TSTP Solution File: GEO175+2 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : GEO175+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 06:18:42 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.21s 0.44s
% Output   : Refutation 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.14  % Problem  : GEO175+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.08/0.15  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.15/0.36  % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.15/0.37  % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 12:55:44 EDT 2022
% 0.15/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.15/0.39  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.15/0.39  The process was started by sandbox on n029.cluster.edu,
% 0.15/0.39  Sat Jun 18 12:55:44 2022
% 0.15/0.39  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 4772.
% 0.15/0.39  
% 0.15/0.39  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.15/0.39  set(auto).
% 0.15/0.39     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.15/0.39     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.15/0.39     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.15/0.39     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.15/0.39     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.15/0.39     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.15/0.39     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.15/0.39     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.15/0.39     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.15/0.39     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.15/0.39     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.15/0.39     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.15/0.39     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.15/0.39  clear(print_given).
% 0.15/0.39  
% 0.15/0.39  formula_list(usable).
% 0.15/0.39  
% 0.15/0.39  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=6.
% 0.15/0.39  
% 0.15/0.39  This is a non-Horn set without equality.  The strategy
% 0.15/0.39  will be ordered hyper_res, ur_res, unit deletion, and
% 0.15/0.39  factoring, with satellites in sos and nuclei in usable.
% 0.15/0.39  
% 0.15/0.39     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.15/0.39     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.15/0.39     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.15/0.39  
% 0.15/0.39  ------------> process usable:
% 0.15/0.39  
% 0.15/0.39  ------------> process sos:
% 0.15/0.39  
% 0.15/0.39  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.21/0.43  
% 0.21/0.43  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.21/0.43  
% 0.21/0.43  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.21/0.43  
% 0.21/0.43  
% 0.21/0.43  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.21/0.43  
% 0.21/0.43  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.21/0.43  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.21/0.43  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.21/0.43  number of clauses in intial UL: 16
% 0.21/0.43  number of clauses initially in problem: 19
% 0.21/0.43  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 84
% 0.21/0.43  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 90
% 0.21/0.43  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.21/0.43  absolute distinct symbol count: 10
% 0.21/0.43     distinct predicate count: 4
% 0.21/0.43     distinct function count: 2
% 0.21/0.43     distinct constant count: 4
% 0.21/0.43  
% 0.21/0.43  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.21/0.43  
% 0.21/0.43  
% 0.21/0.43  
% 0.21/0.43  Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.21/0.43  
% 0.21/0.43  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.21/0.43  
% 0.21/0.43  =========== start of search ===========
% 0.21/0.44  
% 0.21/0.44  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 0.21/0.44  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.21/0.44  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.21/0.44  
% 0.21/0.44  Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.21/0.44  
% 0.21/0.44  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.21/0.44  
% 0.21/0.44  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   0.02 sec ----> 57 [binary,56.1,1.1] {-} $F.
% 0.21/0.44  
% 0.21/0.44  Length of proof is 6.  Level of proof is 5.
% 0.21/0.44  
% 0.21/0.44  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.21/0.44  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.21/0.44  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.21/0.44  
% 0.21/0.44  1 [] {+} -distinct_points(A,A).
% 0.21/0.44  4 [] {+} -distinct_points(A,B)|distinct_points(A,C)|distinct_points(B,C).
% 0.21/0.44  9 [] {+} -convergent_lines(A,B)| -apart_point_and_line(C,A)|distinct_points(C,intersection_point(A,B)).
% 0.21/0.44  10 [] {+} -convergent_lines(A,B)| -apart_point_and_line(C,B)|distinct_points(C,intersection_point(A,B)).
% 0.21/0.44  11 [] {+} -distinct_points(A,B)| -distinct_lines(C,D)|apart_point_and_line(A,C)|apart_point_and_line(A,D)|apart_point_and_line(B,C)|apart_point_and_line(B,D).
% 0.21/0.44  14 [] {+} -convergent_lines(A,B)|distinct_lines(A,B).
% 0.21/0.44  15 [] {+} -apart_point_and_line($c4,$c2).
% 0.21/0.44  16 [] {+} -apart_point_and_line($c4,$c1).
% 0.21/0.44  18 [] {+} convergent_lines($c2,$c1).
% 0.21/0.44  19 [] {-} distinct_points($c4,intersection_point($c2,$c1)).
% 0.21/0.44  21 [hyper,19,4] {-} distinct_points($c4,A)|distinct_points(intersection_point($c2,$c1),A).
% 0.21/0.44  23 [hyper,21,1] {-} distinct_points(intersection_point($c2,$c1),$c4).
% 0.21/0.44  25 [hyper,18,14] {+} distinct_lines($c2,$c1).
% 0.21/0.44  38 [hyper,25,11,23,unit_del,15,16] {-} apart_point_and_line(intersection_point($c2,$c1),$c2)|apart_point_and_line(intersection_point($c2,$c1),$c1).
% 0.21/0.44  50 [hyper,38,9,18,unit_del,1] {+} apart_point_and_line(intersection_point($c2,$c1),$c1).
% 0.21/0.44  56 [hyper,50,10,18] {-} distinct_points(intersection_point($c2,$c1),intersection_point($c2,$c1)).
% 0.21/0.44  57 [binary,56.1,1.1] {-} $F.
% 0.21/0.44  
% 0.21/0.44  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.21/0.44  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.21/0.44  
% 0.21/0.44  
% 0.21/0.44  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.21/0.44  
% 0.21/0.44  
% 0.21/0.44  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.21/0.44  
% 0.21/0.44  ============ end of search ============
% 0.21/0.44  
% 0.21/0.44  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.21/0.44  
% 0.21/0.44  true clauses given           4      (28.6%)
% 0.21/0.44  false clauses given         10
% 0.21/0.44  
% 0.21/0.44        FALSE     TRUE
% 0.21/0.44     5  0         1
% 0.21/0.44     6  2         1
% 0.21/0.44     9  0         3
% 0.21/0.44    11  0         4
% 0.21/0.44    14  0         6
% 0.21/0.44  tot:  2         15      (88.2% true)
% 0.21/0.44  
% 0.21/0.44  
% 0.21/0.44  Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.21/0.44  
% 0.21/0.44  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.21/0.44  
% 0.21/0.44  Process 4772 finished Sat Jun 18 12:55:44 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------