TSTP Solution File: GEO184+3 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : GEO184+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 04:04:24 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.24s 1.41s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.24s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 37 ( 13 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 92 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 88 ( 33 ~; 34 |; 13 &)
% ( 2 <=>; 6 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 10 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 7 ( 6 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 63 ( 4 sgn 44 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(con,conjecture,
! [X1,X2,X4,X5] :
( ( distinct_points(X1,X2)
& convergent_lines(X4,X5)
& incident_point_and_line(X1,X4)
& incident_point_and_line(X2,X4) )
=> equal_lines(X4,line_connecting(X1,X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',con) ).
fof(ax2,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( equal_lines(X1,X2)
<=> ~ distinct_lines(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+6.ax',ax2) ).
fof(apart4,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( distinct_points(X1,X2)
=> ( distinct_points(X1,X3)
| distinct_points(X2,X3) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',apart4) ).
fof(cu1,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X4,X5] :
( ( distinct_points(X1,X2)
& distinct_lines(X4,X5) )
=> ( apart_point_and_line(X1,X4)
| apart_point_and_line(X1,X5)
| apart_point_and_line(X2,X4)
| apart_point_and_line(X2,X5) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',cu1) ).
fof(apart1,axiom,
! [X1] : ~ distinct_points(X1,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',apart1) ).
fof(a4,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( incident_point_and_line(X1,X2)
<=> ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+6.ax',a4) ).
fof(ci1,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( distinct_points(X1,X2)
=> ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(X1,X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',ci1) ).
fof(ci2,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( distinct_points(X1,X2)
=> ~ apart_point_and_line(X2,line_connecting(X1,X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',ci2) ).
fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1,X2,X4,X5] :
( ( distinct_points(X1,X2)
& convergent_lines(X4,X5)
& incident_point_and_line(X1,X4)
& incident_point_and_line(X2,X4) )
=> equal_lines(X4,line_connecting(X1,X2)) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[con]) ).
fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
( distinct_points(esk1_0,esk2_0)
& convergent_lines(esk3_0,esk4_0)
& incident_point_and_line(esk1_0,esk3_0)
& incident_point_and_line(esk2_0,esk3_0)
& ~ equal_lines(esk3_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0)) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
! [X3,X4,X3,X4] :
( ( ~ equal_lines(X3,X4)
| ~ distinct_lines(X3,X4) )
& ( distinct_lines(X3,X4)
| equal_lines(X3,X4) ) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[ax2])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_11,plain,
! [X4,X5,X6] :
( ~ distinct_points(X4,X5)
| distinct_points(X4,X6)
| distinct_points(X5,X6) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[apart4])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_12,plain,
! [X6,X7,X8,X9] :
( ~ distinct_points(X6,X7)
| ~ distinct_lines(X8,X9)
| apart_point_and_line(X6,X8)
| apart_point_and_line(X6,X9)
| apart_point_and_line(X7,X8)
| apart_point_and_line(X7,X9) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[cu1])]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
~ equal_lines(esk3_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( equal_lines(X1,X2)
| distinct_lines(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
fof(c_0_15,plain,
! [X2] : ~ distinct_points(X2,X2),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[apart1])]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( distinct_points(X1,X2)
| distinct_points(X3,X2)
| ~ distinct_points(X3,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
distinct_points(esk1_0,esk2_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
fof(c_0_18,plain,
! [X3,X4,X3,X4] :
( ( ~ incident_point_and_line(X3,X4)
| ~ apart_point_and_line(X3,X4) )
& ( apart_point_and_line(X3,X4)
| incident_point_and_line(X3,X4) ) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[a4])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( apart_point_and_line(X1,X2)
| apart_point_and_line(X1,X3)
| apart_point_and_line(X4,X2)
| apart_point_and_line(X4,X3)
| ~ distinct_lines(X3,X2)
| ~ distinct_points(X4,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
distinct_lines(esk3_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
~ distinct_points(X1,X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
( distinct_points(esk1_0,X1)
| distinct_points(esk2_0,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
( ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,X2)
| ~ incident_point_and_line(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
incident_point_and_line(esk2_0,esk3_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
incident_point_and_line(esk1_0,esk3_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
fof(c_0_26,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( ~ distinct_points(X3,X4)
| ~ apart_point_and_line(X3,line_connecting(X3,X4)) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[ci1])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
( apart_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0))
| apart_point_and_line(X2,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0))
| apart_point_and_line(X1,esk3_0)
| apart_point_and_line(X2,esk3_0)
| ~ distinct_points(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
distinct_points(esk2_0,esk1_0),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
~ apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,esk3_0),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
~ apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,esk3_0),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_25]) ).
fof(c_0_31,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( ~ distinct_points(X3,X4)
| ~ apart_point_and_line(X4,line_connecting(X3,X4)) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[ci2])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
( ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(X1,X2))
| ~ distinct_points(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_26]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
( apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0))
| apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0)) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]),c_0_29]),c_0_30]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,plain,
( ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(X2,X1))
| ~ distinct_points(X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_31]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]),c_0_17])]) ).
cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]),c_0_17])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : GEO184+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 15:27:33 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.24/1.41 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.24/1.41 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.24/1.41 # Preprocessing time : 0.017 s
% 0.24/1.41
% 0.24/1.41 # Proof found!
% 0.24/1.41 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.24/1.41 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.24/1.41 # Proof object total steps : 37
% 0.24/1.41 # Proof object clause steps : 20
% 0.24/1.41 # Proof object formula steps : 17
% 0.24/1.41 # Proof object conjectures : 16
% 0.24/1.41 # Proof object clause conjectures : 13
% 0.24/1.41 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.24/1.41 # Proof object initial clauses used : 11
% 0.24/1.41 # Proof object initial formulas used : 8
% 0.24/1.41 # Proof object generating inferences : 9
% 0.24/1.41 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 6
% 0.24/1.41 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.24/1.41 # Parsed axioms : 36
% 0.24/1.41 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 3
% 0.24/1.41 # Initial clauses : 45
% 0.24/1.41 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.24/1.41 # Initial clauses in saturation : 45
% 0.24/1.41 # Processed clauses : 78
% 0.24/1.41 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.24/1.41 # ...subsumed : 11
% 0.24/1.41 # ...remaining for further processing : 67
% 0.24/1.41 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.24/1.41 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.24/1.41 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.24/1.41 # Backward-rewritten : 1
% 0.24/1.41 # Generated clauses : 145
% 0.24/1.41 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 127
% 0.24/1.41 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 4
% 0.24/1.41 # Paramodulations : 141
% 0.24/1.41 # Factorizations : 4
% 0.24/1.41 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.24/1.41 # Current number of processed clauses : 66
% 0.24/1.41 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 12
% 0.24/1.41 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.24/1.41 # Negative unit clauses : 10
% 0.24/1.41 # Non-unit-clauses : 44
% 0.24/1.41 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 92
% 0.24/1.41 # ...number of literals in the above : 361
% 0.24/1.41 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.24/1.41 # Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 0.24/1.41 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 287
% 0.24/1.41 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 136
% 0.24/1.41 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 15
% 0.24/1.41 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 50
% 0.24/1.41 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.24/1.41 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.24/1.41 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.24/1.41 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.24/1.41 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.24/1.41 # Termbank termtop insertions : 4615
% 0.24/1.41
% 0.24/1.41 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/1.41 # User time : 0.021 s
% 0.24/1.41 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.24/1.41 # Total time : 0.023 s
% 0.24/1.41 # Maximum resident set size: 3060 pages
% 0.24/23.41 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.24/23.43 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.24/23.43 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.43 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.24/23.43 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.43 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.24/23.43 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.24/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.24/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.24/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.24/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.24/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.24/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.24/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.24/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------