TSTP Solution File: GEO183+3 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : GEO183+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 04:04:24 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.27s 1.45s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.27s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 11
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 30 ( 6 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 71 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 68 ( 27 ~; 23 |; 11 &)
% ( 2 <=>; 5 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 9 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 7 ( 6 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 47 ( 4 sgn 34 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(con,conjecture,
! [X1,X2,X4,X5] :
( ( distinct_points(X1,X2)
& convergent_lines(X4,X5)
& equal_lines(X4,line_connecting(X1,X2)) )
=> ( incident_point_and_line(X1,X4)
& incident_point_and_line(X2,X4) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',con) ).
fof(a4,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( incident_point_and_line(X1,X2)
<=> ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+6.ax',a4) ).
fof(ax2,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( equal_lines(X1,X2)
<=> ~ distinct_lines(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+6.ax',ax2) ).
fof(ceq2,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( apart_point_and_line(X1,X2)
=> ( distinct_lines(X2,X3)
| apart_point_and_line(X1,X3) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',ceq2) ).
fof(ci1,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( distinct_points(X1,X2)
=> ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(X1,X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',ci1) ).
fof(ci2,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( distinct_points(X1,X2)
=> ~ apart_point_and_line(X2,line_connecting(X1,X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',ci2) ).
fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1,X2,X4,X5] :
( ( distinct_points(X1,X2)
& convergent_lines(X4,X5)
& equal_lines(X4,line_connecting(X1,X2)) )
=> ( incident_point_and_line(X1,X4)
& incident_point_and_line(X2,X4) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[con]) ).
fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
( distinct_points(esk1_0,esk2_0)
& convergent_lines(esk3_0,esk4_0)
& equal_lines(esk3_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0))
& ( ~ incident_point_and_line(esk1_0,esk3_0)
| ~ incident_point_and_line(esk2_0,esk3_0) ) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X3,X4,X3,X4] :
( ( ~ incident_point_and_line(X3,X4)
| ~ apart_point_and_line(X3,X4) )
& ( apart_point_and_line(X3,X4)
| incident_point_and_line(X3,X4) ) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[a4])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
( ~ incident_point_and_line(esk2_0,esk3_0)
| ~ incident_point_and_line(esk1_0,esk3_0) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( incident_point_and_line(X1,X2)
| apart_point_and_line(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
fof(c_0_11,plain,
! [X3,X4,X3,X4] :
( ( ~ equal_lines(X3,X4)
| ~ distinct_lines(X3,X4) )
& ( distinct_lines(X3,X4)
| equal_lines(X3,X4) ) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[ax2])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_12,plain,
! [X4,X5,X6] :
( ~ apart_point_and_line(X4,X5)
| distinct_lines(X5,X6)
| apart_point_and_line(X4,X6) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ceq2])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
( apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,esk3_0)
| ~ incident_point_and_line(esk2_0,esk3_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( ~ distinct_lines(X1,X2)
| ~ equal_lines(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
equal_lines(esk3_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( apart_point_and_line(X1,X2)
| distinct_lines(X3,X2)
| ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
( apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,esk3_0)
| apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,esk3_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_10]) ).
fof(c_0_18,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( ~ distinct_points(X3,X4)
| ~ apart_point_and_line(X3,line_connecting(X3,X4)) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[ci1])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
~ distinct_lines(esk3_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
( apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,esk3_0)
| apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,X1)
| distinct_lines(esk3_0,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(X1,X2))
| ~ distinct_points(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
( apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0))
| apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,esk3_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
distinct_points(esk1_0,esk2_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,esk3_0),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]),c_0_23])]) ).
fof(c_0_25,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( ~ distinct_points(X3,X4)
| ~ apart_point_and_line(X4,line_connecting(X3,X4)) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[ci2])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
( apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,X1)
| distinct_lines(esk3_0,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
( ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(X2,X1))
| ~ distinct_points(X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_26]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]),c_0_23])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.14 % Problem : GEO183+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.08/0.14 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.14/0.36 % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.36 % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 12:41:40 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.27/1.45 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.27/1.45 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.27/1.45 # Preprocessing time : 0.018 s
% 0.27/1.45
% 0.27/1.45 # Proof found!
% 0.27/1.45 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.27/1.45 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.27/1.45 # Proof object total steps : 30
% 0.27/1.45 # Proof object clause steps : 17
% 0.27/1.45 # Proof object formula steps : 13
% 0.27/1.45 # Proof object conjectures : 15
% 0.27/1.45 # Proof object clause conjectures : 12
% 0.27/1.45 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.27/1.45 # Proof object initial clauses used : 8
% 0.27/1.45 # Proof object initial formulas used : 6
% 0.27/1.45 # Proof object generating inferences : 9
% 0.27/1.45 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 4
% 0.27/1.45 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.27/1.45 # Parsed axioms : 36
% 0.27/1.45 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 3
% 0.27/1.45 # Initial clauses : 44
% 0.27/1.45 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Initial clauses in saturation : 44
% 0.27/1.45 # Processed clauses : 84
% 0.27/1.45 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # ...subsumed : 14
% 0.27/1.45 # ...remaining for further processing : 70
% 0.27/1.45 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Backward-rewritten : 4
% 0.27/1.45 # Generated clauses : 157
% 0.27/1.45 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 134
% 0.27/1.45 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 4
% 0.27/1.45 # Paramodulations : 151
% 0.27/1.45 # Factorizations : 6
% 0.27/1.45 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Current number of processed clauses : 66
% 0.27/1.45 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 11
% 0.27/1.45 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Negative unit clauses : 8
% 0.27/1.45 # Non-unit-clauses : 47
% 0.27/1.45 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 87
% 0.27/1.45 # ...number of literals in the above : 343
% 0.27/1.45 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Current number of archived clauses : 4
% 0.27/1.45 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 327
% 0.27/1.45 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 194
% 0.27/1.45 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 18
% 0.27/1.45 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 38
% 0.27/1.45 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.27/1.45 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.27/1.45 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Termbank termtop insertions : 4516
% 0.27/1.45
% 0.27/1.45 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.27/1.45 # User time : 0.018 s
% 0.27/1.45 # System time : 0.005 s
% 0.27/1.45 # Total time : 0.023 s
% 0.27/1.45 # Maximum resident set size: 3056 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------