TSTP Solution File: GEO058-3 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : GEO058-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 06:17:47 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 2.21s 2.38s
% Output   : Refutation 2.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12  % Problem  : GEO058-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.04/0.13  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 00:30:38 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.36  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.20/0.36  The process was started by sandbox on n005.cluster.edu,
% 0.20/0.36  Sat Jun 18 00:30:38 2022
% 0.20/0.36  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 2707.
% 0.20/0.36  
% 0.20/0.36  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.20/0.36  set(auto).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.20/0.36  clear(print_given).
% 0.20/0.36  
% 0.20/0.36  list(usable).
% 0.20/0.36  
% 0.20/0.36  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=8.
% 0.20/0.36  
% 0.20/0.36  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 0.20/0.36  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.20/0.36  unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.20/0.36  clauses in usable.
% 0.20/0.36  
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.20/0.36  
% 0.20/0.36  ------------> process usable:
% 0.20/0.36  
% 0.20/0.36  ------------> process sos:
% 0.20/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 46 during input processing: 0 [demod,49] {-} between(A,B,extension(A,B,A,B)).
% 0.20/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 47 during input processing: 0 [demod,49] {-} equidistant(A,extension(B,A,B,A),B,A).
% 0.20/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 55 during input processing: 0 [] {-} A=A.
% 0.20/0.36  45 back subsumes 42.
% 0.20/0.36  50 back subsumes 29.
% 0.20/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 55 during input processing: 0 [copy,55,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.20/0.36  
% 0.20/0.36  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.79/1.02  
% 0.79/1.02  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.79/1.02  
% 0.79/1.02  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.79/1.02  
% 0.79/1.02  
% 0.79/1.02  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.79/1.02  
% 0.79/1.02  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.79/1.02  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.79/1.02  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.79/1.02  number of clauses in intial UL: 39
% 0.79/1.02  number of clauses initially in problem: 51
% 0.79/1.02  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 76
% 0.79/1.02  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 92
% 0.79/1.02  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.79/1.02  absolute distinct symbol count: 14
% 0.79/1.02     distinct predicate count: 3
% 0.79/1.02     distinct function count: 6
% 0.79/1.02     distinct constant count: 5
% 0.79/1.02  
% 0.79/1.02  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.79/1.02  
% 0.79/1.02  
% 0.79/1.02  
% 0.79/1.02  Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.79/1.02  
% 0.79/1.02  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.79/1.02  
% 0.79/1.02  =========== start of search ===========
% 2.21/2.38  
% 2.21/2.38  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 2.21/2.38  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 2.21/2.38  % SZS output start Refutation
% 2.21/2.38  
% 2.21/2.38  Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 2.21/2.38  
% 2.21/2.38  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 2.21/2.38  
% 2.21/2.38  Model 4 [ 36 28 123298 ] (0.00 seconds, 151640 Inserts)
% 2.21/2.38  
% 2.21/2.38  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   1.99 sec ----> 404 [binary,402.1,28.1] {-} $F.
% 2.21/2.38  
% 2.21/2.38  Length of proof is 5.  Level of proof is 3.
% 2.21/2.38  
% 2.21/2.38  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 2.21/2.38  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 2.21/2.38  % SZS output start Refutation
% 2.21/2.38  
% 2.21/2.38  2 [] {+} -equidistant(A,B,C,C)|A=B.
% 2.21/2.38  20 [] {+} -equidistant(A,B,C,D)|equidistant(C,D,B,A).
% 2.21/2.38  27 [] {-} u!=v.
% 2.21/2.38  28 [copy,27,flip.1] {+} v!=u.
% 2.21/2.38  47 [] {-} equidistant(A,extension(B,A,C,D),C,D).
% 2.21/2.38  49,48 [] {+} reflection(A,B)=extension(A,B,A,B).
% 2.21/2.38  56 [] {-} v=reflection(u,v).
% 2.21/2.38  57 [copy,56,demod,49,flip.1] {+} extension(u,v,u,v)=v.
% 2.21/2.38  80 [hyper,47,20] {-} equidistant(A,B,extension(C,D,A,B),D).
% 2.21/2.38  393 [para_from,57.1.1,80.1.3] {-} equidistant(u,v,v,v).
% 2.21/2.38  402 [hyper,393,2,flip.1] {-} v=u.
% 2.21/2.38  404 [binary,402.1,28.1] {-} $F.
% 2.21/2.38  
% 2.21/2.38  % SZS output end Refutation
% 2.21/2.38  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 2.21/2.38  
% 2.21/2.38  
% 2.21/2.38  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 2.21/2.38  
% 2.21/2.38  
% 2.21/2.38  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 2.21/2.38  
% 2.21/2.38  ============ end of search ============
% 2.21/2.38  
% 2.21/2.38  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 2.21/2.38  
% 2.21/2.38  true clauses given           6      (35.3%)
% 2.21/2.38  false clauses given         11
% 2.21/2.38  
% 2.21/2.38        FALSE     TRUE
% 2.21/2.38     5  3         0
% 2.21/2.38     7  0         1
% 2.21/2.38     8  0         1
% 2.21/2.38     9  1         2
% 2.21/2.38    10  0         2
% 2.21/2.38    11  0         5
% 2.21/2.38    12  0         6
% 2.21/2.38    13  24        2
% 2.21/2.38    14  7         2
% 2.21/2.38    15  2         2
% 2.21/2.38    16  0         6
% 2.21/2.38    17  7         3
% 2.21/2.38    18  2         2
% 2.21/2.38    19  1         1
% 2.21/2.38    20  0         18
% 2.21/2.38    21  0         3
% 2.21/2.38    22  2         2
% 2.21/2.38    23  1         2
% 2.21/2.38    24  1         9
% 2.21/2.38    25  0         6
% 2.21/2.38    26  1         5
% 2.21/2.38    27  2         1
% 2.21/2.38    28  3         5
% 2.21/2.38    29  0         5
% 2.21/2.38    30  5         1
% 2.21/2.38    31  6         3
% 2.21/2.38    32  8         8
% 2.21/2.38    33  0         3
% 2.21/2.38    34  23        4
% 2.21/2.38    35  5         1
% 2.21/2.38    36  15        6
% 2.21/2.38    37  0         4
% 2.21/2.38    38  4         8
% 2.21/2.38    39  7         1
% 2.21/2.38    40  6         5
% 2.21/2.38    42  1         1
% 2.21/2.38    43  7         1
% 2.21/2.38    44  7         0
% 2.21/2.38    45  3         2
% 2.21/2.38    46  2         0
% 2.21/2.38    47  2         0
% 2.21/2.38    49  0         1
% 2.21/2.38    50  7         0
% 2.21/2.38    51  2         0
% 2.21/2.38    54  2         0
% 2.21/2.38  tot:  169       140      (45.3% true)
% 2.21/2.38  
% 2.21/2.38  
% 2.21/2.38  Model 4 [ 36 -64 123298 ] (0.00 seconds, 151640 Inserts)
% 2.21/2.38  
% 2.21/2.38  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 2.21/2.38  
% 2.21/2.38  Process 2707 finished Sat Jun 18 00:30:40 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------