TSTP Solution File: GEO148+1 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : GEO148+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 03:43:44 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 6.72s 2.28s
% Output : CNFRefutation 6.72s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 15 ( 9 unt; 0 nHn; 15 RR)
% Number of literals : 27 ( 0 equ; 16 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 5 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 21 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_48,plain,
( ~ ordered_by(trajectory_of(X1),X2,X3)
| ~ ordered_by(trajectory_of(X4),X5,X6)
| ~ once(at_the_same_time(at(X4,X6),at(X1,X2)))
| ~ once(at_the_same_time(at(X4,X5),at(X1,X3))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-9xch0l0j/input.p',i_0_48) ).
cnf(i_0_95,negated_conjecture,
once(at_the_same_time(at(esk26_0,esk28_0),at(esk27_0,esk29_0))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-9xch0l0j/input.p',i_0_95) ).
cnf(i_0_34,plain,
( once(at_the_same_time(at(X1,X2),at(X3,X2)))
| ~ connect(X1,X3,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-9xch0l0j/input.p',i_0_34) ).
cnf(i_0_97,negated_conjecture,
ordered_by(trajectory_of(esk27_0),esk29_0,esk25_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-9xch0l0j/input.p',i_0_97) ).
cnf(i_0_96,negated_conjecture,
ordered_by(trajectory_of(esk26_0),esk25_0,esk28_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-9xch0l0j/input.p',i_0_96) ).
cnf(i_0_98,negated_conjecture,
connect(esk26_0,esk27_0,esk25_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-9xch0l0j/input.p',i_0_98) ).
cnf(c_0_105,plain,
( ~ ordered_by(trajectory_of(X1),X2,X3)
| ~ ordered_by(trajectory_of(X4),X5,X6)
| ~ once(at_the_same_time(at(X4,X6),at(X1,X2)))
| ~ once(at_the_same_time(at(X4,X5),at(X1,X3))) ),
i_0_48 ).
cnf(c_0_106,negated_conjecture,
once(at_the_same_time(at(esk26_0,esk28_0),at(esk27_0,esk29_0))),
i_0_95 ).
cnf(c_0_107,negated_conjecture,
( ~ once(at_the_same_time(at(esk26_0,X1),at(esk27_0,X2)))
| ~ ordered_by(trajectory_of(esk26_0),X1,esk28_0)
| ~ ordered_by(trajectory_of(esk27_0),esk29_0,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_105,c_0_106]) ).
cnf(c_0_108,plain,
( once(at_the_same_time(at(X1,X2),at(X3,X2)))
| ~ connect(X1,X3,X2) ),
i_0_34 ).
cnf(c_0_109,plain,
( ~ ordered_by(trajectory_of(esk26_0),X1,esk28_0)
| ~ ordered_by(trajectory_of(esk27_0),esk29_0,X1)
| ~ connect(esk26_0,esk27_0,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_107,c_0_108]) ).
cnf(c_0_110,negated_conjecture,
ordered_by(trajectory_of(esk27_0),esk29_0,esk25_0),
i_0_97 ).
cnf(c_0_111,negated_conjecture,
ordered_by(trajectory_of(esk26_0),esk25_0,esk28_0),
i_0_96 ).
cnf(c_0_112,negated_conjecture,
connect(esk26_0,esk27_0,esk25_0),
i_0_98 ).
cnf(c_0_113,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_109,c_0_110]),c_0_111]),c_0_112])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11 % Problem : GEO148+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 14:30:04 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.44 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.19/0.44 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.44 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.19/0.44 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.19/0.44 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 6.72/2.28 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN:
% 6.72/2.28 # Version: 2.1pre011
% 6.72/2.28 # Preprocessing time : 0.012 s
% 6.72/2.28
% 6.72/2.28 # Proof found!
% 6.72/2.28 # SZS status Theorem
% 6.72/2.28 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 6.72/2.28 # Proof object total steps : 15
% 6.72/2.28 # Proof object clause steps : 9
% 6.72/2.28 # Proof object formula steps : 6
% 6.72/2.28 # Proof object conjectures : 10
% 6.72/2.28 # Proof object clause conjectures : 6
% 6.72/2.28 # Proof object formula conjectures : 4
% 6.72/2.28 # Proof object initial clauses used : 6
% 6.72/2.28 # Proof object initial formulas used : 6
% 6.72/2.28 # Proof object generating inferences : 3
% 6.72/2.28 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 3
% 6.72/2.28 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 6.72/2.28 # Parsed axioms : 102
% 6.72/2.28 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 6.72/2.28 # Initial clauses : 102
% 6.72/2.28 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 6.72/2.28 # Initial clauses in saturation : 102
% 6.72/2.28 # Processed clauses : 121
% 6.72/2.28 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 6.72/2.28 # ...subsumed : 3
% 6.72/2.28 # ...remaining for further processing : 118
% 6.72/2.28 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 4
% 6.72/2.28 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 6.72/2.28 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 6.72/2.28 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 6.72/2.28 # Generated clauses : 354
% 6.72/2.28 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 292
% 6.72/2.28 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 2
% 6.72/2.28 # Paramodulations : 271
% 6.72/2.28 # Factorizations : 76
% 6.72/2.28 # Equation resolutions : 7
% 6.72/2.28 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 6.72/2.28 # Propositional unsat check successes : 0
% 6.72/2.28 # Current number of processed clauses : 117
% 6.72/2.28 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 14
% 6.72/2.28 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 6.72/2.28 # Negative unit clauses : 3
% 6.72/2.28 # Non-unit-clauses : 100
% 6.72/2.28 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 273
% 6.72/2.28 # ...number of literals in the above : 1113
% 6.72/2.28 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 6.72/2.28 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 6.72/2.28 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1829
% 6.72/2.28 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 815
% 6.72/2.28 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 5
% 6.72/2.28 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 142
% 6.72/2.28 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 6.72/2.28 # BW rewrite match attempts : 5
% 6.72/2.28 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 6.72/2.28 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 6.72/2.28 # Condensation successes : 0
% 6.72/2.28 # Termbank termtop insertions : 6400
% 6.72/2.28
% 6.72/2.28 # -------------------------------------------------
% 6.72/2.28 # User time : 0.015 s
% 6.72/2.28 # System time : 0.003 s
% 6.72/2.28 # Total time : 0.018 s
% 6.72/2.28 # ...preprocessing : 0.012 s
% 6.72/2.28 # ...main loop : 0.006 s
% 6.72/2.28 # Maximum resident set size: 7132 pages
% 6.72/2.28
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------