TSTP Solution File: GEO094+1 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : GEO094+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 04:03:33 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.23s 1.42s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.23s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 10
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 41 ( 15 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 163 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 27 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 196 ( 74 ~; 80 |; 33 &)
% ( 4 <=>; 5 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 19 ( 5 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 5 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 4 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 81 ( 13 sgn 45 !; 1 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(proposition_2_14_3,conjecture,
! [X1,X2,X4,X3] :
( ( meet(X3,X2,X4)
& part_of(X2,X1)
& part_of(X4,X1) )
=> ~ end_point(X3,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',proposition_2_14_3) ).
fof(end_point_defn,axiom,
! [X3,X1] :
( end_point(X3,X1)
<=> ( incident_c(X3,X1)
& ! [X2,X4] :
( ( part_of(X2,X1)
& part_of(X4,X1)
& incident_c(X3,X2)
& incident_c(X3,X4) )
=> ( part_of(X2,X4)
| part_of(X4,X2) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO004+0.ax',end_point_defn) ).
fof(meet_defn,axiom,
! [X3,X1,X2] :
( meet(X3,X1,X2)
<=> ( incident_c(X3,X1)
& incident_c(X3,X2)
& ! [X5] :
( ( incident_c(X5,X1)
& incident_c(X5,X2) )
=> ( end_point(X5,X1)
& end_point(X5,X2) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO004+0.ax',meet_defn) ).
fof(inner_point_defn,axiom,
! [X3,X1] :
( inner_point(X3,X1)
<=> ( incident_c(X3,X1)
& ~ end_point(X3,X1) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO004+0.ax',inner_point_defn) ).
fof(c3,axiom,
! [X1] :
? [X3] : inner_point(X3,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO004+0.ax',c3) ).
fof(part_of_defn,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( part_of(X2,X1)
<=> ! [X3] :
( incident_c(X3,X2)
=> incident_c(X3,X1) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO004+0.ax',part_of_defn) ).
fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1,X2,X4,X3] :
( ( meet(X3,X2,X4)
& part_of(X2,X1)
& part_of(X4,X1) )
=> ~ end_point(X3,X1) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[proposition_2_14_3]) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
! [X5,X6,X7,X8,X5,X6] :
( ( incident_c(X5,X6)
| ~ end_point(X5,X6) )
& ( ~ part_of(X7,X6)
| ~ part_of(X8,X6)
| ~ incident_c(X5,X7)
| ~ incident_c(X5,X8)
| part_of(X7,X8)
| part_of(X8,X7)
| ~ end_point(X5,X6) )
& ( part_of(esk7_2(X5,X6),X6)
| ~ incident_c(X5,X6)
| end_point(X5,X6) )
& ( part_of(esk8_2(X5,X6),X6)
| ~ incident_c(X5,X6)
| end_point(X5,X6) )
& ( incident_c(X5,esk7_2(X5,X6))
| ~ incident_c(X5,X6)
| end_point(X5,X6) )
& ( incident_c(X5,esk8_2(X5,X6))
| ~ incident_c(X5,X6)
| end_point(X5,X6) )
& ( ~ part_of(esk7_2(X5,X6),esk8_2(X5,X6))
| ~ incident_c(X5,X6)
| end_point(X5,X6) )
& ( ~ part_of(esk8_2(X5,X6),esk7_2(X5,X6))
| ~ incident_c(X5,X6)
| end_point(X5,X6) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[end_point_defn])])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
( meet(esk4_0,esk2_0,esk3_0)
& part_of(esk2_0,esk1_0)
& part_of(esk3_0,esk1_0)
& end_point(esk4_0,esk1_0) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X6,X7,X8,X9,X6,X7,X8] :
( ( incident_c(X6,X7)
| ~ meet(X6,X7,X8) )
& ( incident_c(X6,X8)
| ~ meet(X6,X7,X8) )
& ( end_point(X9,X7)
| ~ incident_c(X9,X7)
| ~ incident_c(X9,X8)
| ~ meet(X6,X7,X8) )
& ( end_point(X9,X8)
| ~ incident_c(X9,X7)
| ~ incident_c(X9,X8)
| ~ meet(X6,X7,X8) )
& ( incident_c(esk9_3(X6,X7,X8),X7)
| ~ incident_c(X6,X7)
| ~ incident_c(X6,X8)
| meet(X6,X7,X8) )
& ( incident_c(esk9_3(X6,X7,X8),X8)
| ~ incident_c(X6,X7)
| ~ incident_c(X6,X8)
| meet(X6,X7,X8) )
& ( ~ end_point(esk9_3(X6,X7,X8),X7)
| ~ end_point(esk9_3(X6,X7,X8),X8)
| ~ incident_c(X6,X7)
| ~ incident_c(X6,X8)
| meet(X6,X7,X8) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[meet_defn])])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( part_of(X3,X4)
| part_of(X4,X3)
| ~ end_point(X1,X2)
| ~ incident_c(X1,X3)
| ~ incident_c(X1,X4)
| ~ part_of(X3,X2)
| ~ part_of(X4,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
end_point(esk4_0,esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( incident_c(X1,X3)
| ~ meet(X1,X2,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
meet(esk4_0,esk2_0,esk3_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
( part_of(X1,X2)
| part_of(X2,X1)
| ~ incident_c(esk4_0,X1)
| ~ incident_c(esk4_0,X2)
| ~ part_of(X1,esk1_0)
| ~ part_of(X2,esk1_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
part_of(esk3_0,esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
incident_c(esk4_0,esk3_0),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( incident_c(X1,X2)
| ~ meet(X1,X2,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
fof(c_0_18,plain,
! [X4,X5,X4,X5] :
( ( incident_c(X4,X5)
| ~ inner_point(X4,X5) )
& ( ~ end_point(X4,X5)
| ~ inner_point(X4,X5) )
& ( ~ incident_c(X4,X5)
| end_point(X4,X5)
| inner_point(X4,X5) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inner_point_defn])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_19,plain,
! [X4] : inner_point(esk15_1(X4),X4),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c3])]) ).
fof(c_0_20,plain,
! [X4,X5,X6,X4,X5] :
( ( ~ part_of(X5,X4)
| ~ incident_c(X6,X5)
| incident_c(X6,X4) )
& ( incident_c(esk6_2(X4,X5),X5)
| part_of(X5,X4) )
& ( ~ incident_c(esk6_2(X4,X5),X4)
| part_of(X5,X4) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[part_of_defn])])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
( part_of(X1,esk3_0)
| part_of(esk3_0,X1)
| ~ incident_c(esk4_0,X1)
| ~ part_of(X1,esk1_0) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_16])]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
part_of(esk2_0,esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
incident_c(esk4_0,esk2_0),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( ~ inner_point(X1,X2)
| ~ end_point(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
inner_point(esk15_1(X1),X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
( end_point(X4,X2)
| ~ meet(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ incident_c(X4,X3)
| ~ incident_c(X4,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
( incident_c(X1,X2)
| ~ inner_point(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
( incident_c(X1,X2)
| ~ incident_c(X1,X3)
| ~ part_of(X3,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
( part_of(esk3_0,esk2_0)
| part_of(esk2_0,esk3_0) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]),c_0_23])]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
~ end_point(esk15_1(X1),X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
( end_point(X1,esk2_0)
| ~ incident_c(X1,esk3_0)
| ~ incident_c(X1,esk2_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
incident_c(esk15_1(X1),X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
( end_point(X4,X3)
| ~ meet(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ incident_c(X4,X3)
| ~ incident_c(X4,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
( incident_c(X1,esk3_0)
| part_of(esk3_0,esk2_0)
| ~ incident_c(X1,esk2_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
~ incident_c(esk15_1(esk2_0),esk3_0),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]),c_0_32])]) ).
cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
( end_point(X1,esk3_0)
| ~ incident_c(X1,esk3_0)
| ~ incident_c(X1,esk2_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
part_of(esk3_0,esk2_0),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_32]),c_0_35]) ).
cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
~ incident_c(esk15_1(esk3_0),esk2_0),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_36]),c_0_32])]) ).
cnf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
( incident_c(X1,esk2_0)
| ~ incident_c(X1,esk3_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_37]) ).
cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_39]),c_0_32])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.01/0.12 % Problem : GEO094+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.12/0.13 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Fri Jun 17 16:27:06 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.23/1.42 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.23/1.42 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.23/1.42 # Preprocessing time : 0.018 s
% 0.23/1.42
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof found!
% 0.23/1.42 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.23/1.42 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object total steps : 41
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object clause steps : 28
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object formula steps : 13
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object conjectures : 20
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object clause conjectures : 17
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object initial clauses used : 13
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object initial formulas used : 6
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object generating inferences : 15
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 11
% 0.23/1.42 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.23/1.42 # Parsed axioms : 17
% 0.23/1.42 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 4
% 0.23/1.42 # Initial clauses : 41
% 0.23/1.42 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Initial clauses in saturation : 41
% 0.23/1.42 # Processed clauses : 70
% 0.23/1.42 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # ...remaining for further processing : 70
% 0.23/1.42 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 3
% 0.23/1.42 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Backward-rewritten : 2
% 0.23/1.42 # Generated clauses : 137
% 0.23/1.42 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 110
% 0.23/1.42 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Paramodulations : 123
% 0.23/1.42 # Factorizations : 8
% 0.23/1.42 # Equation resolutions : 6
% 0.23/1.42 # Current number of processed clauses : 68
% 0.23/1.42 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 12
% 0.23/1.42 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Negative unit clauses : 3
% 0.23/1.42 # Non-unit-clauses : 53
% 0.23/1.42 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 72
% 0.23/1.42 # ...number of literals in the above : 349
% 0.23/1.42 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Current number of archived clauses : 2
% 0.23/1.42 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 390
% 0.23/1.42 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 107
% 0.23/1.42 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 33
% 0.23/1.42 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # BW rewrite match attempts : 18
% 0.23/1.42 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.23/1.42 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Termbank termtop insertions : 4731
% 0.23/1.42
% 0.23/1.42 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/1.42 # User time : 0.017 s
% 0.23/1.42 # System time : 0.007 s
% 0.23/1.42 # Total time : 0.024 s
% 0.23/1.42 # Maximum resident set size: 3028 pages
% 0.23/23.41 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.23/23.43 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.43 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------