TSTP Solution File: GEO068-3 by E---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1.00
% Problem  : GEO068-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May  4 07:41:28 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.48s 0.68s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.48s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :   13
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   51 (  22 unt;   5 nHn;  51 RR)
%            Number of literals    :  102 (   0 equ;  50 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   6 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   90 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(d4_2,axiom,
    ( equidistant(X2,X1,X4,X3)
    | ~ equidistant(X1,X2,X3,X4) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.JJwfjs9mcY/E---3.1_29769.p',d4_2) ).

cnf(t10_4,axiom,
    ( colinear(X3,X1,X2)
    | ~ colinear(X1,X2,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.JJwfjs9mcY/E---3.1_29769.p',t10_4) ).

cnf(b11,axiom,
    ( between(X3,X4,X6)
    | ~ equidistant(X1,X2,X3,X4)
    | ~ equidistant(X2,X5,X4,X6)
    | ~ equidistant(X1,X5,X3,X6)
    | ~ between(X1,X2,X5) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.JJwfjs9mcY/E---3.1_29769.p',b11) ).

cnf(u_to_w_equals_u1_to_w1,hypothesis,
    equidistant(u,w,u1,w1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.JJwfjs9mcY/E---3.1_29769.p',u_to_w_equals_u1_to_w1) ).

cnf(prove_u1v1w1_colinear,negated_conjecture,
    ~ colinear(u1,v1,w1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.JJwfjs9mcY/E---3.1_29769.p',prove_u1v1w1_colinear) ).

cnf(colinearity2,axiom,
    ( colinear(X3,X1,X2)
    | ~ between(X1,X2,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.JJwfjs9mcY/E---3.1_29769.p',colinearity2) ).

cnf(colinearity4,axiom,
    ( between(X1,X2,X3)
    | between(X2,X3,X1)
    | between(X3,X1,X2)
    | ~ colinear(X1,X2,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.JJwfjs9mcY/E---3.1_29769.p',colinearity4) ).

cnf(uvw_colinear,hypothesis,
    colinear(u,v,w),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.JJwfjs9mcY/E---3.1_29769.p',uvw_colinear) ).

cnf(u_to_v_equals_u1_to_v1,hypothesis,
    equidistant(u,v,u1,v1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.JJwfjs9mcY/E---3.1_29769.p',u_to_v_equals_u1_to_v1) ).

cnf(colinearity1,axiom,
    ( colinear(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ between(X1,X2,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.JJwfjs9mcY/E---3.1_29769.p',colinearity1) ).

cnf(v_to_w_equals_v1_to_w1,hypothesis,
    equidistant(v,w,v1,w1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.JJwfjs9mcY/E---3.1_29769.p',v_to_w_equals_v1_to_w1) ).

cnf(t1,axiom,
    ( between(X3,X2,X1)
    | ~ between(X1,X2,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.JJwfjs9mcY/E---3.1_29769.p',t1) ).

cnf(c2_3,axiom,
    ( colinear(X2,X1,X3)
    | ~ between(X1,X2,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.JJwfjs9mcY/E---3.1_29769.p',c2_3) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( equidistant(X2,X1,X4,X3)
    | ~ equidistant(X1,X2,X3,X4) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[d4_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( colinear(X3,X1,X2)
    | ~ colinear(X1,X2,X3) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[t10_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( between(X3,X4,X6)
    | ~ equidistant(X1,X2,X3,X4)
    | ~ equidistant(X2,X5,X4,X6)
    | ~ equidistant(X1,X5,X3,X6)
    | ~ between(X1,X2,X5) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[b11]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( equidistant(X2,X1,X4,X3)
    | ~ equidistant(X1,X2,X3,X4) ),
    c_0_13 ).

cnf(c_0_17,hypothesis,
    equidistant(u,w,u1,w1),
    u_to_w_equals_u1_to_w1 ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    ~ colinear(u1,v1,w1),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_u1v1w1_colinear]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( colinear(X3,X1,X2)
    | ~ between(X1,X2,X3) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[colinearity2]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( between(X1,X2,X3)
    | between(X2,X3,X1)
    | between(X3,X1,X2)
    | ~ colinear(X1,X2,X3) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[colinearity4]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( colinear(X3,X1,X2)
    | ~ colinear(X1,X2,X3) ),
    c_0_14 ).

cnf(c_0_22,hypothesis,
    colinear(u,v,w),
    uvw_colinear ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( between(X3,X4,X6)
    | ~ equidistant(X1,X2,X3,X4)
    | ~ equidistant(X2,X5,X4,X6)
    | ~ equidistant(X1,X5,X3,X6)
    | ~ between(X1,X2,X5) ),
    c_0_15 ).

cnf(c_0_24,hypothesis,
    equidistant(w,u,w1,u1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,hypothesis,
    equidistant(u,v,u1,v1),
    u_to_v_equals_u1_to_v1 ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    ~ colinear(u1,v1,w1),
    c_0_18 ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    ( colinear(X3,X1,X2)
    | ~ between(X1,X2,X3) ),
    c_0_19 ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    ( colinear(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ between(X1,X2,X3) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[colinearity1]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( between(X1,X2,X3)
    | between(X2,X3,X1)
    | between(X3,X1,X2)
    | ~ colinear(X1,X2,X3) ),
    c_0_20 ).

cnf(c_0_30,hypothesis,
    colinear(w,u,v),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,hypothesis,
    ( between(X1,w1,u1)
    | ~ between(X2,w,u)
    | ~ equidistant(X2,u,X1,u1)
    | ~ equidistant(X2,w,X1,w1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,hypothesis,
    equidistant(v,w,v1,w1),
    v_to_w_equals_v1_to_w1 ).

cnf(c_0_33,hypothesis,
    equidistant(v,u,v1,u1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    ~ between(v1,w1,u1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    ( colinear(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ between(X1,X2,X3) ),
    c_0_28 ).

cnf(c_0_36,hypothesis,
    ( between(w,u,v)
    | between(u,v,w)
    | between(v,w,u) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,hypothesis,
    ~ between(v,w,u),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]),c_0_33])]),c_0_34]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,hypothesis,
    ( between(X1,v1,w1)
    | ~ between(X2,v,w)
    | ~ equidistant(X2,w,X1,w1)
    | ~ equidistant(X2,v,X1,v1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
    ~ between(u1,v1,w1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_35]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,plain,
    ( between(X3,X2,X1)
    | ~ between(X1,X2,X3) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[t1]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,hypothesis,
    ( between(u,v,w)
    | between(w,u,v) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_37]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,hypothesis,
    ~ between(u,v,w),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_17]),c_0_25])]),c_0_39]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,plain,
    ( colinear(X2,X1,X3)
    | ~ between(X1,X2,X3) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c2_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,plain,
    ( between(X3,X2,X1)
    | ~ between(X1,X2,X3) ),
    c_0_40 ).

cnf(c_0_45,hypothesis,
    between(w,u,v),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_42]) ).

cnf(c_0_46,plain,
    ( colinear(X2,X1,X3)
    | ~ between(X1,X2,X3) ),
    c_0_43 ).

cnf(c_0_47,hypothesis,
    ( between(X1,u1,w1)
    | ~ between(X2,u,w)
    | ~ equidistant(X2,w,X1,w1)
    | ~ equidistant(X2,u,X1,u1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_48,hypothesis,
    between(v,u,w),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_44,c_0_45]) ).

cnf(c_0_49,negated_conjecture,
    ~ between(v1,u1,w1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_46]) ).

cnf(c_0_50,hypothesis,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_47,c_0_32]),c_0_48]),c_0_33])]),c_0_49]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem    : GEO068-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% 0.07/0.15  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.34  % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % DateTime   : Fri May  3 18:42:23 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.20/0.48  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.20/0.48  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.JJwfjs9mcY/E---3.1_29769.p
% 1.48/0.68  # Version: 3.1.0
% 1.48/0.68  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 1.48/0.68  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.48/0.68  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.48/0.68  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.48/0.68  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.48/0.68  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 1.48/0.68  # C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 29899 completed with status 0
% 1.48/0.68  # Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 1.48/0.68  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 1.48/0.68  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.48/0.68  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.48/0.68  # No SInE strategy applied
% 1.48/0.68  # Search class: FGUSM-FFMS33-SFFFFFNN
% 1.48/0.68  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 1.48/0.68  # Starting G-E--_208_C02AMC_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 811s (1) cores
% 1.48/0.68  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 1.48/0.68  # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 1.48/0.68  # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 1.48/0.68  # Starting sh5l with 136s (1) cores
% 1.48/0.68  # C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 29904 completed with status 0
% 1.48/0.68  # Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 1.48/0.68  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 1.48/0.68  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.48/0.68  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.48/0.68  # No SInE strategy applied
% 1.48/0.68  # Search class: FGUSM-FFMS33-SFFFFFNN
% 1.48/0.68  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 1.48/0.68  # Starting G-E--_208_C02AMC_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 811s (1) cores
% 1.48/0.68  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 1.48/0.68  # Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 1.48/0.68  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 1.48/0.68  
% 1.48/0.68  # Proof found!
% 1.48/0.68  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.48/0.68  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.48/0.68  # Parsed axioms                        : 105
% 1.48/0.68  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 1.48/0.68  # Initial clauses                      : 105
% 1.48/0.68  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 3
% 1.48/0.68  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 102
% 1.48/0.68  # Processed clauses                    : 1689
% 1.48/0.68  # ...of these trivial                  : 84
% 1.48/0.68  # ...subsumed                          : 828
% 1.48/0.68  # ...remaining for further processing  : 777
% 1.48/0.68  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 6
% 1.48/0.68  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 1.48/0.68  # Backward-subsumed                    : 13
% 1.48/0.68  # Backward-rewritten                   : 8
% 1.48/0.68  # Generated clauses                    : 9788
% 1.48/0.68  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 8726
% 1.48/0.68  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 1.48/0.68  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 1.48/0.68  # Paramodulations                      : 9779
% 1.48/0.68  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 1.48/0.68  # NegExts                              : 0
% 1.48/0.68  # Equation resolutions                 : 6
% 1.48/0.68  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 1.48/0.68  # Total rewrite steps                  : 1369
% 1.48/0.68  # ...of those cached                   : 1155
% 1.48/0.68  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 1.48/0.68  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 1.48/0.68  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 1.48/0.68  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 1.48/0.68  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 1.48/0.68  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 1.48/0.68  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 1.48/0.68  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 1.48/0.68  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 1.48/0.68  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 1.48/0.68  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 1.48/0.68  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 1.48/0.68  # Current number of processed clauses  : 657
% 1.48/0.68  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 56
% 1.48/0.68  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 1.48/0.68  #    Negative unit clauses             : 27
% 1.48/0.68  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 574
% 1.48/0.68  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 7170
% 1.48/0.68  # ...number of literals in the above   : 28157
% 1.48/0.68  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 1.48/0.68  # Current number of archived clauses   : 118
% 1.48/0.68  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 136149
% 1.48/0.68  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 122997
% 1.48/0.68  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 751
% 1.48/0.68  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 673
% 1.48/0.68  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 1.48/0.68  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 660
% 1.48/0.68  # BW rewrite match successes           : 8
% 1.48/0.68  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 1.48/0.68  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 1.48/0.68  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 121325
% 1.48/0.68  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 224
% 1.48/0.68  
% 1.48/0.68  # -------------------------------------------------
% 1.48/0.68  # User time                : 0.180 s
% 1.48/0.68  # System time              : 0.010 s
% 1.48/0.68  # Total time               : 0.190 s
% 1.48/0.68  # Maximum resident set size: 1840 pages
% 1.48/0.68  
% 1.48/0.68  # -------------------------------------------------
% 1.48/0.68  # User time                : 0.907 s
% 1.48/0.68  # System time              : 0.018 s
% 1.48/0.68  # Total time               : 0.925 s
% 1.48/0.68  # Maximum resident set size: 1768 pages
% 1.48/0.68  % E---3.1 exiting
% 1.48/0.68  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------