TSTP Solution File: GEO176+1 by iProver---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9
% Problem  : GEO176+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM

% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May  3 02:16:41 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.47s 1.15s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.47s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named definition)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f9,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( convergent_lines(X0,X1)
     => ~ apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(X0,X1),X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ci3) ).

fof(f10,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( convergent_lines(X0,X1)
     => ~ apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(X0,X1),X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ci4) ).

fof(f12,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( apart_point_and_line(X0,X1)
     => ( apart_point_and_line(X2,X1)
        | distinct_points(X0,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ceq1) ).

fof(f15,conjecture,
    ! [X0,X1,X3,X4] :
      ( ( ( apart_point_and_line(X0,X4)
          | apart_point_and_line(X0,X3) )
        & convergent_lines(X3,X4)
        & distinct_points(X0,X1) )
     => distinct_points(X0,intersection_point(X3,X4)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',con) ).

fof(f16,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0,X1,X3,X4] :
        ( ( ( apart_point_and_line(X0,X4)
            | apart_point_and_line(X0,X3) )
          & convergent_lines(X3,X4)
          & distinct_points(X0,X1) )
       => distinct_points(X0,intersection_point(X3,X4)) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f15]) ).

fof(f18,plain,
    ~ ! [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
        ( ( ( apart_point_and_line(X0,X3)
            | apart_point_and_line(X0,X2) )
          & convergent_lines(X2,X3)
          & distinct_points(X0,X1) )
       => distinct_points(X0,intersection_point(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f16]) ).

fof(f27,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(X0,X1),X0)
      | ~ convergent_lines(X0,X1) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

fof(f28,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(X0,X1),X1)
      | ~ convergent_lines(X0,X1) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f10]) ).

fof(f31,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( apart_point_and_line(X2,X1)
      | distinct_points(X0,X2)
      | ~ apart_point_and_line(X0,X1) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f12]) ).

fof(f32,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( apart_point_and_line(X2,X1)
      | distinct_points(X0,X2)
      | ~ apart_point_and_line(X0,X1) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f31]) ).

fof(f37,plain,
    ? [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ~ distinct_points(X0,intersection_point(X2,X3))
      & ( apart_point_and_line(X0,X3)
        | apart_point_and_line(X0,X2) )
      & convergent_lines(X2,X3)
      & distinct_points(X0,X1) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f18]) ).

fof(f38,plain,
    ? [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ~ distinct_points(X0,intersection_point(X2,X3))
      & ( apart_point_and_line(X0,X3)
        | apart_point_and_line(X0,X2) )
      & convergent_lines(X2,X3)
      & distinct_points(X0,X1) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f37]) ).

fof(f39,plain,
    ( ? [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
        ( ~ distinct_points(X0,intersection_point(X2,X3))
        & ( apart_point_and_line(X0,X3)
          | apart_point_and_line(X0,X2) )
        & convergent_lines(X2,X3)
        & distinct_points(X0,X1) )
   => ( ~ distinct_points(sK0,intersection_point(sK2,sK3))
      & ( apart_point_and_line(sK0,sK3)
        | apart_point_and_line(sK0,sK2) )
      & convergent_lines(sK2,sK3)
      & distinct_points(sK0,sK1) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f40,plain,
    ( ~ distinct_points(sK0,intersection_point(sK2,sK3))
    & ( apart_point_and_line(sK0,sK3)
      | apart_point_and_line(sK0,sK2) )
    & convergent_lines(sK2,sK3)
    & distinct_points(sK0,sK1) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2,sK3])],[f38,f39]) ).

fof(f49,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(X0,X1),X0)
      | ~ convergent_lines(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f27]) ).

fof(f50,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(X0,X1),X1)
      | ~ convergent_lines(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f28]) ).

fof(f52,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( apart_point_and_line(X2,X1)
      | distinct_points(X0,X2)
      | ~ apart_point_and_line(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f32]) ).

fof(f56,plain,
    convergent_lines(sK2,sK3),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f40]) ).

fof(f57,plain,
    ( apart_point_and_line(sK0,sK3)
    | apart_point_and_line(sK0,sK2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f40]) ).

fof(f58,plain,
    ~ distinct_points(sK0,intersection_point(sK2,sK3)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f40]) ).

cnf(c_57,plain,
    ( ~ apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(X0,X1),X0)
    | ~ convergent_lines(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f49]) ).

cnf(c_58,plain,
    ( ~ apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(X0,X1),X1)
    | ~ convergent_lines(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f50]) ).

cnf(c_60,plain,
    ( ~ apart_point_and_line(X0,X1)
    | distinct_points(X0,X2)
    | apart_point_and_line(X2,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f52]) ).

cnf(c_63,negated_conjecture,
    ~ distinct_points(sK0,intersection_point(sK2,sK3)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f58]) ).

cnf(c_64,negated_conjecture,
    ( apart_point_and_line(sK0,sK2)
    | apart_point_and_line(sK0,sK3) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f57]) ).

cnf(c_65,negated_conjecture,
    convergent_lines(sK2,sK3),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f56]) ).

cnf(c_150,plain,
    intersection_point(sK2,sK3) = sP0_iProver_def,
    definition ).

cnf(c_152,negated_conjecture,
    convergent_lines(sK2,sK3),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_65]) ).

cnf(c_153,negated_conjecture,
    ( apart_point_and_line(sK0,sK2)
    | apart_point_and_line(sK0,sK3) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_64]) ).

cnf(c_154,negated_conjecture,
    ~ distinct_points(sK0,sP0_iProver_def),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_63,c_150]) ).

cnf(c_667,plain,
    ( ~ convergent_lines(sK2,sK3)
    | ~ apart_point_and_line(sP0_iProver_def,sK2) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_150,c_57]) ).

cnf(c_668,plain,
    ~ apart_point_and_line(sP0_iProver_def,sK2),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_667,c_152]) ).

cnf(c_674,plain,
    ( ~ convergent_lines(sK2,sK3)
    | ~ apart_point_and_line(sP0_iProver_def,sK3) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_150,c_58]) ).

cnf(c_675,plain,
    ~ apart_point_and_line(sP0_iProver_def,sK3),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_674,c_152]) ).

cnf(c_682,plain,
    ( distinct_points(sK0,X0)
    | apart_point_and_line(X0,sK3)
    | apart_point_and_line(sK0,sK2) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_153,c_60]) ).

cnf(c_762,plain,
    ( apart_point_and_line(sK0,sK2)
    | apart_point_and_line(sP0_iProver_def,sK3) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_682,c_154]) ).

cnf(c_763,plain,
    apart_point_and_line(sK0,sK2),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_762,c_675]) ).

cnf(c_767,plain,
    ( distinct_points(sK0,X0)
    | apart_point_and_line(X0,sK2) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_763,c_60]) ).

cnf(c_828,plain,
    apart_point_and_line(sP0_iProver_def,sK2),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_767,c_154]) ).

cnf(c_829,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_828,c_668]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12  % Problem  : GEO176+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.10/0.12  % Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime : Fri May  3 01:24:06 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.45  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.19/0.45  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --heuristic_context casc_unsat --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.47/1.15  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 0.47/1.15  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.47/1.15  
% 0.47/1.15  %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 0.47/1.15  
% 0.47/1.15  ------  iProver source info
% 0.47/1.15  
% 0.47/1.15  git: date: 2024-05-02 19:28:25 +0000
% 0.47/1.15  git: sha1: a33b5eb135c74074ba803943bb12f2ebd971352f
% 0.47/1.15  git: non_committed_changes: false
% 0.47/1.15  
% 0.47/1.15  ------ Parsing...
% 0.47/1.15  ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...
% 0.47/1.15  
% 0.47/1.15  ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e 
% 0.47/1.15  
% 0.47/1.15  ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e 
% 0.47/1.15  
% 0.47/1.15  ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 0.47/1.15  ------ Proving...
% 0.47/1.15  ------ Problem Properties 
% 0.47/1.15  
% 0.47/1.15  
% 0.47/1.15  clauses                                 19
% 0.47/1.15  conjectures                             4
% 0.47/1.15  EPR                                     14
% 0.47/1.15  Horn                                    11
% 0.47/1.15  unary                                   7
% 0.47/1.15  binary                                  5
% 0.47/1.15  lits                                    41
% 0.47/1.15  lits eq                                 1
% 0.47/1.15  fd_pure                                 0
% 0.47/1.15  fd_pseudo                               0
% 0.47/1.15  fd_cond                                 0
% 0.47/1.15  fd_pseudo_cond                          0
% 0.47/1.15  AC symbols                              0
% 0.47/1.15  
% 0.47/1.15  ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 0.47/1.15  
% 0.47/1.15  ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 0.47/1.15  
% 0.47/1.15  
% 0.47/1.15  ------ 
% 0.47/1.15  Current options:
% 0.47/1.15  ------ 
% 0.47/1.15  
% 0.47/1.15  
% 0.47/1.15  
% 0.47/1.15  
% 0.47/1.15  ------ Proving...
% 0.47/1.15  
% 0.47/1.15  
% 0.47/1.15  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.47/1.15  
% 0.47/1.15  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 0.47/1.15  
% 0.47/1.15  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------