TSTP Solution File: GEO059-2 by E---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1.00
% Problem  : GEO059-2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 19:57:37 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.50s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   23 (  17 unt;   0 nHn;  10 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   32 (   2 equ;  12 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   2 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   60 (   2 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(transitivity_for_equidistance,axiom,
    ( equidistant(X3,X4,X5,X6)
    | ~ equidistant(X1,X2,X3,X4)
    | ~ equidistant(X1,X2,X5,X6) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO002-0.ax',transitivity_for_equidistance) ).

cnf(reflexivity_for_equidistance,axiom,
    equidistant(X1,X2,X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO002-0.ax',reflexivity_for_equidistance) ).

cnf(segment_construction2,axiom,
    equidistant(X1,extension(X2,X1,X3,X4),X3,X4),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO002-0.ax',segment_construction2) ).

cnf(reflection,axiom,
    reflection(X1,X2) = extension(X1,X2,X1,X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO002-2.ax',reflection) ).

cnf(prove_congruence,negated_conjecture,
    ~ equidistant(v,u,v,reflection(reflection(u,v),v)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_congruence) ).

cnf(c_0_5,plain,
    ( equidistant(X3,X4,X5,X6)
    | ~ equidistant(X1,X2,X3,X4)
    | ~ equidistant(X1,X2,X5,X6) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[transitivity_for_equidistance]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,plain,
    ( equidistant(X3,X4,X5,X6)
    | ~ equidistant(X1,X2,X3,X4)
    | ~ equidistant(X1,X2,X5,X6) ),
    c_0_5 ).

cnf(c_0_7,axiom,
    equidistant(X1,X2,X2,X1),
    reflexivity_for_equidistance ).

cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
    equidistant(X1,extension(X2,X1,X3,X4),X3,X4),
    segment_construction2 ).

cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
    reflection(X1,X2) = extension(X1,X2,X1,X2),
    reflection ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( equidistant(X1,X2,X3,X4)
    | ~ equidistant(X4,X3,X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    equidistant(X1,reflection(X2,X1),X2,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    equidistant(X1,X2,reflection(X1,X2),X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    equidistant(reflection(X1,X2),X2,X2,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    equidistant(X1,X2,X1,X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    equidistant(X1,X2,X1,reflection(X2,X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( equidistant(X1,X2,X3,X4)
    | ~ equidistant(X3,X4,X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ~ equidistant(v,u,v,reflection(reflection(u,v),v)),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_congruence]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( equidistant(X1,X2,X3,reflection(X4,X3))
    | ~ equidistant(X3,X4,X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    equidistant(X1,reflection(X2,X1),X1,X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    ~ equidistant(v,u,v,reflection(reflection(u,v),v)),
    c_0_17 ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    equidistant(X1,X2,X1,reflection(reflection(X2,X1),X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.13  % Problem    : GEO059-2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.04/0.14  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.35  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.35  % DateTime   : Sun May 19 14:02:52 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.19/0.48  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.19/0.48  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.50  # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.19/0.50  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.50  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # new_bool_1 with pid 30797 completed with status 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.19/0.50  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.50  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.19/0.50  # Search class: FGUSM-FFSF33-SFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.50  # partial match(1): FGUSM-FFMF33-SFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.50  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting G-E--_215_C46_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S2S with 163s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # G-E--_215_C46_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S2S with pid 30801 completed with status 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Result found by G-E--_215_C46_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S2S
% 0.19/0.50  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.50  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.19/0.50  # Search class: FGUSM-FFSF33-SFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.50  # partial match(1): FGUSM-FFMF33-SFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.50  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting G-E--_215_C46_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S2S with 163s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.19/0.50  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.19/0.50  
% 0.19/0.50  # Proof found!
% 0.19/0.50  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.19/0.50  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.50  # Parsed axioms                        : 20
% 0.19/0.50  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 10
% 0.19/0.50  # Initial clauses                      : 10
% 0.19/0.50  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 10
% 0.19/0.50  # Processed clauses                    : 65
% 0.19/0.50  # ...of these trivial                  : 2
% 0.19/0.50  # ...subsumed                          : 6
% 0.19/0.50  # ...remaining for further processing  : 57
% 0.19/0.50  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Backward-rewritten                   : 2
% 0.19/0.50  # Generated clauses                    : 308
% 0.19/0.50  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 176
% 0.19/0.50  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Paramodulations                      : 308
% 0.19/0.50  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Total rewrite steps                  : 171
% 0.19/0.50  # ...of those cached                   : 139
% 0.19/0.50  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.19/0.50  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.19/0.50  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.19/0.50  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.19/0.50  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.19/0.50  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.19/0.50  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.19/0.50  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.19/0.50  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.19/0.50  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.19/0.50  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.19/0.50  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.19/0.50  # Current number of processed clauses  : 45
% 0.19/0.50  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 28
% 0.19/0.50  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.19/0.50  #    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 0.19/0.50  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 17
% 0.19/0.50  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 131
% 0.19/0.50  # ...number of literals in the above   : 285
% 0.19/0.50  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Current number of archived clauses   : 12
% 0.19/0.50  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 222
% 0.19/0.50  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 142
% 0.19/0.50  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 6
% 0.19/0.50  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 6
% 0.19/0.50  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 279
% 0.19/0.50  # BW rewrite match successes           : 2
% 0.19/0.50  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 2916
% 0.19/0.50  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 99
% 0.19/0.50  
% 0.19/0.50  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.50  # User time                : 0.005 s
% 0.19/0.50  # System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.19/0.50  # Total time               : 0.008 s
% 0.19/0.50  # Maximum resident set size: 1780 pages
% 0.19/0.50  
% 0.19/0.50  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.50  # User time                : 0.007 s
% 0.19/0.50  # System time              : 0.005 s
% 0.19/0.50  # Total time               : 0.012 s
% 0.19/0.50  # Maximum resident set size: 1724 pages
% 0.19/0.50  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.19/0.50  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------