TSTP Solution File: GEO148+1 by E-SAT---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem : GEO148+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May 4 07:44:25 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.19s 0.49s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 16 ( 6 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 41 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 43 ( 18 ~; 11 |; 8 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 5 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 11 ( 5 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 5 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 39 ( 0 sgn 28 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t14,conjecture,
! [X3,X12,X13] :
( connect(X12,X13,X3)
=> ! [X18,X19] :
( ( ordered_by(trajectory_of(X13),X19,X3)
& ordered_by(trajectory_of(X12),X3,X18) )
=> ~ once(at_the_same_time(at(X12,X18),at(X13,X19))) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.xa4H63fBkH/E---3.1_16116.p',t14) ).
fof(homogeneous_behaviour,axiom,
! [X16,X17,X18,X19,X12,X13] :
( ( once(at_the_same_time(at(X12,X16),at(X13,X17)))
& once(at_the_same_time(at(X12,X18),at(X13,X19))) )
=> ~ ( ordered_by(trajectory_of(X12),X16,X18)
& ordered_by(trajectory_of(X13),X19,X17) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.xa4H63fBkH/E---3.1_16116.p',homogeneous_behaviour) ).
fof(connect_defn,axiom,
! [X12,X13,X3] :
( connect(X12,X13,X3)
<=> once(at_the_same_time(at(X12,X3),at(X13,X3))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.xa4H63fBkH/E---3.1_16116.p',connect_defn) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X3,X12,X13] :
( connect(X12,X13,X3)
=> ! [X18,X19] :
( ( ordered_by(trajectory_of(X13),X19,X3)
& ordered_by(trajectory_of(X12),X3,X18) )
=> ~ once(at_the_same_time(at(X12,X18),at(X13,X19))) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t14])]) ).
fof(c_0_4,plain,
! [X35,X36,X37,X38,X39,X40] :
( ~ once(at_the_same_time(at(X39,X35),at(X40,X36)))
| ~ once(at_the_same_time(at(X39,X37),at(X40,X38)))
| ~ ordered_by(trajectory_of(X39),X35,X37)
| ~ ordered_by(trajectory_of(X40),X38,X36) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[homogeneous_behaviour])])]) ).
fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
( connect(esk2_0,esk3_0,esk1_0)
& ordered_by(trajectory_of(esk3_0),esk5_0,esk1_0)
& ordered_by(trajectory_of(esk2_0),esk1_0,esk4_0)
& once(at_the_same_time(at(esk2_0,esk4_0),at(esk3_0,esk5_0))) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X53,X54,X55] :
( ( ~ connect(X53,X54,X55)
| once(at_the_same_time(at(X53,X55),at(X54,X55))) )
& ( ~ once(at_the_same_time(at(X53,X55),at(X54,X55)))
| connect(X53,X54,X55) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[connect_defn])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( ~ once(at_the_same_time(at(X1,X2),at(X3,X4)))
| ~ once(at_the_same_time(at(X1,X5),at(X3,X6)))
| ~ ordered_by(trajectory_of(X1),X2,X5)
| ~ ordered_by(trajectory_of(X3),X6,X4) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
once(at_the_same_time(at(esk2_0,esk4_0),at(esk3_0,esk5_0))),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( once(at_the_same_time(at(X1,X3),at(X2,X3)))
| ~ connect(X1,X2,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
connect(esk2_0,esk3_0,esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
( ~ once(at_the_same_time(at(esk2_0,X1),at(esk3_0,X2)))
| ~ ordered_by(trajectory_of(esk3_0),esk5_0,X2)
| ~ ordered_by(trajectory_of(esk2_0),X1,esk4_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
once(at_the_same_time(at(esk2_0,esk1_0),at(esk3_0,esk1_0))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
ordered_by(trajectory_of(esk3_0),esk5_0,esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
ordered_by(trajectory_of(esk2_0),esk1_0,esk4_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]),c_0_13]),c_0_14])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : GEO148+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.12/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Fri May 3 18:46:38 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.47 Running first-order model finding
% 0.19/0.47 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.xa4H63fBkH/E---3.1_16116.p
% 0.19/0.49 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.19/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # new_bool_1 with pid 16195 completed with status 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.19/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.19/0.49 # Search class: FGHSF-FFMS21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.49 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_S0a with 181s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_S0a with pid 16198 completed with status 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_S0a
% 0.19/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.19/0.49 # Search class: FGHSF-FFMS21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.49 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_S0a with 181s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.19/0.49
% 0.19/0.49 # Proof found!
% 0.19/0.49 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.49 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.49 # Parsed axioms : 37
% 0.19/0.49 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 25
% 0.19/0.49 # Initial clauses : 22
% 0.19/0.49 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Initial clauses in saturation : 22
% 0.19/0.49 # Processed clauses : 37
% 0.19/0.49 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # ...subsumed : 4
% 0.19/0.49 # ...remaining for further processing : 33
% 0.19/0.49 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Generated clauses : 62
% 0.19/0.49 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 46
% 0.19/0.49 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Paramodulations : 60
% 0.19/0.49 # Factorizations : 2
% 0.19/0.49 # NegExts : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Total rewrite steps : 11
% 0.19/0.49 # ...of those cached : 2
% 0.19/0.49 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.49 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.49 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.49 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.49 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.49 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.49 # Current number of processed clauses : 33
% 0.19/0.49 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 12
% 0.19/0.49 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Non-unit-clauses : 21
% 0.19/0.49 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 26
% 0.19/0.49 # ...number of literals in the above : 50
% 0.19/0.49 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 83
% 0.19/0.49 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 50
% 0.19/0.49 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 4
% 0.19/0.49 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 12
% 0.19/0.49 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # BW rewrite match attempts : 14
% 0.19/0.49 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Termbank termtop insertions : 2828
% 0.19/0.49 # Search garbage collected termcells : 564
% 0.19/0.49
% 0.19/0.49 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.49 # User time : 0.002 s
% 0.19/0.49 # System time : 0.005 s
% 0.19/0.49 # Total time : 0.006 s
% 0.19/0.49 # Maximum resident set size: 1840 pages
% 0.19/0.49
% 0.19/0.49 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.49 # User time : 0.003 s
% 0.19/0.49 # System time : 0.006 s
% 0.19/0.49 # Total time : 0.009 s
% 0.19/0.49 # Maximum resident set size: 1760 pages
% 0.19/0.49 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------