TSTP Solution File: GEO067-2 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : GEO067-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 06:17:51 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 7.81s 7.98s
% Output   : Refutation 7.81s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12  % Problem  : GEO067-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.14/0.34  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.34  % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 15:57:38 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.14/0.36  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.14/0.36  The process was started by sandbox2 on n005.cluster.edu,
% 0.14/0.36  Sat Jun 18 15:57:38 2022
% 0.14/0.36  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 32296.
% 0.14/0.36  
% 0.14/0.36  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.14/0.36  set(auto).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.14/0.36  clear(print_given).
% 0.14/0.36  
% 0.14/0.36  list(usable).
% 0.14/0.36  
% 0.14/0.36  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=8.
% 0.14/0.36  
% 0.14/0.36  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 0.14/0.36  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.14/0.36  unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.14/0.36  clauses in usable.
% 0.14/0.36  
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.14/0.36  
% 0.14/0.36  ------------> process usable:
% 0.14/0.36  
% 0.14/0.36  ------------> process sos:
% 0.14/0.36  42 back subsumes 39.
% 0.14/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 45 during input processing: 0 [copy,45,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.14/0.36  
% 0.14/0.36  ======= end of input processing =======
% 1.06/1.28  
% 1.06/1.28  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.06/1.28  
% 1.06/1.28  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.06/1.28  
% 1.06/1.28  
% 1.06/1.28  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 1.06/1.28  
% 1.06/1.28  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 1.06/1.28  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 1.06/1.28  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 1.06/1.28  number of clauses in intial UL: 39
% 1.06/1.28  number of clauses initially in problem: 43
% 1.06/1.28  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 90
% 1.06/1.28  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 93
% 1.06/1.28  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 1.06/1.28  absolute distinct symbol count: 15
% 1.06/1.28     distinct predicate count: 4
% 1.06/1.28     distinct function count: 5
% 1.06/1.28     distinct constant count: 6
% 1.06/1.28  
% 1.06/1.28  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 1.06/1.28  
% 1.06/1.28  
% 1.06/1.28  
% 1.06/1.28  Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.06/1.28  
% 1.06/1.28  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.06/1.28  
% 1.06/1.28  =========== start of search ===========
% 7.81/7.98  
% 7.81/7.98  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 7.81/7.98  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 7.81/7.98  % SZS output start Refutation
% 7.81/7.98  
% 7.81/7.98  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 7.81/7.98  
% 7.81/7.98  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 7.81/7.98  
% 7.81/7.98  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 7.81/7.98  
% 7.81/7.98  Model 3 [ 21 70 231053 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 7.81/7.98  
% 7.81/7.98  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 7.81/7.98  
% 7.81/7.98  Model 4 [ 80 81 245299 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 7.81/7.98  
% 7.81/7.98  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 7.81/7.98  
% 7.81/7.98  Model 5 [ 60 42 153174 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 7.81/7.98  
% 7.81/7.98  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 7.81/7.98  
% 7.81/7.98  Model 6 [ 56 72 245379 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 7.81/7.98  
% 7.81/7.98  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 7.81/7.98  
% 7.81/7.98  Model 7 [ 83 57 196121 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 7.81/7.98  
% 7.81/7.98  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 7.81/7.98  
% 7.81/7.98  -----> EMPTY CLAUSE at   7.58 sec ----> 223 [back_demod,22,demod,222,222,222,222,unit_del,169,169,169,172] {-} $F.
% 7.81/7.98  
% 7.81/7.98  Length of proof is 9.  Level of proof is 3.
% 7.81/7.98  
% 7.81/7.98  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 7.81/7.98  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 7.81/7.98  % SZS output start Refutation
% 7.81/7.98  
% 7.81/7.98  2 [] {+} -equidistant(A,B,C,C)|A=B.
% 7.81/7.98  16 [] {+} -between(A,B,C)|colinear(A,B,C).
% 7.81/7.98  17 [] {+} -between(A,B,C)|colinear(C,A,B).
% 7.81/7.98  18 [] {+} -between(A,B,C)|colinear(B,C,A).
% 7.81/7.98  20 [] {-} -colinear(x,x,y)| -colinear(x,y,x)| -colinear(y,x,x)|x=y.
% 7.81/7.98  21 [copy,20,flip.4] {+} -colinear(x,x,y)| -colinear(x,y,x)| -colinear(y,x,x)|y=x.
% 7.81/7.98  22 [] {+} -colinear(x,x,y)| -colinear(x,y,x)| -colinear(y,x,x)| -colinear(x,z,y).
% 7.81/7.98  43 [] {-} between(A,B,extension(A,B,C,D)).
% 7.81/7.98  44 [] {+} equidistant(A,extension(B,A,C,D),C,D).
% 7.81/7.98  51 [hyper,43,18] {-} colinear(A,extension(B,A,C,D),B).
% 7.81/7.98  52 [hyper,43,17] {+} colinear(extension(A,B,C,D),A,B).
% 7.81/7.98  53 [hyper,43,16] {+} colinear(A,B,extension(A,B,C,D)).
% 7.81/7.98  110 [hyper,44,2,flip.1] {+} extension(A,B,C,C)=B.
% 7.81/7.98  169 [para_from,110.1.1,51.1.2] {-} colinear(A,A,B).
% 7.81/7.98  171 [para_from,110.1.1,53.1.3] {-} colinear(A,B,B).
% 7.81/7.98  172 [para_from,110.1.1,52.1.1] {-} colinear(A,B,A).
% 7.81/7.98  222,221 [hyper,172,21,169,171] {-} y=x.
% 7.81/7.98  223 [back_demod,22,demod,222,222,222,222,unit_del,169,169,169,172] {-} $F.
% 7.81/7.98  
% 7.81/7.98  % SZS output end Refutation
% 7.81/7.98  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 7.81/7.98  
% 7.81/7.98  
% 7.81/7.98  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 7.81/7.98  
% 7.81/7.98  
% 7.81/7.98  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 7.81/7.98  
% 7.81/7.98  ============ end of search ============
% 7.81/7.98  
% 7.81/7.98  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 7.81/7.98  
% 7.81/7.98  true clauses given           1      (7.7%)
% 7.81/7.98  false clauses given         12
% 7.81/7.98  
% 7.81/7.98        FALSE     TRUE
% 7.81/7.98     4  1         0
% 7.81/7.98     5  1         0
% 7.81/7.98     7  0         1
% 7.81/7.98     8  0         1
% 7.81/7.98     9  4         0
% 7.81/7.98    12  0         1
% 7.81/7.98    13  4         3
% 7.81/7.98    14  2         0
% 7.81/7.98    15  1         0
% 7.81/7.98    16  4         2
% 7.81/7.98    17  1         0
% 7.81/7.98    18  2         0
% 7.81/7.98    19  1         0
% 7.81/7.98    20  2         2
% 7.81/7.98    21  1         1
% 7.81/7.98    22  1         1
% 7.81/7.98    24  1         0
% 7.81/7.98    25  0         1
% 7.81/7.98    26  1         0
% 7.81/7.98    30  2         1
% 7.81/7.98    31  0         2
% 7.81/7.98    33  12        0
% 7.81/7.98    34  5         0
% 7.81/7.98    35  1         4
% 7.81/7.98    36  3         2
% 7.81/7.98    37  5         0
% 7.81/7.98    38  8         0
% 7.81/7.98    39  3         0
% 7.81/7.98    40  0         6
% 7.81/7.98    41  0         1
% 7.81/7.98    42  1         4
% 7.81/7.98    43  10        0
% 7.81/7.98    44  2         0
% 7.81/7.98    45  1         1
% 7.81/7.98    47  0         1
% 7.81/7.98    48  3         0
% 7.81/7.98    49  0         4
% 7.81/7.98    50  1         1
% 7.81/7.98    53  2         0
% 7.81/7.98    54  0         2
% 7.81/7.98    55  2         0
% 7.81/7.98    56  1         0
% 7.81/7.98    57  1         0
% 7.81/7.98    58  0         1
% 7.81/7.98  tot:  90        43      (32.3% true)
% 7.81/7.98  
% 7.81/7.98  
% 7.81/7.98  Model 7 [ 83 -126 196121 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 7.81/7.98  
% 7.81/7.98  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 7.81/7.98  
% 7.81/7.98  Process 32296 finished Sat Jun 18 15:57:46 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------