TSTP Solution File: GEO175+3 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : GEO175+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:38:26 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 9.00s 3.15s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 9.00s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :   26
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   46 (  10 unt;  20 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   66 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   57 (  17   ~;  32   |;   3   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   5  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   11 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   30 (  16   >;  14   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :   13 (  12 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   35 (;  35   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ unorthogonal_lines > parallel_lines > orthogonal_lines > incident_point_and_line > equal_points > equal_lines > distinct_points > distinct_lines > convergent_lines > apart_point_and_line > point > line > parallel_through_point > orthogonal_through_point > line_connecting > intersection_point > #nlpp > #skF_2 > #skF_3 > #skF_1 > #skF_4

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(line_connecting,type,
    line_connecting: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(equal_lines,type,
    equal_lines: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(equal_points,type,
    equal_points: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(incident_point_and_line,type,
    incident_point_and_line: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(distinct_points,type,
    distinct_points: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(intersection_point,type,
    intersection_point: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(parallel_through_point,type,
    parallel_through_point: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(apart_point_and_line,type,
    apart_point_and_line: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(convergent_lines,type,
    convergent_lines: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(orthogonal_through_point,type,
    orthogonal_through_point: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(point,type,
    point: $i > $o ).

tff(line,type,
    line: $i > $o ).

tff(parallel_lines,type,
    parallel_lines: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_2',type,
    '#skF_2': $i ).

tff('#skF_3',type,
    '#skF_3': $i ).

tff('#skF_1',type,
    '#skF_1': $i ).

tff(unorthogonal_lines,type,
    unorthogonal_lines: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(distinct_lines,type,
    distinct_lines: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_4',type,
    '#skF_4': $i ).

tff(orthogonal_lines,type,
    orthogonal_lines: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(f_61,axiom,
    ! [X] : ~ convergent_lines(X,X),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',apart3) ).

tff(f_439,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X,Y,U,V] :
        ( ( distinct_points(X,Y)
          & convergent_lines(U,V)
          & distinct_points(X,intersection_point(U,V)) )
       => ( apart_point_and_line(X,U)
          | apart_point_and_line(X,V) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',con) ).

tff(f_132,axiom,
    ! [X,Y,Z] :
      ( convergent_lines(X,Y)
     => ( distinct_lines(Y,Z)
        | convergent_lines(X,Z) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',ceq3) ).

tff(f_113,axiom,
    ! [X,Y,U,V] :
      ( ( distinct_points(X,Y)
        & distinct_lines(U,V) )
     => ( apart_point_and_line(X,U)
        | apart_point_and_line(X,V)
        | apart_point_and_line(Y,U)
        | apart_point_and_line(Y,V) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',cu1) ).

tff(f_100,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( convergent_lines(X,Y)
     => ~ apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(X,Y),Y) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',ci4) ).

tff(f_95,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( convergent_lines(X,Y)
     => ~ apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(X,Y),X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',ci3) ).

tff(c_6,plain,
    ! [X_3] : ~ convergent_lines(X_3,X_3),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_61]) ).

tff(c_96,plain,
    ~ apart_point_and_line('#skF_1','#skF_3'),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_439]) ).

tff(c_100,plain,
    convergent_lines('#skF_3','#skF_4'),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_439]) ).

tff(c_94,plain,
    ~ apart_point_and_line('#skF_1','#skF_4'),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_439]) ).

tff(c_98,plain,
    distinct_points('#skF_1',intersection_point('#skF_3','#skF_4')),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_439]) ).

tff(c_187,plain,
    ! [X_139,Z_140,Y_141] :
      ( convergent_lines(X_139,Z_140)
      | distinct_lines(Y_141,Z_140)
      | ~ convergent_lines(X_139,Y_141) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_132]) ).

tff(c_193,plain,
    ! [Z_140] :
      ( convergent_lines('#skF_3',Z_140)
      | distinct_lines('#skF_4',Z_140) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_100,c_187]) ).

tff(c_3450,plain,
    ! [Y_385,V_386,U_387,X_388] :
      ( apart_point_and_line(Y_385,V_386)
      | apart_point_and_line(Y_385,U_387)
      | apart_point_and_line(X_388,V_386)
      | apart_point_and_line(X_388,U_387)
      | ~ distinct_lines(U_387,V_386)
      | ~ distinct_points(X_388,Y_385) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_113]) ).

tff(c_3553,plain,
    ! [Y_393,Z_394,X_395] :
      ( apart_point_and_line(Y_393,Z_394)
      | apart_point_and_line(Y_393,'#skF_4')
      | apart_point_and_line(X_395,Z_394)
      | apart_point_and_line(X_395,'#skF_4')
      | ~ distinct_points(X_395,Y_393)
      | convergent_lines('#skF_3',Z_394) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_193,c_3450]) ).

tff(c_3587,plain,
    ! [Z_394] :
      ( apart_point_and_line(intersection_point('#skF_3','#skF_4'),Z_394)
      | apart_point_and_line(intersection_point('#skF_3','#skF_4'),'#skF_4')
      | apart_point_and_line('#skF_1',Z_394)
      | apart_point_and_line('#skF_1','#skF_4')
      | convergent_lines('#skF_3',Z_394) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_98,c_3553]) ).

tff(c_3618,plain,
    ! [Z_394] :
      ( apart_point_and_line(intersection_point('#skF_3','#skF_4'),Z_394)
      | apart_point_and_line(intersection_point('#skF_3','#skF_4'),'#skF_4')
      | apart_point_and_line('#skF_1',Z_394)
      | convergent_lines('#skF_3',Z_394) ),
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_94,c_3587]) ).

tff(c_4895,plain,
    apart_point_and_line(intersection_point('#skF_3','#skF_4'),'#skF_4'),
    inference(splitLeft,[status(thm)],[c_3618]) ).

tff(c_20,plain,
    ! [X_19,Y_20] :
      ( ~ apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(X_19,Y_20),Y_20)
      | ~ convergent_lines(X_19,Y_20) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_100]) ).

tff(c_4902,plain,
    ~ convergent_lines('#skF_3','#skF_4'),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_4895,c_20]) ).

tff(c_4908,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_100,c_4902]) ).

tff(c_6414,plain,
    ! [Z_517] :
      ( apart_point_and_line(intersection_point('#skF_3','#skF_4'),Z_517)
      | apart_point_and_line('#skF_1',Z_517)
      | convergent_lines('#skF_3',Z_517) ),
    inference(splitRight,[status(thm)],[c_3618]) ).

tff(c_18,plain,
    ! [X_17,Y_18] :
      ( ~ apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(X_17,Y_18),X_17)
      | ~ convergent_lines(X_17,Y_18) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_95]) ).

tff(c_6429,plain,
    ( ~ convergent_lines('#skF_3','#skF_4')
    | apart_point_and_line('#skF_1','#skF_3')
    | convergent_lines('#skF_3','#skF_3') ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_6414,c_18]) ).

tff(c_6457,plain,
    ( apart_point_and_line('#skF_1','#skF_3')
    | convergent_lines('#skF_3','#skF_3') ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_100,c_6429]) ).

tff(c_6459,plain,
    $false,
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_6,c_96,c_6457]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.14  % Problem  : GEO175+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.15/0.14  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.36  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % DateTime : Fri Aug  4 00:44:08 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 9.00/3.15  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 9.00/3.15  
% 9.00/3.15  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 9.00/3.18  
% 9.00/3.18  Inference rules
% 9.00/3.18  ----------------------
% 9.00/3.18  #Ref     : 0
% 9.00/3.18  #Sup     : 1415
% 9.00/3.18  #Fact    : 72
% 9.00/3.18  #Define  : 0
% 9.00/3.18  #Split   : 3
% 9.00/3.18  #Chain   : 0
% 9.00/3.18  #Close   : 0
% 9.00/3.18  
% 9.00/3.18  Ordering : KBO
% 9.00/3.18  
% 9.00/3.18  Simplification rules
% 9.00/3.18  ----------------------
% 9.00/3.18  #Subsume      : 175
% 9.00/3.18  #Demod        : 223
% 9.00/3.18  #Tautology    : 149
% 9.00/3.18  #SimpNegUnit  : 15
% 9.00/3.18  #BackRed      : 0
% 9.00/3.18  
% 9.00/3.18  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 9.00/3.18  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 9.00/3.18  
% 9.00/3.18  Timing (in seconds)
% 9.00/3.18  ----------------------
% 9.00/3.19  Preprocessing        : 0.56
% 9.00/3.19  Parsing              : 0.32
% 9.00/3.19  CNF conversion       : 0.04
% 9.00/3.19  Main loop            : 1.52
% 9.00/3.19  Inferencing          : 0.52
% 9.00/3.19  Reduction            : 0.41
% 9.00/3.19  Demodulation         : 0.27
% 9.00/3.19  BG Simplification    : 0.05
% 9.00/3.19  Subsumption          : 0.43
% 9.00/3.19  Abstraction          : 0.05
% 9.00/3.19  MUC search           : 0.00
% 9.00/3.19  Cooper               : 0.00
% 9.00/3.19  Total                : 2.13
% 9.00/3.19  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 9.00/3.19  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 9.00/3.19  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 9.00/3.19  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------