TSTP Solution File: GEO180+3 by SPASS---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : GEO180+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 06:23:02 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.18s 0.44s
% Output   : Refutation 0.18s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   23 (  12 unt;   9 nHn;  23 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   47 (   0 equ;  17 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   7 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
    distinct_points(skc3,skc4),
    file('GEO180+3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(5,axiom,
    apart_point_and_line(skc5,line_connecting(skc3,skc4)),
    file('GEO180+3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(6,axiom,
    ~ apart_point_and_line(skc3,line_connecting(skc5,skc4)),
    file('GEO180+3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(31,axiom,
    ( ~ distinct_points(u,v)
    | ~ apart_point_and_line(u,line_connecting(u,v)) ),
    file('GEO180+3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(32,axiom,
    ( ~ distinct_points(u,v)
    | ~ apart_point_and_line(v,line_connecting(u,v)) ),
    file('GEO180+3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(35,axiom,
    ( ~ apart_point_and_line(u,v)
    | apart_point_and_line(w,v)
    | distinct_points(u,w) ),
    file('GEO180+3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(36,axiom,
    ( ~ apart_point_and_line(u,v)
    | distinct_lines(v,w)
    | apart_point_and_line(u,w) ),
    file('GEO180+3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(49,axiom,
    ( ~ distinct_lines(u,v)
    | ~ distinct_points(w,x)
    | apart_point_and_line(x,u)
    | apart_point_and_line(x,v)
    | apart_point_and_line(w,v)
    | apart_point_and_line(w,u) ),
    file('GEO180+3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(53,plain,
    ~ apart_point_and_line(skc3,line_connecting(skc3,skc4)),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[1,31]),
    [iquote('0:Res:1.0,31.0')] ).

cnf(54,plain,
    ~ apart_point_and_line(skc4,line_connecting(skc3,skc4)),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[1,32]),
    [iquote('0:Res:1.0,32.0')] ).

cnf(56,plain,
    ( apart_point_and_line(u,line_connecting(skc3,skc4))
    | distinct_points(skc5,u) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[5,35]),
    [iquote('0:Res:5.0,35.0')] ).

cnf(57,plain,
    ( apart_point_and_line(skc5,u)
    | distinct_lines(line_connecting(skc3,skc4),u) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[5,36]),
    [iquote('0:Res:5.0,36.0')] ).

cnf(62,plain,
    ( ~ distinct_lines(u,line_connecting(skc5,skc4))
    | ~ distinct_points(skc3,v)
    | apart_point_and_line(v,u)
    | apart_point_and_line(v,line_connecting(skc5,skc4))
    | apart_point_and_line(skc3,u) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[49,6]),
    [iquote('0:Res:49.3,6.0')] ).

cnf(69,plain,
    ( ~ distinct_lines(u,line_connecting(skc5,skc4))
    | apart_point_and_line(skc4,u)
    | apart_point_and_line(skc3,u)
    | apart_point_and_line(skc4,line_connecting(skc5,skc4)) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[1,62]),
    [iquote('0:Res:1.0,62.0')] ).

cnf(104,plain,
    ( ~ distinct_lines(u,line_connecting(skc5,skc4))
    | apart_point_and_line(skc4,u)
    | apart_point_and_line(skc3,u) ),
    inference(spt,[spt(split,[position(s1)])],[69]),
    [iquote('1:Spt:69.0,69.1,69.2')] ).

cnf(126,plain,
    ( apart_point_and_line(skc5,line_connecting(skc5,skc4))
    | apart_point_and_line(skc4,line_connecting(skc3,skc4))
    | apart_point_and_line(skc3,line_connecting(skc3,skc4)) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[57,104]),
    [iquote('1:Res:57.1,104.0')] ).

cnf(128,plain,
    apart_point_and_line(skc5,line_connecting(skc5,skc4)),
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[126,54,53]),
    [iquote('1:MRR:126.1,126.2,54.0,53.0')] ).

cnf(142,plain,
    distinct_points(skc5,skc4),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[56,54]),
    [iquote('0:Res:56.0,54.0')] ).

cnf(192,plain,
    ~ distinct_points(skc5,skc4),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[128,31]),
    [iquote('1:Res:128.0,31.1')] ).

cnf(195,plain,
    $false,
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[192,142]),
    [iquote('1:MRR:192.0,142.0')] ).

cnf(196,plain,
    apart_point_and_line(skc4,line_connecting(skc5,skc4)),
    inference(spt,[spt(split,[position(s2)])],[69]),
    [iquote('1:Spt:195.0,69.3')] ).

cnf(197,plain,
    ~ distinct_points(skc5,skc4),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[196,32]),
    [iquote('1:Res:196.0,32.1')] ).

cnf(200,plain,
    $false,
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[197,142]),
    [iquote('1:MRR:197.0,142.0')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : GEO180+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 11:33:16 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.44  
% 0.18/0.44  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.18/0.44  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.18/0.44  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.18/0.44  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.18/0.44  SPASS derived 129 clauses, backtracked 2 clauses, performed 2 splits and kept 123 clauses.
% 0.18/0.44  SPASS allocated 97748 KBytes.
% 0.18/0.44  SPASS spent	0:00:00.10 on the problem.
% 0.18/0.44  		0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.18/0.44  		0:00:00.03 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.18/0.44  		0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.18/0.44  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.18/0.44  		0:00:00.00 for the reduction.
% 0.18/0.44  
% 0.18/0.44  
% 0.18/0.44  Here is a proof with depth 5, length 23 :
% 0.18/0.44  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.18/0.44  Formulae used in the proof : con ci1 ci2 ceq1 ceq2 cu1
% 0.18/0.44  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------