TSTP Solution File: GEO184+3 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : GEO184+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 03:44:04 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 7.93s 2.43s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.93s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 11
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 31 ( 14 unt; 11 nHn; 26 RR)
% Number of literals : 64 ( 0 equ; 23 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 5 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 35 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_26,negated_conjecture,
~ equal_lines(esk3_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-_cdpuhs7/lgb.p',i_0_26) ).
cnf(i_0_14,plain,
( distinct_lines(X1,X2)
| equal_lines(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-_cdpuhs7/lgb.p',i_0_14) ).
cnf(i_0_10,plain,
( distinct_points(X1,X2)
| distinct_points(X3,X2)
| ~ distinct_points(X3,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-_cdpuhs7/lgb.p',i_0_10) ).
cnf(i_0_30,negated_conjecture,
distinct_points(esk1_0,esk2_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-_cdpuhs7/lgb.p',i_0_30) ).
cnf(i_0_38,plain,
( apart_point_and_line(X1,X2)
| apart_point_and_line(X1,X3)
| apart_point_and_line(X4,X2)
| apart_point_and_line(X4,X3)
| ~ distinct_points(X4,X1)
| ~ distinct_lines(X3,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-_cdpuhs7/lgb.p',i_0_38) ).
cnf(i_0_7,plain,
~ distinct_points(X1,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-_cdpuhs7/lgb.p',i_0_7) ).
cnf(i_0_20,plain,
( ~ distinct_points(X1,X2)
| ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(X1,X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-_cdpuhs7/lgb.p',i_0_20) ).
cnf(i_0_21,plain,
( ~ distinct_points(X1,X2)
| ~ apart_point_and_line(X2,line_connecting(X1,X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-_cdpuhs7/lgb.p',i_0_21) ).
cnf(i_0_4,plain,
( ~ incident_point_and_line(X1,X2)
| ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-_cdpuhs7/lgb.p',i_0_4) ).
cnf(i_0_28,negated_conjecture,
incident_point_and_line(esk1_0,esk3_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-_cdpuhs7/lgb.p',i_0_28) ).
cnf(i_0_27,negated_conjecture,
incident_point_and_line(esk2_0,esk3_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-_cdpuhs7/lgb.p',i_0_27) ).
cnf(c_0_50,negated_conjecture,
~ equal_lines(esk3_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0)),
i_0_26 ).
cnf(c_0_51,plain,
( distinct_lines(X1,X2)
| equal_lines(X1,X2) ),
i_0_14 ).
cnf(c_0_52,plain,
( distinct_points(X1,X2)
| distinct_points(X3,X2)
| ~ distinct_points(X3,X1) ),
i_0_10 ).
cnf(c_0_53,negated_conjecture,
distinct_points(esk1_0,esk2_0),
i_0_30 ).
cnf(c_0_54,plain,
( apart_point_and_line(X1,X2)
| apart_point_and_line(X1,X3)
| apart_point_and_line(X4,X2)
| apart_point_and_line(X4,X3)
| ~ distinct_points(X4,X1)
| ~ distinct_lines(X3,X2) ),
i_0_38 ).
cnf(c_0_55,negated_conjecture,
distinct_lines(esk3_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_50,c_0_51]) ).
cnf(c_0_56,plain,
~ distinct_points(X1,X1),
i_0_7 ).
cnf(c_0_57,negated_conjecture,
( distinct_points(esk1_0,X1)
| distinct_points(esk2_0,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_52,c_0_53]) ).
cnf(c_0_58,plain,
( apart_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0))
| apart_point_and_line(X2,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0))
| apart_point_and_line(X1,esk3_0)
| apart_point_and_line(X2,esk3_0)
| ~ distinct_points(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_54,c_0_55]) ).
cnf(c_0_59,plain,
distinct_points(esk2_0,esk1_0),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_56,c_0_57]) ).
cnf(c_0_60,plain,
( ~ distinct_points(X1,X2)
| ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(X1,X2)) ),
i_0_20 ).
cnf(c_0_61,plain,
( apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0))
| apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0))
| apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,esk3_0)
| apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,esk3_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_58,c_0_59]) ).
cnf(c_0_62,plain,
( ~ distinct_points(X1,X2)
| ~ apart_point_and_line(X2,line_connecting(X1,X2)) ),
i_0_21 ).
cnf(c_0_63,plain,
( apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0))
| apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,esk3_0)
| apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,esk3_0) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_60,c_0_61]),c_0_53])]) ).
cnf(c_0_64,plain,
( ~ incident_point_and_line(X1,X2)
| ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,X2) ),
i_0_4 ).
cnf(c_0_65,plain,
( apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,esk3_0)
| apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,esk3_0) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_62,c_0_63]),c_0_53])]) ).
cnf(c_0_66,negated_conjecture,
incident_point_and_line(esk1_0,esk3_0),
i_0_28 ).
cnf(c_0_67,plain,
apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,esk3_0),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_64,c_0_65]),c_0_66])]) ).
cnf(c_0_68,negated_conjecture,
incident_point_and_line(esk2_0,esk3_0),
i_0_27 ).
cnf(c_0_69,plain,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_64,c_0_67]),c_0_68])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13 % Problem : GEO184+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.03/0.14 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.14/0.36 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.36 % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 15:35:15 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.47 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.21/0.48 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/0.48 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.21/0.48 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.21/0.48 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 7.93/2.43 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 7.93/2.43 # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.93/2.43 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.93/2.43 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___008_C45_F1_PI_S5PRR_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4S
% 7.93/2.43 # and selection function SelectNewComplexAHPNS.
% 7.93/2.43 #
% 7.93/2.43 # Preprocessing time : 0.026 s
% 7.93/2.43
% 7.93/2.43 # Proof found!
% 7.93/2.43 # SZS status Theorem
% 7.93/2.43 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.93/2.43 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.93/2.43
% 7.93/2.43 # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.93/2.43 # User time : 0.031 s
% 7.93/2.43 # System time : 0.004 s
% 7.93/2.43 # Total time : 0.036 s
% 7.93/2.43 # Maximum resident set size: 7128 pages
% 7.93/2.43
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------