12.61  																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.51/12.61  																			|-Branch two:
% 40.51/12.61  																			| (179)  ~ (all_60_0_73 = 0)
% 40.51/12.61  																			| (346) all_51_0_66 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 40.51/12.61  																			|
% 40.51/12.61  																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (248), into two cases.
% 40.51/12.61  																				|-Branch one:
% 40.51/12.61  																				| (347) all_46_0_61 = 0
% 40.51/12.61  																				|
% 40.51/12.61  																					| Equations (347) can reduce 162 to:
% 40.51/12.61  																					| (288) $false
% 40.51/12.61  																					|
% 40.51/12.61  																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.51/12.61  																				|-Branch two:
% 40.51/12.61  																				| (162)  ~ (all_46_0_61 = 0)
% 40.51/12.61  																				| (350) all_43_0_57 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_4_4, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 40.51/12.61  																				|
% 40.51/12.61  																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (241), into two cases.
% 40.51/12.61  																					|-Branch one:
% 40.51/12.61  																					| (287) all_60_0_73 = 0
% 40.51/12.61  																					|
% 40.51/12.61  																						| Equations (287) can reduce 179 to:
% 40.51/12.61  																						| (288) $false
% 40.51/12.61  																						|
% 40.51/12.61  																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.51/12.61  																					|-Branch two:
% 40.51/12.61  																					| (179)  ~ (all_60_0_73 = 0)
% 40.51/12.61  																					| (354) all_51_0_66 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 40.51/12.61  																					|
% 40.51/12.61  																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (279), into two cases.
% 40.51/12.61  																						|-Branch one:
% 40.51/12.62  																						| (295) all_58_0_72 = 0
% 40.51/12.62  																						|
% 40.51/12.62  																							| Equations (295) can reduce 176 to:
% 40.51/12.62  																							| (288) $false
% 40.51/12.62  																							|
% 40.51/12.62  																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.51/12.62  																						|-Branch two:
% 40.51/12.62  																						| (176)  ~ (all_58_0_72 = 0)
% 40.53/12.62  																						| (358) all_43_0_57 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 40.53/12.62  																						|
% 40.53/12.62  																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (253), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.62  																							|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.62  																							| (335) all_49_0_64 = 0
% 40.53/12.62  																							|
% 40.53/12.62  																								| Equations (335) can reduce 167 to:
% 40.53/12.62  																								| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.62  																								|
% 40.53/12.62  																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.62  																							|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.62  																							| (167)  ~ (all_49_0_64 = 0)
% 40.53/12.62  																							| (362) all_43_0_57 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 40.53/12.62  																							|
% 40.53/12.62  																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (255), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.62  																								|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.62  																								| (335) all_49_0_64 = 0
% 40.53/12.62  																								|
% 40.53/12.62  																									| Equations (335) can reduce 167 to:
% 40.53/12.62  																									| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.62  																									|
% 40.53/12.62  																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.62  																								|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.62  																								| (167)  ~ (all_49_0_64 = 0)
% 40.53/12.62  																								| (366) all_43_0_57 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 40.53/12.62  																								|
% 40.53/12.62  																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (268), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.62  																									|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.62  																									| (295) all_58_0_72 = 0
% 40.53/12.62  																									|
% 40.53/12.62  																										| Equations (295) can reduce 176 to:
% 40.53/12.62  																										| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.62  																										|
% 40.53/12.62  																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.62  																									|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.62  																									| (176)  ~ (all_58_0_72 = 0)
% 40.53/12.62  																									| (370) all_49_0_64 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 40.53/12.62  																									|
% 40.53/12.62  																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (257), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.62  																										|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.62  																										| (339) all_51_0_66 = 0
% 40.53/12.62  																										|
% 40.53/12.62  																											| Equations (339) can reduce 171 to:
% 40.53/12.62  																											| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.62  																											|
% 40.53/12.62  																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.62  																										|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.62  																										| (171)  ~ (all_51_0_66 = 0)
% 40.53/12.62  																										| (374) all_43_0_57 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 40.53/12.62  																										|
% 40.53/12.62  																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (270), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.62  																											|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.62  																											| (295) all_58_0_72 = 0
% 40.53/12.62  																											|
% 40.53/12.62  																												| Equations (295) can reduce 176 to:
% 40.53/12.62  																												| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.62  																												|
% 40.53/12.62  																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.62  																											|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.62  																											| (176)  ~ (all_58_0_72 = 0)
% 40.53/12.62  																											| (378) all_51_0_66 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 40.53/12.62  																											|
% 40.53/12.62  																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (274), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.62  																												|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.62  																												| (287) all_60_0_73 = 0
% 40.53/12.62  																												|
% 40.53/12.62  																													| Equations (287) can reduce 179 to:
% 40.53/12.62  																													| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.62  																													|
% 40.53/12.62  																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.62  																												|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.62  																												| (179)  ~ (all_60_0_73 = 0)
% 40.53/12.62  																												| (382) all_58_0_72 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 40.53/12.62  																												|
% 40.53/12.62  																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (273), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.62  																													|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.62  																													| (287) all_60_0_73 = 0
% 40.53/12.62  																													|
% 40.53/12.62  																														| Equations (287) can reduce 179 to:
% 40.53/12.62  																														| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.62  																														|
% 40.53/12.62  																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.62  																													|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.62  																													| (179)  ~ (all_60_0_73 = 0)
% 40.53/12.62  																													| (386) all_58_0_72 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 40.53/12.62  																													|
% 40.53/12.62  																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (280), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.62  																														|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.62  																														| (295) all_58_0_72 = 0
% 40.53/12.62  																														|
% 40.53/12.62  																															| Equations (295) can reduce 176 to:
% 40.53/12.62  																															| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.62  																															|
% 40.53/12.62  																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.62  																														|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.62  																														| (176)  ~ (all_58_0_72 = 0)
% 40.53/12.62  																														| (390) all_43_0_57 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 40.53/12.62  																														|
% 40.53/12.62  																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (269), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.62  																															|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.62  																															| (295) all_58_0_72 = 0
% 40.53/12.62  																															|
% 40.53/12.62  																																| Equations (295) can reduce 176 to:
% 40.53/12.62  																																| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.62  																																|
% 40.53/12.62  																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.62  																															|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.62  																															| (176)  ~ (all_58_0_72 = 0)
% 40.53/12.62  																															| (394) all_51_0_66 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 40.53/12.62  																															|
% 40.53/12.62  																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (240), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.62  																																|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.62  																																| (287) all_60_0_73 = 0
% 40.53/12.62  																																|
% 40.53/12.62  																																	| Equations (287) can reduce 179 to:
% 40.53/12.62  																																	| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.62  																																	|
% 40.53/12.62  																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.62  																																|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.62  																																| (179)  ~ (all_60_0_73 = 0)
% 40.53/12.62  																																| (398) all_51_0_66 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0))
% 40.53/12.62  																																|
% 40.53/12.62  																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (271), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.62  																																	|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.62  																																	| (295) all_58_0_72 = 0
% 40.53/12.62  																																	|
% 40.53/12.62  																																		| Equations (295) can reduce 176 to:
% 40.53/12.62  																																		| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.62  																																		|
% 40.53/12.62  																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.62  																																	|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.62  																																	| (176)  ~ (all_58_0_72 = 0)
% 40.53/12.62  																																	| (402) all_51_0_66 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 40.53/12.62  																																	|
% 40.53/12.62  																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (272), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.62  																																		|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.62  																																		| (295) all_58_0_72 = 0
% 40.53/12.62  																																		|
% 40.53/12.62  																																			| Equations (295) can reduce 176 to:
% 40.53/12.62  																																			| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.62  																																			|
% 40.53/12.62  																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.62  																																		|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.62  																																		| (176)  ~ (all_58_0_72 = 0)
% 40.53/12.62  																																		| (406) all_51_0_66 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 40.53/12.62  																																		|
% 40.53/12.62  																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (260), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.62  																																			|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.62  																																			| (287) all_60_0_73 = 0
% 40.53/12.62  																																			|
% 40.53/12.62  																																				| Equations (287) can reduce 179 to:
% 40.53/12.62  																																				| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.62  																																				|
% 40.53/12.62  																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.62  																																			|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.62  																																			| (179)  ~ (all_60_0_73 = 0)
% 40.53/12.62  																																			| (410) all_43_0_57 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 40.53/12.62  																																			|
% 40.53/12.62  																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (275), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.62  																																				|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.62  																																				| (295) all_58_0_72 = 0
% 40.53/12.62  																																				|
% 40.53/12.62  																																					| Equations (295) can reduce 176 to:
% 40.53/12.62  																																					| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.62  																																					|
% 40.53/12.62  																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.62  																																				|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.62  																																				| (176)  ~ (all_58_0_72 = 0)
% 40.53/12.62  																																				| (414) all_43_0_57 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0))
% 40.53/12.62  																																				|
% 40.53/12.62  																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (276), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.62  																																					|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.62  																																					| (295) all_58_0_72 = 0
% 40.53/12.62  																																					|
% 40.53/12.62  																																						| Equations (295) can reduce 176 to:
% 40.53/12.62  																																						| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.62  																																						|
% 40.53/12.62  																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.62  																																					|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.62  																																					| (176)  ~ (all_58_0_72 = 0)
% 40.53/12.62  																																					| (418) all_43_0_57 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 40.53/12.62  																																					|
% 40.53/12.62  																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (259), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.62  																																						|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.62  																																						| (287) all_60_0_73 = 0
% 40.53/12.62  																																						|
% 40.53/12.62  																																							| Equations (287) can reduce 179 to:
% 40.53/12.62  																																							| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.62  																																							|
% 40.53/12.62  																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.62  																																						|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.62  																																						| (179)  ~ (all_60_0_73 = 0)
% 40.53/12.62  																																						| (422) all_43_0_57 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 40.53/12.62  																																						|
% 40.53/12.62  																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (258), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.62  																																							|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.62  																																							| (287) all_60_0_73 = 0
% 40.53/12.62  																																							|
% 40.53/12.62  																																								| Equations (287) can reduce 179 to:
% 40.53/12.62  																																								| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.62  																																								|
% 40.53/12.62  																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.62  																																							|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.62  																																							| (179)  ~ (all_60_0_73 = 0)
% 40.53/12.62  																																							| (426) all_43_0_57 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 40.53/12.62  																																							|
% 40.53/12.62  																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (261), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.62  																																								|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.62  																																								| (287) all_60_0_73 = 0
% 40.53/12.62  																																								|
% 40.53/12.62  																																									| Equations (287) can reduce 179 to:
% 40.53/12.62  																																									| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.62  																																									|
% 40.53/12.62  																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.62  																																								|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.62  																																								| (179)  ~ (all_60_0_73 = 0)
% 40.53/12.62  																																								| (430) all_43_0_57 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 40.53/12.63  																																								|
% 40.53/12.63  																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (238), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.63  																																									|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.63  																																									| (287) all_60_0_73 = 0
% 40.53/12.63  																																									|
% 40.53/12.63  																																										| Equations (287) can reduce 179 to:
% 40.53/12.63  																																										| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.63  																																										|
% 40.53/12.63  																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.63  																																									|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.63  																																									| (179)  ~ (all_60_0_73 = 0)
% 40.53/12.63  																																									| (434) all_49_0_64 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 40.53/12.63  																																									|
% 40.53/12.63  																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (244), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.63  																																										|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.63  																																										| (287) all_60_0_73 = 0
% 40.53/12.63  																																										|
% 40.53/12.63  																																											| Equations (287) can reduce 179 to:
% 40.53/12.63  																																											| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.63  																																											|
% 40.53/12.63  																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.63  																																										|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.63  																																										| (179)  ~ (all_60_0_73 = 0)
% 40.53/12.63  																																										| (438) all_51_0_66 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 40.53/12.63  																																										|
% 40.53/12.63  																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (234), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.63  																																											|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.63  																																											| (339) all_51_0_66 = 0
% 40.53/12.63  																																											|
% 40.53/12.63  																																												| Equations (339) can reduce 171 to:
% 40.53/12.63  																																												| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.63  																																												|
% 40.53/12.63  																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.63  																																											|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.63  																																											| (171)  ~ (all_51_0_66 = 0)
% 40.53/12.63  																																											| (294)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 40.53/12.63  																																											|
% 40.53/12.63  																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (326), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.63  																																												|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.63  																																												| (339) all_51_0_66 = 0
% 40.53/12.63  																																												|
% 40.53/12.63  																																													| Equations (339) can reduce 171 to:
% 40.53/12.63  																																													| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.63  																																													|
% 40.53/12.63  																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.63  																																												|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.63  																																												| (171)  ~ (all_51_0_66 = 0)
% 40.53/12.63  																																												| (446)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0))
% 40.53/12.63  																																												|
% 40.53/12.63  																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (338), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.63  																																													|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.63  																																													| (291) all_43_0_57 = 0
% 40.53/12.63  																																													|
% 40.53/12.63  																																														| Equations (291) can reduce 158 to:
% 40.53/12.63  																																														| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.63  																																														|
% 40.53/12.63  																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.63  																																													|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.63  																																													| (158)  ~ (all_43_0_57 = 0)
% 40.53/12.63  																																													| (450)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 40.53/12.63  																																													|
% 40.53/12.63  																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (342), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.63  																																														|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.63  																																														| (291) all_43_0_57 = 0
% 40.53/12.63  																																														|
% 40.53/12.63  																																															| Equations (291) can reduce 158 to:
% 40.53/12.63  																																															| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.63  																																															|
% 40.53/12.63  																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.63  																																														|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.63  																																														| (158)  ~ (all_43_0_57 = 0)
% 40.53/12.63  																																														| (454)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 40.53/12.63  																																														|
% 40.53/12.63  																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (354), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.63  																																															|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.63  																																															| (339) all_51_0_66 = 0
% 40.53/12.63  																																															|
% 40.53/12.63  																																																| Equations (339) can reduce 171 to:
% 40.53/12.63  																																																| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.63  																																																|
% 40.53/12.63  																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.63  																																															|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.63  																																															| (171)  ~ (all_51_0_66 = 0)
% 40.53/12.63  																																															| (458)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 40.53/12.63  																																															|
% 40.53/12.63  																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (362), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.63  																																																|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.63  																																																| (291) all_43_0_57 = 0
% 40.53/12.63  																																																|
% 40.53/12.63  																																																	| Equations (291) can reduce 158 to:
% 40.53/12.63  																																																	| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.63  																																																	|
% 40.53/12.63  																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.63  																																																|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.63  																																																| (158)  ~ (all_43_0_57 = 0)
% 40.53/12.63  																																																| (462)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 40.53/12.63  																																																|
% 40.53/12.63  																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (366), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.63  																																																	|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.63  																																																	| (291) all_43_0_57 = 0
% 40.53/12.63  																																																	|
% 40.53/12.63  																																																		| Equations (291) can reduce 158 to:
% 40.53/12.63  																																																		| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.63  																																																		|
% 40.53/12.63  																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.63  																																																	|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.63  																																																	| (158)  ~ (all_43_0_57 = 0)
% 40.53/12.63  																																																	| (466)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 40.53/12.63  																																																	|
% 40.53/12.63  																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (386), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.63  																																																		|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.63  																																																		| (295) all_58_0_72 = 0
% 40.53/12.63  																																																		|
% 40.53/12.63  																																																			| Equations (295) can reduce 176 to:
% 40.53/12.63  																																																			| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.63  																																																			|
% 40.53/12.63  																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.63  																																																		|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.63  																																																		| (176)  ~ (all_58_0_72 = 0)
% 40.53/12.63  																																																		| (470)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 40.53/12.63  																																																		|
% 40.53/12.63  																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (390), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.63  																																																			|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.63  																																																			| (291) all_43_0_57 = 0
% 40.53/12.63  																																																			|
% 40.53/12.63  																																																				| Equations (291) can reduce 158 to:
% 40.53/12.63  																																																				| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.63  																																																				|
% 40.53/12.63  																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.63  																																																			|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.63  																																																			| (158)  ~ (all_43_0_57 = 0)
% 40.53/12.63  																																																			| (474)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 40.53/12.63  																																																			|
% 40.53/12.63  																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (394), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.63  																																																				|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.63  																																																				| (339) all_51_0_66 = 0
% 40.53/12.63  																																																				|
% 40.53/12.63  																																																					| Equations (339) can reduce 171 to:
% 40.53/12.63  																																																					| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.63  																																																					|
% 40.53/12.63  																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.63  																																																				|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.63  																																																				| (171)  ~ (all_51_0_66 = 0)
% 40.53/12.63  																																																				| (478)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 40.53/12.63  																																																				|
% 40.53/12.63  																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (398), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.63  																																																					|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.63  																																																					| (339) all_51_0_66 = 0
% 40.53/12.63  																																																					|
% 40.53/12.63  																																																						| Equations (339) can reduce 171 to:
% 40.53/12.63  																																																						| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.63  																																																						|
% 40.53/12.63  																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.63  																																																					|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.63  																																																					| (171)  ~ (all_51_0_66 = 0)
% 40.53/12.63  																																																					| (482)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0))
% 40.53/12.63  																																																					|
% 40.53/12.63  																																																						| Instantiating (482) with all_271_0_299 yields:
% 40.53/12.63  																																																						| (483) (all_271_0_299 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (all_271_0_299 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (all_271_0_299 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = all_271_0_299)
% 40.53/12.63  																																																						|
% 40.53/12.63  																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (402), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.63  																																																						|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.63  																																																						| (339) all_51_0_66 = 0
% 40.53/12.63  																																																						|
% 40.53/12.63  																																																							| Equations (339) can reduce 171 to:
% 40.53/12.63  																																																							| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.63  																																																							|
% 40.53/12.63  																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.63  																																																						|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.63  																																																						| (171)  ~ (all_51_0_66 = 0)
% 40.53/12.63  																																																						| (487)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 40.53/12.63  																																																						|
% 40.53/12.63  																																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (406), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.63  																																																							|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.63  																																																							| (339) all_51_0_66 = 0
% 40.53/12.63  																																																							|
% 40.53/12.63  																																																								| Equations (339) can reduce 171 to:
% 40.53/12.63  																																																								| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.63  																																																								|
% 40.53/12.63  																																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.63  																																																							|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.63  																																																							| (171)  ~ (all_51_0_66 = 0)
% 40.53/12.63  																																																							| (491)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 40.53/12.63  																																																							|
% 40.53/12.63  																																																								| Instantiating (491) with all_279_0_301 yields:
% 40.53/12.63  																																																								| (492) (all_279_0_301 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (all_279_0_301 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (all_279_0_301 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = all_279_0_301) | ( ~ (all_279_0_301 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_279_0_301)
% 40.53/12.63  																																																								|
% 40.53/12.63  																																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (414), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.63  																																																								|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.63  																																																								| (291) all_43_0_57 = 0
% 40.53/12.63  																																																								|
% 40.53/12.63  																																																									| Equations (291) can reduce 158 to:
% 40.53/12.63  																																																									| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.63  																																																									|
% 40.53/12.63  																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.63  																																																								|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.63  																																																								| (158)  ~ (all_43_0_57 = 0)
% 40.53/12.63  																																																								| (496)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0))
% 40.53/12.63  																																																								|
% 40.53/12.63  																																																									| Instantiating (496) with all_283_0_302 yields:
% 40.53/12.63  																																																									| (497) (all_283_0_302 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (all_283_0_302 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (all_283_0_302 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = all_283_0_302)
% 40.53/12.63  																																																									|
% 40.53/12.63  																																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (418), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.63  																																																									|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.63  																																																									| (291) all_43_0_57 = 0
% 40.53/12.63  																																																									|
% 40.53/12.63  																																																										| Equations (291) can reduce 158 to:
% 40.53/12.63  																																																										| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.63  																																																										|
% 40.53/12.63  																																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.63  																																																									|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.63  																																																									| (158)  ~ (all_43_0_57 = 0)
% 40.53/12.63  																																																									| (501)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 40.53/12.63  																																																									|
% 40.53/12.63  																																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (422), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.63  																																																										|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.63  																																																										| (291) all_43_0_57 = 0
% 40.53/12.63  																																																										|
% 40.53/12.63  																																																											| Equations (291) can reduce 158 to:
% 40.53/12.63  																																																											| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.63  																																																											|
% 40.53/12.63  																																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.63  																																																										|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.63  																																																										| (158)  ~ (all_43_0_57 = 0)
% 40.53/12.63  																																																										| (505)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 40.53/12.63  																																																										|
% 40.53/12.63  																																																											| Instantiating (505) with all_291_0_304 yields:
% 40.53/12.63  																																																											| (506) (all_291_0_304 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (all_291_0_304 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (all_291_0_304 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = all_291_0_304) | ( ~ (all_291_0_304 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_291_0_304)
% 40.53/12.64  																																																											|
% 40.53/12.64  																																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (430), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.64  																																																											|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.64  																																																											| (291) all_43_0_57 = 0
% 40.53/12.64  																																																											|
% 40.53/12.64  																																																												| Equations (291) can reduce 158 to:
% 40.53/12.64  																																																												| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.64  																																																												|
% 40.53/12.64  																																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.64  																																																											|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.64  																																																											| (158)  ~ (all_43_0_57 = 0)
% 40.53/12.64  																																																											| (510)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 40.53/12.64  																																																											|
% 40.53/12.64  																																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (434), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.64  																																																												|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.64  																																																												| (335) all_49_0_64 = 0
% 40.53/12.64  																																																												|
% 40.53/12.64  																																																													| Equations (335) can reduce 167 to:
% 40.53/12.64  																																																													| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.64  																																																													|
% 40.53/12.64  																																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.64  																																																												|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.64  																																																												| (167)  ~ (all_49_0_64 = 0)
% 40.53/12.64  																																																												| (514)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 40.53/12.64  																																																												|
% 40.53/12.64  																																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (438), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.64  																																																													|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.64  																																																													| (339) all_51_0_66 = 0
% 40.53/12.64  																																																													|
% 40.53/12.64  																																																														| Equations (339) can reduce 171 to:
% 40.53/12.64  																																																														| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.64  																																																														|
% 40.53/12.64  																																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.64  																																																													|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.64  																																																													| (171)  ~ (all_51_0_66 = 0)
% 40.53/12.64  																																																													| (518)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 40.53/12.64  																																																													|
% 40.53/12.64  																																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (220), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.64  																																																														|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.64  																																																														| (347) all_46_0_61 = 0
% 40.53/12.64  																																																														|
% 40.53/12.64  																																																															| Equations (347) can reduce 162 to:
% 40.53/12.64  																																																															| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.64  																																																															|
% 40.53/12.64  																																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.64  																																																														|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.64  																																																														| (162)  ~ (all_46_0_61 = 0)
% 40.53/12.64  																																																														| (290)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = v0))
% 40.53/12.64  																																																														|
% 40.53/12.64  																																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (224), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.64  																																																															|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.64  																																																															| (335) all_49_0_64 = 0
% 40.53/12.64  																																																															|
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																| Equations (335) can reduce 167 to:
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																|
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.64  																																																															|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.64  																																																															| (167)  ~ (all_49_0_64 = 0)
% 40.53/12.64  																																																															| (290)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = v0))
% 40.53/12.64  																																																															|
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (219), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																| (347) all_46_0_61 = 0
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																|
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																	| Equations (347) can reduce 162 to:
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																	| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																	|
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																| (162)  ~ (all_46_0_61 = 0)
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																| (530)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = v0))
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																|
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (223), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																	|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																	| (335) all_49_0_64 = 0
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																	|
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																		| Equations (335) can reduce 167 to:
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																		| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																		|
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																	|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																	| (167)  ~ (all_49_0_64 = 0)
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																	| (534)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = v0))
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																	|
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (221), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																		|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																		| (347) all_46_0_61 = 0
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																		|
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																			| Equations (347) can reduce 162 to:
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																			| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																			|
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																		|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																		| (162)  ~ (all_46_0_61 = 0)
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																		| (538)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = v0))
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																		|
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (497), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																			|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																			| (539) (all_283_0_302 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (all_283_0_302 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0)
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																			|
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (539), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																				|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																				| (540) all_283_0_302 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																				|
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																					| Applying alpha-rule on (540) yields:
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																					| (541) all_283_0_302 = 0
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																					| (542) apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																					|
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (235), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																					|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																					| (339) all_51_0_66 = 0
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																					|
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																						| Equations (339) can reduce 171 to:
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																						| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																						|
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																					|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																					| (171)  ~ (all_51_0_66 = 0)
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																					| (546)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																					|
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (232), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																						|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																						| (339) all_51_0_66 = 0
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																						|
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																							| Equations (339) can reduce 171 to:
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																							| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																							|
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																						|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																						| (171)  ~ (all_51_0_66 = 0)
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																						| (550) all_49_0_64 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																						|
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (226), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																							|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																							| (339) all_51_0_66 = 0
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																							|
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																								| Equations (339) can reduce 171 to:
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																								| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																								|
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																							|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																							| (171)  ~ (all_51_0_66 = 0)
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																							| (554) all_46_0_61 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_4_4, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																							|
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (227), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																								|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																								| (339) all_51_0_66 = 0
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																								|
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																									| Equations (339) can reduce 171 to:
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																									| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																									|
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																								|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																								| (171)  ~ (all_51_0_66 = 0)
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																								| (558) all_46_0_61 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_4_4) = v0))
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																								|
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (233), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																									|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																									| (339) all_51_0_66 = 0
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																									|
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																										| Equations (339) can reduce 171 to:
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																										| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																										|
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																									|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																									| (171)  ~ (all_51_0_66 = 0)
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																									| (562) all_49_0_64 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																									|
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (322), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																										|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																										| (339) all_51_0_66 = 0
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																										|
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																											| Equations (339) can reduce 171 to:
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																											| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																											|
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																										|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																										| (171)  ~ (all_51_0_66 = 0)
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																										| (566)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																										|
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (346), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																											|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																											| (339) all_51_0_66 = 0
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																											|
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																												| Equations (339) can reduce 171 to:
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																												| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																												|
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																											|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																											| (171)  ~ (all_51_0_66 = 0)
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																											| (570)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																											|
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (378), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																												|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																												| (339) all_51_0_66 = 0
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																												|
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																													| Equations (339) can reduce 171 to:
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																													| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																													|
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																												|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																												| (171)  ~ (all_51_0_66 = 0)
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																												| (574)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																												|
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (230), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																													|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																													| (339) all_51_0_66 = 0
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																													|
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																														| Equations (339) can reduce 171 to:
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																														| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																														|
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																													|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.64  																																																																													| (171)  ~ (all_51_0_66 = 0)
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																													| (578) all_49_0_64 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																													|
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (228), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																														|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																														| (339) all_51_0_66 = 0
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																														|
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																															| Equations (339) can reduce 171 to:
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																															| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																															|
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																														|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																														| (171)  ~ (all_51_0_66 = 0)
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																														| (582) all_46_0_61 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_4_4, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																														|
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (229), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																															|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																															| (339) all_51_0_66 = 0
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																															|
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																																| Equations (339) can reduce 171 to:
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																																| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																																|
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																															|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																															| (171)  ~ (all_51_0_66 = 0)
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																															| (586) all_46_0_61 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_4_4) = v0))
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																															|
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (231), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																																|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																																| (339) all_51_0_66 = 0
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																																|
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																																	| Equations (339) can reduce 171 to:
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																																	| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																																	|
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																																|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																																| (171)  ~ (all_51_0_66 = 0)
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																																| (590) all_49_0_64 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																																|
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																																	| Instantiating formula (19) with all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2, 0, all_51_0_66 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = all_51_0_66, apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																																	| (339) all_51_0_66 = 0
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																																	|
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																																	| Equations (339) can reduce 171 to:
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																																	| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																																	|
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																				|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																				| (593) all_283_0_302 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																				|
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																					| Applying alpha-rule on (593) yields:
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																					| (541) all_283_0_302 = 0
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																					| (595) apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																					|
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (236), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																					|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																					| (287) all_60_0_73 = 0
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																					|
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																						| Equations (287) can reduce 179 to:
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																						| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																						|
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																					|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																					| (179)  ~ (all_60_0_73 = 0)
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																					| (599) all_46_0_61 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_4_4, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																					|
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (237), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																						|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																						| (287) all_60_0_73 = 0
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																						|
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																							| Equations (287) can reduce 179 to:
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																							| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																							|
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																						|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																						| (179)  ~ (all_60_0_73 = 0)
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																						| (603) all_46_0_61 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_4_4) = v0))
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																						|
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																							| Instantiating formula (19) with all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3, 0, all_60_0_73 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = all_60_0_73, apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0, yields:
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																							| (287) all_60_0_73 = 0
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																							|
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																							| Equations (287) can reduce 179 to:
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																							| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																							|
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																			|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																			| (606)  ~ (all_283_0_302 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = all_283_0_302
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																			|
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																				| Applying alpha-rule on (606) yields:
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																				| (607)  ~ (all_283_0_302 = 0)
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																				| (608) distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = all_283_0_302
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																				|
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (264), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																				|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																				| (291) all_43_0_57 = 0
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																				|
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																					| Equations (291) can reduce 158 to:
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																					| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																					|
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																				|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																				| (158)  ~ (all_43_0_57 = 0)
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																				| (612)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																				|
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (266), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																					|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																					| (295) all_58_0_72 = 0
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																					|
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																						| Equations (295) can reduce 176 to:
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																						| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																						|
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																					|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																					| (176)  ~ (all_58_0_72 = 0)
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																					| (616) all_46_0_61 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_4_4) = v0))
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																					|
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (267), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																						|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																						| (295) all_58_0_72 = 0
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																						|
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																							| Equations (295) can reduce 176 to:
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																							| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																							|
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																						|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																						| (176)  ~ (all_58_0_72 = 0)
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																						| (620) all_49_0_64 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																						|
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (249), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																							|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																							| (347) all_46_0_61 = 0
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																							|
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																								| Equations (347) can reduce 162 to:
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																								| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																								|
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																							|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																							| (162)  ~ (all_46_0_61 = 0)
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																							| (624) all_43_0_57 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_4_4) = v0))
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																							|
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (250), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																								|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																								| (347) all_46_0_61 = 0
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																								|
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																									| Equations (347) can reduce 162 to:
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																									| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																									|
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																								|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																								| (162)  ~ (all_46_0_61 = 0)
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																								| (628) all_43_0_57 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_4_4, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																								|
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (251), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																									|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																									| (347) all_46_0_61 = 0
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																									|
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																										| Equations (347) can reduce 162 to:
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																										| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																										|
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																									|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																									| (162)  ~ (all_46_0_61 = 0)
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																									| (632) all_43_0_57 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_4_4) = v0))
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																									|
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (252), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																										|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																										| (335) all_49_0_64 = 0
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																										|
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																											| Equations (335) can reduce 167 to:
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																											| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																											|
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																										|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																										| (167)  ~ (all_49_0_64 = 0)
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																										| (636) all_43_0_57 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																										|
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (483), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																											|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.65  																																																																											| (637) (all_271_0_299 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (all_271_0_299 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0)
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																											|
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (637), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																												|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																												| (638) all_271_0_299 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																												|
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																													| Applying alpha-rule on (638) yields:
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																													| (639) all_271_0_299 = 0
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																													| (640) apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																													|
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (318), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																													|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																													| (291) all_43_0_57 = 0
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																													|
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																														| Equations (291) can reduce 158 to:
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																														| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																														|
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																													|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																													| (158)  ~ (all_43_0_57 = 0)
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																													| (446)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0))
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																													|
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (426), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																														|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																														| (291) all_43_0_57 = 0
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																														|
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																															| Equations (291) can reduce 158 to:
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																															| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																															|
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																														|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																														| (158)  ~ (all_43_0_57 = 0)
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																														| (648)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																														|
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (628), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																															|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																															| (291) all_43_0_57 = 0
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																															|
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																																| Equations (291) can reduce 158 to:
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																																| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																																|
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																															|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																															| (158)  ~ (all_43_0_57 = 0)
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																															| (652)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_4_4, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																															|
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (632), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																																|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																																| (291) all_43_0_57 = 0
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																																|
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																																	| Equations (291) can reduce 158 to:
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																																	| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																																	|
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																																|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																																| (158)  ~ (all_43_0_57 = 0)
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																																| (656)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_4_4) = v0))
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																																|
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (330), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																																	|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																																	| (291) all_43_0_57 = 0
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																																	|
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																																		| Equations (291) can reduce 158 to:
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																																		| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																																		|
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																																	|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																																	| (158)  ~ (all_43_0_57 = 0)
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																																	| (566)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																																	|
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (350), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																																		|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																																		| (291) all_43_0_57 = 0
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																																		|
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																																			| Equations (291) can reduce 158 to:
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																																			| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																																			|
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																																		|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																																		| (158)  ~ (all_43_0_57 = 0)
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																																		| (664)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_4_4, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																																		|
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (358), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																																			|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																																			| (291) all_43_0_57 = 0
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																																			|
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																																				| Equations (291) can reduce 158 to:
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																																				| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																																				|
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																																			|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																																			| (158)  ~ (all_43_0_57 = 0)
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																																			| (668)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																																			|
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (374), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																																				|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																																				| (291) all_43_0_57 = 0
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																																				|
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																																					| Equations (291) can reduce 158 to:
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																																					| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																																					|
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																																				|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																																				| (158)  ~ (all_43_0_57 = 0)
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																																				| (672)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																																				|
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (410), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																																					|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																																					| (291) all_43_0_57 = 0
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																																					|
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																																						| Equations (291) can reduce 158 to:
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																																						| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																																						|
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																																					|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																																					| (158)  ~ (all_43_0_57 = 0)
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																																					| (676)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																																					|
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (624), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																																						|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																																						| (291) all_43_0_57 = 0
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																																						|
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																																							| Equations (291) can reduce 158 to:
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																																							| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																																							|
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																																						|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																																						| (158)  ~ (all_43_0_57 = 0)
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																																						| (680)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_4_4) = v0))
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																																						|
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (636), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																																							|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																																							| (291) all_43_0_57 = 0
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																																							|
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																																								| Equations (291) can reduce 158 to:
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																																								| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																																								|
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																																							|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																																							| (158)  ~ (all_43_0_57 = 0)
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																																							| (684)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																																							|
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																																								| Instantiating formula (19) with all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2, 0, all_43_0_57 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = all_43_0_57, apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																																								| (291) all_43_0_57 = 0
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																																								|
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																																								| Equations (291) can reduce 158 to:
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																																								| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																																								|
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																												|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																												| (687) all_271_0_299 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																												|
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																													| Applying alpha-rule on (687) yields:
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																													| (639) all_271_0_299 = 0
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																													| (689) apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																													|
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (265), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																													|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																													| (295) all_58_0_72 = 0
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																													|
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																														| Equations (295) can reduce 176 to:
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																														| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																														|
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																													|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																													| (176)  ~ (all_58_0_72 = 0)
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																													| (693) all_46_0_61 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_4_4, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																													|
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																														| Instantiating formula (19) with all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3, 0, all_58_0_72 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = all_58_0_72, apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0, yields:
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																														| (295) all_58_0_72 = 0
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																														|
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																														| Equations (295) can reduce 176 to:
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																														| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																														|
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																											|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																											| (696)  ~ (all_271_0_299 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = all_271_0_299
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																											|
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																												| Applying alpha-rule on (696) yields:
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																												| (697)  ~ (all_271_0_299 = 0)
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																												| (698) distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = all_271_0_299
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																												|
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (235), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																												|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																												| (339) all_51_0_66 = 0
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																												|
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																													| Equations (339) can reduce 171 to:
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																													| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																													|
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																												|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																												| (171)  ~ (all_51_0_66 = 0)
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																												| (546)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																												|
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (232), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																													|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																													| (339) all_51_0_66 = 0
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																													|
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																														| Equations (339) can reduce 171 to:
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																														| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																														|
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																													|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																													| (171)  ~ (all_51_0_66 = 0)
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																													| (550) all_49_0_64 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																													|
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (236), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																														|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																														| (287) all_60_0_73 = 0
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																														|
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																															| Equations (287) can reduce 179 to:
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																															| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																															|
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																														|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																														| (179)  ~ (all_60_0_73 = 0)
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																														| (599) all_46_0_61 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_4_4, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																														|
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (237), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																															|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.66  																																																																															| (287) all_60_0_73 = 0
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																															|
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																| Equations (287) can reduce 179 to:
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																|
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																															|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																															| (179)  ~ (all_60_0_73 = 0)
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																															| (603) all_46_0_61 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_4_4) = v0))
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																															|
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (226), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																| (339) all_51_0_66 = 0
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																|
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																	| Equations (339) can reduce 171 to:
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																	| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																	|
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																| (171)  ~ (all_51_0_66 = 0)
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																| (554) all_46_0_61 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_4_4, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																|
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (227), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																	|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																	| (339) all_51_0_66 = 0
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																	|
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																		| Equations (339) can reduce 171 to:
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																		| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																		|
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																	|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																	| (171)  ~ (all_51_0_66 = 0)
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																	| (558) all_46_0_61 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_4_4) = v0))
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																	|
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (233), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																		|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																		| (339) all_51_0_66 = 0
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																		|
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																			| Equations (339) can reduce 171 to:
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																			| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																			|
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																		|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																		| (171)  ~ (all_51_0_66 = 0)
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																		| (562) all_49_0_64 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																		|
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (318), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																			|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																			| (291) all_43_0_57 = 0
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																			|
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																				| Equations (291) can reduce 158 to:
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																				| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																				|
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																			|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																			| (158)  ~ (all_43_0_57 = 0)
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																			| (446)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0))
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																			|
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (426), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																				|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																				| (291) all_43_0_57 = 0
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																				|
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																					| Equations (291) can reduce 158 to:
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																					| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																					|
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																				|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																				| (158)  ~ (all_43_0_57 = 0)
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																				| (648)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																				|
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (616), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																					|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																					| (347) all_46_0_61 = 0
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																					|
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																						| Equations (347) can reduce 162 to:
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																						| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																						|
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																					|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																					| (162)  ~ (all_46_0_61 = 0)
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																					| (738)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_4_4) = v0))
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																					|
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (628), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																						|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																						| (291) all_43_0_57 = 0
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																						|
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																							| Equations (291) can reduce 158 to:
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																							| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																							|
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																						|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																						| (158)  ~ (all_43_0_57 = 0)
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																						| (652)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_4_4, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																						|
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (632), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																							|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																							| (291) all_43_0_57 = 0
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																							|
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																								| Equations (291) can reduce 158 to:
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																								| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																								|
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																							|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																							| (158)  ~ (all_43_0_57 = 0)
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																							| (656)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_4_4) = v0))
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																							|
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (506), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																								|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																								| (747) (all_291_0_304 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (all_291_0_304 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (all_291_0_304 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = all_291_0_304)
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																								|
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (747), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																									|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																									| (748) (all_291_0_304 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (all_291_0_304 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0)
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																									|
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (748), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																										|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																										| (749) all_291_0_304 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																										|
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																											| Applying alpha-rule on (749) yields:
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																											| (750) all_291_0_304 = 0
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																											| (542) apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																											|
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (322), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																											|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																											| (339) all_51_0_66 = 0
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																											|
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																												| Equations (339) can reduce 171 to:
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																												| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																												|
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																											|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																											| (171)  ~ (all_51_0_66 = 0)
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																											| (566)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																											|
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (346), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																												|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																												| (339) all_51_0_66 = 0
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																												|
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																													| Equations (339) can reduce 171 to:
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																													| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																													|
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																												|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																												| (171)  ~ (all_51_0_66 = 0)
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																												| (570)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																												|
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (378), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																													|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																													| (339) all_51_0_66 = 0
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																													|
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																														| Equations (339) can reduce 171 to:
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																														| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																														|
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																													|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																													| (171)  ~ (all_51_0_66 = 0)
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																													| (574)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																													|
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (229), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																														|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																														| (339) all_51_0_66 = 0
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																														|
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																															| Equations (339) can reduce 171 to:
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																															| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																															|
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																														|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																														| (171)  ~ (all_51_0_66 = 0)
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																														| (586) all_46_0_61 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_4_4) = v0))
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																														|
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (230), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																															|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																															| (339) all_51_0_66 = 0
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																															|
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																																| Equations (339) can reduce 171 to:
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																																| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																																|
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																															|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																															| (171)  ~ (all_51_0_66 = 0)
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																															| (578) all_49_0_64 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																															|
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (231), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																																|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																																| (339) all_51_0_66 = 0
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																																|
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																																	| Equations (339) can reduce 171 to:
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																																	| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																																	|
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																																|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																																| (171)  ~ (all_51_0_66 = 0)
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																																| (590) all_49_0_64 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																																|
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (228), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																																	|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																																	| (339) all_51_0_66 = 0
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																																	|
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																																		| Equations (339) can reduce 171 to:
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																																		| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																																		|
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																																	|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																																	| (171)  ~ (all_51_0_66 = 0)
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																																	| (582) all_46_0_61 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_4_4, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																																	|
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																																		| Instantiating formula (19) with all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2, 0, all_51_0_66 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = all_51_0_66, apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																																		| (339) all_51_0_66 = 0
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																																		|
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																																		| Equations (339) can reduce 171 to:
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																																		| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																																		|
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																										|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																										| (782) all_291_0_304 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																										|
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																											| Applying alpha-rule on (782) yields:
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																											| (750) all_291_0_304 = 0
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																											| (689) apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																											|
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (265), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																											|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																											| (295) all_58_0_72 = 0
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																											|
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																												| Equations (295) can reduce 176 to:
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																												| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																												|
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																											|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																											| (176)  ~ (all_58_0_72 = 0)
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																											| (693) all_46_0_61 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_4_4, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																											|
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																												| Instantiating formula (19) with all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3, 0, all_58_0_72 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = all_58_0_72, apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0, yields:
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																												| (295) all_58_0_72 = 0
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																												|
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																												| Equations (295) can reduce 176 to:
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																												| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																												|
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																									|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																									| (791)  ~ (all_291_0_304 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = all_291_0_304
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																									|
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																										| Applying alpha-rule on (791) yields:
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																										| (792)  ~ (all_291_0_304 = 0)
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																										| (793) distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = all_291_0_304
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																										|
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (222), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																										|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																										| (335) all_49_0_64 = 0
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																										|
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																											| Equations (335) can reduce 167 to:
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																											| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																											|
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																										|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																										| (167)  ~ (all_49_0_64 = 0)
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																										| (797) all_46_0_61 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_4_4, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																										|
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (265), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																											|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																											| (295) all_58_0_72 = 0
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																											|
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																												| Equations (295) can reduce 176 to:
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																												| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																												|
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																											|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																											| (176)  ~ (all_58_0_72 = 0)
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																											| (693) all_46_0_61 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_4_4, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																											|
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (322), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																												|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																												| (339) all_51_0_66 = 0
% 40.53/12.67  																																																																																												|
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																													| Equations (339) can reduce 171 to:
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																													| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																													|
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																												|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																												| (171)  ~ (all_51_0_66 = 0)
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																												| (566)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																												|
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (330), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																													|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																													| (291) all_43_0_57 = 0
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																													|
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																														| Equations (291) can reduce 158 to:
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																														| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																														|
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																													|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																													| (158)  ~ (all_43_0_57 = 0)
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																													| (566)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																													|
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (346), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																														|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																														| (339) all_51_0_66 = 0
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																														|
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																															| Equations (339) can reduce 171 to:
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																															| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																															|
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																														|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																														| (171)  ~ (all_51_0_66 = 0)
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																														| (570)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																														|
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (350), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																															|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																															| (291) all_43_0_57 = 0
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																															|
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																| Equations (291) can reduce 158 to:
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																|
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																															|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																															| (158)  ~ (all_43_0_57 = 0)
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																															| (664)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_4_4, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																															|
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (358), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																| (291) all_43_0_57 = 0
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																|
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																	| Equations (291) can reduce 158 to:
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																	| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																	|
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																| (158)  ~ (all_43_0_57 = 0)
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																| (668)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																|
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (378), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																	|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																	| (339) all_51_0_66 = 0
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																	|
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																		| Equations (339) can reduce 171 to:
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																		| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																		|
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																	|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																	| (171)  ~ (all_51_0_66 = 0)
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																	| (574)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																	|
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (554), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																		|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																		| (347) all_46_0_61 = 0
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																		|
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																			| Equations (347) can reduce 162 to:
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																			| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																			|
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																		|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																		| (162)  ~ (all_46_0_61 = 0)
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																		| (829)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_4_4, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																		|
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (410), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																			|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																			| (291) all_43_0_57 = 0
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																			|
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																				| Equations (291) can reduce 158 to:
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																				| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																				|
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																			|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																			| (158)  ~ (all_43_0_57 = 0)
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																			| (676)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																			|
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (624), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																				|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																				| (291) all_43_0_57 = 0
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																				|
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																					| Equations (291) can reduce 158 to:
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																					| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																					|
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																				|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																				| (158)  ~ (all_43_0_57 = 0)
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																				| (680)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_4_4) = v0))
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																				|
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (636), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																					|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																					| (291) all_43_0_57 = 0
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																					|
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																						| Equations (291) can reduce 158 to:
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																						| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																						|
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																					|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																					| (158)  ~ (all_43_0_57 = 0)
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																					| (684)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																					|
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (603), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																						|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																						| (347) all_46_0_61 = 0
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																						|
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																							| Equations (347) can reduce 162 to:
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																							| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																							|
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																						|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																						| (162)  ~ (all_46_0_61 = 0)
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																						| (845)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_4_4) = v0))
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																						|
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (558), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																							|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																							| (347) all_46_0_61 = 0
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																							|
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																								| Equations (347) can reduce 162 to:
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																								| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																								|
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																							|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																							| (162)  ~ (all_46_0_61 = 0)
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																							| (849)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_4_4) = v0))
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																							|
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (797), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																								|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																								| (347) all_46_0_61 = 0
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																								|
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																									| Equations (347) can reduce 162 to:
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																									| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																									|
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																								|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																								| (162)  ~ (all_46_0_61 = 0)
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																								| (853)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_4_4, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																								|
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (693), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																									|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																									| (347) all_46_0_61 = 0
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																									|
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																										| Equations (347) can reduce 162 to:
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																										| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																										|
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																									|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																									| (162)  ~ (all_46_0_61 = 0)
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																									| (857)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_4_4, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																									|
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (230), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																										|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																										| (339) all_51_0_66 = 0
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																										|
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																											| Equations (339) can reduce 171 to:
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																											| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																											|
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																										|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																										| (171)  ~ (all_51_0_66 = 0)
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																										| (578) all_49_0_64 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																										|
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (231), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																											|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																											| (339) all_51_0_66 = 0
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																											|
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																												| Equations (339) can reduce 171 to:
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																												| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																												|
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																											|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																											| (171)  ~ (all_51_0_66 = 0)
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																											| (590) all_49_0_64 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																											|
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (228), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																												|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																												| (339) all_51_0_66 = 0
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																												|
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																													| Equations (339) can reduce 171 to:
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																													| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																													|
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																												|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																												| (171)  ~ (all_51_0_66 = 0)
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																												| (582) all_46_0_61 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_4_4, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																												|
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (229), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																													|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																													| (339) all_51_0_66 = 0
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																													|
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																														| Equations (339) can reduce 171 to:
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																														| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																														|
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																													|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																													| (171)  ~ (all_51_0_66 = 0)
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																													| (586) all_46_0_61 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_4_4) = v0))
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																													|
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (582), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																														|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																														| (347) all_46_0_61 = 0
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																														|
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																															| Equations (347) can reduce 162 to:
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																															| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																															|
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																														|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																														| (162)  ~ (all_46_0_61 = 0)
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																														| (877)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_4_4, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																														|
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (586), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																															|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																															| (347) all_46_0_61 = 0
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																															|
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																																| Equations (347) can reduce 162 to:
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																																| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																																|
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																															|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																															| (162)  ~ (all_46_0_61 = 0)
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																															| (881)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_4_4) = v0))
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																															|
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (492), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																																|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																																| (882) (all_279_0_301 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (all_279_0_301 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (all_279_0_301 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = all_279_0_301)
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																																|
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (882), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																																	|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																																	| (883) (all_279_0_301 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (all_279_0_301 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0)
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																																	|
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (883), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																																		|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																																		| (884) all_279_0_301 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																																		|
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																																			| Applying alpha-rule on (884) yields:
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																																			| (885) all_279_0_301 = 0
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																																			| (595) apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																																			|
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																																			| Instantiating formula (19) with all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3, 0, all_60_0_73 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = all_60_0_73, apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0, yields:
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																																			| (287) all_60_0_73 = 0
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																																			|
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																																			| Equations (287) can reduce 179 to:
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																																			| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																																			|
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																																		|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																																		| (889) all_279_0_301 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 40.53/12.68  																																																																																																																		|
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																			| Applying alpha-rule on (889) yields:
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																			| (885) all_279_0_301 = 0
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																			| (640) apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																			|
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																			| Instantiating formula (19) with all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2, 0, all_43_0_57 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = all_43_0_57, apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																			| (291) all_43_0_57 = 0
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																			|
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																			| Equations (291) can reduce 158 to:
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																			| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																			|
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																	|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																	| (894)  ~ (all_279_0_301 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = all_279_0_301
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																	|
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																		| Applying alpha-rule on (894) yields:
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																		| (895)  ~ (all_279_0_301 = 0)
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																		| (896) distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = all_279_0_301
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																		|
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (599), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																		|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																		| (347) all_46_0_61 = 0
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																		|
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																			| Equations (347) can reduce 162 to:
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																			| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																			|
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																		|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																		| (162)  ~ (all_46_0_61 = 0)
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																		| (900)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_4_4, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																		|
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																			| Instantiating formula (16) with all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3, all_283_0_302, all_291_0_304 and discharging atoms distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = all_291_0_304, distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = all_283_0_302, yields:
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																			| (901) all_291_0_304 = all_283_0_302
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																			|
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																			| Instantiating formula (16) with all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3, all_279_0_301, all_291_0_304 and discharging atoms distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = all_291_0_304, distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = all_279_0_301, yields:
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																			| (902) all_291_0_304 = all_279_0_301
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																			|
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																			| Instantiating formula (16) with all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3, all_271_0_299, all_291_0_304 and discharging atoms distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = all_291_0_304, distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = all_271_0_299, yields:
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																			| (903) all_291_0_304 = all_271_0_299
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																			|
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																			| Combining equations (902,901) yields a new equation:
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																			| (904) all_283_0_302 = all_279_0_301
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																			|
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																			| Combining equations (903,901) yields a new equation:
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																			| (905) all_283_0_302 = all_271_0_299
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																			|
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																			| Combining equations (904,905) yields a new equation:
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																			| (906) all_279_0_301 = all_271_0_299
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																			|
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																			| Simplifying 906 yields:
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																			| (907) all_279_0_301 = all_271_0_299
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																			|
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																			| Equations (907) can reduce 895 to:
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																			| (697)  ~ (all_271_0_299 = 0)
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																			|
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																			| From (907) and (896) follows:
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																			| (698) distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = all_271_0_299
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																			|
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																			| Instantiating formula (8) with all_0_0_0, all_0_2_2, all_0_4_4 and discharging atoms incident_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = all_0_0_0, yields:
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																			| (910) all_0_0_0 = 0 | apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																			|
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																			| Instantiating formula (115) with all_46_0_61, all_271_0_299, all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2, all_0_4_4 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = all_46_0_61, distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = all_271_0_299, yields:
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																			| (911) all_271_0_299 = 0 | all_46_0_61 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = v0)
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																			|
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (910), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																			|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																			| (912) apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																			|
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (911), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																				|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																				| (639) all_271_0_299 = 0
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																				|
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																					| Equations (639) can reduce 697 to:
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																					| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																					|
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																				|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																				| (697)  ~ (all_271_0_299 = 0)
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																				| (916) all_46_0_61 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = v0)
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																				|
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (916), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																					|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																					| (347) all_46_0_61 = 0
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																					|
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																						| Equations (347) can reduce 162 to:
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																						| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																						|
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																					|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																					| (162)  ~ (all_46_0_61 = 0)
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																					| (920)  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = v0)
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																					|
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																						| Instantiating (920) with all_600_0_1911 yields:
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																						| (921)  ~ (all_600_0_1911 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = all_600_0_1911
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																						|
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																						| Applying alpha-rule on (921) yields:
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																						| (922)  ~ (all_600_0_1911 = 0)
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																						| (923) apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = all_600_0_1911
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																						|
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																						| Instantiating formula (19) with all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2, 0, all_600_0_1911 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = all_600_0_1911, apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																						| (924) all_600_0_1911 = 0
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																						|
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																						| Equations (924) can reduce 922 to:
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																						| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																						|
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																			|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																			| (926)  ~ (apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0)
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																			| (927) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																			|
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																				| Equations (927) can reduce 285 to:
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																				| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																				|
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																| (929)  ~ (all_279_0_301 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_279_0_301
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																|
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																	| Applying alpha-rule on (929) yields:
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																	| (895)  ~ (all_279_0_301 = 0)
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																	| (931) distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_279_0_301
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																	|
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																	| Instantiating formula (32) with all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6, all_279_0_301, 0 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_279_0_301, distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = 0, yields:
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																	| (885) all_279_0_301 = 0
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																	|
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																	| Equations (885) can reduce 895 to:
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																	| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																	|
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																								|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																								| (934)  ~ (all_291_0_304 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_291_0_304
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																								|
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																									| Applying alpha-rule on (934) yields:
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																									| (792)  ~ (all_291_0_304 = 0)
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																									| (936) distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_291_0_304
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																									|
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																									| Instantiating formula (32) with all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6, all_291_0_304, 0 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_291_0_304, distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = 0, yields:
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																									| (750) all_291_0_304 = 0
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																									|
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																									| Equations (750) can reduce 792 to:
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																									| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																									|
% 40.53/12.69  																																																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.69  				|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.69  				| (939)  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0) & incident_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_0_1_1
% 40.53/12.69  				|
% 40.53/12.69  					| Applying alpha-rule on (939) yields:
% 40.53/12.69  					| (940)  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0)
% 40.53/12.69  					| (941) incident_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_0_1_1
% 40.53/12.69  					|
% 40.53/12.69  					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (246), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.69  					|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.69  					| (287) all_60_0_73 = 0
% 40.53/12.69  					|
% 40.53/12.69  						| Equations (287) can reduce 179 to:
% 40.53/12.69  						| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.69  						|
% 40.53/12.69  						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.69  					|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.69  					| (179)  ~ (all_60_0_73 = 0)
% 40.53/12.69  					| (290)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = v0))
% 40.53/12.69  					|
% 40.53/12.69  						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (263), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.69  						|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.69  						| (291) all_43_0_57 = 0
% 40.53/12.69  						|
% 40.53/12.69  							| Equations (291) can reduce 158 to:
% 40.53/12.69  							| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.69  							|
% 40.53/12.69  							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.69  						|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.69  						| (158)  ~ (all_43_0_57 = 0)
% 40.53/12.69  						| (294)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 40.53/12.69  						|
% 40.53/12.69  							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (282), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.69  							|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.69  							| (295) all_58_0_72 = 0
% 40.53/12.69  							|
% 40.53/12.69  								| Equations (295) can reduce 176 to:
% 40.53/12.69  								| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.69  								|
% 40.53/12.69  								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.69  							|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.69  							| (176)  ~ (all_58_0_72 = 0)
% 40.53/12.69  							| (290)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = v0))
% 40.53/12.69  							|
% 40.53/12.69  								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (262), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.69  								|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.69  								| (291) all_43_0_57 = 0
% 40.53/12.69  								|
% 40.53/12.69  									| Equations (291) can reduce 158 to:
% 40.53/12.69  									| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.69  									|
% 40.53/12.69  									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.69  								|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.69  								| (158)  ~ (all_43_0_57 = 0)
% 40.53/12.69  								| (302)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 40.53/12.69  								|
% 40.53/12.69  									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (247), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.69  									|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.69  									| (287) all_60_0_73 = 0
% 40.53/12.69  									|
% 40.53/12.69  										| Equations (287) can reduce 179 to:
% 40.53/12.69  										| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.69  										|
% 40.53/12.69  										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.69  									|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.69  									| (179)  ~ (all_60_0_73 = 0)
% 40.53/12.69  									| (306)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 40.53/12.69  									|
% 40.53/12.69  										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (281), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.69  										|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.69  										| (295) all_58_0_72 = 0
% 40.53/12.69  										|
% 40.53/12.69  											| Equations (295) can reduce 176 to:
% 40.53/12.69  											| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.69  											|
% 40.53/12.69  											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.69  										|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.69  										| (176)  ~ (all_58_0_72 = 0)
% 40.53/12.69  										| (310)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = v0))
% 40.53/12.69  										|
% 40.53/12.69  											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (283), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.69  											|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.69  											| (295) all_58_0_72 = 0
% 40.53/12.69  											|
% 40.53/12.69  												| Equations (295) can reduce 176 to:
% 40.53/12.69  												| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.69  												|
% 40.53/12.69  												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.69  											|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.69  											| (176)  ~ (all_58_0_72 = 0)
% 40.53/12.69  											| (314)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 40.53/12.69  											|
% 40.53/12.69  												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (277), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.69  												|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.69  												| (295) all_58_0_72 = 0
% 40.53/12.69  												|
% 40.53/12.69  													| Equations (295) can reduce 176 to:
% 40.53/12.69  													| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.69  													|
% 40.53/12.69  													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.69  												|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.69  												| (176)  ~ (all_58_0_72 = 0)
% 40.53/12.69  												| (318) all_43_0_57 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0))
% 40.53/12.69  												|
% 40.53/12.69  													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (243), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.69  													|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.69  													| (287) all_60_0_73 = 0
% 40.53/12.69  													|
% 40.53/12.69  														| Equations (287) can reduce 179 to:
% 40.53/12.69  														| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.69  														|
% 40.53/12.69  														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.69  													|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.69  													| (179)  ~ (all_60_0_73 = 0)
% 40.53/12.70  													| (322) all_51_0_66 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 40.53/12.70  													|
% 40.53/12.70  														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (242), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.70  														|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.70  														| (287) all_60_0_73 = 0
% 40.53/12.70  														|
% 40.53/12.70  															| Equations (287) can reduce 179 to:
% 40.53/12.70  															| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.70  															|
% 40.53/12.70  															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.70  														|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.70  														| (179)  ~ (all_60_0_73 = 0)
% 40.53/12.70  														| (326) all_51_0_66 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0))
% 40.53/12.70  														|
% 40.53/12.70  															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (278), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.70  															|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.70  															| (295) all_58_0_72 = 0
% 40.53/12.70  															|
% 40.53/12.70  																| Equations (295) can reduce 176 to:
% 40.53/12.70  																| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.70  																|
% 40.53/12.70  																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.70  															|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.70  															| (176)  ~ (all_58_0_72 = 0)
% 40.53/12.70  															| (330) all_43_0_57 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 40.53/12.70  															|
% 40.53/12.70  																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (239), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.70  																|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.70  																| (287) all_60_0_73 = 0
% 40.53/12.70  																|
% 40.53/12.70  																	| Equations (287) can reduce 179 to:
% 40.53/12.70  																	| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.70  																	|
% 40.53/12.70  																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.70  																|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.70  																| (179)  ~ (all_60_0_73 = 0)
% 40.53/12.70  																| (334) all_49_0_64 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 40.53/12.70  																|
% 40.53/12.70  																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (254), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.70  																	|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.70  																	| (335) all_49_0_64 = 0
% 40.53/12.70  																	|
% 40.53/12.70  																		| Equations (335) can reduce 167 to:
% 40.53/12.70  																		| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.70  																		|
% 40.53/12.70  																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.70  																	|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.70  																	| (167)  ~ (all_49_0_64 = 0)
% 40.53/12.70  																	| (338) all_43_0_57 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 40.53/12.70  																	|
% 40.53/12.70  																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (256), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.70  																		|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.70  																		| (339) all_51_0_66 = 0
% 40.53/12.70  																		|
% 40.53/12.70  																			| Equations (339) can reduce 171 to:
% 40.53/12.70  																			| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.70  																			|
% 40.53/12.70  																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.70  																		|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.70  																		| (171)  ~ (all_51_0_66 = 0)
% 40.53/12.70  																		| (342) all_43_0_57 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 40.53/12.70  																		|
% 40.53/12.70  																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (245), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.70  																			|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.70  																			| (287) all_60_0_73 = 0
% 40.53/12.70  																			|
% 40.53/12.70  																				| Equations (287) can reduce 179 to:
% 40.53/12.70  																				| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.70  																				|
% 40.53/12.70  																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.70  																			|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.70  																			| (179)  ~ (all_60_0_73 = 0)
% 40.53/12.70  																			| (346) all_51_0_66 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 40.53/12.70  																			|
% 40.53/12.70  																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (248), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.70  																				|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.70  																				| (347) all_46_0_61 = 0
% 40.53/12.70  																				|
% 40.53/12.70  																					| Equations (347) can reduce 162 to:
% 40.53/12.70  																					| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.70  																					|
% 40.53/12.70  																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.70  																				|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.70  																				| (162)  ~ (all_46_0_61 = 0)
% 40.53/12.70  																				| (350) all_43_0_57 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_4_4, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 40.53/12.70  																				|
% 40.53/12.70  																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (241), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.70  																					|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.70  																					| (287) all_60_0_73 = 0
% 40.53/12.70  																					|
% 40.53/12.70  																						| Equations (287) can reduce 179 to:
% 40.53/12.70  																						| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.70  																						|
% 40.53/12.70  																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.70  																					|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.70  																					| (179)  ~ (all_60_0_73 = 0)
% 40.53/12.70  																					| (354) all_51_0_66 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 40.53/12.70  																					|
% 40.53/12.70  																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (279), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.70  																						|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.70  																						| (295) all_58_0_72 = 0
% 40.53/12.70  																						|
% 40.53/12.70  																							| Equations (295) can reduce 176 to:
% 40.53/12.70  																							| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.70  																							|
% 40.53/12.70  																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.70  																						|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.70  																						| (176)  ~ (all_58_0_72 = 0)
% 40.53/12.70  																						| (358) all_43_0_57 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 40.53/12.70  																						|
% 40.53/12.70  																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (253), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.70  																							|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.70  																							| (335) all_49_0_64 = 0
% 40.53/12.70  																							|
% 40.53/12.70  																								| Equations (335) can reduce 167 to:
% 40.53/12.70  																								| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.70  																								|
% 40.53/12.70  																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.70  																							|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.70  																							| (167)  ~ (all_49_0_64 = 0)
% 40.53/12.70  																							| (362) all_43_0_57 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 40.53/12.70  																							|
% 40.53/12.70  																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (255), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.70  																								|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.70  																								| (335) all_49_0_64 = 0
% 40.53/12.70  																								|
% 40.53/12.70  																									| Equations (335) can reduce 167 to:
% 40.53/12.70  																									| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.70  																									|
% 40.53/12.70  																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.70  																								|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.70  																								| (167)  ~ (all_49_0_64 = 0)
% 40.53/12.70  																								| (366) all_43_0_57 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 40.53/12.70  																								|
% 40.53/12.70  																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (268), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.70  																									|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.70  																									| (295) all_58_0_72 = 0
% 40.53/12.70  																									|
% 40.53/12.70  																										| Equations (295) can reduce 176 to:
% 40.53/12.70  																										| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.70  																										|
% 40.53/12.70  																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.70  																									|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.70  																									| (176)  ~ (all_58_0_72 = 0)
% 40.53/12.70  																									| (370) all_49_0_64 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 40.53/12.70  																									|
% 40.53/12.70  																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (257), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.70  																										|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.70  																										| (339) all_51_0_66 = 0
% 40.53/12.70  																										|
% 40.53/12.70  																											| Equations (339) can reduce 171 to:
% 40.53/12.70  																											| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.70  																											|
% 40.53/12.70  																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.70  																										|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.70  																										| (171)  ~ (all_51_0_66 = 0)
% 40.53/12.70  																										| (374) all_43_0_57 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 40.53/12.70  																										|
% 40.53/12.70  																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (270), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.70  																											|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.70  																											| (295) all_58_0_72 = 0
% 40.53/12.70  																											|
% 40.53/12.70  																												| Equations (295) can reduce 176 to:
% 40.53/12.70  																												| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.70  																												|
% 40.53/12.70  																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.70  																											|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.70  																											| (176)  ~ (all_58_0_72 = 0)
% 40.53/12.70  																											| (378) all_51_0_66 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 40.53/12.70  																											|
% 40.53/12.70  																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (274), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.70  																												|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.70  																												| (287) all_60_0_73 = 0
% 40.53/12.70  																												|
% 40.53/12.70  																													| Equations (287) can reduce 179 to:
% 40.53/12.70  																													| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.70  																													|
% 40.53/12.70  																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.70  																												|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.70  																												| (179)  ~ (all_60_0_73 = 0)
% 40.53/12.70  																												| (382) all_58_0_72 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 40.53/12.70  																												|
% 40.53/12.70  																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (273), into two cases.
% 40.53/12.70  																													|-Branch one:
% 40.53/12.70  																													| (287) all_60_0_73 = 0
% 40.53/12.70  																													|
% 40.53/12.70  																														| Equations (287) can reduce 179 to:
% 40.53/12.70  																														| (288) $false
% 40.53/12.70  																														|
% 40.53/12.70  																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.53/12.70  																													|-Branch two:
% 40.53/12.70  																													| (179)  ~ (all_60_0_73 = 0)
% 40.53/12.70  																													| (386) all_58_0_72 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 40.89/12.70  																													|
% 40.89/12.70  																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (280), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.70  																														|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.70  																														| (295) all_58_0_72 = 0
% 40.89/12.70  																														|
% 40.89/12.70  																															| Equations (295) can reduce 176 to:
% 40.89/12.70  																															| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.70  																															|
% 40.89/12.70  																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.70  																														|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.70  																														| (176)  ~ (all_58_0_72 = 0)
% 40.89/12.70  																														| (390) all_43_0_57 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 40.89/12.70  																														|
% 40.89/12.70  																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (269), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.70  																															|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.70  																															| (295) all_58_0_72 = 0
% 40.89/12.70  																															|
% 40.89/12.70  																																| Equations (295) can reduce 176 to:
% 40.89/12.70  																																| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.70  																																|
% 40.89/12.70  																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.70  																															|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.70  																															| (176)  ~ (all_58_0_72 = 0)
% 40.89/12.70  																															| (394) all_51_0_66 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 40.89/12.70  																															|
% 40.89/12.70  																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (240), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.70  																																|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.70  																																| (287) all_60_0_73 = 0
% 40.89/12.70  																																|
% 40.89/12.70  																																	| Equations (287) can reduce 179 to:
% 40.89/12.70  																																	| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.70  																																	|
% 40.89/12.70  																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.70  																																|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.70  																																| (179)  ~ (all_60_0_73 = 0)
% 40.89/12.70  																																| (398) all_51_0_66 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0))
% 40.89/12.70  																																|
% 40.89/12.70  																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (271), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.70  																																	|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.70  																																	| (295) all_58_0_72 = 0
% 40.89/12.70  																																	|
% 40.89/12.70  																																		| Equations (295) can reduce 176 to:
% 40.89/12.70  																																		| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.70  																																		|
% 40.89/12.70  																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.70  																																	|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.70  																																	| (176)  ~ (all_58_0_72 = 0)
% 40.89/12.70  																																	| (402) all_51_0_66 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 40.89/12.70  																																	|
% 40.89/12.70  																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (272), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.70  																																		|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.70  																																		| (295) all_58_0_72 = 0
% 40.89/12.70  																																		|
% 40.89/12.70  																																			| Equations (295) can reduce 176 to:
% 40.89/12.70  																																			| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.70  																																			|
% 40.89/12.70  																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.70  																																		|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.70  																																		| (176)  ~ (all_58_0_72 = 0)
% 40.89/12.70  																																		| (406) all_51_0_66 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 40.89/12.70  																																		|
% 40.89/12.70  																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (260), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.70  																																			|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.70  																																			| (287) all_60_0_73 = 0
% 40.89/12.70  																																			|
% 40.89/12.70  																																				| Equations (287) can reduce 179 to:
% 40.89/12.70  																																				| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.70  																																				|
% 40.89/12.70  																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.70  																																			|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.70  																																			| (179)  ~ (all_60_0_73 = 0)
% 40.89/12.70  																																			| (410) all_43_0_57 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 40.89/12.70  																																			|
% 40.89/12.70  																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (275), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.70  																																				|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.70  																																				| (295) all_58_0_72 = 0
% 40.89/12.70  																																				|
% 40.89/12.70  																																					| Equations (295) can reduce 176 to:
% 40.89/12.70  																																					| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.70  																																					|
% 40.89/12.70  																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.70  																																				|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.70  																																				| (176)  ~ (all_58_0_72 = 0)
% 40.89/12.70  																																				| (414) all_43_0_57 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0))
% 40.89/12.70  																																				|
% 40.89/12.70  																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (276), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.70  																																					|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.70  																																					| (295) all_58_0_72 = 0
% 40.89/12.70  																																					|
% 40.89/12.70  																																						| Equations (295) can reduce 176 to:
% 40.89/12.70  																																						| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.70  																																						|
% 40.89/12.70  																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.70  																																					|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.70  																																					| (176)  ~ (all_58_0_72 = 0)
% 40.89/12.70  																																					| (418) all_43_0_57 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 40.89/12.70  																																					|
% 40.89/12.70  																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (259), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.70  																																						|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.70  																																						| (287) all_60_0_73 = 0
% 40.89/12.70  																																						|
% 40.89/12.71  																																							| Equations (287) can reduce 179 to:
% 40.89/12.71  																																							| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.71  																																							|
% 40.89/12.71  																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.71  																																						|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.71  																																						| (179)  ~ (all_60_0_73 = 0)
% 40.89/12.71  																																						| (422) all_43_0_57 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 40.89/12.71  																																						|
% 40.89/12.71  																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (258), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.71  																																							|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.71  																																							| (287) all_60_0_73 = 0
% 40.89/12.71  																																							|
% 40.89/12.71  																																								| Equations (287) can reduce 179 to:
% 40.89/12.71  																																								| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.71  																																								|
% 40.89/12.71  																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.71  																																							|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.71  																																							| (179)  ~ (all_60_0_73 = 0)
% 40.89/12.71  																																							| (426) all_43_0_57 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 40.89/12.71  																																							|
% 40.89/12.71  																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (261), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.71  																																								|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.71  																																								| (287) all_60_0_73 = 0
% 40.89/12.71  																																								|
% 40.89/12.71  																																									| Equations (287) can reduce 179 to:
% 40.89/12.71  																																									| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.71  																																									|
% 40.89/12.71  																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.71  																																								|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.71  																																								| (179)  ~ (all_60_0_73 = 0)
% 40.89/12.71  																																								| (430) all_43_0_57 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 40.89/12.71  																																								|
% 40.89/12.71  																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (238), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.71  																																									|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.71  																																									| (287) all_60_0_73 = 0
% 40.89/12.71  																																									|
% 40.89/12.71  																																										| Equations (287) can reduce 179 to:
% 40.89/12.71  																																										| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.71  																																										|
% 40.89/12.71  																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.71  																																									|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.71  																																									| (179)  ~ (all_60_0_73 = 0)
% 40.89/12.71  																																									| (434) all_49_0_64 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 40.89/12.71  																																									|
% 40.89/12.71  																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (244), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.71  																																										|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.71  																																										| (287) all_60_0_73 = 0
% 40.89/12.71  																																										|
% 40.89/12.71  																																											| Equations (287) can reduce 179 to:
% 40.89/12.71  																																											| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.71  																																											|
% 40.89/12.71  																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.71  																																										|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.71  																																										| (179)  ~ (all_60_0_73 = 0)
% 40.89/12.71  																																										| (438) all_51_0_66 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 40.89/12.71  																																										|
% 40.89/12.71  																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (234), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.71  																																											|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.71  																																											| (339) all_51_0_66 = 0
% 40.89/12.71  																																											|
% 40.89/12.71  																																												| Equations (339) can reduce 171 to:
% 40.89/12.71  																																												| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.71  																																												|
% 40.89/12.71  																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.71  																																											|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.71  																																											| (171)  ~ (all_51_0_66 = 0)
% 40.89/12.71  																																											| (294)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 40.89/12.71  																																											|
% 40.89/12.71  																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (326), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.71  																																												|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.71  																																												| (339) all_51_0_66 = 0
% 40.89/12.71  																																												|
% 40.89/12.71  																																													| Equations (339) can reduce 171 to:
% 40.89/12.71  																																													| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.71  																																													|
% 40.89/12.71  																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.71  																																												|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.71  																																												| (171)  ~ (all_51_0_66 = 0)
% 40.89/12.71  																																												| (446)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0))
% 40.89/12.71  																																												|
% 40.89/12.71  																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (338), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.71  																																													|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.71  																																													| (291) all_43_0_57 = 0
% 40.89/12.71  																																													|
% 40.89/12.71  																																														| Equations (291) can reduce 158 to:
% 40.89/12.71  																																														| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.71  																																														|
% 40.89/12.71  																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.71  																																													|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.71  																																													| (158)  ~ (all_43_0_57 = 0)
% 40.89/12.71  																																													| (450)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 40.89/12.71  																																													|
% 40.89/12.71  																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (342), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.71  																																														|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.71  																																														| (291) all_43_0_57 = 0
% 40.89/12.71  																																														|
% 40.89/12.71  																																															| Equations (291) can reduce 158 to:
% 40.89/12.71  																																															| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.71  																																															|
% 40.89/12.71  																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.71  																																														|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.71  																																														| (158)  ~ (all_43_0_57 = 0)
% 40.89/12.71  																																														| (454)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 40.89/12.71  																																														|
% 40.89/12.71  																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (354), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.71  																																															|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.71  																																															| (339) all_51_0_66 = 0
% 40.89/12.71  																																															|
% 40.89/12.71  																																																| Equations (339) can reduce 171 to:
% 40.89/12.71  																																																| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.71  																																																|
% 40.89/12.71  																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.71  																																															|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.71  																																															| (171)  ~ (all_51_0_66 = 0)
% 40.89/12.71  																																															| (458)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 40.89/12.71  																																															|
% 40.89/12.71  																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (362), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.71  																																																|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.71  																																																| (291) all_43_0_57 = 0
% 40.89/12.71  																																																|
% 40.89/12.71  																																																	| Equations (291) can reduce 158 to:
% 40.89/12.71  																																																	| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.71  																																																	|
% 40.89/12.71  																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.71  																																																|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.71  																																																| (158)  ~ (all_43_0_57 = 0)
% 40.89/12.71  																																																| (462)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 40.89/12.71  																																																|
% 40.89/12.71  																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (366), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.71  																																																	|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.71  																																																	| (291) all_43_0_57 = 0
% 40.89/12.71  																																																	|
% 40.89/12.71  																																																		| Equations (291) can reduce 158 to:
% 40.89/12.71  																																																		| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.71  																																																		|
% 40.89/12.71  																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.71  																																																	|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.71  																																																	| (158)  ~ (all_43_0_57 = 0)
% 40.89/12.71  																																																	| (466)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 40.89/12.71  																																																	|
% 40.89/12.71  																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (386), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.71  																																																		|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.71  																																																		| (295) all_58_0_72 = 0
% 40.89/12.71  																																																		|
% 40.89/12.71  																																																			| Equations (295) can reduce 176 to:
% 40.89/12.71  																																																			| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.71  																																																			|
% 40.89/12.71  																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.71  																																																		|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.71  																																																		| (176)  ~ (all_58_0_72 = 0)
% 40.89/12.71  																																																		| (470)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 40.89/12.71  																																																		|
% 40.89/12.71  																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (390), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.71  																																																			|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.71  																																																			| (291) all_43_0_57 = 0
% 40.89/12.71  																																																			|
% 40.89/12.71  																																																				| Equations (291) can reduce 158 to:
% 40.89/12.71  																																																				| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.71  																																																				|
% 40.89/12.71  																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.71  																																																			|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.71  																																																			| (158)  ~ (all_43_0_57 = 0)
% 40.89/12.71  																																																			| (474)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 40.89/12.71  																																																			|
% 40.89/12.71  																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (394), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.71  																																																				|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.71  																																																				| (339) all_51_0_66 = 0
% 40.89/12.71  																																																				|
% 40.89/12.71  																																																					| Equations (339) can reduce 171 to:
% 40.89/12.71  																																																					| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.71  																																																					|
% 40.89/12.71  																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.71  																																																				|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.71  																																																				| (171)  ~ (all_51_0_66 = 0)
% 40.89/12.71  																																																				| (478)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 40.89/12.71  																																																				|
% 40.89/12.71  																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (398), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.71  																																																					|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.71  																																																					| (339) all_51_0_66 = 0
% 40.89/12.71  																																																					|
% 40.89/12.71  																																																						| Equations (339) can reduce 171 to:
% 40.89/12.71  																																																						| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.71  																																																						|
% 40.89/12.71  																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.71  																																																					|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.71  																																																					| (171)  ~ (all_51_0_66 = 0)
% 40.89/12.71  																																																					| (482)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0))
% 40.89/12.71  																																																					|
% 40.89/12.71  																																																						| Instantiating (482) with all_271_0_2382 yields:
% 40.89/12.71  																																																						| (1138) (all_271_0_2382 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (all_271_0_2382 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (all_271_0_2382 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = all_271_0_2382)
% 40.89/12.71  																																																						|
% 40.89/12.71  																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (402), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.71  																																																						|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.71  																																																						| (339) all_51_0_66 = 0
% 40.89/12.71  																																																						|
% 40.89/12.71  																																																							| Equations (339) can reduce 171 to:
% 40.89/12.71  																																																							| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.71  																																																							|
% 40.89/12.71  																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.71  																																																						|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.71  																																																						| (171)  ~ (all_51_0_66 = 0)
% 40.89/12.71  																																																						| (487)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 40.89/12.71  																																																						|
% 40.89/12.71  																																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (406), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.71  																																																							|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.71  																																																							| (339) all_51_0_66 = 0
% 40.89/12.71  																																																							|
% 40.89/12.71  																																																								| Equations (339) can reduce 171 to:
% 40.89/12.71  																																																								| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.71  																																																								|
% 40.89/12.71  																																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.71  																																																							|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.71  																																																							| (171)  ~ (all_51_0_66 = 0)
% 40.89/12.71  																																																							| (491)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 40.89/12.71  																																																							|
% 40.89/12.71  																																																								| Instantiating (491) with all_279_0_2384 yields:
% 40.89/12.71  																																																								| (1147) (all_279_0_2384 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (all_279_0_2384 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (all_279_0_2384 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = all_279_0_2384) | ( ~ (all_279_0_2384 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_279_0_2384)
% 40.89/12.71  																																																								|
% 40.89/12.71  																																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (414), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.71  																																																								|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.71  																																																								| (291) all_43_0_57 = 0
% 40.89/12.71  																																																								|
% 40.89/12.71  																																																									| Equations (291) can reduce 158 to:
% 40.89/12.71  																																																									| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.71  																																																									|
% 40.89/12.71  																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.71  																																																								|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.71  																																																								| (158)  ~ (all_43_0_57 = 0)
% 40.89/12.71  																																																								| (496)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0))
% 40.89/12.71  																																																								|
% 40.89/12.71  																																																									| Instantiating (496) with all_283_0_2385 yields:
% 40.89/12.71  																																																									| (1152) (all_283_0_2385 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (all_283_0_2385 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (all_283_0_2385 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = all_283_0_2385)
% 40.89/12.71  																																																									|
% 40.89/12.71  																																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (418), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.71  																																																									|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.71  																																																									| (291) all_43_0_57 = 0
% 40.89/12.71  																																																									|
% 40.89/12.71  																																																										| Equations (291) can reduce 158 to:
% 40.89/12.71  																																																										| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.71  																																																										|
% 40.89/12.71  																																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.71  																																																									|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.71  																																																									| (158)  ~ (all_43_0_57 = 0)
% 40.89/12.71  																																																									| (501)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 40.89/12.71  																																																									|
% 40.89/12.71  																																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (422), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.71  																																																										|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.71  																																																										| (291) all_43_0_57 = 0
% 40.89/12.71  																																																										|
% 40.89/12.71  																																																											| Equations (291) can reduce 158 to:
% 40.89/12.71  																																																											| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.71  																																																											|
% 40.89/12.71  																																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.71  																																																										|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.71  																																																										| (158)  ~ (all_43_0_57 = 0)
% 40.89/12.71  																																																										| (505)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 40.89/12.71  																																																										|
% 40.89/12.71  																																																											| Instantiating (505) with all_291_0_2387 yields:
% 40.89/12.71  																																																											| (1161) (all_291_0_2387 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (all_291_0_2387 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (all_291_0_2387 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = all_291_0_2387) | ( ~ (all_291_0_2387 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_291_0_2387)
% 40.89/12.71  																																																											|
% 40.89/12.71  																																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (430), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.71  																																																											|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.71  																																																											| (291) all_43_0_57 = 0
% 40.89/12.71  																																																											|
% 40.89/12.71  																																																												| Equations (291) can reduce 158 to:
% 40.89/12.71  																																																												| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.71  																																																												|
% 40.89/12.71  																																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.71  																																																											|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.71  																																																											| (158)  ~ (all_43_0_57 = 0)
% 40.89/12.71  																																																											| (510)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 40.89/12.71  																																																											|
% 40.89/12.71  																																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (434), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.71  																																																												|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.71  																																																												| (335) all_49_0_64 = 0
% 40.89/12.71  																																																												|
% 40.89/12.71  																																																													| Equations (335) can reduce 167 to:
% 40.89/12.71  																																																													| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.71  																																																													|
% 40.89/12.71  																																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.71  																																																												|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.71  																																																												| (167)  ~ (all_49_0_64 = 0)
% 40.89/12.71  																																																												| (514)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 40.89/12.72  																																																												|
% 40.89/12.72  																																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (438), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.72  																																																													|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.72  																																																													| (339) all_51_0_66 = 0
% 40.89/12.72  																																																													|
% 40.89/12.72  																																																														| Equations (339) can reduce 171 to:
% 40.89/12.72  																																																														| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.72  																																																														|
% 40.89/12.72  																																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.72  																																																													|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.72  																																																													| (171)  ~ (all_51_0_66 = 0)
% 40.89/12.72  																																																													| (518)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 40.89/12.72  																																																													|
% 40.89/12.72  																																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (220), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.72  																																																														|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.72  																																																														| (347) all_46_0_61 = 0
% 40.89/12.72  																																																														|
% 40.89/12.72  																																																															| Equations (347) can reduce 162 to:
% 40.89/12.72  																																																															| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.72  																																																															|
% 40.89/12.72  																																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.72  																																																														|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.72  																																																														| (162)  ~ (all_46_0_61 = 0)
% 40.89/12.72  																																																														| (290)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = v0))
% 40.89/12.72  																																																														|
% 40.89/12.72  																																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (224), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.72  																																																															|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.72  																																																															| (335) all_49_0_64 = 0
% 40.89/12.72  																																																															|
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																| Equations (335) can reduce 167 to:
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																|
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.72  																																																															|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.72  																																																															| (167)  ~ (all_49_0_64 = 0)
% 40.89/12.72  																																																															| (290)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = v0))
% 40.89/12.72  																																																															|
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (219), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																| (347) all_46_0_61 = 0
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																|
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																	| Equations (347) can reduce 162 to:
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																	| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																	|
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																| (162)  ~ (all_46_0_61 = 0)
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																| (530)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = v0))
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																|
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (223), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																	|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																	| (335) all_49_0_64 = 0
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																	|
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																		| Equations (335) can reduce 167 to:
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																		| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																		|
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																	|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																	| (167)  ~ (all_49_0_64 = 0)
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																	| (534)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = v0))
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																	|
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (221), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																		|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																		| (347) all_46_0_61 = 0
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																		|
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																			| Equations (347) can reduce 162 to:
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																			| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																			|
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																		|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																		| (162)  ~ (all_46_0_61 = 0)
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																		| (538)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = v0))
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																		|
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1152), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																			|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																			| (1194) (all_283_0_2385 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (all_283_0_2385 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0)
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																			|
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1194), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																				|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																				| (1195) all_283_0_2385 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																				|
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																					| Applying alpha-rule on (1195) yields:
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																					| (1196) all_283_0_2385 = 0
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																					| (542) apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																					|
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (235), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																					|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																					| (339) all_51_0_66 = 0
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																					|
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																						| Equations (339) can reduce 171 to:
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																						| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																						|
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																					|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																					| (171)  ~ (all_51_0_66 = 0)
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																					| (546)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																					|
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (232), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																						|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																						| (339) all_51_0_66 = 0
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																						|
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																							| Equations (339) can reduce 171 to:
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																							| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																							|
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																						|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																						| (171)  ~ (all_51_0_66 = 0)
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																						| (550) all_49_0_64 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																						|
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (226), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																							|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																							| (339) all_51_0_66 = 0
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																							|
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																								| Equations (339) can reduce 171 to:
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																								| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																								|
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																							|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																							| (171)  ~ (all_51_0_66 = 0)
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																							| (554) all_46_0_61 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_4_4, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																							|
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (227), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																								|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																								| (339) all_51_0_66 = 0
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																								|
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																									| Equations (339) can reduce 171 to:
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																									| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																									|
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																								|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																								| (171)  ~ (all_51_0_66 = 0)
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																								| (558) all_46_0_61 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_4_4) = v0))
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																								|
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (233), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																									|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																									| (339) all_51_0_66 = 0
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																									|
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																										| Equations (339) can reduce 171 to:
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																										| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																										|
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																									|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																									| (171)  ~ (all_51_0_66 = 0)
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																									| (562) all_49_0_64 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																									|
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (322), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																										|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																										| (339) all_51_0_66 = 0
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																										|
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																											| Equations (339) can reduce 171 to:
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																											| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																											|
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																										|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																										| (171)  ~ (all_51_0_66 = 0)
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																										| (566)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																										|
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (346), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																											|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																											| (339) all_51_0_66 = 0
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																											|
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																												| Equations (339) can reduce 171 to:
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																												| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																												|
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																											|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																											| (171)  ~ (all_51_0_66 = 0)
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																											| (570)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																											|
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (378), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																												|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																												| (339) all_51_0_66 = 0
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																												|
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																													| Equations (339) can reduce 171 to:
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																													| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																													|
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																												|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																												| (171)  ~ (all_51_0_66 = 0)
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																												| (574)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																												|
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (230), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																													|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																													| (339) all_51_0_66 = 0
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																													|
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																														| Equations (339) can reduce 171 to:
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																														| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																														|
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																													|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																													| (171)  ~ (all_51_0_66 = 0)
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																													| (578) all_49_0_64 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																													|
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (228), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																														|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																														| (339) all_51_0_66 = 0
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																														|
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																															| Equations (339) can reduce 171 to:
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																															| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																															|
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																														|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																														| (171)  ~ (all_51_0_66 = 0)
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																														| (582) all_46_0_61 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_4_4, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																														|
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (229), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																															|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																															| (339) all_51_0_66 = 0
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																															|
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																																| Equations (339) can reduce 171 to:
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																																| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																																|
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																															|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																															| (171)  ~ (all_51_0_66 = 0)
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																															| (586) all_46_0_61 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_4_4) = v0))
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																															|
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (231), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																																|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																																| (339) all_51_0_66 = 0
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																																|
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																																	| Equations (339) can reduce 171 to:
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																																	| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																																	|
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																																|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																																| (171)  ~ (all_51_0_66 = 0)
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																																| (590) all_49_0_64 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																																|
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																																	| Instantiating formula (19) with all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2, 0, all_51_0_66 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = all_51_0_66, apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																																	| (339) all_51_0_66 = 0
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																																	|
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																																	| Equations (339) can reduce 171 to:
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																																	| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																																	|
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																				|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																				| (1248) all_283_0_2385 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																				|
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																					| Applying alpha-rule on (1248) yields:
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																					| (1196) all_283_0_2385 = 0
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																					| (595) apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																					|
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (236), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																					|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																					| (287) all_60_0_73 = 0
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																					|
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																						| Equations (287) can reduce 179 to:
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																						| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																						|
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																					|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																					| (179)  ~ (all_60_0_73 = 0)
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																					| (599) all_46_0_61 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_4_4, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																					|
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (237), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																						|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																						| (287) all_60_0_73 = 0
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																						|
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																							| Equations (287) can reduce 179 to:
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																							| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																							|
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																						|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																						| (179)  ~ (all_60_0_73 = 0)
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																						| (603) all_46_0_61 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_4_4) = v0))
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																						|
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																							| Instantiating formula (19) with all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3, 0, all_60_0_73 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = all_60_0_73, apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0, yields:
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																							| (287) all_60_0_73 = 0
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																							|
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																							| Equations (287) can reduce 179 to:
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																							| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																							|
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																			|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																			| (1261)  ~ (all_283_0_2385 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = all_283_0_2385
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																			|
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																				| Applying alpha-rule on (1261) yields:
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																				| (1262)  ~ (all_283_0_2385 = 0)
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																				| (1263) distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = all_283_0_2385
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																				|
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (264), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																				|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																				| (291) all_43_0_57 = 0
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																				|
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																					| Equations (291) can reduce 158 to:
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																					| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																					|
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																				|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																				| (158)  ~ (all_43_0_57 = 0)
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																				| (612)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																				|
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (266), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																					|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																					| (295) all_58_0_72 = 0
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																					|
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																						| Equations (295) can reduce 176 to:
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																						| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																						|
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																					|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																					| (176)  ~ (all_58_0_72 = 0)
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																					| (616) all_46_0_61 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_4_4) = v0))
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																					|
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (267), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																						|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																						| (295) all_58_0_72 = 0
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																						|
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																							| Equations (295) can reduce 176 to:
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																							| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																							|
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																						|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																						| (176)  ~ (all_58_0_72 = 0)
% 40.89/12.72  																																																																						| (620) all_49_0_64 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																						|
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (249), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																							|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																							| (347) all_46_0_61 = 0
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																							|
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																								| Equations (347) can reduce 162 to:
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																								| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																								|
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																							|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																							| (162)  ~ (all_46_0_61 = 0)
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																							| (624) all_43_0_57 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_4_4) = v0))
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																							|
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (250), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																								|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																								| (347) all_46_0_61 = 0
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																								|
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																									| Equations (347) can reduce 162 to:
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																									| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																									|
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																								|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																								| (162)  ~ (all_46_0_61 = 0)
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																								| (628) all_43_0_57 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_4_4, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																								|
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (251), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																									|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																									| (347) all_46_0_61 = 0
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																									|
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																										| Equations (347) can reduce 162 to:
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																										| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																										|
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																									|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																									| (162)  ~ (all_46_0_61 = 0)
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																									| (632) all_43_0_57 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_4_4) = v0))
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																									|
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (252), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																										|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																										| (335) all_49_0_64 = 0
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																										|
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																											| Equations (335) can reduce 167 to:
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																											| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																											|
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																										|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																										| (167)  ~ (all_49_0_64 = 0)
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																										| (636) all_43_0_57 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																										|
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1138), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																											|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																											| (1292) (all_271_0_2382 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (all_271_0_2382 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0)
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																											|
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1292), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																												|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																												| (1293) all_271_0_2382 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																												|
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																													| Applying alpha-rule on (1293) yields:
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																													| (1294) all_271_0_2382 = 0
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																													| (640) apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																													|
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (318), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																													|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																													| (291) all_43_0_57 = 0
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																													|
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																														| Equations (291) can reduce 158 to:
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																														| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																														|
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																													|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																													| (158)  ~ (all_43_0_57 = 0)
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																													| (446)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0))
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																													|
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (426), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																														|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																														| (291) all_43_0_57 = 0
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																														|
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																															| Equations (291) can reduce 158 to:
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																															| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																															|
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																														|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																														| (158)  ~ (all_43_0_57 = 0)
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																														| (648)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																														|
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (628), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																															|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																															| (291) all_43_0_57 = 0
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																															|
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																| Equations (291) can reduce 158 to:
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																|
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																															|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																															| (158)  ~ (all_43_0_57 = 0)
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																															| (652)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_4_4, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																															|
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (632), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																| (291) all_43_0_57 = 0
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																|
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																	| Equations (291) can reduce 158 to:
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																	| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																	|
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																| (158)  ~ (all_43_0_57 = 0)
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																| (656)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_4_4) = v0))
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																|
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (330), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																	|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																	| (291) all_43_0_57 = 0
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																	|
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																		| Equations (291) can reduce 158 to:
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																		| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																		|
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																	|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																	| (158)  ~ (all_43_0_57 = 0)
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																	| (566)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																	|
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (350), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																		|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																		| (291) all_43_0_57 = 0
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																		|
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																			| Equations (291) can reduce 158 to:
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																			| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																			|
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																		|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																		| (158)  ~ (all_43_0_57 = 0)
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																		| (664)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_4_4, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																		|
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (358), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																			|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																			| (291) all_43_0_57 = 0
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																			|
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																				| Equations (291) can reduce 158 to:
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																				| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																				|
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																			|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																			| (158)  ~ (all_43_0_57 = 0)
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																			| (668)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																			|
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (374), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																				|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																				| (291) all_43_0_57 = 0
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																				|
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																					| Equations (291) can reduce 158 to:
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																					| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																					|
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																				|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																				| (158)  ~ (all_43_0_57 = 0)
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																				| (672)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																				|
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (410), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																					|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																					| (291) all_43_0_57 = 0
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																					|
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																						| Equations (291) can reduce 158 to:
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																						| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																						|
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																					|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																					| (158)  ~ (all_43_0_57 = 0)
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																					| (676)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																					|
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (624), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																						|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																						| (291) all_43_0_57 = 0
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																						|
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																							| Equations (291) can reduce 158 to:
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																							| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																							|
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																						|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																						| (158)  ~ (all_43_0_57 = 0)
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																						| (680)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_4_4) = v0))
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																						|
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (636), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																							|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																							| (291) all_43_0_57 = 0
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																							|
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																								| Equations (291) can reduce 158 to:
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																								| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																								|
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																							|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																							| (158)  ~ (all_43_0_57 = 0)
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																							| (684)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																							|
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																								| Instantiating formula (19) with all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2, 0, all_43_0_57 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = all_43_0_57, apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																								| (291) all_43_0_57 = 0
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																								|
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																								| Equations (291) can reduce 158 to:
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																								| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																								|
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																												|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																												| (1342) all_271_0_2382 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																												|
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																													| Applying alpha-rule on (1342) yields:
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																													| (1294) all_271_0_2382 = 0
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																													| (689) apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																													|
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (265), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																													|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																													| (295) all_58_0_72 = 0
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																													|
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																														| Equations (295) can reduce 176 to:
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																														| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																														|
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																													|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																													| (176)  ~ (all_58_0_72 = 0)
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																													| (693) all_46_0_61 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_4_4, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																													|
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																														| Instantiating formula (19) with all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3, 0, all_58_0_72 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = all_58_0_72, apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0, yields:
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																														| (295) all_58_0_72 = 0
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																														|
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																														| Equations (295) can reduce 176 to:
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																														| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																														|
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																											|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																											| (1351)  ~ (all_271_0_2382 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = all_271_0_2382
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																											|
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																												| Applying alpha-rule on (1351) yields:
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																												| (1352)  ~ (all_271_0_2382 = 0)
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																												| (1353) distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = all_271_0_2382
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																												|
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (235), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																												|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																												| (339) all_51_0_66 = 0
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																												|
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																													| Equations (339) can reduce 171 to:
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																													| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																													|
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																												|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																												| (171)  ~ (all_51_0_66 = 0)
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																												| (546)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																												|
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (232), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																													|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																													| (339) all_51_0_66 = 0
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																													|
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																														| Equations (339) can reduce 171 to:
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																														| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																														|
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																													|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																													| (171)  ~ (all_51_0_66 = 0)
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																													| (550) all_49_0_64 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																													|
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (236), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																														|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																														| (287) all_60_0_73 = 0
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																														|
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																															| Equations (287) can reduce 179 to:
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																															| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																															|
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																														|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																														| (179)  ~ (all_60_0_73 = 0)
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																														| (599) all_46_0_61 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_4_4, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																														|
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (237), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																															|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																															| (287) all_60_0_73 = 0
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																															|
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																| Equations (287) can reduce 179 to:
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																|
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																															|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																															| (179)  ~ (all_60_0_73 = 0)
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																															| (603) all_46_0_61 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_4_4) = v0))
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																															|
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (226), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																| (339) all_51_0_66 = 0
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																|
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																	| Equations (339) can reduce 171 to:
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																	| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																	|
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																| (171)  ~ (all_51_0_66 = 0)
% 40.89/12.73  																																																																																| (554) all_46_0_61 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_4_4, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																|
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (227), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																	|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																	| (339) all_51_0_66 = 0
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																	|
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																		| Equations (339) can reduce 171 to:
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																		| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																		|
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																	|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																	| (171)  ~ (all_51_0_66 = 0)
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																	| (558) all_46_0_61 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_4_4) = v0))
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																	|
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (233), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																		|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																		| (339) all_51_0_66 = 0
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																		|
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																			| Equations (339) can reduce 171 to:
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																			| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																			|
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																		|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																		| (171)  ~ (all_51_0_66 = 0)
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																		| (562) all_49_0_64 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																		|
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (318), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																			|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																			| (291) all_43_0_57 = 0
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																			|
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																				| Equations (291) can reduce 158 to:
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																				| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																				|
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																			|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																			| (158)  ~ (all_43_0_57 = 0)
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																			| (446)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0))
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																			|
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (426), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																				|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																				| (291) all_43_0_57 = 0
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																				|
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																					| Equations (291) can reduce 158 to:
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																					| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																					|
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																				|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																				| (158)  ~ (all_43_0_57 = 0)
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																				| (648)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																				|
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (628), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																					|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																					| (291) all_43_0_57 = 0
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																					|
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																						| Equations (291) can reduce 158 to:
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																						| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																						|
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																					|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																					| (158)  ~ (all_43_0_57 = 0)
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																					| (652)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_4_4, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																					|
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (632), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																						|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																						| (291) all_43_0_57 = 0
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																						|
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																							| Equations (291) can reduce 158 to:
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																							| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																							|
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																						|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																						| (158)  ~ (all_43_0_57 = 0)
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																						| (656)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_4_4) = v0))
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																						|
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1161), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																							|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																							| (1398) (all_291_0_2387 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (all_291_0_2387 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (all_291_0_2387 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = all_291_0_2387)
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																							|
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1398), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																								|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																								| (1399) (all_291_0_2387 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (all_291_0_2387 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0)
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																								|
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1399), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																									|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																									| (1400) all_291_0_2387 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																									|
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																										| Applying alpha-rule on (1400) yields:
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																										| (1401) all_291_0_2387 = 0
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																										| (542) apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																										|
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (322), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																										|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																										| (339) all_51_0_66 = 0
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																										|
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																											| Equations (339) can reduce 171 to:
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																											| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																											|
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																										|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																										| (171)  ~ (all_51_0_66 = 0)
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																										| (566)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																										|
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (346), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																											|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																											| (339) all_51_0_66 = 0
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																											|
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																												| Equations (339) can reduce 171 to:
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																												| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																												|
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																											|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																											| (171)  ~ (all_51_0_66 = 0)
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																											| (570)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																											|
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (378), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																												|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																												| (339) all_51_0_66 = 0
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																												|
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																													| Equations (339) can reduce 171 to:
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																													| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																													|
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																												|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																												| (171)  ~ (all_51_0_66 = 0)
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																												| (574)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																												|
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (229), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																													|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																													| (339) all_51_0_66 = 0
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																													|
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																														| Equations (339) can reduce 171 to:
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																														| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																														|
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																													|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																													| (171)  ~ (all_51_0_66 = 0)
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																													| (586) all_46_0_61 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_4_4) = v0))
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																													|
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (230), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																														|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																														| (339) all_51_0_66 = 0
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																														|
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																															| Equations (339) can reduce 171 to:
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																															| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																															|
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																														|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																														| (171)  ~ (all_51_0_66 = 0)
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																														| (578) all_49_0_64 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																														|
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (231), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																															|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																															| (339) all_51_0_66 = 0
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																															|
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																																| Equations (339) can reduce 171 to:
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																																| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																																|
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																															|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																															| (171)  ~ (all_51_0_66 = 0)
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																															| (590) all_49_0_64 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																															|
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (228), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																																|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																																| (339) all_51_0_66 = 0
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																																|
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																																	| Equations (339) can reduce 171 to:
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																																	| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																																	|
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																																|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																																| (171)  ~ (all_51_0_66 = 0)
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																																| (582) all_46_0_61 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_4_4, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																																|
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																																	| Instantiating formula (19) with all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2, 0, all_51_0_66 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = all_51_0_66, apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																																	| (339) all_51_0_66 = 0
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																																	|
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																																	| Equations (339) can reduce 171 to:
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																																	| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																																	|
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																									|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																									| (1433) all_291_0_2387 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																									|
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																										| Applying alpha-rule on (1433) yields:
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																										| (1401) all_291_0_2387 = 0
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																										| (689) apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																										|
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (265), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																										|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																										| (295) all_58_0_72 = 0
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																										|
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																											| Equations (295) can reduce 176 to:
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																											| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																											|
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																										|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																										| (176)  ~ (all_58_0_72 = 0)
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																										| (693) all_46_0_61 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_4_4, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																										|
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																											| Instantiating formula (19) with all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3, 0, all_58_0_72 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = all_58_0_72, apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0, yields:
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																											| (295) all_58_0_72 = 0
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																											|
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																											| Equations (295) can reduce 176 to:
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																											| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																											|
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																								|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																								| (1442)  ~ (all_291_0_2387 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = all_291_0_2387
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																								|
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																									| Applying alpha-rule on (1442) yields:
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																									| (1443)  ~ (all_291_0_2387 = 0)
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																									| (1444) distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = all_291_0_2387
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																									|
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (222), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																									|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																									| (335) all_49_0_64 = 0
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																									|
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																										| Equations (335) can reduce 167 to:
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																										| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																										|
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																									|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																									| (167)  ~ (all_49_0_64 = 0)
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																									| (797) all_46_0_61 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_4_4, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																									|
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (322), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																										|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																										| (339) all_51_0_66 = 0
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																										|
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																											| Equations (339) can reduce 171 to:
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																											| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																											|
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																										|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																										| (171)  ~ (all_51_0_66 = 0)
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																										| (566)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																										|
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (330), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																											|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																											| (291) all_43_0_57 = 0
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																											|
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																												| Equations (291) can reduce 158 to:
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																												| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																												|
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																											|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																											| (158)  ~ (all_43_0_57 = 0)
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																											| (566)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																											|
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (334), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																												|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																												| (335) all_49_0_64 = 0
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																												|
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																													| Equations (335) can reduce 167 to:
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																													| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																													|
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																												|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																												| (167)  ~ (all_49_0_64 = 0)
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																												| (1460)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																												|
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (346), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																													|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																													| (339) all_51_0_66 = 0
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																													|
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																														| Equations (339) can reduce 171 to:
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																														| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																														|
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																													|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																													| (171)  ~ (all_51_0_66 = 0)
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																													| (570)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																													|
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (350), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																														|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																														| (291) all_43_0_57 = 0
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																														|
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																															| Equations (291) can reduce 158 to:
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																															| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																															|
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																														|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																														| (158)  ~ (all_43_0_57 = 0)
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																														| (664)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_4_4, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																														|
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (358), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																															|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																															| (291) all_43_0_57 = 0
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																															|
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																																| Equations (291) can reduce 158 to:
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																																| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																																|
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																															|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																															| (158)  ~ (all_43_0_57 = 0)
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																															| (668)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																															|
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (378), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																																|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																																| (339) all_51_0_66 = 0
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																																|
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																																	| Equations (339) can reduce 171 to:
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																																	| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																																	|
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																																|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																																| (171)  ~ (all_51_0_66 = 0)
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																																| (574)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																																|
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (550), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																																	|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																																	| (335) all_49_0_64 = 0
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																																	|
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																																		| Equations (335) can reduce 167 to:
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																																		| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																																		|
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																																	|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																																	| (167)  ~ (all_49_0_64 = 0)
% 40.89/12.74  																																																																																																	| (1480)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																	|
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (410), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																		|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																		| (291) all_43_0_57 = 0
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																		|
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																			| Equations (291) can reduce 158 to:
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																			| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																			|
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																		|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																		| (158)  ~ (all_43_0_57 = 0)
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																		| (676)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																		|
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (225), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																			|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																			| (335) all_49_0_64 = 0
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																			|
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																				| Equations (335) can reduce 167 to:
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																				| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																				|
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																			|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																			| (167)  ~ (all_49_0_64 = 0)
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																			| (1488)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																			|
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (370), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																				|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																				| (335) all_49_0_64 = 0
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																				|
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																					| Equations (335) can reduce 167 to:
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																					| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																					|
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																				|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																				| (167)  ~ (all_49_0_64 = 0)
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																				| (1492)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																				|
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (620), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																					|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																					| (335) all_49_0_64 = 0
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																					|
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																						| Equations (335) can reduce 167 to:
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																						| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																						|
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																					|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																					| (167)  ~ (all_49_0_64 = 0)
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																					| (1496)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																					|
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (624), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																						|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																						| (291) all_43_0_57 = 0
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																						|
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																							| Equations (291) can reduce 158 to:
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																							| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																							|
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																						|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																						| (158)  ~ (all_43_0_57 = 0)
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																						| (680)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_4_4) = v0))
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																						|
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (636), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																							|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																							| (291) all_43_0_57 = 0
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																							|
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																								| Equations (291) can reduce 158 to:
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																								| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																								|
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																							|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																							| (158)  ~ (all_43_0_57 = 0)
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																							| (684)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																							|
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (230), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																								|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																								| (339) all_51_0_66 = 0
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																								|
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																									| Equations (339) can reduce 171 to:
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																									| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																									|
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																								|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																								| (171)  ~ (all_51_0_66 = 0)
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																								| (578) all_49_0_64 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																								|
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (231), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																									|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																									| (339) all_51_0_66 = 0
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																									|
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																										| Equations (339) can reduce 171 to:
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																										| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																										|
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																									|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																									| (171)  ~ (all_51_0_66 = 0)
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																									| (590) all_49_0_64 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																									|
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (578), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																										|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																										| (335) all_49_0_64 = 0
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																										|
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																											| Equations (335) can reduce 167 to:
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																											| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																											|
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																										|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																										| (167)  ~ (all_49_0_64 = 0)
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																										| (1516)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																										|
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1147), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																											|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																											| (1517) (all_279_0_2384 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (all_279_0_2384 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (all_279_0_2384 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = all_279_0_2384)
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																											|
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1517), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																												|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																												| (1518) (all_279_0_2384 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (all_279_0_2384 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0)
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																												|
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1518), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																													|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																													| (1519) all_279_0_2384 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																													|
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																														| Applying alpha-rule on (1519) yields:
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																														| (1520) all_279_0_2384 = 0
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																														| (595) apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																														|
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																														| Instantiating formula (19) with all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3, 0, all_60_0_73 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = all_60_0_73, apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0, yields:
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																														| (287) all_60_0_73 = 0
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																														|
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																														| Equations (287) can reduce 179 to:
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																														| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																														|
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																													|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																													| (1524) all_279_0_2384 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																													|
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																														| Applying alpha-rule on (1524) yields:
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																														| (1520) all_279_0_2384 = 0
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																														| (640) apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																														|
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																														| Instantiating formula (19) with all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2, 0, all_43_0_57 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = all_43_0_57, apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																														| (291) all_43_0_57 = 0
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																														|
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																														| Equations (291) can reduce 158 to:
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																														| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																														|
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																												|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																												| (1529)  ~ (all_279_0_2384 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = all_279_0_2384
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																												|
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																													| Applying alpha-rule on (1529) yields:
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																													| (1530)  ~ (all_279_0_2384 = 0)
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																													| (1531) distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = all_279_0_2384
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																													|
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (562), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																													|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																													| (335) all_49_0_64 = 0
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																													|
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																														| Equations (335) can reduce 167 to:
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																														| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																														|
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																													|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																													| (167)  ~ (all_49_0_64 = 0)
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																													| (1535)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																													|
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (590), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																														|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																														| (335) all_49_0_64 = 0
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																														|
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																															| Equations (335) can reduce 167 to:
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																															| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																															|
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																														|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																														| (167)  ~ (all_49_0_64 = 0)
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																														| (1539)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																														|
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																															| Instantiating formula (16) with all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3, all_283_0_2385, all_291_0_2387 and discharging atoms distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = all_291_0_2387, distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = all_283_0_2385, yields:
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																															| (1540) all_291_0_2387 = all_283_0_2385
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																															|
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																															| Instantiating formula (16) with all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3, all_279_0_2384, all_291_0_2387 and discharging atoms distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = all_291_0_2387, distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = all_279_0_2384, yields:
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																															| (1541) all_291_0_2387 = all_279_0_2384
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																															|
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																															| Instantiating formula (16) with all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3, all_271_0_2382, all_291_0_2387 and discharging atoms distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = all_291_0_2387, distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = all_271_0_2382, yields:
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																															| (1542) all_291_0_2387 = all_271_0_2382
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																															|
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																															| Combining equations (1541,1540) yields a new equation:
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																															| (1543) all_283_0_2385 = all_279_0_2384
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																															|
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																															| Combining equations (1542,1540) yields a new equation:
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																															| (1544) all_283_0_2385 = all_271_0_2382
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																															|
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																															| Combining equations (1543,1544) yields a new equation:
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																															| (1545) all_279_0_2384 = all_271_0_2382
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																															|
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																															| Simplifying 1545 yields:
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																															| (1546) all_279_0_2384 = all_271_0_2382
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																															|
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																															| Equations (1546) can reduce 1530 to:
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																															| (1352)  ~ (all_271_0_2382 = 0)
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																															|
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																															| From (1546) and (1531) follows:
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																															| (1353) distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = all_271_0_2382
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																															|
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																															| Instantiating formula (8) with all_0_1_1, all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms incident_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_0_1_1, yields:
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																															| (1549) all_0_1_1 = 0 | apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																															|
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																															| Instantiating formula (115) with all_49_0_64, all_271_0_2382, all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_3_3) = all_49_0_64, distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = all_271_0_2382, yields:
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																															| (1550) all_271_0_2382 = 0 | all_49_0_64 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0)
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																															|
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1549), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																															|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																															| (1551) apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																															|
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1550), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																																|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																																| (1294) all_271_0_2382 = 0
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																																|
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																																	| Equations (1294) can reduce 1352 to:
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																																	| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																																	|
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																																|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																																| (1352)  ~ (all_271_0_2382 = 0)
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																																| (1555) all_49_0_64 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0)
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																																|
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1555), into two cases.
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																																	|-Branch one:
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																																	| (335) all_49_0_64 = 0
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																																	|
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																																		| Equations (335) can reduce 167 to:
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																																		| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																																		|
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																																	|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																																	| (167)  ~ (all_49_0_64 = 0)
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																																	| (1559)  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0)
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																																	|
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																																		| Instantiating (1559) with all_597_0_3994 yields:
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																																		| (1560)  ~ (all_597_0_3994 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_597_0_3994
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																																		|
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																																		| Applying alpha-rule on (1560) yields:
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																																		| (1561)  ~ (all_597_0_3994 = 0)
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																																		| (1562) apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_597_0_3994
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																																		|
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																																		| Instantiating formula (19) with all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2, 0, all_597_0_3994 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_597_0_3994, apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																																		| (1563) all_597_0_3994 = 0
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																																		|
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																																		| Equations (1563) can reduce 1561 to:
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																																		| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																																		|
% 40.89/12.75  																																																																																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.76  																																																																																																															|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.76  																																																																																																															| (1565)  ~ (apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = 0)
% 40.89/12.76  																																																																																																															| (1566) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 40.89/12.76  																																																																																																															|
% 40.89/12.76  																																																																																																																| Equations (1566) can reduce 940 to:
% 40.89/12.76  																																																																																																																| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.76  																																																																																																																|
% 40.89/12.76  																																																																																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.76  																																																																																																											|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.76  																																																																																																											| (1568)  ~ (all_279_0_2384 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_279_0_2384
% 40.89/12.76  																																																																																																											|
% 40.89/12.76  																																																																																																												| Applying alpha-rule on (1568) yields:
% 40.89/12.76  																																																																																																												| (1530)  ~ (all_279_0_2384 = 0)
% 40.89/12.76  																																																																																																												| (1570) distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_279_0_2384
% 40.89/12.76  																																																																																																												|
% 40.89/12.76  																																																																																																												| Instantiating formula (32) with all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6, all_279_0_2384, 0 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_279_0_2384, distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = 0, yields:
% 40.89/12.76  																																																																																																												| (1520) all_279_0_2384 = 0
% 40.89/12.76  																																																																																																												|
% 40.89/12.76  																																																																																																												| Equations (1520) can reduce 1530 to:
% 40.89/12.76  																																																																																																												| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.76  																																																																																																												|
% 40.89/12.76  																																																																																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.76  																																																																																							|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.76  																																																																																							| (1573)  ~ (all_291_0_2387 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_291_0_2387
% 40.89/12.76  																																																																																							|
% 40.89/12.76  																																																																																								| Applying alpha-rule on (1573) yields:
% 40.89/12.76  																																																																																								| (1443)  ~ (all_291_0_2387 = 0)
% 40.89/12.76  																																																																																								| (1575) distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_291_0_2387
% 40.89/12.76  																																																																																								|
% 40.89/12.76  																																																																																								| Instantiating formula (32) with all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6, all_291_0_2387, 0 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_291_0_2387, distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = 0, yields:
% 40.89/12.76  																																																																																								| (1401) all_291_0_2387 = 0
% 40.89/12.76  																																																																																								|
% 40.89/12.76  																																																																																								| Equations (1401) can reduce 1443 to:
% 40.89/12.76  																																																																																								| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.76  																																																																																								|
% 40.89/12.76  																																																																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.76  			|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.76  			| (1578)  ~ (all_63_0_75 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_4_4) = all_63_0_75
% 40.89/12.76  			|
% 40.89/12.76  				| Applying alpha-rule on (1578) yields:
% 40.89/12.76  				| (193)  ~ (all_63_0_75 = 0)
% 40.89/12.76  				| (1580) distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_4_4) = all_63_0_75
% 40.89/12.76  				|
% 40.89/12.76  				| Instantiating formula (32) with all_0_5_5, all_0_4_4, all_63_0_75, 0 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_4_4) = all_63_0_75, distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_4_4) = 0, yields:
% 40.89/12.76  				| (1581) all_63_0_75 = 0
% 40.89/12.76  				|
% 40.89/12.76  				| Equations (1581) can reduce 193 to:
% 40.89/12.76  				| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.76  				|
% 40.89/12.76  				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.76  		|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.76  		| (1583)  ~ (all_55_0_69 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_55_0_69
% 40.89/12.76  		|
% 40.89/12.76  			| Applying alpha-rule on (1583) yields:
% 40.89/12.76  			| (190)  ~ (all_55_0_69 = 0)
% 40.89/12.76  			| (1585) distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_55_0_69
% 40.89/12.76  			|
% 40.89/12.76  			| Instantiating formula (32) with all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6, all_55_0_69, 0 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_55_0_69, distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = 0, yields:
% 40.89/12.76  			| (1586) all_55_0_69 = 0
% 40.89/12.76  			|
% 40.89/12.76  			| Equations (1586) can reduce 190 to:
% 40.89/12.76  			| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.76  			|
% 40.89/12.76  			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.76  	|-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.76  	| (1588)  ~ (all_62_0_74 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_4_4) = all_62_0_74
% 40.89/12.76  	|
% 40.89/12.76  		| Applying alpha-rule on (1588) yields:
% 40.89/12.76  		| (187)  ~ (all_62_0_74 = 0)
% 40.89/12.76  		| (1590) distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_4_4) = all_62_0_74
% 40.89/12.76  		|
% 40.89/12.76  		| Instantiating formula (32) with all_0_5_5, all_0_4_4, all_62_0_74, 0 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_4_4) = all_62_0_74, distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_4_4) = 0, yields:
% 40.89/12.76  		| (1591) all_62_0_74 = 0
% 40.89/12.76  		|
% 40.89/12.76  		| Equations (1591) can reduce 187 to:
% 40.89/12.76  		| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.76  		|
% 40.89/12.76  		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.76  |-Branch two:
% 40.89/12.76  | (1593)  ~ (all_48_0_63 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_48_0_63
% 40.89/12.76  |
% 40.89/12.76  	| Applying alpha-rule on (1593) yields:
% 40.89/12.76  	| (184)  ~ (all_48_0_63 = 0)
% 40.89/12.76  	| (1595) distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_48_0_63
% 40.89/12.76  	|
% 40.89/12.76  	| Instantiating formula (32) with all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6, all_48_0_63, 0 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_48_0_63, distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = 0, yields:
% 40.89/12.76  	| (1596) all_48_0_63 = 0
% 40.89/12.76  	|
% 40.89/12.76  	| Equations (1596) can reduce 184 to:
% 40.89/12.76  	| (288) $false
% 40.89/12.76  	|
% 40.89/12.76  	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 40.89/12.76  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 40.89/12.76  
% 40.89/12.76  12167ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------